Think Progress

McCain still considering flip-flop on Alaska Refuge drilling.

Jonathan Martin notes that John McCain “isn’t totally closing the door on dropping his opposition to drilling in ANWR.” In an interview with the Weekly Standard’s Stephen Hayes, McCain said he continues to examine whether to endorse drilling in the Alaska Refuge. McCain earlier said he’s “more than happy” to consider flip-flopping on Alaskan oil drilling, but then quickly back-tracked, reiterating his position that the Refuge “is a pristine place and if they found oil in the Grand Canyon, I don’t think I’d drill in the Grand Canyon.”



60 Responses to “McCain still considering flip-flop on Alaska Refuge drilling.”

  1. Alpine Jones says:

    What’s wrong with flip-flopping? I think it shows intellectual integrity to be open to arguments for a certain issue and change one’s stance on complicated political issues like this.


  2. Gregor Samsa says:

    Why not drill in the Grand Canyon?

    Have you seen pictures of it?

    It’s a desert. There is no wildlife. No trees, no water. Nothing.

    I’d say let’s drill!!

    /sarc off


  3. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    It’s long overdue for some smart person to make a website that features a McCain Flip-flop meter that shows his current position, and his various past positions on a major topics of discussion. It could become a very popular website.

    Ever so slightly O/T: here is one area with no McCain flip-flopping: the brutal slaughter of the South Ossetians by the Georgians last week. McCain is pure war-monger on this issue…

    War-monger McCain has given birth to his very own war: the Georgian slaughter and invasion of South Ossetia, which started about a week ago. His buddy, Mikhail Saakashvili, President of the Republic of Georgia, is another strutting little fascist bully, cut from the same cloth as Bush.

    And McCain has his advisor, who has received hundreds of thousands of dollars from Saakashvili and Georgia to lobby for NATO membership and US support for his imperial adventure. Why is McCain supporting this Georgian war criminal?

    Turn in to “Russia Today” television news to get a different viewpoint from that of Bush/Rice/McCain and our corrupt lying corporate media. Or visit their web site, http://www.russiatoday.com.


  4. Gregor Samsa says:

    Uhm, Alpine, it’s ok to change one’s opinion as new facts come to light, or a better alternative is found.

    McCain, on the other hand, flip-flops at the slightest provocation.


  5. dbadass says:

    What about all that perfectly good land that we have tied up with golf courses? I say drill the country clubs. There must be some oil down there somewhere…


  6. Above the Clouds says:

    Minnesota’s Bachmann insists on drill, drill, drill. I wonder if that means drilling in her community? If there is oil in Idaho’s trees, there must be oil in the frozen north.


  7. henry wallace says:

    McStupid needs to flip flop on billionair tax breaks…Us is on verge of bankruptsy. Bush/McLiar/Chaney/Republican Congress have bankrupted the US like Carter did to the USSR in 1970s.


  8. WaltTheMan says:

    Independence Hall is in Pennsylvania, the state where the American oil industry was born. Why not drill there. We could melt down the Liberty Bell and use that as the base for the oil rig. No one can tell me that there is no oil there.


  9. Badmoodman says:

    I’m tellin’ ya, McCain’s flips and spins would make Enrico Fermi envious.


  10. Another Joe says:

    To the repugs, its not a “flip-flop”, its strategic posturing. With the help of the MSM, the various “sound bites” on each different position get “target-marketed” to appropriate demographic groups.

    Those that legitimized stolen elections in 2000, 2002, and 2004 certainly have no interest in seeing the “will of the people” prevail.

    They have found a perfect pawn in mccain – a shameless panderer that stands for nothing.

    This is right out of chimpy’s playbook – create so many different talking points that most don’t know what to think, so they choose to accept what is most “convenient” for their ideology.

    Don’t get me wrong – I am glad bloggers and others point out the impossibly inconsistent positions and rhetoric. I think we also have to acknowledge these “flip-flops” are not a result of “incompetence,” a chaotic campaign, or changes in position.

    They represent a deliberate tactic that has served the repugs well and will continue to do so as long as global corporate interests see their media assets as tools of propaganda instead of legitimate communications businesses (5 major corps own 80+ percent of media).

    Until we are willing to collaboratively apply pressure by withholding the only “vote” that is guaranteed to be counted, we will get more of the same – that “vote” being the dollars we choose to spend or withhold from the corpocracy.


  11. CB_Brooklyn says:

    All these oil drilling propositions is nothing but a distraction from free-energy. Fact is the new Japanese water powered car was already reported by Reuters in Japan; I wonder why it didn’t make CNN and FOX???

    Here’s the Reuters news video.

    Also read this article to learn what’s really going on:

    The 9/11 Truth Movement, Free Energy Suppression and the Global Elite’s Agenda


  12. Badmoodman says:

    “…if they found oil in the Grand Canyon, I don’t think I’d drill in the Grand Canyon.”

    – - If it wasn’t in your home state of Arizona, you would.


  13. Badger says:

    I am 100% in favor of More Drilling…but not for OIL.

    from the Dept. of Energy:

    More than 100,000 MWe of economically viable capacity may be available in the continental United States, representing a 40-fold increase over present geothermal power generating capacity. This potential is about 10% of the overall U.S. electric capacity today, and represents a domestic energy source that is clean, reliable, and proven.

    And Geothermal Energy Wells provide Clean, Carbon Free Energy FOREVER!


  14. bratboy says:

    Why not flip-flop on this issue. He’s flip-flopped on everything else, so why not this one also. He’s batting 1.000 so far.


  15. dbadass says:

    bratboy:
    Sorry as this is OT but I have always wondered about batting averages. Understand that I find basesball super boring and don’t know a whole lot about it but to each their own. Anyway why do they do it as ppt rather than a simple percentage? Is it to inflate the numbers as Americans like larger numbers in sport or what is that all about. Do they need to draw it out more so as to try to show comparisons between hitters?


  16. Doc Rock says:

    Holding out for a bigger pay day?


  17. barfly says:

    I once hated “the rich”..until I seen the amount of taxes they paid…Enlightened Progressive.

    An enlightened progressive would know to use the word “saw.”

    And as a percentage of overall income, “the rich” pay less that average workers.


  18. bratboy says:

    dbadass Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    bratboy:
    Sorry as this is OT but I have always wondered about batting averages. Understand that I find basesball super boring and don’t know a whole lot about it but to each their own. Anyway why do they do it as ppt rather than a simple percentage? Is it to inflate the numbers as Americans like larger numbers in sport or what is that all about. Do they need to draw it out more so as to try to show comparisons between hitters?

    I’m not sure how that started either. I was never curious enough to find out why they do it that way. It, to me, doesn’t matter. What I do find interesting that if a batter gets up to the plate ten times and gets three hits, he is doing well. Even better if he gets four hits. Anyway you look at it, it’s well below 50% (I could have used .500, but you get my meaning). :^)

    I used to like baseball, but it has gotten rather tedious to watch, much less listen to on radio like I used to do.


  19. dbadass says:

    I still hat e the rich but it has more to do with their condescending attitude and excessive consumption…


  20. WaltTheMan says:

    Batting averages are based on (Hits * 1000)/(AtBats – Walks).


  21. dbadass says:

    Why not just a simple percentage of successful at bats?


  22. barfly says:

    The Straight Talk Express. Your one-stop, flip-flop shop, with a Thirty Minutes or Less Guarantee: any campaign position will be flipped in thirty minutes or less, or your next special-interest pander is free!


  23. WaltTheMan says:

    Because, baseball originated in the late 1800’s as a national sport. Pitchers were so poor at that time, baseball scores read like football scores.


  24. pete says:

    The new paradigm of $100+ oil is cutting consumption. Giving out new leases, in a panic driven by election-year politics, is insane.

    But, since Flippy McSpin helped create the problem with his career voting record, he has no choice but to adopt the party line. And as a pandering, fundamentally dishonest SOB, he will simply deny his intimate connection with the oil industry.

    Plus, one should realize that anything McSpin says which suggests he’s a moderate is a bald-faced lie. He’s as much a reckless radical as any PNACer or Bushbot. And his voting record as a True Neocon(TM) is much more consistent than his hyperbole has ever been.

    Pretty much everything he says can be assumed to be untruthful because, if he told the truth, he would be kicked out of the club. The reason he sounds so confused once he goes off script is because he’s making crap up as he goes. He’s just “scatting” to cover himself and the other guilty parties.


  25. had enough says:

    Is anyone really taking that demented old fool seriously… isn’t this all about multi national corporations moving forward using an old fart such as McCain?


  26. had enough says:

    Dr. Hussein Matt Says:

    Oops, O/T:

    Obama raises $51 million in July
    Democratic presidential nearly doubles McCain’s fundraising for month

    And most contributing to Obama do not have a land line phone to be polled in this so called tight race.


  27. pete says:

    Dr. Hussein Matt Says:

    Oops, O/T:

    Obama raises $51 million in July
    Democratic presidential nearly doubles McCain’s fund raising for month

    August 16th, 2008 at 4:57 pm

    You remind me of a conversation I heard about polls. One group that doesn’t even get counted in most polls is occasional voters or “people who only vote when they’re pissed”. And they also tend to ignore the fact that many people just aren’t paying attention this early in the campaign. It tends to be more active people, like ourselves, who can manage to worry about who says what before the nominations are even official. Most people responding to a cold call haven’t given it much thought.

    Fortunately, as the coverage expands, awareness goes up. I can’t imagine McSpin fairing well among people who have yet to see him unedited. And I don’t imagine that many occasional or first time voters will turn out in Flippy’s favor. I think that, barring catastrophe, polls and results will be closer to that 2-1 margin in fund raising than the current 5%-10% lead in the polls.


  28. had enough says:

    OT

    Let’s not forget the senate race.


    * A few weeks ago Merkley was ahead of Smith from OR… I believe he could recapture

    * Franknn is now tied with Coleman in Min

    * Min and NC are close

    How predictable are these polls as so many voting dem do not have a land line phone?

    We may be able to make the 60 mark.. stop the obstructive congress we have now and begin to make real changes.


  29. EugeneDebs says:

    Alpine Jones Says:

    What’s wrong with flip-flopping? I think it shows intellectual integrity to be open to arguments for a certain issue and change one’s stance on complicated political issues like this.

    Yes it does. However we cant give this double standard to the rightwing hatemongers so that every time there is the slightest inconsistancy by a Dem its flip flopping because they have no principles and whenever a GOPer changes his mind it is because they have studied the issue and and come to a new conclusion based on a complex and changing policy issue. So we keep pointing out the changes because it is at the very least hypocrisy. Look at how often Grampy McCretin has accused Obama of having flip flopped. Letting them have it both ways is taking a knife to a gunfight.


  30. MapleStreet says:

    McCain doesn’t flip flop on one thing. The conflict in Georgia (as well as his Bomb Iran solo) show us that it is still the 1950s. The Cold War is Still On.

    Quick, everyone build your bomb shelter. Hold Duck and Cover Drills. Sing the Tommy the Turtle Song about Duck and Cover to your children. The Soviets are coming, The Soviets are coming.


  31. stormy says:

    So far off topic but have to share: Crooks and Liars, Midday open thread, “Dick Cheney Blues” A MUST watch.


  32. had enough says:

    Election ‘08:

    Corporatist BIG money using MSM and a few cheating voting machines left

    VS:

    We the People using the internet and some improvement of the voting system since ‘06


  33. Zooey says:

    Alpine Jones Says:

    What’s wrong with flip-flopping? I think it shows intellectual integrity to be open to arguments for a certain issue and change one’s stance on complicated political issues like this.
    August 16th, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    That’s why the right respected and admired John Kerry’s apparent flip-flop, right?


  34. Another Joe says:

    While being able to revise a position or strategy is an important part of successfully navigating difficult journeys and situations, that is not what we are talking about here.

    The flip flops in question here are part of a deliberate strategy to confuse and manipulate.

    No, I don’t think mccain is smart enough to have mastered deceptive politics – he is a useful moron, just like the chimp was.

    But that is irrelevant – our elections should not be about the personalities of the idiots that stand in front of the cameras and microphones.

    They need to be about the interests they represent and the outcomes of their politics.

    In the case of mccain, there is a long track record that should demonstrate he is a disaster waiting to happen and stands for nothing.


  35. pete says:

    In the case of mccain, there is a long track record that should demonstrate he is a disaster waiting to happen and stands for nothing.
    August 16th, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    I must disagree. His actions have placed him in the extremity of the Reichwing. His “straight talk” and “maverick” image are effective fabrications but, his voting record is there for any curious enough to ask. The question is, will anybody bring that record to the attention of the incurious masses?

    Lord knows there’s plenty of evidence. Johnny posted a great list here:http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/11/did-mccain-campaign-lift-georgia-speech-from-wikipedia/#comment-5151630


  36. pete says:

    Oops! Please note that McSpins “flip-flops” almost always result in his “moving right” on the issue.


