Your opinion is one of millions.

Sucks to have studied so hard and still have little credibility, no?

Let’s see, yes, your McBush tokens are good for a free high colonic.

But remember, don’t drink the water when you’re done!

Why? You’re the one who got caught at it. Its what conservatives do when making their case, and we understand that.

You could have made a weaker case, but preserved a small shred of personal credibilty, by mentioning other sources, like factcheck – but you instead chose to post only the source that validated your assertion, and were subsequently shown to be in error. You cherry-picked that NYT article, since you could have easily googled any number of sources that had the correct figure, but did, and said nothing. That’s the hallmark of a weak intellect: expecting others to be as partisan and incurious of facts as you.

Fcuk off dipshit.

You have ZERO credibility, unless we’re talking plagiarism.

A VERY credibly plagiarist.

And I wouldn’t classify you as a cherry-picker. You’re just plain igorant.

How can it be possible for repugs to believe that they are the only ones on course?

pelosi doesn’t see a damn thing wrong with what they do and have done.

Like exposing plagiarists?

One of my favorite pasttimes.

Take it up with the New York Times. The article I cited was written on July 27.

No, I’ll take it up with you. You chose a source that validated your assertion, and didn’t bother to inform us that other evidence existed that put the figures at a radically different level. That’s a lie of omission.

It one big reason we have such contempt for conservatives. You consistently present only those things that make your case, and ignore, or don’t bother to mention things that invalidate your case. This cherry-picking is obvious, and a little rude. It’s why we never believe you guys, when you try to make a point. A little digging will usually expose the truth, and the extra effort p*sses people off, when they realize you likely knew there was exculpatory or conflicting data, and didn’t bother to mention it. It also makes you look like a weak debater.

The concept of transporting oil south from Alaska was discussed as early as the 1960s. In 1968, large crude oil reserves were discovered at Prudhoe Bay by the Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO).

http://tapseis.anl.gov/guide/history.cfm

So yes, long before ANY work began, there was a PLAN.

Oh, and ARCO did exist then.

F
U
C
K
I
N
G

J
A
C
K
A
S
S

You are an incredible specimen of idiocracy.

If you cared to do more research, you’d find that the PLANNING goes back well beyond simple “pre-construction efforts” (i.e. clearing right-of-ways, acquiring property rights, etc.)

I must stop now.

I’m afraid your stupidity could be contagious.

Let’s cut to the chase:

“THE OTHERS” ALL AGREE WITH ME.

Oh, and cause you’re too inept to dig any deeper than ONE SOURCE, we should blame your source??????

Typical fcuking Repuke. God, what a imbecile your are…

You’ve got none, zero, zilch, room to ask for anything.

You’re a plagiarist, a fcuking loser without a single idea of your own.

PATHETIC.

For someone who just got caught plagiarizing, you seem to want a lot.

Honestly, you should just quit trying…

Open secrets says Hillary got 936 thousand, and the nyt says $87,000?

Quite a discrepancy.

Boy that’s a rich one coming from the plagiarist idiot who rarely links to it’s “sources”.