Bolton: Regime Change In Iran ‘Would Lead To Greater Stability In The Region’
Bolton: Regime Change In Iran ‘Would Lead To Greater Stability In The Region’
Continuing his long-running advocacy for a war against Iran, John Bolton said on Fox News today, “Diplomacy is finished.” Bolton said there are only two options: targeted military strikes or full-scale regime change. He added:
I think regime change would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the region as a whole.
Watch it:
Justin Logan comments, “I have an eerie feeling that I’ve heard this somewhere before, but I just can’t place it…” How about just a few reminders:
President Bush, 2/26/03:
Acting against the danger will also contribute greatly to the long-term safety and stability of our world.
Vice President Cheney, 8/26/02:
Regime change in Iraq would bring about a number of benefits to the region. When the gravest of threats are eliminated, the freedom-loving peoples of the region will have a chance to promote the values that can bring lasting peace.
John McCain, 2/14/03:
[O]nly a change of regime will make Iraq a state that does not threaten us and others, and where a liberated people assume the rights and responsibilities of freedom. … Not only would deterrence condemn the Iraqi people to more unspeakable tyranny, it would condemn Saddam’s neighbors to perpetual instability.
Despite his unceasing advocacy for war, Bolton is always quick to remind his audience that he finds war detestable and “deeply unattractive.”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Scott Ritter was on the Peter B Collins show yesterday and stated that American taxpayers are unknowingly funding terrorist attacks within Iran by the CIA and their proxies.
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/ritter_scott
August 6th, 2008 at 9:24 pmAnd they’ll greet us as liberators, right?
August 6th, 2008 at 9:28 pmYeah, Mr. Bolton, just like it did in Iraq. What an idiot…
August 6th, 2008 at 9:28 pmBolt-on, for the love of pete, shut the fcuk up, stupid jerk.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:30 pmSHUT.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:32 pmTHE.
F UCK.
UP.
NOW!!!
“…regime change would …lead to greater stability in the region as a whole…”
Damn right!! And the sooner we can change the bushco regime the greater stability we all will have. Bolton will be the first to follow George WTF and the Dick.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:34 pm…”targeted military strikes or full-scale regime change”
Is there a difference?
If there’s one thing to hang on this misadministration it’s that diplomacy is indeed finished.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:34 pmYes, yes, Mr. Bolton, but will it win an election in the fall? Good luck with that.
Also, you forgot to mention THE SURGE!!!!!
August 6th, 2008 at 9:36 pmIsn’t that what they have elections over there for? Just saying…I mean he knows that they have elections there….I hope.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:38 pmThis dumb ass doesn’t seem to remember the last time the American government tried regime change in Iran. For those of you that don’t know or for you old timers that don’t remember, OPERATION AJAX was a covert plan by both MI5 and the CIA, which overthrew a democratically elected government and put the Shah of Iran back on the throne. After that, the CIA helped the Shah start SAVAK, which was his secret police force. Well, the rest as they is history. When we will learn and stop f’n with this country?
August 6th, 2008 at 9:43 pmWhat? Gonna get rid of the Ayatollah? He and the Mullahs in Iran run the country.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:43 pmthe more we mind our own business,the better off everyone will be ….missionaries carrying the wrong message are the scourge of mankind. there’s a fine line between helping others and the desire of controling and directing for “OUR” benefit with little regard to their real needs….
August 6th, 2008 at 9:47 pmWhat? Gonna get rid of the Ayatollah? He and the Mullahs in Iran run the country.
Why does the U.S. install puppet rulers, only to eventually topple them?
Will the CIA ever learn?
August 6th, 2008 at 9:48 pmSCfan2064 Says:
This dumb ass doesn’t seem to remember the last time the American government tried regime change in Iran. For those of you that don’t know or for you old timers that don’t remember, OPERATION AJAX was a covert plan by both MI5 and the CIA, which overthrew a democratically elected government and put the Shah of Iran back on the throne. After that, the CIA helped the Shah start SAVAK, which was his secret police force. Well, the rest as they is history. When we will learn and stop f’n with this country?
Thank God just when I despair that nobody in the US pays any attention to the shit we do SCfan2064 speaks with the voice of reason
August 6th, 2008 at 9:51 pmIf things go well, bolton will dissapear into the dark underworld where people like him plot wars, death and destruction for the rest of us.
It’s only in bizzaro world where people like him come out in the open.
August 6th, 2008 at 9:52 pmWhy does the U.S. install puppet rulers, only to eventually topple them?
Will the CIA ever learn?
Oh, they learned alright. It is the easiest way to keep the military machine running and provide the reason to keep the masses askeered!
August 6th, 2008 at 9:53 pmBolton is always quick to remind his audience that he finds war detestable and “deeply unattractive.”
One word: BULL$HIT!
August 6th, 2008 at 9:55 pmit’s time for this one
to get back on the cover
of the pringle’s can.
*
good luck.
@
August 6th, 2008 at 9:57 pmJohn Bolton said:
“I think […]”
Well, there’s the problem…the neocons need to stop thinking!
And shut up!
And go the phuck away!
August 6th, 2008 at 9:57 pmYeah Joe or a can of coffee
August 6th, 2008 at 9:58 pmI’m surprised they didn’t go to a panel of Karl Rove and Ollie North and ask them what they thought about Bolton’s genius…
August 6th, 2008 at 10:00 pmThe guys got 6 months to stir things up and he will do his damndest to stir it up goooood.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:01 pmI don’t know what is into me today, but everything these guys say is just cracking me up. Clearly they don’t listen to themselves because they say some crazy stuff. Only Mr. Bolton and his muppet pals could possibly suggest that one more regime change in the middle east would take care of everything. Just one more. I mean that is just funny. That takes some serious confidence to get out there and make these statements given our current state of affairs and our 40 year history in the region. I mean you have to give him that. He does have some serious confidence, even if he is nuts.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:04 pmYou know, as a matter of fact, the situation on this whole darned planet is a little tenuous. I think if we just changed all the non-American regimes, then we could really see some stability.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:11 pmand more proof that the w/house feeds fox talking points to spread their propaganda.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:11 pmwhat exactly makes bolton an expert on iran anyway?
and why is diplomacy finished in dealing with the iranians? -and more to the point,what exactly have they done to provoke the ire of insipid,ill-informed ‘pundits’ like bolton? - i have absolutely had it with this ass-clown crowing the same old bull$hit about iran - crikey,the way this guy keeps banging the war drums,you would think that ahmadinejad has been banging his wife - he does seem to have some sort of personal grievance with iran.
REGIME CHANGE IN THE UNITED STATES WILL LEAD TO GREATER STABILITY IN THE REGION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
August 6th, 2008 at 10:18 pmThank God for Fox News, if not, Bolton would walk the streets shouting, the end of the world.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:21 pmEven if we find 1000 trillion barrels of oil in Texas, the price will still be high, thanks to the oil companies and their interest.
Remember dick won’t release the memo about his secret meetings with oil companies.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:24 pmgawd, I hit the wrong button.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:25 pmbolton, tell it to the 20%ers (or are they teenagers yet) they love things that go boom.
bolton’s arrogance, the lack of a healthy ego and oil keeps him believing his self-serving bs. he’s worthless, powerless and chimpy’s nose picker.
he’s is out-of-touch with the majority progressives here and around the world.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:41 pmWar, death, and destruction are Bolton’s Viagra.He is holding the neocon line that has proven to be a failure on so many levels even a big brain like George Bush couldn’t keep them straight.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:50 pmI wish this Zionist Walrus Boil On The Ass of Society would simply shut up.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:54 pmLet’s send Bolton over and see what he can do.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:54 pmVICTORY
CACI Case Closed; Randi Wins
The most conservative court in the country goes out of their way to clear Randi and condemn torture at Abu Gharib.
http://www.medialaw.org/ Content/ NavigationMenu/ Publications1/
MLRC_MediaLawDaily/Attachments/8-05-08CACIv.Rhodes.pdf
http://money.cnn.com/ news/ newsfeeds/ articles/ apwire/ 8ec34cf
801ee334170b2541df154b63d.htm
and more homework:
August 6th, 2008 at 10:57 pmhttp://therandirhodesshow.com/ index.php?/ archives/ 56-Wednesday,-August-6,-2008.html#extended
“Bolton” and “stability” in the same quote is like “Nixon” and “honest” in the same quote.
The irony gods are doin’ 6000 RPM.
August 6th, 2008 at 10:58 pmYeah, and Bolton has been right so many times before…
August 6th, 2008 at 10:58 pmDespite his unceasing advocacy for war, Bolton is always quick to remind his audience that he finds war detestable and “deeply unattractive.”
I’m sorry, but this is flat out false. War gives neo-cons erections. That is a fact. Neo-cons also lie about their true feelings, which is easy because they have none.
I sincerely believe that if you approached them with a guaranteed way to end all warfare on the planet, they would not only reject your idea, but they would pour their money into destroying you and your idea. Neo-cons live for war.
If Mr. Bolton (who did not earn the title “Ambassador”) really detests war so much, then why is war the only course he advocates in his many media appearances?
August 6th, 2008 at 10:59 pmWho listenes to this guy any more (other than FOX news)?
1. He is partly responsible for us going into an unncessary war based on deceptions.
2. He is closely tied to the worst President in US history.
3. He was a complete failure at the UN and his antics resulted in our international reputation being the worst it’s been for a generation.
4. He has been ridiculed by almost anyone teaching Internation Law, Political Science, etc
Other than filling up time and saying things that Roger Ailes wants him to say, what is his purpose in life?
August 6th, 2008 at 11:09 pmThe problem is Bolton is merely repeating what’s written daily in Israeli newspapers. This morning’s Jerusalem Post said much the same thing. The logic tree was ornamentally decorated with a shipping embargo and various IDF military drills.
From our end, the State Department noted “proceeding to open the door to a disincentive package,” otherwise known as a can of whup arse.
http://stateofthedivision.blogspot.com/2008/08/reading-signs.html
August 6th, 2008 at 11:19 pmThis falls into the category of stuff that one generally ONLY hears in a Saturday Night Live skit.
Is this man insane? Didn’t all the neocons say that about Iraq? How’s that working out? And isn’t Iran already a democracy? You know, the kind of “regime” we wanted to replace Saddam’s with?
Why in the world does Bolton think we’re going to agree this is a good idea? Oh yeah — there are plenty of kool-aid drinkers out there who do, unfortunately.
August 6th, 2008 at 11:33 pmBolton’s “stability” = Wilford Brimley’s “diabetes TV scam.”
WHAT?? Duelling Scary Moustaches DON’T equate??
August 6th, 2008 at 11:57 pmFox must’ve doctored that statement.
I believe this is what Bolton actually said:
I think regime change, after we incinerate their Persian asses in a pre-emptive nuclear attack, would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the region as a whole.
Just saying . . .
August 7th, 2008 at 12:10 amDonovan » Universal Soldier
He’s five foot-two, and he’s six feet-four,
He fights with missiles and with spears.
He’s all of thirty-one, and he’s only seventeen,
Been a soldier for a thousand years.
He’a a Catholic, a Hindu, an Atheist, a Jain,
A Buddhist and a Baptist and a Jew.
And he knows he shouldn’t kill,
And he knows he always will,
Kill you for me my friend and me for you.
And he’s fighting for Canada,
He’s fighting for France,
He’s fighting for the USA,
And he’s fighting for the Russians,
And he’s fighting for Japan,
And he thinks we’ll put an end to war this way.
And he’s fighting for Democracy,
He’s fighting for the Reds,
He says it’s for the peace of all.
He’s the one who must decide,
Who’s to live and who’s to die,
And he never sees the writing on the wall.
But without him,
How would Hitler have condemned him at Dachau?
Without him Caesar would have stood alone,
He’s the one who gives his body
As a weapon of the war,
And without him all this killing can’t go on.
He’s the Universal Soldier and he really is to blame,
His orders come from far away no more,
They come from here and there and you and me,
And brothers can’t you see,
This is not the way we put the end to war.
Chords:- F,G7,C,Am Dm,Em
August 7th, 2008 at 12:13 amMiss Spoke ~ Nice. Mr Leach is one of my all time faves.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:17 amRegime change in the US will lead to much greater stability in the world.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:18 amI think regime change would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the region as a whole.
Of course that’s what they said about Iraq. Democracy was supposed to flourish in the region once Saddam Hussein was deposed in a bizzare, reverse domino theory. It didn’t work in Viet Nam, it didn’t work in Iraq and it won’t work in Iran.
