Think Progress

Right-Wing Hate Group Blames Immigrants For Increasing Greenhouse Emissions

coverimm.gifIn a new report, the right-wing Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) is promoting its anti-immigrant agenda by suggesting that “Immigration to the United States significantly increases world-wide CO2 emissions,” and “future levels of immigration will have a significant impact on efforts to reduce global CO2 emissions.”

CIS criticizes “environmentalists” for using a “piecemeal” approach of opposing fossil fuels and promoting conservation, claiming that the real way to help the environment would be to stop immigration. From the report:

Immigration to the United States significantly increases world-wide CO2 emissions
because it transfers population from lower-polluting parts of the world to the United States, which is a higher polluting country. On average immigrants increase their emissions four-fold by coming to America.

CIS assumes that each American will always have the same “stabilized” rate of carbon emission, and thus population growth — fueled by immigrants — is entirely to blame for a rise in American CO2 levels. But instead of proposing that Americans modify their behavior and emit less carbon, CIS simply posits stopping immigration to cut down on population.

As the Immigration Policy Center (IPC) pointed out in a press release, CIS is using all these arguments to essentially scapegoat immigrants:

Immigrants are not the problem – the U.S. lifestyle and U.S. CO2 emissions are the problem. … We could choose any group of Americans – the wealthy, residents of a particular state, dog owners, accountants, redheads – and eliminating that group would lower emissions.

CIS, whose founder Mark Krikorian has said that “immigration is incompatible with modern society,” has a history of promoting outrageous ideas to control migration to the U.S. These include attempting to deport the spouses of American soldiers, and suggesting Americans try “making America a more inhospitable place” for immigrants.

But CIS is not alone on the right in blaming immigrants for environmental problems. Homeland Security Chairman Michael Chertoff has also said that immigrants “degrade the environment” with “human waste, garbage, discarded bottles and other human artifact.”

Digg It!




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

45 Responses to “Right-Wing Hate Group Blames Immigrants For Increasing Greenhouse Emissions”

  1. Count Istvan Says:

    First leprosy now this.


  2. raynman Says:

    Damn those immigrants for coming to the United States in their SUVs and luxury automobiles....


  3. Uncle Ho Says:

    If the Titanic didn't have all those immigrants in steerage, it never would have sank.

    snark


  4. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre Says:

    Yeah, let's blame the poor immigrants, who are working hard at lawn cleanup, house building, repairs and waiting on tables and working in restaurant kitchens for the air pollution and CO2 rising... It couldn't be the rich piggy native-born Americans, with their fleets of SUVs, monster houses and endless toys. No, it couldn't be us... It must be somebody else... Hmm, let's pick on the nearly voiceless immigrants... Heck of smear, Center for Immigration Studies (CIS)...


  5. had enough Says:

    So now the hate America right believes in greenhouse emission reports as long as they can use it in a bigoted way?

    What mind set will believe this?


  6. hussein toasterhead Says:

    Well, on the bright side, at least they're not denying the science of global climate change.

    It's ont intellectual baby step forward, followed a giant intellectual leap toward idiocy.


  7. LibertyLover Says:

    I blame right wing hate groups for their emissions.


  8. jerseyboyblue Says:

    Right wing pollution at its worst.


  9. Marie Says:

    Talk about reaching for reasons to blame immigrants!!
    Like they're the ones buying the Hummers - yeah, those immigrants that's what they do - pollute!


  10. 5th Estate Says:

    "Immigration to the United States significantly increases world-wide CO2 emissions because it transfers population from lower-polluting parts of the world to the United States, which is a higher polluting country. On average immigrants increase their emissions four-fold by coming to America."

    I think this is the dumbest thing I've ever heard (and must be #976 in an apparently never-ending series of 'The Dumbest Thing I've Ever Heard From Right-Wingers')


  11. theduckmanz Says:

    Dorky me.... CIS were the bad guys in the Clone Wars


  12. trollsbwild Says:

    Gee. I would blame the rich fat bastards who eat at fancy restaurants every night, then pass that gas into the atmosphere.


  13. upside99 Says:

    test


  14. upside99 Says:

    Next we will hear that the immigrants are responsible for the high price of gas, the huge national debt, the devalued dollar and all the deaths in Iraq .... Oh, wait, that would be the BushCo Repugs.

    My Bad!


