Fox News Meme: Publisher ‘Got To’ McClellan, Forced Him To ‘Spice It Up A Little Bit’
Fox News Meme: Publisher ‘Got To’ McClellan, Forced Him To ‘Spice It Up A Little Bit’
In response to Scott McClellan’s scathing new memoir criticizing the Bush administration’s deception, current and former White House officials have blanketed the media to bash the former press secretary. They have called him a “traitor” and dismissed him as “disgruntled.”
Fox News and its guests, however, have put the blame on McClellan’s publisher. According to this new Fox News meme, McClellan isn’t responsible for the revelations in the book because his publisher made him do it:
Brad Blakeman, former White House staffer: “A publisher got to him and he waved a lot of money, I’m sure, in front of him and he took the bait and that is just unfortunate.”
Trent Duffy, former White House deputy press secretary: “It’s like he just turned over the pen to a publisher and signed his name at the bottom and got a big fat book contract.”
Bill O’Reilly: “McClellan is in it for the bucks, keeping in mind his publisher also distributes books by George Soros and other far left people.”
Ari Fleischer, former White House press secretary: “And I talked to Scott yesterday and Scott did tell me, that his editor, this is Scott’s words, ‘tweaked some things closely in the last few months.’ And I think what did happen, Bill, was the book was pretty much done and set and Scott went back in, and I think his editor wrote a lot of it.”
Newt Gingrich, former House speaker: “Here is this guy who want to sell books. He’s cut his ties to the administration and his publisher says, ‘Now look, you can spice it up a little bit.’”
Steve Doocy: “Apparently the publisher did some tweaking. How much? That’s a really good question.”
Watch a compilation:
This meme is nothing but an attempt to dismiss reality. The right wing is acting as if McClellan was manipulated by a nefarious ghostwriter. He wasn’t; the words are his own. Peter Osnos, founder and editor-in-chief of Public Affairs Books, which is publishing McClellan’s book, told the Politico, “This was a book that he wanted to write.” “No one has ever done a book for us just for the money,” said Osnos. “I can say that with absolute certainty.”
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell yesterday reported that she spoke with “publishing sources” who said that “there was probably not a very large advance paid for this book,” debunking the claim that McClellan sold out his former boss for a big pile of money.
Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date
78 Responses to “Fox News Meme: Publisher ‘Got To’ McClellan, Forced Him To ‘Spice It Up A Little Bit’”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
We ... are ... Borg ...you ... will ... be ... assimilated ...
May 29th, 2008 at 11:25 amall this character assassination and rabid denouncing of Scottie shows that Bush has his faithful fanatical followers........just like Hitler.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:27 amThese people are both hilarious and despicable at the same time. They call McClellan a liar and then fabricate stories about him to justify their own sick actions.
One thing you have to say about them, though. They obviously jump on the same bandwagon in unison and stick to an identical talking point simutaneously. What a bunch of lemmings.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:27 amHere is the update on the reich-wing talking points
1. He did it for the money
May 29th, 2008 at 11:29 am2. It doesn't sounds like Scotty
3. He's "disgruntled"
Seriously? This is Fox's spin on this?
It's McClellan’s book. Period. He wrote it. He is standing behind it.
My one hope from this book dust-up is that it makes it harder for Bush to justify attacking Iran. People hopefully are more incredulous about 'evidence' presented in the case for war.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:29 amThese people aren't even creative enough to rewrite their talking points. Just a bunch of dumb parrots not even smart enough to care how they sound.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:31 amThe only thing missing is the swastikas behind these guys when they're talking.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:32 amwhat it is it that they are desperate. they've had the Fox Audience conned for how long?
May 29th, 2008 at 11:33 amAri Fleischer was caught repeating the exact same words as the Bush White House during his appearance on Hardball.
Anyways, I saw this guy on almost every talk show on tv after the release of the book, repeating the exact same words on every show. Damage control, damage control, damage control.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:35 amGod forbid those repug arse-nuggets stop spinning for one nanosecond and simply face up to the truth, and own their disaster. Sickening.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:35 amGeorge Bush, present White House occupier: "He's just mad at me for not letting him have a piece of Condi."
May 29th, 2008 at 11:36 amDoes no one else think it's hysterical that the Right is suddenly chastising someone for doing something "for the money"? Isn't that the entire raison d'etre of the Right?
May 29th, 2008 at 11:39 amThat's the best the WH smear machine can come up with? The publisher made him "spice it up?" Christ. Pathetic.
Get ready, Scottie. The various memes so far are already starting to smell stale & ineffective. They'll be trotting out some new faces for the real personal attacks, in a no-holds-barred effort to discredit the truth you revealed, very, very soon.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:41 amI would never in a million years buy McLellan's book -- but you know, any bad press against this Monstrous Criminal Presidency is aok with me. Of course, all these revelations are too late. Mr. McLellan: try explaining this to:
all the husbands, wives, children, brothers , sisters and other loved ones of all the casualties from these 2 Illegal Pre-emptives Wars.
It's too late.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:42 amBut, at same time I love seeing this Cabal Squirm.
OK, now they are trying to use verbiage that would suggest that McClellan is lying. But they still aren't specifically saying that McClellan's book is a complete pack of lies and they aren't rebutting any of his points specifically at all, let alone with evidence.
They're just playing "shoot the messenger" with their smear machine, hoping that it will distract us from wanting to know the truth.
Yes, it's possible that a loyal Bushie, who truly believed that the administration he represented was good, righteous, and completely above-board, could be talked into manufacturing a bunch of vicious lies (I think we call that libel) to betray a bunch of honest public servants just to sell a book. It's also possible that a freak set of weather conditions could enable me to flap my arms and fly to the moon. But rather unlikely.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:44 amAll this spin and Scotty-smearing, and yet NO ONE is denying the content of the book. This is rich!
May 29th, 2008 at 11:46 amVarious people, including Bill O'Reilly commenting that someone else is doing something for the money involved.
A Republican and money?
What a surprise.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:50 amThe republicans are all atwitter.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:52 amSean Insanity has a radio show and two t.v. shows; O'Racist has a radio show and a T.V. show and is an "author"....however EVERYONE else is doing it for the money. F**king hypocrites.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:53 amDr. Hussein Matt Says
May 29th, 2008 at 11:29 am
Here is the update on the reich-wing talking points
1. He did it for the money
2. It doesn’t sounds like Scotty
3. He’s “disgruntled”
___________________________________
These talking points are rather incongruent. You'd think they could get together, decide what their story is, and stick to it.
Kind of reminds me of the right's slams against Obama:
1. Obama is a Muslim
2. Obama's Christian pastor is a racist
Those don't exactly go together, either.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:53 amHey guys, in case you aren't aware, Scottie will be on Olberman's show tonight.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:53 amIf Fleischer is correct, it ought to be pretty easy to settle. Someone needs to ask McClellan if he stands by what's in the book and if he disagrees with Fleischer's characterization that the editor tweaked the controversial information. Either Ari is misleading or McClellan is. They can't have it both ways. And the press can settle it by simply asking McClellan to respond to Fleischer's charges.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:54 amMcClellan will be on Countdown w/KO tonight. Let's see how his interview shakes out on the Fleischer (& other) claims.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:56 amWell, there reacting, because this is a big deal. It's one thing to have your opponents criticize your policies or leadership. It's another to have your former press secretary criticize your policies or leadership.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:57 amThey have called him a “traitor”
A traitor to the american people or a traitor to the Bush loyalists?
Because one I have a problem with... the other I really dont.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:57 amLike I said previously, it is rather amusing that Snotty has panicked the old Republican Noise Machine into scratching faster than a cat covering crap on a marble floor, by merely confirming what everyone already knows to be the truth.
I also have visions of them as monkeys trying to put toothpaste back in a tube.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:57 amIt would be hilarious if not so sickening.
Tweaking = Truth
They all got the White House Memo to smear Scotty.
May 29th, 2008 at 11:59 amOn one point, they're absolutely correct. He's disgruntled - and he should be. They hung him out to dry. They fed him lies. He passed the lies on to the press, got called a liar, and then - to his surprise, because he's obviously not the sharpest pencil in the jar - discovered he WAS a liar. I'd be disgruntled, too.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:00 pmExactly! And that is why they are running scared in BushCo Land. Here is someone who was in the middle of the propaganda architecture and now is spilling the beans. I would be crapping my chinos too, if I was one of them.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:00 pmGet some popcorn and crack open a beer. Reich-wingers eating their own....how amusing and enjoyable to watch.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:00 pmi love this psycho ward fire drill the right wing's running.
very funny!
