I need my left wing liberals to curse and slander those evil republicans. That is the only thing that keeps my pole numbers up. Have you seen the drop i’ve been taking lately?

What, you think I can run on my experience? I need these rumor milling, hate mongering, leftists to keep spewing the lies about my opponent.

Change is coming people. Pull out your wallets.

I have to admit tho, that some of these postings were a scream . . . so NEVERMIND . . . forget I said anything!

Lynching is always good for a chortle or two

Before I altered this, C&L used it in describing *”Billo the Clown.”

*Oberman

Well if triplekick11 doesn’t pay attention to Ann Coulter, like most of the country, then I’m sure he never heard her say that. Unfortunately for you, he can paruse this website and find death threat after death threat… the reason the secret service doesn’t investigate is because they’re posted by elementary school kids who’s mommies obviously don’t monitor their internet time… while they poke fun at real men who have enlisted in military service when all they’ve ever done is finish the first level of “call of duty 17″ on their x-box 360. They usually come up with really groovy monnikers like Mcmetal(lica) or DieNowForPeace(andHairgrease).

August 11th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

I wonder if you alerted the Secret Service when mAnn Coulter claimed that Clinton should be assassinated ……

Somehow I doubt it ; you GOP/Chimpy cowardly suckholes only try to defend the garbage GOP and this imbecilic president…….

They don’t realize that, while such a tag might be effective in the hands of an adversary with some wit and understanding of the world, it doesn’t really work if they just fling it against the wall like they do with their own poo.

Wasn’t Lenin an atheist? Why would he love someone who supports the ACLU, because it “turns it head” to muslims?

I’m confused.

Did you go ask him in the Wayback Machine? ‘Cause I’m pretty sure, he’s been dead awhile, now.

How do you define torture toasterhead? In your own words. If you can define what consevatism is in your own words, torture shouldn’t be that hard. Listening to bad music for hours and days? Is that torture? Is doing nothing to an alleged enemy the safest way to go about gathering inteligence? Letiing all of them go when they don’t talk? “Your free to go. You gave us zero information about who you are and what you may or may not know. Have a great day sir.”.
August 11th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

I don’t define torture in my own words. International law is an adequate definition for me. But if you must have some concrete examples, here’s Amnesty International’s take:

Torture can be physical and include various techniques including: beating, whipping, burning, rape, suspension upside down, submersion into water almost to the point of suffocation, and electric torture with shocks of high voltage on various parts of the body, very often on the genitals.

And it can be psychological, including threats, deceit, humiliation, insults, sleep deprivation, blindfolding, isolation, mock executions, witnessing torture of others (including one’s own family), being forced to torture or kill others, and the withholding of medication or personal items.

“Listening to bad music for hours and days,” if it causes sleep deprivation, is torture. Psychological torture can be just as bad as physical torture. And there are no circumstances in which it is justified. Ever. No ticking time bombs or hostages – nothing.

Torture only produces bad intelligence. Its purpose is not to interrogate, but to break a prisoner’s humanity into a state of conditioned helplessness. A human in this state will say whatever they have to to stop the torture – they won’t give you accurate or actionable intelligence. They’re more likely to give you false leads that will make it even more difficult to find that ticking time bomb.

The best way to get information from an al-Qa’ida prisoner is to treat them well. I know it sounds “soft on terror,” but it works. When you treat these detainees with a bit of dignity, even stroke their egos a bit, they get comfortable and let information slip. That’s how we got a lot of good information from Shaikh al-Libi and Khalid Shaikh Mohammed (before we started torturing them).

Actually the Democrats do support torture. Did you see Fahrenheit 9/11? It had me begging for a waterboard. Loved the third grader working the camera angles and the poorly written narration? I had to watch “Showgirls” immediately afterwards just to watch how professionals make movies ;-)

It figures you’d think Showgirls was a terrific movie. It has won a LOT of awards.

Pretty much all Razzies, but still a hell of an achievement.

Problem solved, Bunny. The Geneva Convention did it for us, of which the United States is a signatory.

August 11th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

Not surprising

Your cowardice and stupidity leads you to believe that “Path to 9/11″ was the movie equivalent of War And Peace or the Iliad………

Let’s just say there’s enough evidence to justify an arrest warrant. He’s still entitled to a trial. However, it may not come to that — he has vowed not to be taken alive, and he allegedly has ordered his men to shoot and kill him if that appears inevitable.

Even if Osama bin Laden genuinely had nothing to do with 9/11, he is still culpable in other attacks attributed to Al Qaeda.

But I’m amused that you’re concerned about whether or not we’re going after the right guy. Since when have you right-wingers been concerned about erring on the side of caution? Does this mean you think we should release all detainees from Gitmo unless we are absolutely, positively sure they are “the right guys”?

As far as 9/11 being an inside job, I admit there are plenty of details that make me go “hmmm…”, and it was a Godsend for Bushco and their agenda. But while that can raise eyebrows, it doesn’t indict anyone.

and toss off a load at the thought that any woman would be interested in a republican without money changing hands first.

That’s “heroic” and patriotic.

The GOP’s and your own view that “it saves lives” or that nonsense about situations that occur on TV shows or in the movies , is absolutely insane.

This country was founded upon certain principles and inalienable rights ; torture is not one of them , nor is it an option……………

Bunny2 Says:

There is NO circumstance that would make you consider using waterboarding. It’s 100% off the table and not one circumstance would allow you to use it, ever?

To what end?

Does it produce dependable intelligence?

If so, how do you account for McCain’s revealing the names of the Green Bay Packers (or Pittsburgh Steelers, depending on which city he’s campaigning in) to his North Vietnamee captors?

If not, then why use it at all?