Comments on: Furious O’Reilly Defends Bush, Slams McClellan For Meeting With ‘The Hate-Bush Press’

By: skeletonman

skeletonman — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:42:38 +0000

Bill-O has an Axis II disorder

By: Bozo The Neoclown

Bozo The Neoclown — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:10:25 +0000

With a little luck, this issue which apparently “bores” the likes of o’lielly will cause him to have a massive stroke on air one of these days when he gets all whipped up about the issue for the 45,928th time.

By: LibertyLover

LibertyLover — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:20:42 +0000

ask*

By: LibertyLover

LibertyLover — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:20:21 +0000

O’Reilly … slammed McClellan ….for sitting by while they “just raped the president verbally”:

Bush has been raping the country for 7+ years. But the last I checked, speaking the truth can hardly be considered rape.

Then again, Billo would know about verbal rape, wouldn’t he? Just as Andrea Mackris.

By: christopher wiwi

christopher wiwi — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 03:34:20 +0000

Still no one in the media has asked if Scotty was lying or said he was lying, how come?

Hey Billo, why didn`t you ask the hard and obvious questions? Instead you defended the SHRUB like the reich wing boot licker you are.

By: sacopenapa

sacopenapa — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 02:46:27 +0000

Being gay is not a problem… but, does O’reilly have a *crush* on Bush? You know… kind of fancing kinky FACIST uniform and rough play…

By: shaun

shaun — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:19:41 +0000

i watched the interview and thought mcclellan did ok – billo was busting for a brawl and scotty stayed pretty cool and didn’t take o’reilly’s bait – my favourite part,and i hope that everyone else caught this as well, was when billo was trying to slap him about wmd’s and how the rest of the world also believed saddam had them to which mcclellan emphasised that the main concern was that saddam might have been trying to develop nuclear weapons – bill then interrupted and said something along the lines of “….we’re not talking about nuclear weapons – let’s stay with the wmd’s….”!!! – mcclellan then reminded bill that nukes are also wmd’s – THAT was f**king priceless!!!!

By: sectionop92

sectionop92 — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:15:15 +0000

I think Billo is frustrated and with him taking a vow of abstinence in silent support of Bush’s policies, has him more “testy” than usual.

By: pete

pete — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:02:00 +0000

Oh! BTW. Just in case a troll, or Bill0 himself, happens by: no one has the right, or wisdom, to decide another’s feelings for this country. And so long as enemies of freedom, like yourself and pathetic minions, enforce loyalty to a criminal administration? We deserve the contempt and enmity of the Free World.

I find this realization distasteful because I love my country. But, I sure have learned to hate the crimes perpetrated in our names, and the guilty parties responsible. Outside the government itself, Mr. Bill O’Reilly is one of the arch fiends. And, soon enough, he will be relegated to the obscurity reserved for yellow journalists throughout time. Unless he achieves a bigger footnote by dying in a cell, where he was placed by the very “ideals” he worshiped and sought to impose.

Times are changing and the bloviating gasbags of the New Reich are losing it. It’s often unpleasant to watch them eat their own, no matter how much they deserve it. But, I have a feeling that Bill0 will prove amusing, if aggravating, right up until they haul him off the air, frothing at the mouth, and away to a “treatment facility”. Popcorn is still cheap. Stock up and enjoy the inevitable meltdown.

By: pete

pete — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:28:22 +0000

Perhaps this has been addressed? I just skimmed the thread.

What Bill0 and his ilk fail to realize is that most Americans want the same thing for the Administration and the country. Justice.

Justice can only be served when the principals are compelled, one way or another, to tell the truth. Telling the truth about the criminal acts of an administration, regardless of justification, is one’s patriotic duty. And to besmirch the first Bushite to tell the truth, when no one dares attack his statements, is juvenile schoolyard name-calling. Just the kind of irrational, un-American, raving Bill0 does best.

By: Sharkie

Sharkie — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:26:10 +0000

I think O’Reily meant to say that he raped him orally (not verbally) or at least that is what Bill fantasizes about.

By: Cal Malenky

Cal Malenky — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:53:00 +0000

Every guest on BillO’s show is merely a springboard for Bill to hit his talking points. He doesn’t care what the guests have to say, he doesn’t listen to anybody and when they piss him off he tells them to SHUT UP.
McClelland had no chance to get a word in edgewise beyond repeating his personal affection for the boy king. Filibuster Bill did all the talking.

By: sectionop92

sectionop92 — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:36:02 +0000

When Ailes rings the bell, Billo becomes Pavlov’s attack dog. Did anyone else get the feeling Billo was transferring some repressed feelings onto McClellan? The words “rape, kill” and his vocal inclinations of those words and more sounded like he wants to do them alright, but that McClellan was just a therapeutic sounding board for his issues. Someone better search him in FOX World HQ for weapons come Super Tuesday in November. Billo will not be politically humbled, humiliated and lose in the ratings on the same day without internal casualties to follow and a hilarious YouTube recounting of events that show yet another classic Mt. Billo eruption!

By: nineteen84

nineteen84 — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 21:23:27 +0000

O’Really is an embarrassment for our species.

It’s discouraging to think that he may have evolved through natural means.

Perhaps he is a neocon genetic engineering experiment that went badly wrong.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:50:51 +0000

Man I knew when Daryll dropped that “shake off the devil” line it would take on a life of its own. I said it befre but it’s worth repeating. “Pure genius”!

By: nanlichi

nanlichi — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:28:40 +0000

And what’s all that about “get behind me Satan”? There’s more to Daryll’s church than meets the eye.

By: ForTruth

ForTruth — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:22:24 +0000

Is “shaking the devil off” like jerking off?

By: TeleMan

TeleMan — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:20:32 +0000

No, no, no. Daryll is a good Xtian – he wouldn’t do that!

Daryll Says: (from the Abstinence-Only thread)
You can abstain from sex. If you become aroused, read your bible and shake the devil off.

By: Uncle Ho

Uncle Ho — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:18:13 +0000

President Bush a man among men?

That’ll be the god dammed day.

more like a chicken among chickens. If Bush HAD gone to Vietnam, he would have been fragged his 1st week in-country. and rightfully so.

By: Uncle Ho

Uncle Ho — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 20:11:29 +0000

TeleMan says;
Hey, Daryll’s back from “shaking off the devil.”

And I thought Daryll was off choking the chicken or spanking the monkey.