Comments on: White House exerts executive privilege to hide global warming documents.

By: neopro

neopro — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 03:37:14 +0000

if republicans hate this planet so much, they are more than welcome to leave it

By: Bad Eye

Bad Eye — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:44:21 +0000

marwick Says:

June 20th, 2008 at 6:22 pm

Perhaps you can explain what the fk EP has to do with documents on global warming. What is it that Bush is afraid of? Care to speculate?

By: marwick

marwick — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:22:56 +0000

Japanese IPCC scientists says global warming “worst scientific scandal”

No wonder Al Gore’s carbon footprint continues to grow. He converted to green energy AND increased his energy usage while he polishes his Oscar. Sweet.

By: LeaderofMen

LeaderofMen — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:09:59 +0000

Global warming, or more accurately, climate change is not a national issue, it is a GLOBAL issue. Thus, executive privilege for sequestering documentation related to this is bogus. Anyone with a high school education can understand this.

Thus, the REAL issue is what they’ve been doing with the science, which is to HIDE it. That constitutes a grave threat to our existence as a civilization.

Once again, historians will prove that this administration was the worst in our nation’s history. The. Worst. With a capital W. Incompetence is not complete unless it’s completely incompetent. W is proving precisely how incompetent he is and HE’S NOT DONE YET.

By: Kgprophet

Kgprophet — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:49:28 +0000

I have yet to hear any rational argument by Global Climate Crisis deniers:

What possible sinister motivation would all these scientists have to warn us about the effects of man-made pollution? Why would they possibly risk their reputations if wasn’t sound science? If this is a hoax, what do they intend to accomplish?

Answer: Nothing. There is no hoax. But who are going to believe? The guy with the PhD or the guy with the talking points?

By: sacopenapa

sacopenapa — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:26:28 +0000

According to Bush, there is a NEW TERRORIST on the block: The Weather!

By: MapleStreet

MapleStreet — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:13:50 +0000

To claim executive priviledge, he would be asserting that the materials contained secrets of the White House including internal WH discussions of political strategy.

So why would a scientific report from the EPA have materials that are politically determined ?

By: SP Biloxi

SP Biloxi — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:35:49 +0000

EPA documents + Executive Privilege = Covering Dick Cheney’s hide.

By: Wayne A. Schneider

Wayne A. Schneider — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:50:28 +0000

Time to charge George Bush with inherent contempt. Only this time, they should actually go have him arrested. That can be George Bush’s legacy.

By: Uncle Ho

Uncle Ho — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:12:59 +0000

When it comes to stonewalling and abuse of executive privelage, Bush make Nixon look like an amateur.

By: DRxJ

DRxJ — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:11:12 +0000

Global Warming? What Global Warming?
Why the need to “hide” something that doesn’t exist, correct rightie????

By: Leftside Annie

Leftside Annie — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:50:18 +0000

I am so effing SICK of these gutless barstids. Where’s my effing pitchfork??? Let’s march, people!!

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:49:13 +0000

pretty telling, ralph, when Faux polls show him at 29%.
That’s pretty close to the average of the last ten or so I looked at on that site.

By: ralph the wonder llama

ralph the wonder llama — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:42:43 +0000

OT (or maybe not):

The latest poll from Fox has Bush at 29% approval.

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

By: ralph the wonder llama

ralph the wonder llama — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:30:02 +0000

Agreed, RUC. The fun parts of being a troll are, sadly, often overlooked.

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:23:32 +0000

joe, you gotta have some sympathy; they go through them so quick these days (much like a box of Kleenex®) that their choices are really limited by now.

Plus creativity isn’t generally considered among their strengths

Yeah, but there’s still a shitload of good names that anybody with an ounce of brai…. Never mind…
‘Where’s My Cheetos’, ‘Ooops, Mom’s coming downstairs’, etc..

By: ralph the wonder llama

ralph the wonder llama — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:18:46 +0000

joe cantwell Says:

these troll names really need work.

joe, you gotta have some sympathy; they go through them so quick these days (much like a box of Kleenex®) that their choices are really limited by now.

Plus creativity isn’t generally considered among their strengths.

By: JMOHR

JMOHR — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:15:00 +0000

Yes, this is the typical response that we see from the administration and the Democrats. The Republicans learned from Watergate. The Democrats have not. It takes tough action to defend democracy.

By: joe cantwell

joe cantwell — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:09:01 +0000

ralph,

yesterday he was “the_dude_man” today he’s “lock_box” tomorrow he’ll be “blast_in_the_face”.

these troll names really need work.

By: bogtrotters

bogtrotters — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:06:45 +0000

Impeach, convict, imprison. Do it the Guantanamo way, where the order doesn’t really matter.