Comments on: 8 years ago today: Bush pledged to ‘uphold the honor and dignity of the office.’

By: Game of Life

Game of Life — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:13:37 +0000

Saint Augustine Says:

The attitude of our 5 in 1 troll exudes an air of superiority that reminds me of David Addington when he testified at that Congressional hearing just a little while ago.

Exactly.

Why do trolls come on one at a time? Could it be one ahole is using different names? how can they believe mcchimpy will be better when mcchimpy doesn’t speak for himself? And they say Sen. Obama does magic.

mcchimpy is the dummy and chimpy is the ventriloquist.

By: Game of Life

Game of Life — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:58:37 +0000

chimpy proved once again he’s a liar. I knew it then and I know it now.

One has to innately have honor and dignity before one can claim to uphold it. And chimpy isn’t close to getting either one.

I mean really, look at all the “good” and “love” chimpy has shown our troops. When chimpy steps outside of paradise which we refer to as the USA he’s stampeded by his admirers.
I can go on with this story but I’m making myself sick…

why would anyone cling onto a useless oil old “party” that really hasn’t been sensible, trustworthy or logical in the the 20th century?

By: Gregor Samsa

Gregor Samsa — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:04:33 +0000

I think that the name of the President that failed to protect us was Bill Clinton.
~P Alfonso

But the man who was living in the White House at the time of the attacks didn’t fail to protect the US?

Wow… funny how responsibility falls exclusively on the guy whose shift had already ended.

He will go in history as the only President that failed to approve that Osama be killed.

And pray tell, how was he supposed to know that Obama would mastermind an attack years later?

Wouldn’t the guy who received a memo called “Bin Laden determined to strike in the US” share some of that responsibility? No? Why is that?

George W. Bush and Dick Chaney have saved your asses for the past seven years.

How did they do that, exactly? By invading a country that posed no threat and that didn’t have anything to do with 9/11?

Yeah, that is some vigorous defence, indeed.

You don’t have to thank them. I will do it for you.

And after you are done kissing the ground they walk on, you may want to consider a little therapy. Having a crush like that cannot be healthy.

By: ucsbclassics53

ucsbclassics53 — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:49:54 +0000

and Alfonso, the GOP stood by and claimed Clinton was WAGGING the dog, when he sent cruise missiles against the terrorist training camps in Afghanistan…

so you should thank the GOP for instigating the blowjob impeachment affair that distracted Clinton from going after terrorists…

Actually you don’t have to thank them.
I shall do it for you.

P.S. Try posting without GOP talking points… it might do you some good…

By: ucsbclassics53

ucsbclassics53 — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 05:46:06 +0000

GEORGE W. Bush and Dick Cheney, the ones who let Bin Laden get away…at Tora Bora…

you’re right, we SHOULD thank Bush and Cheney for their incompetence…

By: P Alfonso

P Alfonso — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:17:09 +0000

Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
Seven years ago we were attacked by a bunch of fanatics that started planing the attacks of 9/11 long before G.W. Bush was elected president. I think that the name of the President that failed to protect us was Bill Clinton. He will go in history as the only President that failed to approve that Osama be killed. He wanted the CIA to arrest him.
George W. Bush and Dick Chaney have saved your asses for the past seven years.
You don’t have to thank them.
I will do it for you.

By: Innocent Bystander

Innocent Bystander — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:53:06 +0000

Let George and Dick to explain themselves…at the Hague. I’ll be happy to support the extradition.

By: republicanSScareme

republicanSScareme — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:41:07 +0000

The criminal super rich are totally demonic, folks. You’d better realize that before they eat you alive.

By: barfly

barfly — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:31:47 +0000

Face it guys, this troll will stiil be spouting those same lies next year, since it gives the sad little clown some measure of emotional comfort, believing them. Every time you present facts, he regards it as if it’s an attempt to take away the poor dear’s security blanket. And nights in the political wilderness can get cold, so let him have his little blankie. It’s not hurting anyone for him to believe this bunk, unless he’s in some position of power, and judging by his posts, he’s too naive to be a politician.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:30:37 +0000

4NIC8

By: sacopenapa

sacopenapa — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:28:06 +0000

WAR CRIMINAL! HAGUE 2009!

By: Keith

Keith — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:26:15 +0000

After bugging the Security Council’s phones the US realized the vote would be 11-4 against the invasion. Not even considering a Big Five veto.

By: RandomChaos

RandomChaos — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:23:17 +0000

Although Iraq was cooperative on what inspectors called “process”—allowing inspectors access to suspected weapons sites, for example—it was only marginally cooperative in answering the questions surrounding its weapons programs. Unable to resolve its differences with Security Council members who favored strengthening and continuing weapons inspections, the United States abandoned the inspections process and initiated the invasion of Iraq on March 19.

By: Keith

Keith — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:12:47 +0000

July 18, 2003 — President Bush told a group of surprised reporters that Saddam Hussein had refused to permit weapons inspectors to return to Iraq: “And we gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn’t let them in. And therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him from power.” [Washington Post]

By: Saint Augustine

Saint Augustine — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:12:44 +0000

The attitude of our 5 in 1 troll exudes an air of superiority that reminds me of David Addington when he testified at that Congressional hearing just a little while ago.

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:11:31 +0000

johnny,
See ProA-hole and his kind see America as two distinct parts… The haves and have mores. The haves are us, the people, who currently deserve what the BushCo will let us have. The have mores are the elite, the Rove’s, the Pelosi’s, the chickhawks, the O’Liely’s, the CONyers, … they’re ABOVE the law and therefore “untouchable”. It’s a cultural identity that should have been refuted when Ford pardoned Nixon. Since then, elites in DC and their upper crust supporters have felt like THEY are the have mores…

ProA-hole is either jealous or an idealist…
Her contempt for Americana is so rich that ever her identity is being defined by her Anti-American stances.

To date no answer on the query:
Name one redeeming quality to lies…
Name one redeeming quality to usurping Congress…
Name one redeeming quality to violating American Justice…
Name one redeeming quality to torture…
Name one redeeming quality to undermining Liberty…
Name one redeeming quality, just one to any of this…
… Because this is what you defend

All I have read by her is excuses…

By: jonny

jonny — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:03:58 +0000

512. Max-1 Says:
_____

Pee equates America with corrupt right-wing politicians and the Reaganista/Bushista military-industrial-oil-companies would-be plutocracy.

Americans don’t, but Pee does.

By: RandomChaos

RandomChaos — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:03:54 +0000

See ya DB, have a great evening

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:01:06 +0000

#507 ProAmerica Says:

Max,

What freedoms? I thought the Evil Bu$hCo Regime took them all away. LOL

If you had your way, you’d be correct.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:13 +0000

Still I can think of some funny things that ROTL might stand for…