Bolton illustrates the very definition of crazy, where you do the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome.
http://progressiveworldreview.com
August 7th, 2008 at 12:20 am.
The same talking point was used to justify war crimes against Iraq, a country that posed NO IMMINENT THREAT (T.P. has dropped the ball on the 07/25/08 hearings that confirm this) to the USA when BushCo devised the 9/11 connection, the anthrax connection, the WMD connection, the “regime change” connection…
Iraq is still awaiting that stability, that democracy, that peace that these war criminals promised…
And we’re still waiting T.P. to press IMPEACHMENT!
.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:27 amMemo to Thinkprogress: Filed that under Lunatic. Bolton is beyond nauseating.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:37 amSick to death seeing these corrupt bastards on MSM… especially this one. And he so calmly and matter of fact like talks of more mass murders …and the idiots glued to the TV are buying these lies.
August 7th, 2008 at 12:58 amRUCerious, he’s one of mine as well.
I’m an old hippy chick and I weep daily for the future of my young grandchildren.
Fare Thee Well and I Bid You Goodnight
August 7th, 2008 at 1:05 amRight, because if invading two countries in the region hasn’t stabilized it, invading a third will. Right.
Is anybody keeping track anymore of all the things these blowhards have been wrong about? I lost count a long time ago.
Although it’s still somewhat entertaining to see FauxNews’ faux journalists feign outrage when they are accused of using the talking points the White House sends them. What better evidence of that than Bolton being allowed to spew his claptrap unchallenged? And since when is he a expert on the MiddleEast?
August 7th, 2008 at 1:06 amArticles like these that expose view points of some prominent leaders in the United States make me wonder, “are they that clueless?”
First and foremost, when we talk about diplomacy, the United States went into Iran with a closed mind. They put down the demand and stated very simply “it’s this way, or no way.” I don’t know what country will respond to demands such as that, and this doesn’t seem like the best use of soft power diplomacy on behalf of the United States. During the Cold War, diplomacy on behalf of Kennedy and Kruschev was back and forth. Sure, demands were placed, yet compromise is what lead to a safe ending despite what we know now.
If you look at it, Iran is winning this diplomacy war. They are exposing the stupidity of this administration to the entire world, and that “negative” image of the United States that has become so rampant is only progressed by the United States non-benevolent demands. Lets face it, the US is the unipolar global hegemon. It’s the king of the hill. And what do others try to do to the king of the hill when its act in an unbenevolent way? They try to fend it off. Thus, this negative image that the US is recieving, it’s much more serious than merely saying “the US has a negative image now.” The implications, and ramifications of this are immense.
August 7th, 2008 at 1:13 amwelcome back pm. did you leave your mind behind again?
August 7th, 2008 at 1:14 amour vapid troll said,
“Israel would not be in constant fear of a nuclear attack.”
Explain to me, genius, how a country that has (now admittedly) at least 50 nuclear weapons in violation of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (which they refuse to sign and Iran has signed) could possibly be afraid of a nuclear attack emanating from a country that doesn’t have a single nuclear weapon? By that logic, the United States should attack and occupy Iraq simply because…ah shit!
You’re a moron and have been flagged for being delusional!
August 7th, 2008 at 1:15 amAnother quick thing to note is during the 1990’s Dick Cheney, our current vice president was quoted saying that going into Iraq and regime change would be a quagmire, with no one running the government, not knowing what to do, it would be utter instability.
I wonder what changed?
August 7th, 2008 at 1:16 amCan’t decide which is worse:
* watching the horrific massacres, murders and mayhem erupt over lies
* the anguish of a complicit congress refusing to at least bring on an impeachment or two
or
* the unbearable stupidity of our public believing this crap brought to us by MSM also invested in MIC.. and because of this stupidity we may lose all.
August 7th, 2008 at 1:24 amcheck out this clip I found of John McCain sucking up to Dick Cheney
August 7th, 2008 at 1:32 amand I am still pissed about this:
Demonstrators on the Democratic National Convention’s biggest night will be “within sight and sound” of the delegates as they are shuttled to Invesco Field at Mile High for Sen. Barack Obama’s acceptance speech, city officials said this afternoon.
Why change the rules again? Why is the Bush crime family always protected/isolated from protesters??
And what will his small children think as I am sure they will be watching their dad. Phuck
August 7th, 2008 at 1:41 am“I think regime change would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the region as a whole.”
Well then Johnny, get your gun…
August 7th, 2008 at 2:36 amOnly faux gives this idiot Bolton any airtime….that speaks VOLUMES.
August 7th, 2008 at 3:46 amDr. Hussein Matt @ No. 61:
August 7th, 2008 at 3:54 amI have to totally agree with your comment.
BOLTON: I think what they’re doing is what they’ve done for five years which is play for time, time to continue perfect their nuclear weapon.
Suggested reading for “ambassador” Bolton
August 7th, 2008 at 5:12 amhttp://www.dni.gov/ press_releases/ 20071203_release.pdf
They said something to this effect when Saddam came into power.
August 7th, 2008 at 5:23 amAugust 7th, 2008 at 6:28 am
Bolton should be locked up and duct=taped top to bottom with double around the offending mouth. He’s nothing more than a raving lunatic that doesn’t deserve the time of day, any day. Speaking of days, remember what happened on August 6, 1945? Let’s not ever repeat it.
August 7th, 2008 at 6:31 amSanctions against Iran should be able to stop their nuclear weapons and ICBM development. But sanctions aren’t available because of the opposition of Russia and China.
Why do these 2 countries want to push toward nuclear war? It makes no sense. Russia is an oil exporter and China an importer, so it’s probably not that.
There is no question that Iran is moving toward nuclear war, something has to stop this. We could easily have 10 Hiroshimas and it’s preventable.
In the name of humanity nuclear war must be prevented.
When Hezbollah has the Bomb there won’t be an easy way out.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:11 amJohn Bolton has impeached himself as a credible source on any topic. Bolton is a wacko. Why people get this way is a puzzlement. Why people put these wackos on the air and in print, I have no idea. Why anyone would believe John Bolton is a complete mystery.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:28 amJust like Larry Craig finds sex with men detestable and deeply unattractive.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:28 amStability? Like in Iraq? Watch these videos if you want to see the truth.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:30 amSurge didn’t work
I’ve been asking the same question. Bolton is an idiot and a walrus.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:50 amRegime change in Washington DC will lead to stability in the world.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:57 amSo was Joe Lieberman
August 7th, 2008 at 8:27 amCats r Flyfishn Says:
I’ve been asking the same question. Bolton is an idiot and a walrus.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:50 am
______
I must take issue with this statement. Why do you feel the need to insult odobenus rosmarus so?
August 7th, 2008 at 8:28 amdennis Says:
BradBlog reports some very disturbing news-
The last US domestic terrorist attack, the’ anthrax killer’, was a Registered Democrat.
August 7th, 2008 at 8:16 am Add Karma
Actually, the last domestic terrorist attack was carried out by a racist, bigoted conservative fanatic.
And there’s no proof that Bruce Ivins was the anthrax killer. He’s just a convenient scapegoat.
August 7th, 2008 at 8:31 amIf your going to mention affiliations Dennis you should list all of them. [Ivins was Roman Catholic]
August 7th, 2008 at 8:33 amWhen, oh when, will Reality ever enter into the equations of Walrus man and his cronies? There is no end to the innane drivel that he and his fantasy based cronies spew. Will January 20th, 2009 never arrive?
August 7th, 2008 at 8:40 amImpeach Pelosi, Cheney and Bush and Save the Constitution!
only fitting that “Bolton The Clown” has a repeat performance at FOX CIRCUS.
Honestly, how can anyone take this guy seriously?
Bolton has been wrong on so many occassions and offers nothing but the same diatribe and talking pts from the Bush crowd and the entertainers at FIXED NEWS……
August 7th, 2008 at 8:51 amRegime change in the Bolton house and the WH would also help stabalize the region, including the good old U.S. of A.
August 7th, 2008 at 10:05 amRick Y says:
In the name of humanity nuclear war must be prevented.
Then can you please tell Bolton to stop trying to provoke me?
Thank you.
August 7th, 2008 at 10:07 amThe should have been, ‘then can you please tell Bolton to stop trying to provoke ONE’!
That Bolton is a total creep.
August 7th, 2008 at 10:09 am“lead to greater stability in the region as a whole”
Is this anything like the greater stability we have for invading Iraq and getting rid of their WMDs ?
