Think Progress

New film finds ‘disillusionment’ in Bush’s hometown of Crawford.

sign.gifFilmmaker David Modigliani’s new documentary “Crawford” takes a look at what happened to the small Texas community of 700 residents after George W. Bush bought a 1,600-acre ranch early in his presidential campaign in 1999. “I wanted to do a film indicting Bush for this political stagecraft, using this town as a prop,” Modigliani said. “But I found something much more compelling, which was the people of Crawford: their stories, their journeys, their arcs. The film became about them”:

“Generally speaking, there was this excitement, enchantment and economic boon that came with his moving to town,” Mr. Modigliani said. “By the end of the film, there’s a sense of disillusionment, being tired of the attention and feeling like the novelty has worn off.”



39 Responses to “New film finds ‘disillusionment’ in Bush’s hometown of Crawford.”

  1. Max-1 says:

    .

    IMPEACH BUSH
    for
    BLOWing the JOB!

    .


  2. ninique says:

    “Generally speaking, there was this excitement, enchantment and economic boon that came with his moving to town,” Mr. Modigliani said. “By the end of the film, there’s a sense of disillusionment, being tired of the attention and feeling like the novelty has worn off.”

    gee, I wonder why?


  3. ninique says:

    you mean they had a rude awakening is more like it. Disillusionment, ha!


  4. upside99 says:

    So now, even the sheeple of Craw-f’ing’-ford, TX can feel the same pain the rest of us feel. The novelty wore off for many of us before the 2000 fiasco. How enlightening!


  5. theswan says:

    No comment but some reality


  6. dbadass says:

    Reminds me of how those of us in a little town in Maine felt and for those still there probably still feel


  7. StratRat says:

    Bush only bought the scrub-brush patch of land to play the role of a cowboy (see Ronald Reagan). Bush was always a faker (in business, in the military, in government) and this just makes the case. I wonder if the good folks of Crawford know Bush bought land in Paraguay to escape the inevitable crimes against humanity indictment?


  8. Max-1 says:

    John Yoo says:

    Clinton certainly didn’t make it easy. Same as the Bush administration. Knowing what you know now about what they had done, if they had been much more open and forthcoming coming out of the gate, it would have been better for everybody.

    But I will say this: I wasn’t in favor of impeachment. I don’t think what Clinton did rose to the level of what impeachment is really for. I think if people in Congress wanted to impeach President Bush they could, not because he committed a crime but because they think he’s a bad president.

    That was the phrase [“high crimes and misdemeanors”] that came from Britain, and the British used to, under that phrase, remove people just because they screwed up a war.

    There are great examples. Allegedly these were the same standards of impeachments when they impeached a minister because the British suffered a setback in the war with the Dutch. It wasn’t a crime, but you were a bad leader. But it has to be something of significance to the state. Clinton, what he did didn’t seem to rise to that level.

    Are/is we safer, yet?

    .


  9. upside99 says:

    dbadass Says:

    Reminds me of how those of us in a little town in Maine felt and for those still there probably still feel

    Probably not unlike how Yale and Harvard feel about their “illustrious” poster boy with the Naugahyde sheepskins with their crests on them..


  10. ninique says:

    it reminds me of how Nemo felt when his fish mom was eaten.


  11. Zooey says:

    Imagine that…


  12. ninique says:

    StratRat Says:

    Bush only bought the scrub-brush patch of land to play the role of a cowboy (see Ronald Reagan). Bush was always a faker (in business, in the military, in government) and this just makes the case. I wonder if the good folks of Crawford know Bush bought land in Paraguay to escape the inevitable crimes against humanity indictment?

    tell me about it! working a farm is actually hard word. He probably can’t even drive a tractor!


  13. zbig says:

    Now Crawford can change the sign to “Welcome to Crawford, Home of the Worst President Ever!”


  14. StratRat says:

    tell me about it! working a farm is actually hard word. He probably can’t even drive a tractor!

    He sure cannot drive a tractor, but he surely is driving all of us to drink.


  15. ninique says:

    Maybe if they change the name to Crayfish…


  16. ninique says:

    omg, could you imagine what those poor people go through when they talk to other people about their home town. Imagine the shame.


  17. Art says:

    They should change the name of the town to…
    Scott McClellan, TX


  18. spencers mom says:

    People of Crawford, we feel your pain. We’ve been sick of him for a very long time, too.

    - The American Public

    PEACE


  19. celtic cynic says:

    The polish is off the turd !!! Yea


  20. Buckie Boy says:

    “feeling like the novelty has worn off”

    Well, it has worn off on just about everybody by now.

    But then again, there are those who don’t have the brains to see the truth and still worship this worthless piece of shit.


  21. shoeless says:

    Well, sure they are disillusioned. How would you like to have to look at that billboard every day for 8 years?


  22. dbadass says:

    What kind of Zoning board approved that thing it is god awful visually and what point does it serve? I lived for years right down the road from a presidents home and no one in that town ever thought a ridiculous billboard was needed. Don’t these people have any aesthetic appreciations?


  23. shoeless says:

    Totalitarians typically enjoy seeing very large images of themselves displayed in public places.


  24. upside99 says:


    shoeless Says:

    Totalitarians typically enjoy seeing very large images of themselves displayed in public places.

    Kinda like that big mustachioed statue in Baghdad that came tumbling down, maybe?


  25. dbadass says:

    I am still in awe that no wise ass kids have defaced this badboy yet. No doubt the billboard has 24/7 secret service protection. What self respecting teen could turn down such an obvious target


  26. shoeless says:

    upside99 Says:

    Kinda like that big mustachioed statue in Baghdad that came tumbling down, maybe?

    I imagine the residents will tie some ropes to that billboard and pull it down next January.


  27. shoeless says:

    The good thing for the residents of Crawford is that, as soon as Bush is out of office, and no longer needs his fake ranch for PR purposes, he will sell it and get the hell out of there faster than a jack rabbit running from a brush fire.


  28. Leftside Annie says:

    The people of Crawford say:

    Take down the sign! Please, please, please!!! Take it down! Oh, please take it down! For the love of GOD, take…it…down!!!!!


  29. Zooey says:

    They must replace that billboard every week. Surely it’s had a handlebar mustache at some point…


  30. dbadass says:

    or a “womb broom”


  31. aarrgghh says:

    king midas strikes agin!

    god protect paraguay …


  32. JBaddo says:

  33. tokin librul says:

    “By the end of the film, there’s a sense of disillusionment, being tired of the attention and feeling like the novelty has worn off.”

    them Crawford crackers gotta be PURTEE s-low on the ol’ up-take, by gosh; that had happened to the rest of us by the end of january, 2000…


  34. tokin librul says:

    C/o Badass: Don’t these people have any aesthetic appreciations?
    June 2nd, 2008 at 5:39 pm

    Your short answer, brought to by your Dept of Short Answers, is:

    No. No, they do not have any aesthetic appreciations. They have cows and pigs, and if you’ve got a pretty prolific breeded, you put up a picture near the road and hope to attract passing inseminators and such./..


  35. RUCerious says:

    Ya think he’ll ever have the nerve to just drive into town to buy some groceries? Hit a few bars? Doubt it.


  36. JaneaneTheAcerbicGoblin says:

    The good thing for the residents of Crawford is that, as soon as Bush is out of office, and no longer needs his fake ranch for PR purposes, he will sell it and get the hell out of there faster than a jack rabbit running from a brush fire

    This is probably true. Bush used Crawford Texas (and they went along willingly because Bush was such a “man”, when in reality he was a fake cowboy), now he doesn’t need them anymore. You got used, Crawford, how do you feel?

    It’s not disillusionment, it’s the feeling you’ve been cheated.


  37. Doc Rock says:

    The Yankee candy store cowboy who’s afraid of horses losing popularity in Crawford? We’re shocked, shocked, I tell you!


  38. RUCerious says:

    #36 JaneneAG, if you’re right, there’ll be alot of relieved horses in Crawford. They’re never certain when they might get ‘milked’ again.


  39. bspence11 says:

    I just don’t like the fact that this guy set out from the start to make an anti-Bush film. I prefer a little more objectivity than that!



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll