In the fall of 2004, the religious flacks who run Clear Channel dumped all the great Classic Rock N’ Roll songs so that they could push what they called “contemporary and old school” songs, with the “contemporary” referring to Christian acid cult rock music and the “old school” referring to cherry-picked “Oldies” which contain religious-themed lyrics.

I refuse to listen to Clear Channel radio stations.

Crazed religious fundamentalists in the 1950s held Rock N’ Roll record burning parties. This didn’t work. So religious fundamentalists, and conservatives, hit on another scheme…buy up as much of the media as possible in the United States, establishing a media monopoly, and start censoring all things liberal while pushing all things conservative. Clear Channel is an offshoot of this un-American, anti-democracy fascist Republican scheme.

And since Jesus Christ himself said, “What profits a man, though he gain the whole world, yet loses his soul” (describing monopolists), and “It’s easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than it is for a rich man to enter heaven,” then one can safely presume that the wealthy, monopolistic-minded people at Clear Channel (and so many other conservative, monopolistic owned companies) aren’t going to end up anywhere near heaven.

Sauce for the goose..sauce for the gander. If we’re gonna complain about curious george/obama t-shirts, we should not condone this racially charged, stereotypic, and incorrect portrayal of president Bush/Bushmen.

I think Harry Sherer is a comedic genius, and a national treasure…but lose the cover.

No, of course you’re not right, and furthermore you KNOW that. I was talking about media, not public demonstration. Public demonstrations not monitored or filtered by a corporate watchdog fall into an entirely different category, and one for a different thread.

your apology is accepted.

good luck at work.

*

i thought this was your work.

*

this sentence makes no sense:

You didn’t use the word ‘liar’ but you get the idea. I asked you to respond as to what you were referring too.

probably because of the misuse of the adverb too

and because it is vague.

try again.

thanks.

•

*

good luck.

*

where do you work?

–

S_Mart = rogerse

I don’t think so. I think it’s the troll recently known as cock_block or whatever it was.

YAY!!!

Clear Channel is a 527 Corporation. ther stock are traded on the NASDAQ

And we all know who this POS is. How many times has this idiot been kicked, we should start keeping track, just for grins.

backup,

i did a search here for “liar”

it appears twice.

once in a comment by GeeDubs

and again in your comment.

i never used it.

joe cantwell Says:
——————————————————————————–

backup,

caught in another lie.

rog, would that be a “gotcha”?

*

good luck.

*

June 26th, 2008 at 1:15 pm Recommend (0) | Report Abuse

joe. Here’s you from yesterday. You didn’t use the word ‘liar’ but you get the idea. I asked you to respond as to what you were referring too. But nothing from you. If you think I’m a liar or a hypocrite, let me now why you think that so I can respond. Otherwise, why don’t we stick to the issues. I withdraw the mudslinger comment.

I’ve got to go to work. Have a great day.

They’re permenent members of the Fools and Cretins Club.

Only a pile of feces reich-winger could possibly be stupid enough to post such a comment.

matt,

rog and i have already

discussed his problems with satire.

let’s not throw it in his face.

thanks.

•

good luck.

$

We’re slow to get going but we have a big advantage…
There’s just so much DIRT on Republicans and a hard rain is a’gonna fall… MUD CITY!
Another advatage… nothing sticks like the truth.

Be a good liberal and show rogerse how to mudsling. I know you can do it there are no better mud slingers than liberals.

you’re getting upset

and nervous.

•

good luck.

:)

Clear Channel is a 527 Corporation. ther stock are traded on the NASDAQ.

stock.

taxes.

crap load.

•

good luck.

&

hey dumbass, still waiting for a non-paragraph answer to the “socratic” question..

Well, sh!tstain, I’m not capable of writing non-paragraph answers. I am a big fan of complete sentences.

If you need a short answer to your question about whether “controversial” applies across the board in questions about censorship, I’ve already answered it repeatedly. Your inability to comprehend complete sentences is the problem, not my answer.

Yes.

Is that short enough?

hey dumbass, still waiting for a non-paragraph answer to the “socratic” question..

backup,

rog just called gummitch

a dumbass.

i think that’s mudslinging,

what say you?

*

good luck.

£