thank you..

porno izle

mynet
netlog
sohbet odalari
kiz arkadas
sohbet

For example you can contact General Motors and say
Dear GM, You advertise on the Glenn Beck website. This week he said of detainees at Guantanamo,
“We’re going to shoot them all in the head…If we can’t put them away and they’re going to use our court system—kill them.”
Does GM endorse this statement advocating mass murder of detainees at Guantanamo? Thank you for taking the time to reply.

I assume you would be ‘for’ giving him a trial before you do so?

lol

You all who say or imply that the Bush Administration and republicans in general are full of hate, should read ‘The Skeptical Cynic’ comment carefully. It’s another case of the pot calling the kettle black.

I harbor no hate for anyone who disagrees with my opinions, and yes some of those opinions are conservative (some are liberal as well). For example I’m not ‘for’ Obama in the next election – however, I’m not ‘for’ McCain either. I disagree with just about everything Obama stands for and most everything McCain stands for. So I have to pick the one that I feel is the lesser of 2 evils (in which case I have to lean towards McCain no matter how much of a bad taste it leaves in my mouth to do so). My point is, even though I disagree with Obama’s policies, I’m not going to go on a rant calling him names and making accusations of him.

Sorry got a bit off subject. So back to the point. Perhaps I’m wrong in this fact. So please correct me by providing links to official documentation that shows I’m wrong if I am. Is it not true that if one of our service men are accused of a crime, so long as they are part of our military (i.e. not civilian) they must face a military court system? Assuming that is true, then my next question is – then why should these terrorists be afforded a civilian court system – that is normally reserved for American Citizens? Where in the constitution does it state that prisoners taken by our military must be given a trial in American Citizen/Civilian courts?

This to me is simply crazy. I just don’t see how any American citizen would want to use our courts in this manner. This is why we have a Civilian Court system and a Military Court system.

Sorry I’m late.

Glenn didn’t say, “If I were president I would shoot all the prisoners in the head.” How many of you even listened to the clip? Listen again. He said if he were president he would release the prisoners.

Some of you may be squeamish with the thought, but our soldiers are shooting enemy combatants in the head. Glenn is saying that Guantanamo is the only thing we have going for us, because it gives us the best option of taking those combatants who surrender as prisoners. He isn’t arguing that we need to kill more of the enemy, he is arguing to allow them to be taken as prisoners, where they can be treated humanely as the enemy, but not as American citizens suspected of a crime. I’m not saying I agree that a “take no prisoners” command is the best alternative to running enemy combatants through our judicial system. But I’m not not saying it either.

Btw, didn’t Saddam get the death sentence for killing 147 people HE claimed were a danger to his government. He didn’t believe in trials for terrorists/enemy combatants either.

The neocon idiots prove time & again that they believe in Saddam’s type of law & order.

IMHO, Beck represents an critically clear and present danger to the U.S. and should be dragged into the street, clapped in irons, rendered to some remote tiny island in the middle of a of the South Pacific, encaged in a bamboo pen, sprayed daily with a mosquito attracting pheromone and the U.S. Constitution read at about 85 dB in a Latino accent 24/7 until his eyes cross and he tears off his own ears. Then…. we’ll think of something more unsettling.

posed by

When you know that this man is a former drunk and has a testy relationshiip with some members of his family, you can understand how he is able to say such things. He is a Limbaugh wannbe. He has like so many talk show hosts on the right, and like some on the left, no real talent. He tries to hide this fact by doing what they all do. The ones like Limbaugh, Hannity, etc. Use verbal bullying and total bs to make up for the fact. He talks louder and more outrageously hoping no one will notice what a shallow man he is.

I don’t believe in censorship. I simply turn off the station. And anyone who expects at this late date that radio station owners or television moguls will do anything serious about on air talent are mistaken. These people are hired to do just what they do. Stir up controversy and lies. It brings in money and the idiots that listen to them. Some people are so dense, they believe this is journalism. It’s not. It’s empty talk.

And when these people sometimes get fired like Michael Savage or anyone else, they get hired immediately. The days when talk shows had to have some civic relevance and responsibility have gone the way of the corporate media or the dodo bird. They are meant to entertain the lowest, stupid, common denominator in America. They do not inform or move forward any meaningful, intelligent discourse in this society. You cannot put perfume on a skunk and call it anything but stink. These hosts stink. And the people that listen to them as if they are being informed are stupid.

The news for the last ten years has been regulated to the entertainment section of television. For instance CBS news has less of war news then any other television station. And the rest have so little some nights it is not mentioned at all. This is who they are now. And it is what we deserve for not complaining loudly and often. As for me, I don’t have television anymore. I get my news from a few isolated places here in this country. And the rest I get from news sources outside the US.

As a last comment. In case any of you still have not caught on to just how uninformed Americans are. Try this. America used to be 1st in the world as free objective press. We now are ranked 44th in the world and falling. The Netherlands is ranked #1.