  15. hussein toasterhead Says:

    From the conclusion of this bit of drivel:

    Some may be tempted to see this ana|ysis as “blaming immigrants” for what are really America’s failures. It is certainly reasonable to argue that Americans could do much more to reduce per capita emissions. And it is certainly not our intention to imply that immigrants are particularly responsible for global warming. As we report in this study, immigrants produce somewhat less CO2 on average than native-born Americans. But to simply dismiss the large role that continuing high levels of immigration play in increasing U.S. and worldwide CO2 emissions is not only intellectually dishonest, it is also counter-productive.

    Intellectually dishonest? Really?

    Hey, wanna see some intellectual dishonesty? How about this whole study, and the fact that its economic models make no attempt to quantify the environmental impacts of immigrants staying in their home countries. Such as, for example, the consequences of people staying in the #2 and #3 sending countries, China and India, the two fastest-growing polluters in the world? Or if they migrate to the heavily-polluted cities of the Persian Gulf, or to growing megalopolises in South America and Africa?


  16. shoeless Says:

    On average immigrants increase their emissions four-fold by coming to America.

    If only we could stop those darn immigrants from running around in our yards with their doggone gas powered lawn mowers!


  17. BluNews Says:

    Great logic. Don't let immigrants in so they won't pollute as much as we do.

    Hey, maybe immigrants are the reason for $4 gas too!


  18. upside99 Says:

    Daryll!

    Good to see you again!

    And what kind of gases would those be, pray tell? Are they different from your gases, or mine?

    You are such a riot.


  19. shoeless Says:

    BluNews Says:

    Hey, maybe immigrants are the reason for $4 gas too!

    Well sure they are. See #16.


  20. rmoore Says:

    We should make the ban on immigration retroactive and deport Kirkorian


  21. hussein toasterhead Says:

    BluNews Says:

    Great logic. Don’t let immigrants in so they won’t pollute as much as we do.

    August 13th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
    _____

    Since the study uses PPP comparisons to back up its hypothesis, it's also an implicit argument against providing development assistance or even food aid to the world's poorest countries. If we keep the poorest people in the world from developing/overcoming poverty/surviving, we keep them from polluting.

    And since it's written in a quasi-academic style, I expect this report to be cited ad-infinitum by the anti-immigration bigots and science deniers alike. The science deniers get to use it to show that climate science is racist, and the bigots get to pretend they're being green.

    This is just disgusting on so many levels.


  22. Paul W Says:

    Immigration to the United States significantly increases world-wide CO2 emissions
    because it transfers population from lower-polluting parts of the world to the United States, which is a higher polluting country. On average immigrants increase their emissions four-fold by coming to America.

    So as long as you are an "original" member of the American "club" it's okay to pollute all you want. But everyone else has to stay away and keep their emmisions to a minimum.

    http://progressiveworldreview.com


  23. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Somebody check and see if we're approaching a full moon.

    The wingnuttery is in full bloom right now.


  24. gummitch Says:

    I thought these wingnuts didn't believe in climate change. Or maybe there is climate change but CO2 isn't to blame, it's the sun. Or if CO2 is to blame, it's not because of human activity.

    Unless, of course, you want to blame it on all those leaf blowers.


  25. hussein toasterhead Says:

    The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Somebody check and see if we’re approaching a full moon.

    The wingnuttery is in full bloom right now.

    August 13th, 2008 at 5:29 pm

    Almost. The moon's in a waxing gibbous phase, 91% full.

    It would be interesting to do a study of insane wingnuttery and moon phases over the past eight years, to see if there's any correlation. I somehow doubt it - these guys are just as loony wherever the lunar terminator lies.


  26. ScaryBrownHusseinChick (ThinkOutsideTheBush) Says:

    Emissions would mainly decrease because the fat, rich Reichwingers wouldn't have any immigrants to cook for them.


  27. peaceweaver Says:

    Does this mean the right wing now believes in population control? That means birth control, right?

    How can you argue that population growth is bad for greenhouse gas emissions, and not accept zero population growth?


  28. pete Says:

    What's the record for most "stupidest things ever" in one day? Because today has to be challenging that record!

    This crap doesn't even make sense in stereotypical Reichwing "logic". Do they forget that, according to their stereotypes, "illegal immigrants" travel 10 to a car and live with entire, extended, families in small hovels? Heck! They should thank all the "illegal immigrants" for making our averages look better.


  29. shoeless Says:

    Daryll Says:
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    They give off other gases besides greenhouse.

    Daryll, did you know that the vast majority of Mexican immigrants are good Christians who love Jesus as much as you do?

    When the Rapture comes, you will get to fly naked through the air with all those naked Mexicans, as you all immigrate to the promised land, where you will live with the naked Mexicans forever.


  30. pete Says:

    Shoeless:

    The only way Daryll will ever make it into Heaven is by sneaking through the gate under a truckload of fertilizer.


  31. republicans hate facts Says:

    Daryll Says:
    They give off other gases besides greenhouse.

    sh*t always gives off high volumes greenhouse gases, that's why you republicans and your policies are so bad for the environment...


  32. Zooey Says:

    Immigrationphobia: It's the new racism!!


  33. stateofthedivision Says:

    A few years ago, CIS and The Rand Corporation published terribly flawed studies blaming the rise in uninsureds on illegal immigration. Neither study was worth the paper they used for printing.

    CIS is a hack group. Unfortunately, groups like this get invited to testify before Congress. The dumbing down of America...


  34. Gregor Samsa Says:

    Neither Krikorian nor Chertoff sound like true American surnames.

    Could these two be descendants of -gasp!- immigrants?

    Oh, the irony...


  35. stateofthedivision Says:

    Chertoff has dual citizenship, American and Israeli.


  36. sacopenapa Says:

    The migrants of the First World are those whose cuntries in the third World have been invaded, occupied and exploited, and econumicaly destroyed by the former. It is the "invasion" of the "invaded".


  37. sacopenapa Says:

    I meant economicaly exployted. Miss typed! Sorry1


  38. Max-1 Says:

    .

    We do realize that the Nazi's blamed the Jews for the perceived problems of Europe...
    ... Just like the NoeClowns blame the "brown skin" immigrants for the perceived problems here.
    ... NO?

    .


  39. dbadass Says:

    We should all worry more about the microbial "illegals" which encouraged by a climate influx and modern travel realities are expanding their ranges. Ah the joy of self replicating molecules...


  40. ucsbclassics53 Says:

    I bet those "illegals" are to blame for the hate group's erectile dysfunction problems too, eh?


  41. EugeneDebs Says:

    Daryll Says:
    They give off other gases besides greenhouse.

    I guess in the same way YOU emit noxious stupidity and racist idiocy waves. You do understand you are a disgustingly stupid individual dont you? I mean this isnt news to you is it?


  42. insideoutgraphics Says:

    Lou Dobbs must be loving this...Leprosy,CO2,litter,
    OH MY!!
    I frankly am insulted that they actually expected
    us to believe this report?

    Where do these people get their ideas from?

    A Hate Hat filled with moronic ideas?They pull one out each week and then expand upon it I guess.

    Maybe they pull them out of the ass of the GOP Elephant.


  43. BobB Says:

    I hate to disagree with my fellow progressives, but facts are facts. Not only is it is true that immigration increases the U.S. population, it is the main cause of the increase.

    Second, it is also true that when somebody comes from a country that uses little CO2 per person, comes here, and adopts our lifestyle, the world's emission of CO2 increases.

    This is just simple logic and mathematics.

    Let's not let ideology get in the way of logical reasoning, like right-wingers do.


  44. kwaayesnama Says:

    Lets see my choice is John McCain or that smart black man Barack Obama?

    McCain who does not know how to use a computer but is willing to learn if we elect him – I’ll just vote for that smart black man.

    My Choices are: John McCain who says the economic downturn is psychological? - Na! I'll vote for the smart black man.

    McCain who says you are better off under George Bush? - Nope I'll vote for the smart black man.

    Mc Cain who wants to continue killing more people looking for weapons of mass destruction that do not exist? - Gee! I'll vote for the smart black man.

    McCain who believes that we should stay the course but is not willing to support the people he puts in harms way. - I'll take a chance on the smart black man.

    Should I vote for a man that does not know that 9-11 was caused by Osama Bin Laden not Sedam Hussein? - Easy! I'll vote for the smart black man.

    Vote for the man who does not know if the Sunnis or Sheits are our enemies? - No way I'll vote for the smart black man.

    Vote for the man who helped put our government on the China, Saudi Arabia credit card? - Not a chance I'll vote for the smart black man.

    Vote for the man with the worst temper in the Senate to have his finger on the nuclear button? - No way - I'll vote for the smart black man.


  45. denizerdogan Says:

    Just like the cold war when everyone who didn’t agree with the U.S. was either a communist or a communist sympathizer. toki This poor crazy guy spent half a decade being tortured because a bunch of stupid politicians araç sorgulama were sure the NVA was in bed with the Russians (minimal help) and/or the Chinese (ancient enemy of the vietnamese). ssk sorgulama You would think he would have learned from others’ mistakes. Guess not. Republicans need an enemy. key ödemeleri This century it apparently will be all Muslims, health all of whom must be alQaeda operatives.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll