The book has bombed in sales. O’Rielly should just ignore him.

Do you wingnuts say these things just to hear yourself lie? Or, do you think constantly repeating an untruth will make it happen?

As of July 22, McClellan’s book was #3 on the non-fiction best seller’s list.

Bestseller list

NONFICTION

3. What Happened, by Scott McClellan. (PublicAffairs, $27.95.) A former White House press secretary regrets that “I allowed myself to be deceived” by top officials.

http://www.startribune.com/entertainment/books/25759944.html?page=2&c=y

…my vote goes for Tracy being an emotionally maladjusted individual. In each one of her posts, there’s a “daddy figure” whom Tracy elevates to God-like status,

Yes, I noticed that as well. Tracy is 35 years old, which would make it a Reagan brat. Like most groveling right-wingers, Tracy needs authoritarian guidance to marginally function. This low self-esteem is likely caused by abuse suffered at the hand of an authoritarian figure during Tracy’s childhood.

After a lifetime of uncritically swallowing authoritarian right-wing propaganda, Tracy cannot tell truth from lies, or fact from fiction.

After reading her posts which contain erroneous logic as a standard, my vote goes for Tracy being an emotionally maladjusted individual. In each one of her posts, there’s a “daddy figure” whom Tracy elevates to God-like status, defending them no matter what heinous act they commit. People like Tracy are not only emotionally maladjusted, they are intellectually lazy…notice how all of her “daddy figures” TELL her what to think and believe. Truly pathetic.

Oh BS! McClellan accused, with absolutely not proof, O’Reilly of taking talking points, i.e. politial positions of the White House and using them to promote the Bush agenda.

How embarrassing for you to sit there and watch Bill O’Reilly and every other a-hole on Fox News recite White House talking points verbatim over the past 7+ years and then act as if you don’t know what is going on.

You are either a complete dumbass or you are a shameless liar.

Which is it?

O’Rielly is not a legitimate news source. He is a large talking-head.

….O’Rielly “now we bring on Dick Morris”…enough said.

Also, no one has offered a legitimate complaint that his book is misleading or inaccurate despite some accusations. I wouldn’t put anyone in jail on that evidence but the refusal to challenge his account feeds a strong suspicion of guilt.

And a mention of “Bill” by Tweety, while he was talking over Scotty’s answer and trying to put words in his mouth, is quite different than Scotty accusing Bill0 of anything. Slander would require something like, “Commentators, including Bill0, took their talking points from us”. Then Bill0 would have to sue, define talking point, prove he never repeated one, prove damages related to the defamation etc.

It would take only a few minutes of Youtube to produce an instance of Bill0 repeating a talking point. He knows it. We know it. His viewers think anyone who would challenge Bill0 is a far left loon. Because Bill0 tells them so EVERY DAY.

But knowledgeable, clever, people knew that.

BTW, did Bill0 offer a tearful admission that, in light of his apparent part in inciting a shooting spree, he’s going to tone it down a bit? That’s what a rational, feeling, human would do.

Dr. Hussein Matt Says:@#1. and Marie @#47,
Can O’Reilly, Savage, and Hannity be convicted in some sort of incitement to murder crime?
July 29th, 2008 at 12:01 am’

There might be a precedent set by the persecution of musicians for actions attributed to their lyrics but, the most that would be likely to achieve is warning labels on books even if the shooter wrote, “these guys gave me the idea”. I’m not thrilled by the idea of warning labels even if the Buy-bull is labeled “By Prescription Only”.

However, the victims might be able to keep the authors in court for the next decade on civil matters. They could certainly attach any additional earnings the authors may gain from their new books about why it wasn’t their fault. Or claiming credit? (shudders!)

Unfortunately, Unitarians tend to be more forgiving than Reichwing True-Christians(TM).

His talking point memo from the White House and GOP provides his issues and agenda.

If Billo cares not, then why all the fuss?

Earth to Billo, We all know you get the talking points. That is why ingrahm, Sean, and the rest are all saying the same thing every single day.

Obama could be at the scene of a accident and save the life of someone and you would read the GOP memo that Obama only save one.

Billo reaffirms how much of a liar he really is with this.