May 29th, 2008 at 12:01 pmThe spin Doctors at work to bad the idiots didn't see Scotty admit he didn't have any help he wrote the book all by himself. It's always the blame game with these guys. Look for this story to be blamed on Bill Clinton, now that's a story Americans will believe.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:01 pmI suspect that even though Bush's own people (or former people) are now confirming what we've pretty much known for some time, the collective reaction from America is a yawn and a shrug. We've either become completely numb to outrageous acts due to the endless parade of them, or we've just been overmedicated by our amusements and other distractions. Or maybe a little of both.
Am I dreaming, or was there once a time in this country that ANY evidence or testimony suggesting that our leaders lied to us to get us into a war would have sparked a deafening outcry from the people?
May 29th, 2008 at 12:02 pmI find the idea of George Soros as a "far leftist" just as bizarre now as I did when I first heard it. He is only "far left" when looked at from a Nazi viewpoint.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:02 pmAn algorithm for the current flap over McClellan's bombshell: the veracity of McClellan's account is inversely proportional to the vitriol and duplicity of the administration's response.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:04 pmScotty better watch his back even though he might be working with Rove and Co. not against them. He could end up hanging himself, being that he's been declared mentally "changed" and all, with the same rope as the DC Madame.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:07 pmgummitch Says:
Does no one else think it’s hysterical that the Right is suddenly chastising someone for doing something “for the money”? Isn’t that the entire raison d’etre of the Right?
Excellent point!
May 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pmThe Institute of Expertology has some things to say here...
May 29th, 2008 at 12:10 pmhttp://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174937/cerf_and_navasky_the_mccain_touch
backup Says
May 29th, 2008 at 11:54 am
Someone needs to ask McClellan if he stands by what’s in the book and if he disagrees with Fleischer’s characterization that the editor tweaked the controversial information.
___________________________________________________
Absolutely. Hopefully, Olbermann will ask just that. It's possible that if any "tweaking" went on, it could have been as benign as sentence structure or paragraph placement. If it altered actual information into falsehoods, that goes beyond tweaking straight into lying.
And while the journalists are still busy with this story, I would like to see EVERY ONE of the detractors asked by their interviewers specifically what, if anything, in McClellan's book was a lie. Let them refute Scott's allegations on the record, and let them give proof. Up to now, Scott's critics are being allowed to get away with character assassination without offering anything to substantiate it.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:10 pmHere are some other titles from the librul publisher:
BOY GENIUS
Karl Rove, the Architect of George W. Bush's Remarkable Political Triumphs
BY HIS OWN RULES
The Story of Donald Rumsfeld
CHURCHILL BY HIMSELF
The Definitive Collection of Quotations
FOR GOD AND COUNTRY
Faith and Patriotism Under Fire
GOVERNOR REAGAN
His Rise To Power
I IS FOR INFIDEL
From Holy War to Holy Terror: Eighteen Years Inside Afghanistan
RICHARD M. NIXON
A Life in Full
RONALD REAGAN
The Presidential Portfolio
RONALD REAGAN
May 29th, 2008 at 12:12 pm(THE BOXED SET)
A Life in Politics
Here's some McIIIrd quotes on Iraq, courtesy of TomDispatch...
How would American troops be greeted?: "I believe… that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators." (March 20, 2003)
Did Saddam Hussein have a nuclear program that posed an imminent threat to the United States?:
"Saddam Hussein is on a crash course to construct a nuclear weapon." (October 10, 2002)
Will a war with Iraq be long or short?: "This conflict is… going to be relatively short." (March 23, 2003)
How is the war going?: "I would argue that the next three to six months will be critical." (September 10, 2003)
How is it going (almost two months later, from the war's "greatest critic")? "I think the initial phases of [the war] were so spectacularly successful that it took us all by surprise." (October 31, 2003)
Is this war really necessary?: "Only the most deluded of us could doubt the necessity of this war." (August 30, 2004)
How is it going? (Recurring question for the war's "greatest critic"): "We will probably see significant progress in the next six months to a year." (December 4, 2005)
Will the President's "surge" of troops into Baghdad and surrounding areas that the senator had been calling for finally make the difference?: "We can know fairly well [whether the surge is working] in a few months." (February 4, 2007)
May 29th, 2008 at 12:15 pmThe right side is filled with school yard bullies. And as we all know about bullies; they are merely cowards who talk a good game. In the end, it is them who will cave and run away from the fight. We are seeing this play out with McClellan's book. Nobody will argue the facts of the book, or the instances McClellen describes. They will spit and shout jingoistic phrases like traitor, disgruntled, disloyal, and all the rest we have heard now for 7+ years.
To be sure, it has been progressives who were right all along. Those doing the shouting right now have all been wrong. That makes me smile. You should too.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:16 pmmissmolly. I don't catch Olbermann much, but I hope I catch it tonight. This is a big deal. I understand the possible motivations of McClellan to sell books and/or get back at the Bush administration, but I also understand that it's possible he has a heavy conscience or simply believes what he knows will eventually get out anyway. I also understand the administrations desire to attack McClellan's character.
The truth is there somewhere. I'm interested in this story. To get a glimpse of those that have been on the inside is much more telling than listening to pundits that haven't.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:19 pmStratRat Says:
The right side is filled with school yard bullies. And as we all know about bullies; they are merely cowards who talk a good game. In the end, it is them who will cave and run away from the fight. We are seeing this play out with McClellan’s book. Nobody will argue the facts of the book, or the instances McClellen describes. They will spit and shout jingoistic phrases like traitor, disgruntled, disloyal, and all the rest we have heard now for 7+ years.
This is from ABC News
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/05/as-scottie-sowe.html
It seems McClellan himself did much what you describe when he was WH Press secretary. I highly doubt he had much credibility with Progressives back then.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:22 pmAt least Scott decided to come clean (even if its only a little) before he's old and on his death bed. The sad thing is, considering the people he's talking about, he'd better grow some eyes in the back of his head. I put nothing past the worst humanity has to offer, Bush and Cheney.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:23 pmEx-Bush aide's criticisms stun a team built on loyalty
By David Jackson and Richard Wolf, USA TODAY
WASHINGTON — It's not unusual for a former White House official to write a book — but it is when the author is a fellow Texan and he's attacking President Bush for his handling of Iraq.
A team "built on loyalty"...?
Yeah. All loyalty.
NO truth, NO honor, NO morals, NO ethics, NO conscience.
Just loyalty.
As far as I'm concerned... the Manson family "team" was built on the exact same kind of loyalty - with the same result - LOTS of dead people.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:25 pmCounter-talking points:
1. McClelland had to write a book to get the message out because he does not have a TV show where he can "DO IT LIVE, DO IT LIVE".
2. McClelland is, no doubt, going to get some money for the book. We are still a capatalistic economy, aren't we, or did that decline with the democracy?
3. It may be that the publisher is "left-leaning". Can anyone imagine a "right-leaning" one to agree to publish something against BushCo?
4. So an editor edited the book. And the writer wrote the book. And the reader will read the book. And BushCo will bash the book. By definitions, my friends.
5. For a Bush apologist to say "I think..." should give us ALL good reason to also think - that McClelland indeed is telling us Exactly What Happened.
6. Of course McClelland is a "traitor", if the BushCo definition used against those of us who have been in opposition to BushCo policies is applied to him. And it is. "Disloyal" equals "traitor" to BushCo.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:26 pmIt seems McClellan himself did much what you describe when he was WH Press secretary. I highly doubt he had much credibility with Progressives back then.
Agreed. McClellan still had too much kool-aid in him at that time, maybe even now. The important thing is that the subject is out in the open. 'Regular' Americans may just start to wonder what actually happened to create the situation we all find ourselves in. That has to be a good thing.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:28 pmBy not calling him a liar they (the reich) are just confirming to the world that the SHRUB and his cronies are murdering corrupt people who need to start wearing ORANGE JUMPSUITS....
May 29th, 2008 at 12:29 pmOnce again, Faux Snooze tries to fix the facts around a faulty premise.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:29 pmReminds me of a certain chympicized administration.
RUCerious Says:
Once again, Faux Snooze tries to fix the facts around a faulty premise.
Reminds me of a certain chympicized administration.
