Think Progress

SCOTUS slashes Exxon damages for Valdez spill by $2 billion.

This morning, the Supreme Court issued a 5-3 decision (Justice Samuel Alito did not participate) slashing punitive damages Exxon Mobil must pay for the 1989 Valdez spill disaster from $2.5 billion to $500 million. “Nearly 33,000 Alaskans are in line to share in the award,” AP reports, which have been cut now from $75,000 each to about $15,000.



46 Responses to “SCOTUS slashes Exxon damages for Valdez spill by $2 billion.”

  1. DieNowForPeace says:

    More rewards for incompetence.

    No wonder the retarded trolls salute the Dumbya.


  2. shoeless says:

    Well of course they had to cut the damage payment, what with the current price of oil and all.


  3. MCMetal says:

    I’m surprised Assholito recused himself because he owns stock in Exxon ; guess his friends on the court didn’t want his stock prices to drop…………


  4. Zimzone says:

    Activist Judges appointed by retarded Presidents and castrated Politicians.

    ‘F’ You, Alaska, wildlife, coastal birds, pristine wilderness and rational citizens everywhere.

    Great sarcasm, shoeless…


  5. Bob says:

  6. ralph the wonder llama says:

    Did someone say “activist judges”?


  7. A Patriot Acting says:

    I’m sure Senator Ted Stevens is outraged and will get to the bottom of this!

    /snarc


  8. deebaser says:

    nearly 20 years for 15,000 in damages?


  9. PatrioticLiberalChristian says:

    Let’s see, gas in 1989 cost about $1 a gallon and is hovering around $4 a gallon now, a four-times increase. So, let’s take the $500M and multiple it by 4 to make the damages $2B in today’s dollars.


  10. Witch1 says:

    Move along folk’s, nothing to see here except all the black tar goo Exxon left on the beach and the billion’s of dollar’s of profit they kept for the people who didn’t need it…The moto should read.”If you stall long enough everyone will die off before you have to pay” or ” It’s better to spend million’s on judge’s and attorney’s than pay the fine”……Blessings


  11. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    What a surprise: the ruling class helping the ruling class…
    After giving us eight years of treason by Bush Incorporated, the moron Supremes just want to keep on giving…


  12. barfly says:

    “Nearly 33,000 Alaskans are in line to share in the award,” AP reports, which have been cut now from $75,000 each to about $15,000.</em>

    Oil men spend more than that on tips at the Producer’s Club.


  13. celtic cynic says:

    Once again, the best ‘judges’ money can buy.


  14. Chocolate Jesus says:

    “punitive”, in my kooky activist mind, means “to punish”, thus i think it makes some sense that a punitive judgement should have some reasonable relationship to an entity’s net worth, not merely to whatever lowball number it can appraise its harm down to..

    lets face it, this was about as effective to change exxons behaviour as a parking ticket is to change ours..


  15. misshusseinmolly says:

    What? Is ExxonMobil claiming to be a hardship case?


  16. Bob says:

    Time flies when you’re appealing. Poor Exxon had to keep fighting all these years just because of one little accident.

    Does the whole puny amount come close to CEO compensation?
    You want to give these clumsies more places to explore and drill? It’ll take 20 years more to get ANWR all oil slicked?


  17. Zimzone says:

    As I said earlier, when you’re in a hole, quit DRILLING!


  18. Buckie Boy says:

    Every bit of the government has been corrupted by the Repukian Mafia.

    By the people, for the people….not so much anymore.

    Repukian moto: Corporations Rule!!!


  19. stateofthedivision says:

    Corporate liability. or lack thereof, just got a big shot in the arm. From pharmaceutical companies to big oil, this federal triumpherate keeps giving out the lollipops. “Buyer beware” just got much worse.


  20. BearCountry says:

    Rule by and for corporations is one of the marks of a fascist government.


  21. Leftside Annie says:

    But of course, we can trust our corporations to do the right thing…for themselves.

    *sigh*

    Welcome to America, Inc. Please check your civil rights at the door.


  22. shoeless says:

    Oh well, maybe the people in Alaska can make some money selling the oil they remove from the sea birds and otters.


  23. spencers mom says:

    With all the tax right offs Exxon got from “legal fees” resulting from this environmental catastrophy, they actually profitted off of this whole case. And what they wind up paying, after the nice SCOTUS discount? Also a tax write off. Should see records profits yet again this quarter!

    And we thought justice was only for the rich…

    PEACE


  24. oldtree says:

    Impeach the members of the court. They do not serve the people of this country any longer. 4 of them voted to shred the constitution recently.
    What country is this again? wrong answer


  25. clb72 says:

    What does it tell you that Exxon’s stock price is unchanged on the news. This is chump change for them.


  26. PatrioticLiberalChristian says:

    Dr.Hussein Matt

    Outstanding imitation! It almost has me worried about you! :)


  27. McWars says:

    The nightmare for Exxon is finally over. Will we see Rex Tillerson and Boner crying in relief?


  28. shoeless says:

    PatrioticLiberalChristian Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    Dr.Hussein Matt

    Outstanding imitation!

    It certainly was a great imitation! Just about the only word spelled correctly was “oil”.


  29. kelso says:

    Heck, at $500 million per spill, Exxon is going to start crashing tankers just for laughs.

    Accountability is un-American these days.


  30. McWars says:

    Rogerse just made more sense. I’m emailing the doctoral committee to speed up their vote.


  31. upside99 says:

    I guess Texas’ Senior ‘Big Awl’ whores, Kay ‘Beetle’ Bailey-Hutchinson and Cornyn have earned their K Street salary on this one. She and Cornyn have been working the SCOTUS and everyone else on the Hill tirelessly on this for the past 3 years.


  32. stateofthedivision says:

    The original jury award, the voice of the people, was $5 billion. The federal judiciary reduced that to 10% of the original amount. Does that mean our federal government is 90% corporate and 10% people oriented?

    Also, $500 million equates to 12 hours of sales and less than 5 days of profit. Not much of a punitive fine, is it?

    http://peureport.blogspot.com/2008/06/exxon-gets-craps-for-valdez-oil-spill.html


  33. Fred says:

    Yep, corporate America is good for us….
    do we really want to see more of this:
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080625/ap_on_re_us/plant_shooting

    honestly, it only happens in the US. It is a regular event here but you never hear of it from other civilized nations.

    We are owned by the corporate war mongers. When will we learn.


  34. upside99 says:

    Dr. Matt:

    That was great! I was wildly scrolling up to find Roger2’s original post, as I completely accepted that he/she/it wrote it.

    Kudos!


  35. impeachcheneythenbush says:

    Does anyone know why this issue would be considered a Constitutional one? That, after all, is what the Supreme Court is supposed to be deciding.


  36. Chuck U. Farley says:

    Do you think there’s any chance that Alaskans will figure out that their Republicans don’t give a damn about them?


  37. arleang says:

    Dear Chuck U. — Maybe the Alaskans will figure it out some day.

    Once again justice delayed is justice denied. The Supreme Court had no business reducing the award. At this point the SCOTUS does more to promote lawlessness than Congress, and that’s saying a lot.


  38. LibertyLover says:

    My current reading list is a book by John Grisham called “The Appeal” — a nice little rundown about corporate interests and a Supreme Court. Scary stuff.


  39. Skeeter1 says:

    What a wimpy decision. Souter and the four who signed should be ashamed.

    Either punitives are consisent with American law, or they are not. Although I personally don’t think punitives have a place in American tort law, it is almost worse to see this “yes they have a place, but only a minor place” ruling.

    The Court should either have upheld the full award, or knocked it down to nothing.


  40. stateofthedivision says:

    Exxon blamed a rogue ship pilot for the accident, when they conducted the hiring and ongoing evaluation of his performance. Not mentioned in most news pieces is the broken underwater radar system that would have allowed the person at the controls to avoid the rocky outcropping. A jury heard the evidence and slammed the company with a $5 billion judgement. The federal judiciary came through with a $4.5 billion reduction.

    This legal defense was employed by The Carlyle Group’s LifeCare Hospitals after Hurricane Katrina. The company was responsible for managing patient care in a disaster, but they blame rogue doctors and nurses, likely not even on LifeCare’s payroll. Who allowed non-LifeCare clinicians access to their patients? A grand jury heard the evidence and chose not to charge the rogue clinicians with any crime for their heroic, life saving efforts. Carlyle’s crack legal team now blames FEMA, claiming patients became “wards of the federal government” as soon as FEMA evacuation teams set up in New Orleans. How will the current federal government bail out Carlyle and LifeCare from their 24 potential wrongful death lawsuits? Stay tuned!


  41. marlow says:

    Skeeter1 Says:

    You’re right. The fact of knocking the award down to a spit-in-your-face joke shows the utter contempt of this SCOTUS for the interests of the American people. How long has it been since this government actually operated “Of, by and for”?


  42. jnratliff says:

    It looks like we the people need to tear down our current government and start over. The republican neonazis have just about destroied our country and part of the rest of the planet and will detroy everything unless we just kick the stupid a holes back to the corner to the irrelevent status they have proven they deserve!


  43. Marie says:

    I think we can expect things like this as oil barons try to get as much as they can before the Dems take over in January.


  44. Marie says:

    When Bush leaves and his legacy is nothing but sh!t, can we recall the appointments he made? Can we begin impeachment of the SCOTUS members – namely Scalia, who has joined in cases when he should have recused himself?


  45. dixie blood says:

    SCOTUS = FASCIST CORPORATE SCUM!!


  46. Chinnook says:

    For 20 years before the spill I made $10,000 every year herring fishing.
    The Captain Hazlewood a known relapsed alchoholic ,which was known to Exxon crashed that tanker on a reef less than 2 miles from the primary spawning ground of PWS Herring ,exactly when They were there to spawn ,since that time It has been proven the collapse of the Herring Stocks was a result of Hydrocarbon poisen We have not fished Herring for 20 years , Since that timeThe compensatory damages were for lost fishing in the year of the spill , for Me $10,000 now after 20 years of lost fishing The Supreme Court allows Me $8,000 total for My lost livlihood.Just goes to Show that this is a land where Justice is a game of whoever has the most money wins.
    We never knew the extent of the long term Damages in 94 when That case was settled for Compensatory.
    Now there is no real deterrent for corperate negligence ,which is exactly what putting a known drunk at the wheel of a supertanker is .



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll