When there is a study declaring a cause for homosexuality it’ll have to deal with studies like the following one:

Landmark study: Change for homosexuals is possible

http://www.bpnews.net/BPnews.asp?ID=26429

Posted on Sep 14, 2007 | by Michael Foust

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)–In what some are calling groundbreaking research, a new four-year study concludes it is possible for homosexuals to change their physical attractions and become heterosexual through the help of Christian ministries.

The data was released Sept. 13 at a news conference in Nashville, Tenn., and is published in the new book, “Ex-Gays?” (InterVarsity Press) by psychologists Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse. Thirty-eight percent of the subjects followed in the study said they had successfully left homosexuality, while an additional 29 percent said they had had only modest successes but were committed to keep trying. In another significant finding, Jones and Yarhouse said attempts at conversion do not appear to be psychologically harmful.
.
.
.

This seems to following what the Apostle Paul says in First Corinthians:

I Corinthians 6:

11And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

The phrase “And that is what some of you were.” refers to the list in verses 9 and 10. Verses 9 and 10 are quoted above.

Only if you believe that nonsense. Is this the same scripture that makes it a capital offense for a woman to wear a dress made from two different cloths, or for a farmer to plant two different crops in the same field? That’s hardly a rational source upon which to base your laws, now is it?
June 18th, 2008 at 6:21 pm

You sure the Bible says that these are capital offenses?

Where does it say that?

That’s hardly a rational source upon which to base your laws, now is it?

Certainly seems irrational to base an opinion on someone’s misrepresentation of scripture.

WTF???
June 18th, 2008 at 6:31 pm

You sure?

The implied “I” is still bitblt speaking-writing.

bitblt Says:

Believe you’re quoting the King James translation.

Did bitblt not speak of himself in the third person?

WTF???

Only if you believe that nonsense. Is this the same scripture that makes it a capital offense for a woman to wear a dress made from two different cloths, or for a farmer to plant two different crops in the same field? That’s hardly a rational source upon which to base your laws, now is it?

The New International Version might be more enlightening…

Isaiah 45

6
so that from the rising of the sun
to the place of its setting
men may know there is none besides me.
I am the LORD, and there is no other.
7
I form the light and create darkness,
I bring prosperity and create disaster;
I, the LORD, do all these things.
8
“You heavens above, rain down righteousness;
let the clouds shower it down.
Let the earth open wide,
let salvation spring up,
let righteousness grow with it;
I, the LORD, have created it.

Obviously the writer is saying that God is in control.

“I am the LORD, and there is none else. I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things. (Isaiah 45:6-7)”

Well, there you have it. Proof positive that God Almighty wants evil to exist. If, as postulated, homosexuality is, indeed, evil, it is because God wills it. Who are we to interfere with the will of God Almighty. Amen.
Impeach Pelosi, Cheney and Bush and Save the Constitution!
So let it be written; so let it be done!

Shall I come and comfort thee with my rod and staff, again?

god

June 18th, 2008 at 3:29 pm

Which is strange , considering all the shit that flies out of his bloated mouth…………

Even the Freepers don’t believe this scumbag. However, they still want him to continue to tell his lies in order to smear Obama.

I found this interesting post on Free Republic:

To: pissant

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2030754/posts

I wish we had a picture of Daryll. Then we’d know what color lips are when they’re constantly and firmly in contact with W’s rect*m.

Dark brown?

Janet Says:
Hmmm, I don’t think Rush Limbaugh has dark lips.

Oh, Janet, now that image is in my head and no amount of bleach is gonna clear it.

Thanks a lot.

misshusseinmolly Says:
Nah — don’t flag Daryll. He’s far too entertaining. Plus, he obviously works very hard at this. He’s pretty good at staying in character, but he makes a few slip-ups — like trying to convince us he’s “dark toned”.

Or that he’s a christain. I’m with one of the earlier posts, why aren’t mainstream christains denouncing these extremists? They are very quick to condemn Muslim mainstreamers for not condemning thier extremists.

I hold all christains responsible for it if they are doing nothing about it.