Max that was an excellent and explicit debunking. You do understand though that FACTS, and well, REALITY have no ability to penetrate the atmosphere of Planet Wingnut

I guess when you think being a military super power allows you to do anything without any consequences. Besides isn’t it really about the US placing some stakes in the game of “protecting” central asia and it’s natural gas and oil?

Remember how we were with the Cuban Missle Crisis ? Why shouldn’t Russia be a teeeeny weeeeny bit upset that we’re putting missles on their border.

Any North Korean launch would be to the east rather than the west with the intercept fired over Russia.

Any Iranian missiles launched at the US would travel over Russia, not Poland, so we would again have to launch over Russia.

who do they think they’re kidding? Certainly not Russia.

Iran will aim it’s missiles (soon to be nuclear)at which ever European cities it thinks it can threaten, and then they will use that threat to blackmail Europe to stand aside while they use their proxy army, Hezbollah to attack Israel.

Although it should also be clear now to any person with their head screwed on straight, that Russia is also a serious threat to all of the former Eastern bloc countries.

Why is it that the Left always, instinctively sides with Americas adversaries and enemies?

Lets get some FACTS correct…
1) Iran, through the IAEA is allowed to enrich uranium for nuclear fuel to power nuclear reactors for energy independance.
2) Iran’s enrichment process is allowed to enrich up to 5% strength, according to IAEA standards. Currently, Iran is enriching to around 3% and pushing toward 5%
3) To make a nuclear weapon, ANY nation that seeks to manufacture uranium for that purpose, would need to enrich said uranium to at least 80% streangth.
4) Since the USA has been the only nation to ever use nuclear weapons, TWICE, upon civilian populations, please explain how people from the USA are qualified to be the moral police when it comes to said use of nuclear weapons.
5) Depleated uranium is currently being used in weapons by the USA. Please explain how the use of depleated uranium doesn’t harm civillian populations and doesn’t create long term heath consequences for ANY civilian population.
6) Since when is the continued use of nuclearized weapons upon civillian populations by the USA a nullifying factor when deciding who should and shouldn’t use nuclearized weapons upon civilian population?
7) Please provide evidence that Iran is currently capable of sending missles into northern European regions.
8) Do you always believe what the National State feeds you?
9) Are you a Loyal Nationalist?

.

But North Korea? No, they would not travel over Poland. They would travel over Alaska or the North Pole–If North Korea had any that could travel that far and if they were totally suicidal.

What placing a missile shield in Poland will accomplish is a new arms race with Russia. Aren’t we tied down in Iraq and Afghanistan and the other 750 bases in 125 countries?

No one could have anticipated, indeed.

Get your facts straight. Georgia invaded and slaughtered people in South Ossetia first. You are listening to too much Ed Shultz, Obama, Joe “Zionist’ Biden, George Bush, Condi Rice, Dick Cheney, and CNNBCBSFOXMSNBC.

http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Shalom-interview-Senator-Biden.html

http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0….to_Georgia.html

You do understand your post was just stupid dont you? First Iran DOES have a nuclear program? Really? You know this how? I mean all 16 of OUR intelligence agencies say otherwise. I guess what with your vast resources as an idiot posting on a message board our intelligence agencies with their billion dollar budgets their thousands of resources the world over are obsolete. We just need to ask YOU. Why are you wasting your time on this board contact the CIA and explain to them how much better YOU know what Iran is up to than THEY do. I am sure THEY like me could use the laugh so spread the wealth. I love the logic of just telling us we are wrong. I guess you are just the arbiter of all that is true or false right or wrong…Nah thats just stupid. I am all for slowing proliferation. I dont really see how implementing a missile shield THAT HASNT BEEN SHOW TO WORK does that. Negotiations do that. What IS hypocritical, I suggest you look the word up I dont think it means what you think it does, is throwing a FIT about other countries trying to obtain nuclear weapons while we not only say we are keeping ours but telling the world we are building a whole new generation of what Bush called MORE USABLE nuclear weapons. Your posts are weak and your logic non-existant

From Conservative Snark Wiki…

The ethnic rivalry between the Poles and Koreans goes back to the WWII days when Korea occupied Poland for years before the Germans invaded kicked them out, and the Russian gave the occupying Koreans asylum in Belarus. This part of history isn’t well know because the liberal media doesn’t want it out.

What is the stated purpose of the ‘missile shield’?
Isn’t it to make Europe safer?

How does antagonizing Russia with a useless battery of ten (10) anti-ballistic warheads with a 60% success rate (under perfect and controlled conditions) make Europe safer?

It doesn’t.

Show of hands, who understands Strategic thinking and International Relations… would you please help our Secretary of State? She and robert verdi seem lost…