August 7th, 2008 at 10:34 amI am afraid Bolton is right when he says that bombing Iran will bring peace and stability to the Middle East. Think about it, when the ground is sterilized and every single living thing is destroyed the entire region will be quiet.
And the half life will ensure that the area is peaceful for many centuries to come.
The ultimate neocon wet dream, a huge smoking beacon for Jesus to come back and Rapture their sorry asses.
August 7th, 2008 at 10:39 amMr. Bolton, go to the top of the Empire State in NY and jump!
August 7th, 2008 at 3:32 pmWhat does he mean by regime change? If he really trusted the people of Iran, the first thing he would do, would be to address the Seyyeds properly as an occupying force, against whom the people of Iran have been fighting non-violently. But every time JB says something, it diverts the world attention to the Seyyeds, and makes them look tough. Please help the people of Iran, by not glorifying the Seyyeds.
August 7th, 2008 at 4:44 pmFrom here deep from within the pathological jungle of neo-fascist/socialist Red Canaduh,
… here’s what I think should have been said:
Bolton:
“I think a Dr. Ron Paul regime change would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the American region, now in its eleventh hour just before it becomes the world’s deepest economic hole under this warmongering fraud.”
And:
~President Bush, 2/26/03:
“Acting with Republican Constitutionalist Dr. Paul in freedom, trade, & open-ended justice, against the dangerous corporate fascist lobby complex of my forefathers, will also contribute greatly to the long-term safety and stability of our Constitution, & every person in our world. Then maybe Laura & I will be able to find a way to live with myself.”
~ Vice President Cheney, 8/26/02~:
“A Dr. Ron Paul Republican regime change in Hollywashingmywood, DC, would bring about a number of benefits to my family & the region. When the gravest of threats from me & my base are eliminated, the honest freedom-loving peoples of the region will have a chance to promote the values that can bring lasting peace & abiding happiness, productivity & prosperity. As for me, I’ll tell you this only once; suicide will never, ever, EVER, be taken off the table. DO YOU HEAR ME?”
~ John McCain, 2/14/03:
“All my dear American family, & all of my many, many, many great friends, who I’m so blessed & grateful for, spread all over everywhere in this great nation, as well as everywhere all around this great world, which I’ve so extensively traveled in luxury on your great-grand kid’s unlimited tab; only a Dr. Ron Paul change of regime will make America a free competition state that does not threaten us and others, and where a liberated people under a small, Constitutional government would assume the rights and responsibilities of freedom. … Not only would honest competition in the mysterious markets liberate the American people to unspeakable prosperity, it would create incentive-rich cures, & tremendous personal happiness, which, my friends, would overjoy me and perhaps even give me another worthwhile 20 years. Otherwise, I’m sunk ~ condemned to become a puppet anti-viva maleophile for the rest of my days. I beg you, all my fine friends, to give me your support in this awesome, holy, righteous dream. My friends, trust me, … trust me, … today the REAL ”Uncle Sam” needs you more than ever before.”
—————————————————–
Yea, I’m a canuck.
Call it “Dea’s Dream.”
So, give peace a chance.
Right?
Not used to that? Take a walk on the wild side.
… While there’s still a tiny chance that Dr. Paul might even be able to fill these boots. Look around, but time’s nearly up; he’s the only one that will ever promise you a pay cut ~ … his own ~ because he figures he’ll have much less to do, once peace breaks out everywhere.
Write him in, & get set for abiding happiness ~ in a country under an ideal, freedom-protecting small Uncle Sam you can love ~ after the last runoff.
Otherwise, we could really use the REAL Uncle Sam up here in Red Canaduh badly, … to make our country the very best in the world overnight, if you’d still rather use your own historical bloodletting ‘Land of Brotherhood’ method … and aren’t planning on using him.
August 7th, 2008 at 7:41 pm“I think regime change would be preferable because I think that would lead to greater stability in the region as a whole.”
Kind of like it did when we changed their regime before with the Shah. Or kind of like when we put Sadam in charge of Iraq. Or kind of like when we supported Musharraf’s military coup d’état in Pakistan, or when we put al-Maliki in charge of Iraq…
August 7th, 2008 at 8:12 pmWe’ve just posted ringtone-ready audio from this interview over at Entertonement.
August 8th, 2008 at 11:19 am