  37. Badger says:

    I think Sen. McCains position on Georgia will come back to bite him. I don’t believe most Americans will think they are “ALL Georgians Now”. They are sick of War, and aren’t eager to let Sen. McCain get us into another one in the Caucases.
    And Russia is set to demonstrate to the World that Bush’s Promises and Backing for Georgia are meaningless.

    So far, nothing in what we’ve seen towards Russia lately makes any kind of sense. Bluster. Sanctimonious bullshit. Mindless invocation of long trashed concepts like “freedom” and “democracy”. Needless provocation. Threats that cannot be backed by anything real. Appeals to higher sentiments. And, above everything, appalling double standards and breathtaking hypocrisy.

    Sen. McCain is trying to seperate himself from Bush by running to the Right…but that’s not where the Voters are.

    The best part , is that there are no Democrats to Blame for any of this.

    Want more Wars? Vote McCain


  38. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    Ok, another ad. Show McBush flip flopping on issues and then speed things up and finally he’s not only flip flopping, he starts spinning round and round. It’s really too bad that the majority of the people in this country don’t get this kind of information. If they did, McBush’s poll numbers would be in the teens.


  39. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    John Kerry Says:
    I’m sure all you libs just LOVE this from San Fran Nan!
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Saturday when the U.S. Congress returns next month from its summer recess, Democrats will offer legislation that could give oil companies drilling access to more offshore areas.

    And you and your ilk are going to love all the conditions that are going to be put on that drilling, along with all the clean renewable energy incentives that will be attached to the bill.


  40. Iolair says:

    John, you beat me to it:

    Pelosi receptive to considering more drilling
    By DINA CAPPIELLO, Associated Press Writer
    Sat Aug 16, 3:44 PM ET

    WASHINGTON – Democrats’ stance against offshore drilling has shifted more, with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signaling on Saturday her willingness to consider opening up more coastal areas to oil and gas exploration.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080816/ap_on_go_co/democrats_energy


  41. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    Alpine Jones Says:
    What’s wrong with flip-flopping? I think it shows intellectual integrity to be open to arguments for a certain issue and change one’s stance on complicated political issues like this.

    Yes, there is something to be said for a politician changing his mind on an issue as conditions change, like Obama has done a couple of times. But it is altogether something else when a politician changes his mind twice in one day and says one thing in front of one crowd and the entirely opposite thing in front of another crowd…..that’s called pandering. Not to mention that McBush has changed his stance on every substantial issue and all the changes have been to the right, as an attempt to woo the evangelical right.


  42. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    Iolair Says:
    John, you beat me to it:

    So, trolls, if the Democrats consider allowing some drilling, here what they will get in return:

    Lawmakers will be able to “consider opening portions of the Outer Continental Shelf for drilling, with appropriate safeguards, and without taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil,” said Pelosi, D-Calif.

    Congress left for the August recess deadlocked over how to address $4-a-gallon gasoline. Democratic proposals to tap the nation’s petroleum reserve, curb oil speculation and force oil companies to drill on already leased federal lands were blocked by Republicans trying to force votes on offshore drilling.

    Yet any vote on drilling is likely to force the Republicans’ hand, since it will likely be packaged with unpopular proposals to tap the petroleum reserve and recoup unpaid royalties from the late 1990s to pay for renewable energy projects.

    Actually, I think this is a clever move on the Democrats part. They will be getting what they want for energy and the oil companies will be forced to drill on their current holdings before they will be allowed to drill off-shore. Since the oil companies have no intention of drilling on their current leases, I guess there won’t be any off-shore drilling either.

    Sounds like a “win-win” for the Democrats. Because how can the Republicans object when the Democrats are bending on off-shore drilling. The people in this country know that just drilling is not the answer to energy independence and that just drilling is short-sited because oil is a finite resource.


  43. dbadass says:

    Come on John Kerry. Pull up a chair. I’ll put the kettle on…


  44. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    #pete Says:
    I think that, barring catastrophe, polls and results will be closer to that 2-1 margin in fund raising than the current 5%-10% lead in the polls.

    Another thing that the polls don’t take into consideration is the fact that there are so many more Democrats than Republicans. When they compile their polls, they usually pick half Democrats and half Republicans and then ask them the question. Well, this election will not be based on the votes of 1,000 hand picked Americans (thank god). The polls also don’t take into consideration all the newly registered young voters. If they actually show up and vote, and I can see no reason why they won’t, it’s going to be a rout.


  45. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    #dbadass Says:
    Come on John Kerry. Pull up a chair. I’ll put the kettle on…

    I suspect he has already split. He’s more of a “hit and run” kind of troll.



  46. Another Joe says:

    pete – what I am trying to say is that mccain will consistently support for whatever the group you refer to as “Reichwing” that is behind his candidacy demands.

    In and of himself, he is just an extremely old man with diminishing mental capabilities.

    The things he support are not ideas of his own making nor does he represent any kind of “leadership” in terms of policies or governing.

    This is like having a senile ol’ man stand in front of the 4th of July parade, pretending that eveyone is following him.

    But in this case, it serves a useful purpose for those that actually organize and direct the charade.


  47. dixie blood says:

    Bilbo says,

    “Lawmakers will be able to “consider opening portions of the Outer Continental Shelf for drilling, with appropriate safeguards, and without taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil,” said Pelosi, D-Calif.”

    A Democrat with a spine would take away the “taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil” AND refuse to drill oil holes in the Outer Continental Shelf!!!!!


  48. dixie blood says:

    Nancy’s suckin’ big time on dat environment thang!!!


  49. dixie blood says:

    Nancy is a complete sell out to corporate, fascist Amerika or not bright!

    If she had a brain she would take back the “taxpayer subsidies to Big Oil” and put it into renewables, etc.

    But, she’s sold out or stupid, either way it sucks!!!!


  50. dixie blood says:

    Why is Nancy always behind the curve ball? She’s never out front on any issue!

    She’s always reacting and not leading the way!!!


  51. Iolair says:

    Dixie,

    remember, Nancy took impeachment off the table, just before Democrats got control of the House and Senate. She has been true to her word ever since, and Bush has gotten nearly everything he has wanted (with the glaring exception of privatizing Social Security).


  52. Another Joe says:

    bilbo – the dems announced to the world that they have no spines when pelosi declare impeachment off-the-table in 2006.

    They have continually reinforced that message, clearly demonstrating they have no spine when they caved in to the most unpopular president in modern (and probably all of) US history on FISA.

    And don’t forget, “yes we can” obama also capitulated to dur chimpfurher, even though his supporters overwhelmingly were against telecom immunity.

    Was ralph right?


  53. Another Joe says:

    Dixie – just like it took a dem to eliminate the social safety net and welfare, it will take a dem to eliminate social security.

    Unfortunately, obama has already started “catapulting the propaganda” that the most successful federal program of all-time, Social Security, is in “crisis”.

    I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t like what I am seeing. The political/economic interest behind dur chimpfurher may get their ultimate wet-dream yet.


  54. Another Joe says:

    OOPS! not DIXIE – meant Iolair


  55. dixie blood says:

    Iolair –

    “remember”

    I will never forget the sell out that Nancy PollLoser is, period!

    And there are several many other DemoRats that need to be removed if law and order is to be reestabilished(sp?)!!

    And this great Democracy returned to the people!!!!!!!!!


  56. Iolair says:

    Bilbo Hussein Baggins Says:

    Iolair Says:
    John, you beat me to it:

    So, trolls, if the Democrats consider allowing some drilling…

    A troll am I? Are you sure?


  57. Iolair says:

  58. Who Misspoke Today? says:

    …reiterating his position that the Refuge “is a pristine place and if they found oil in the Grand Canyon, I don’t think I’d drill in the Grand Canyon.”

    (In your best Reagan impression)Well, McCain won’t drill, but his oil buddies will.


  59. Bad Eye says:

    Re: drill, drill, drill.

    The ignorance continues. A Republican gentleman who contributes a weekly article to the editorial pages of our local newspaper once again has parroted the line about China drilling off our coast

    Oh, and he doesn’t just refer to “Chinese,” but “Communist Chinese.” Red Scare, anyone???

    I have sent him an e-mail asking him to cite his sources, and also advised him that if he could not prove his claim, I trusted that he would be offering a retraction in an upcoming article.

    Here’s a link (left off the prefix; my posts always get flagged when I offer links) for anyone interested in responding to the Chinese drilling claims:

    mcclatchydc.com/251/story/40776.html



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll