Think Progress

Pentagon Spokesman Disputes Mullen’s View Of Afghanistan: Nothing ‘Urgent Or Precarious’ About It»

During today’s Pentagon daily briefing, spokesman Geoff Morrell disputed a reporter’s characterization of Afghanistan as “desperate.” Mocking the question, Morrell insisted there was nothing “urgent or precarious about the situation” there:

MORRELL: You characterize it as Afghanistan desperately needing more troops. I would take issue with the characterization that there’s anything desperate about the situation in Afghanistan, anything urgent or precarious about the situation in Afghanistan. What we have is a situation where the commanders would like additional forces, and we are working to provide them with the additional forces they would like.

Morrell didn’t just “take issue” with the reporter’s description; he was also disputing the view of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Adm. Michael Mullen. Just two weeks ago, in an interview with Jim Lehrer, Mullen declared that the situation in Afghanistan “is urgent“:

JIM LEHRER: With no — now, Afghanistan. Senator Obama has used the term that Afghanistan — the situation there is “precarious and urgent.” Do you share that?

ADM. MIKE MULLEN: I think it is. It is urgent. It is one where the violence is growing.

Watch a compilation:

Whether Afghanistan faces a precarious time is hardly up for dispute. In May, June, and July, coalition casualties in Afghanistan topped those in Iraq; so far more troops have been killed in August than in Iraq as well. Last month, Gen. David Petraeus warned that al Qaeda could start diverting resources from Iraq to Afghanistan.

Center for American Progress Senior Policy Analyst Caroline Wadhams wrote, “Until U.S. leadership turns its attention and resources to the Afghan theater and the region, it will continue to play defense against a strengthening enemy.”

Digg It!




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

29 Responses to “Pentagon Spokesman Disputes Mullen’s View Of Afghanistan: Nothing ‘Urgent Or Precarious’ About It”

  1. RUCerious Says:

    Poppy production skyrocketing, CIA reaping enormous profits, Taliban controlling wide swaths of prime growing area.

    Perfecto. Mission Accomplished.

    Osama Been Who?


  2. Leftside Annie Says:

    MORRELL: We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been at war with Eastasia. We are winning the war with Eastasia. The surge is working.

    Etc.


  3. Zooey Says:

    If he says it, it must be true!!


  4. Bozo The Neoclown Says:

    The local “troll-ey” should be dropping off it’s inmates momentarily who will propmtly start screaming, “the surge is a success”, “it’s all Obama’s fault”


  5. stateofthedivision Says:

    Morrell recently said CentCom reserves wouldn’t leave Kuwait to assist in Afghanistan. The reason? “Instability in the region.” Bush, Cheney, Olmert and Ehud Barak foment that very thing.


  6. RUCerious Says:

    When are they going to discover oil in Afghoulistan?


  7. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre Says:

    Hmm, the Afghanis want to run Afghanistan without benefit of the occupying U. S. imperial military forces… The Iraqis want to run Iraq without benefit of occupying U. S. imperial military forces… What’s next, will the American people want to vote without Republican-controlled corporations, such as Diebold and ES&S, et al ad nauseum, “counting” our votes in the November Presidential Election?


  8. Paul W Says:

    I would take issue with the characterization that there’s anything desperate about the situation in Afghanistan, anything urgent or precarious about the situation in Afghanistan.

    Substitute Iraq for Afghanistan and it becomes a familiar tune.

    http://progressiveworldreview.com


  9. Badger Says:

    Newsweek reports:
    The Taliban pay newly recruited fighters $200 a month–almost DOUBLE the pay of cops and soldiers.

    The insurgents are awash in Drug Money…The Karzai Govt. is awash in corruption and incompetence.

    This is going to get worse. Mr. Morrell may have to eat those words before too long. They just do not want to admit the seriousness of the situation, because the situation is a direct result of our military being stuck in the Iraqi Quagmire.


  10. upside99 Says:

    Let’s send in BlackWater. I am sure they can handle the situation. Maybe Halliburton can get a no-bid to process and ship all that heroin, too.

    See, diversification CAN work!


  11. 00mpp00 Says:

    There’s a good question for McCain…

    http://www.political-buzz.com/


  12. TripleKick 8 Says:

    wadhams is an idiot soros dong sucker. The other countries helping in afghanistan simply need to step it up. America’s military is Go d’s hand, never lost a meaningful battle


  13. sluggo Says:

    This is why we are in the mess in Iraq/torture/etc we are in; a press that cannot even ask questions.

    You don’t ask a question unless you are prepared with your backup. A good reporter would have responded with the follow-up that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs two weeks ago used these words to characterize the war and now is it the official policy that the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is wrong?

    Put this spokesman on the spot and see what he says.

    However, this would have required some level of journalist professionalism, which apparently is not to be found in the White House press room.

    Sigh….


  14. upside99 Says:

    Trip must be on some SERIOUS stuff today. That was a major rant.

    Care to share, Trip?


  15. Xisithrus Says:

    3kick8, havent you yet learned that you cant win hearts and minds thru force?


  16. jonny Says:

    12. TripleKick 8 Says:
    … America’s military is Go d’s hand, …
    _____

    DrippyDick –

    When your Imaginary Friend pounds off, he spooges on America’s military?

    Whatta sickie.


  17. jonny Says:

    TripleKick 8 Says:
    … Doesn’t that inspire pride?
    ______

    Only in Prussian types. The rest of us feel gratitude and relief.

    Now — are you proud that CLINTON’S military “kicked butt” in Afghanistan & Iraq?


  18. jonny Says:

    TripleKick 8 Says:
    clintons military that he has “distain” for?…
    _____

    No, the military that the Bushistas went to war with.


  19. Doc Rock Says:

    Tangled web weaving alert!


  20. jonny Says:

    22. TripleKick 8 Says:
    it’s OUR military. Take some pride.
    _____

    Psst — as the MOST expensive military in the history of the PLANET, it had BETTER be able to “kick butt.”

    I AM proud of the kids. The Pentagon stooges & whores got a ways to go to earn some RESPECT, let alone PRIDE.


  21. dbadass Says:

    So I go away for a day and TripleKick6 has to morph to 8? Anyone taking bets on when we hit double digits?


  22. gummitch Says:

    dbadass Says:

    So I go away for a day and TripleKick6 has to morph to 8? Anyone taking bets on when we hit double digits?

    It was knocking around earlier at TK7 but it sort of feels like this is the evening shift. Either that, or there has been a lot of glue sniffing going on in TKLand this afternoon. This version seems to be operating with significantly fewer brain cells, although admittedly in these fractional amounts it’s hard to measure.


  23. MapleStreet Says:

    6. RUCerious, Whether they find oil in Afghanistan or not, the oil interests have got a nice agreement for a nice pipline that they have been wanting for quite some time.


  24. VerbalKint Says:

    Either that, or there has been a lot of glue sniffing going on in TKLand this afternoon.

    Judging from its comments, it has had too much to drink tonight.


  25. pete Says:

    Odd. Are we supposed to feel proud that Bushco, following in Bush 41’s footsteps, has exhausted our military while cutting major procurement and research programs. Our boys are using weapons that were worn out in the jungles of Vietnam. Our tankers are wearing out without replacements. Ditto for everything from tanks to F-15s.

    Heck, between the cuts and the attrition, the Russians and or Chinese could take a substantive lead in both numbers and technology. Though they needn’t ever fire a shot.

    It wouldn’t take much of an arms race to break us, as certainly as the Soviet Union was broken, and for the same reason. The corruption and irresponsibility of leadership which has squandered our reserves and world standing.


  26. pete Says:

    On a related note. I can’t help but wonder what percentage of the weapons showing up in Afghanistan are from the hundreds of thousands the military lost track of in Iraq. And how many of the foreign fighters bought their tickets with greenbacks? Pay offs for a pledge to not fight us in Iraq.


  27. Robt Says:

    No way !!

    Bush is not listening to his military Commanders ?

    Oh wait, if he doesn’t like to hear what they say, he replaces them………Until they speak up…


  28. Wayne Says:

    TripleKick 8 Says:

    Why is it that this troll becomes more moronic with each new incarnation?
    By the time he reaches #10 even he won’t be able to understand what he posts. lmao


  29. chiefeditor Says:

    Audio from this segment is up at Entertonement.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll