I don’t have to agree with it and don’t like it.

Is there a list of Bush being told NO to issue and his authority? He doesn’t hear it near as much as I do.

Must be in Bush’s Project for a New Century’s constitution where only wealthy have rights and can’t be told NO……

It would appear that McCain has designated himself as a self-appointed judge and jury and has already rendered his verdict.

McSlime has provided us with an important sneak preview regarding the manner in which he would manage the Oval Office.

They are the Corporate Fascist that hate Democracy in all forms!!!

AND REPEATING, AND REPEATING, UNTIL IT GETS DONE.

“IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS 4″
“IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS 4″
“IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS 4″
“IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS 4″
“IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS 4″

McCain is dangerous, unbalanced, confused, ignorant, opportunistic, untruthful, corrupt, old, and just plain nasty. If Obama can’t beat him, I will give up. I will leave, or set myself on fire outside the McCain inauguration. Because that will mean that the American people are just too gullible and stupid to deserve the government we have fought for all these years. And four current members of the supreme court are radical enemies of our way of life. Any supposed Democrat who votes for McCain votes against the constitution and against freedom.

This needs repeating…“And four current members of the supreme court are radical enemies of our way of life.”

They are the Corporate Fascist that hate Democracy in all forms!!!

Turley said Scalia’s dissent was an “obnoxious rant”. Soooo…. he’s still rendering up the same specious nonsense as above in 2000. Well educated pompous moron!

What redeeming quality does G. W(orst) B. see in withholding Habeas Corpus Rights?

Money, money and more money…

We’ll(sic) abide by the Supreme Courts decision… That doesnt mean I have to agree with it…”

What redeeming quality does G. W(orst) B. see in withholding Habeas Corpus Rights?

.

Q U E S T I O N:
If the President of the USA, upon signing bills into laws, makes sure to NOT faithful ensure they ARE lawfully executed(defined as being Constitutionally sound/passing muster), is it legal? If later, the SCOTUS decides that aspects of this law ARE unconstitutional, then did the law pass the muster? Did the president fulfill his Constitutional Duty? And if not, what should the remedy be…

… The president id due to “retire” January 20, 2009. Upon “retirement” he receives a lifetime of benefits that includes a guaranteed salary and SS protection, heath coverage and diplomatic status. This is essentially a “Gold Watch” handed to him as an award for a heck of a job.

I say, “Melt that ‘Gold Watch’ down and use it as the necessary ’stimulus’ America needs.”

Does George W(orst) Bush deserve such a hefty severance package… ? This is why Impeachment is NECESSARY! Sure he MIGHT get arrested 10 years from now, a-la Milosevic style in Paraguay, however what message does this send to future presidents… ?

.

“It obviously concerns me. These are unlawful combatants. They are not American citizens. We should pay attention to Justice Roberts.”

You and unJustice “Corporate Fascist” Roberts should pay attention to the GOD DAMNED CONSTITUTION YOU A$$HOLE!!!!

If the 2nd Amendment can give me the right to hand a pair of Bear Arms on the wall, the 9th can be read as retaining *people*, not “rights”. :)

All joking aside, the 14th Amendment is probably more appropriate:

“No State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…”

No mention of Citizenship.

“I strongly agree with those who dissented.”

So, when the president does it that means it’s NOT illegal?

.

Has anyone offered a reason why Bin Laden has not been tried, in absentia, on charges related to 9/11? It’s becoming quite clear that the government is stalling because it can’t build cases against “internees” and actual trials would expose same. Would it not be reasonable to conclude that Bushco is afraid they can’t even build a case against the arch criminal? Is that the big secret at the heart of their web of lies?

R E M E M B E R:
THEY(sic) HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOMS…
… And so THEY(sic) legislated away those FREEDOMS
(MCA of 2006/Habeas Corpus R.I.P.)

.

Or, perhaps Scalia believes the British won the revolution and we live in a monarchy, hard to tell from his rulings…

How about antilegal battlebot, or person in suspended confinement, or mayhaps confinee for somereasonoranother…

I know…I am ever the optimist. Even trolls can be re-trained, albeit at great expense.

Thank you Annie. I am hoping even Rx2 understands that very simple, but important idea.

I wouldn’t get my hopes up on rogers, StratRat.
A brick house hasn’t fallen on his head yet.