Now, now...Be nice to chimps. It isn't their fault that Bush happens to be a low level primate.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:31 pmAnd rightly so because, as it turns out, much of what he said was FALSE. And we knew it was false when he said. So his revelations come as no surprise.
But nice try at using the same trick that defense lawyers depend on when their client is a mob boss -- any witness against him who took part in anything illegal is instantly not credible, because he's a crook.
Good one.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:33 pmIf people pay attention, I think they'll notice that most of the reaction to McClellan is from people well outside the White House (like the flacks at FoxSnooze), or those who are inextricably tied to Bush, like Rove. There have already been books from insiders, but they were sparse and easily dismissed by the Bushies. McClellan's impact comes because he was perceived as the ultimate loyalist and because he happens to be the first of what will be a glut of tell-all books.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:34 pmTelling the truth
AND
making a profit
ARE NOT
mutually exclusive.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:34 pmExcellent comment, Annie. Another kind of "team" built on the same type of loyalty -- and I'm not the first to suggest this parallel -- is a mafia crime family.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:35 pmDieNowForPeace Says:
Telling the truth
AND
making a profit
ARE NOT
mutually exclusive.
Exactly...And who does the right side bring out to counter McClellans words? Multi-millionaire 'journalists', that's who. Gibson, Williams, Mitchell, etc...They are all in debt to the adminstration for giving them a career.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:37 pmThe frothing at the mouth right-wing critics of Scott McClellan sound a lot like, well, Scott McClellan:
"I think it appears to be more about trying to justify personal views and opinions than it does about looking at the results that we are achieving on behalf of the American people."
McClellan, asked if former Treasury secretary Paul O'Neill's book contained falsehoods, January 12, 2004
"Well, why, all of a sudden, if he had all these grave concerns, did he not raise these sooner? This is one-and-a-half years after he left the administration. And now, all of a sudden, he's raising these grave concerns that he claims he had."
McClellan, on the book by former counter-terrorism tsar Richard Clarke, March 22, 2204.
For more details, see:
May 29th, 2008 at 12:42 pm"A Look Back at Scott McClellan's Greatest Hits."
StratRat Says:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems McClellan himself did much what you describe when he was WH Press secretary. I highly doubt he had much credibility with Progressives back then.
Agreed. McClellan still had too much kool-aid in him at that time, maybe even now. The important thing is that the subject is out in the open. ‘Regular’ Americans may just start to wonder what actually happened to create the situation we all find ourselves in. That has to be a good thing.
Actually, I think I agree with Missmolly and this is not going to get much traction with the general public. They will see it as inside baseball. There is not much new in his book that has not been said before, though I admit having him say it does dredge it to the surface again.
And Ralph, my point was, I don't know why I should feel sorry for this guy if he is getting attacked by the people he has attacked. In another interview, he said he thought Bush would change the tone of politics in Washington but instead wound up becoming part of it. Now he has done the same. Another day at the office inside the Beltway.
May 29th, 2008 at 12:46 pmThese guys are pathetic. The emperor has no clothes, indeed. Do they really think we are that stupid? Don't answer that!
May 29th, 2008 at 12:58 pmSpice up Bush treason? Spice up Cheney treason? Spice up Rumsfeld treason? No need to: it stands on its own: the pure essence of gangsterism and endless lies...
May 29th, 2008 at 1:06 pm58 - Yeah, Keltoi, who gives a damn about all those OLD lies? Only 4,100 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died because of them. Who gives a crap?? It's all old news now, isn't it??
Jebus, Keltoi. Cheerlead for evil much, buddy?
May 29th, 2008 at 1:17 pmbackup Says:
Well, there reacting, because this is a big deal. It’s one thing to have your opponents criticize your policies or leadership. It’s another to have your former press secretary criticize your policies or leadership.
And it's quite another to have the man who told your lies to the public for years come out with the truth about Bush that we "moonbats" have been screaming to the heavens with no one listening.
May 29th, 2008 at 1:34 pmKeltoi Says:
Actually, I think I agree with Missmolly and this is not going to get much traction with the general public.
You hope. Once again, The Republican's only hope to retain power is that no one is paying attention to what they are doing.
May 29th, 2008 at 1:39 pmHe doesn't have any credibility with us NOW, dillweed. He's just reiterating what we've already known for a long time. And it's hilarious because this is all such "news" to you dittoheads. We're just enjoying the show, you know, the way you guys did when you were impeaching a president over a bl@wj@b. Just good clean fun, remember?
May 29th, 2008 at 1:41 pmLeftside Annie Says:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
58 - Yeah, Keltoi, who gives a damn about all those OLD lies? Only 4,100 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died because of them. Who gives a crap?? It’s all old news now, isn’t it??
Jebus, Keltoi. Cheerlead for evil much, buddy?
Well, I am not going to dive into the lies vs bad intel debate for the bazillionith time. Both Clintons, Gore, France blah blah blah said Saddam had WMD. This thread is about McClellan getting attacked, not Iraq.
The only reason he wrote this book is he feels like Rove and Libby made a fool of him. This is payback. I do not believe for one second he feels some deep need to correct history. I had no use for him when he was WHPS and certainly don't now.
May 29th, 2008 at 2:01 pmOf course McClellan is disgruntled, he was lied to by the Bush administration and in turn he lied to the world.
Calling him "disgruntled" is the first true thing the White House has uttered 7 and a half years!
http://thelieshavenotimproved.blogspot.com/
May 29th, 2008 at 2:15 pmClassic O'Reilly/Fox panic blame list
1. George Soros
2. Liberal bloggers
3. The extreme left (their is no other left)
4. Did it for the money
5. The publisher got to him.
6. Disgruntled (as well as the majority of Americans)
7. Not the guy I knew (he told the truth)
8. Want's to sell books.
9. Grab a lie from a right wing source (Ari Fleischer)
10. Left wing conspiracy (we're all to blame)
May 29th, 2008 at 2:20 pmWhile I knew for all those years that Scottie was the White House Press Corp Liar, I wonder why the people who were feeding him lies would think I would believe them now? They are all liars and crooks. They are a crime family and Scott is telling the truth albeit much too late.
May 29th, 2008 at 2:23 pmMay have already been said, but isn't it amazing the "machine" these people have with their talking points?
May 29th, 2008 at 2:25 pmI listened to the vulgar pigboy some today and he was with the talking points gurus saying the publisher/editor (and ghostwriters, he presumed)put words in McClellan's mouth, just like the White House did, and he was just a mouthpiece and out of the loop. Rush says let him testify before Congress because he did not really KNOW anything.
May 29th, 2008 at 2:26 pmKarl Rove told him what to say, just like Rupert tells his minions what to say (through Ailes), and now some liberals, I guess, are putting words in his mouth. He's just a ventriloquist dummy and now that Karl's hand is no longer up his a$$ it must be some liberal editor.
Left wing conspiracy...Space alien conspiracy... LOL! Anything but the truth on Scotty McFelon's shock and awe book from Faux News.
May 29th, 2008 at 3:28 pmIf O'Reilly and the entire Fox "News" network were not such fascist propagandists, this would be really funny. But these people are really an affront and a danger to democracy. The headlines on the Fox Network come straight out of a television network controlled by mad tyrants.
May 29th, 2008 at 3:53 pmOn his show today, Fats Limbaugh also pushed the Soros meme abotu Scottie and went so far as to say McClellan himself probably didn't even write the book.
May 29th, 2008 at 4:35 pmFox and GOP are trying to hold on their fragmented base.
May 29th, 2008 at 6:31 pmStory like this must be attacked.Fox unleashed their big mouths against Scottie
To Fox and GOP , Scottie and his story must be kept in the jar.
No surprise there who is attacking and where the attacks are coming from.
Americans want the rest of the world to know that we think Fox News is a disgrace to our country and all decent people throughout the world. As a matter of interest, it is a Zionist operation.
May 29th, 2008 at 8:06 pm.
LOL
What these Loyalist Christian(R) Blowhards are missing are facts.
Not one can back their claims up with an iota of factual information.
They thrive on hear-say. They refer to beliefs as facts.
Like with Bush...
How does one fix a fact?
.
May 29th, 2008 at 9:16 pmrepublicanSScareme,
May 29th, 2008 at 9:17 pmJust FOXPRAVDA?
The Administration's talking heads doth protest too much, me thinks!
May 31st, 2008 at 10:25 am