Comments on: Halperin: McCain’s Houses Gaffe ‘One Of The Worst Moments’ Of The Campaign For…Barack Obama

By: ctcadguy

ctcadguy — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:26:46 +0000

Corporate Media is run by Rethugs. That is why we hear nothing of the Keating five scandal, the fact that he finished in the bottom 1% of his class at Annapolis and the fact that he was a lousy pilot (crashed five planes). We hear nothing about his cheating on his first wife and we hear nothing about him being a crass hot head.

The Rethugs own the media.

By: EugeneDebs

EugeneDebs — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:39:20 +0000

drick23 Says:

thanks shane. cant take another opinion, just like the leer jet limousine liberals. only one way or the highway go CNN!!! Commie news network. and i hope you like your pay stubs having a diminishing money amount d ue to your vote for the magig negro Nobama. universal hc , and everything he wants = more taxes bt2

Congratulations you got all the ignorant hivemind talking points into the post. Your reward for being the most moronic poster of the day will arrive soon. No award for being a racist imbecile though. Sorry

By: Robt

Robt — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 07:03:15 +0000

Fact is Halperin when replying to George Steph., stated himself that, “there’s already an Ayers add running in places.”

Now just before this, Halperin chimes smugly that Obama’s ad on McCain is making it hard for John to run a campaign on the up and up and this opens the door to attacking Obama in the Down and Down (para phrased, of course).

So you have Halperin first say, Obama went low. Opened the door for McCain.

So McCain is going to fire back low because Obama started it.

But, McCain is already firing low with a Bill Ayers ad…? Before Obama
ran the how many homes ad…,,?

Halperin needs to get it straight. Which is it Halperin?

If Bill Ayers ads are running already. But because Obama crossed the line with a Home ownership ad (aftr the Ayers ad). That opens the door to run slime ads on Bill Ayers like McCain is already running?

************ Halperin’s Hannity Moment***************

By: Keith

Keith — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:43:21 +0000

All during the 1992 campaign, every Republican was saying that if Clinton were president, he would raise EVERYONE’S taxes. In his eight years, he only raised taxes on singles earning $150k or more, couples earning $300k, and big businesses. Today, every Republican will tell you that Clinton raised everyone’s taxes. Same lying strategy now used against Obama.

If it were 2000 and we had record surpluses, then we would not have to raise taxes. But since we have record deficits and a $10 TRILLION debt, we must raise taxes. We could save $175 billion every year by stopping corporate welfare. And we should cut back our $900 billion annual military spending—but the top 1% and big corporations can afford to pay more.

By: Musk

Musk — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:31:24 +0000

Oh . . . I get it. Obama is the reason why McCain is such an SOB. Wow . . . it’s sooo obvious. How could I have muissed that

By: MCMetal

MCMetal — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 05:08:51 +0000

drick23 Says:
——————————————————————————–

August 25th, 2008 at 12:40 am

How much less are your taxes with the GOP in the White House , dicklick ?

I know you sure as hell aren’t earning over $250 grand a year ; you’re nowhere near that smart………

By: Shayne

Shayne — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:50:32 +0000

Sure dreck, CNN is a liberal news outlook. That’s why they have the likes of Glen Beck and Lou Dobbs on there, right? Why don’t you go check how much the sales tax in your hometown has gone up in the last eight years. Our buiness it has gone up 2% in the last two years to make up for the money the federal government sends to Iraq instead of spending here. But I can tell by the genius of your writing and spelling that you’re clearly in the top 1% of the population that has received all the tax breaks in the last 8 years.

By: Shayne

Shayne — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:33:55 +0000

FLAGGED dreck.

By: Shinning Light

Shinning Light — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:13:01 +0000

There is a reason why we do not subscribe to Time anymore (Actually several)

By: Shayne

Shayne — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:03:38 +0000

Hey drick23 you know who the next president will not be? Your loser candidate John McCain. Get used to it.

By: Keith

Keith — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 03:38:32 +0000

CNN’s Howard Kurtz asked today “is it really important the number of houses that McCain owns?”. But that is also spin. McCain said that his staff would get back to the questioner—meaning he did not know how many houses he had or (more likely) he was afraid to give an honest answer. That he would not or could not answer the question is the point—not whether or not you should criticize someone for owning seven houses.

By: hellinabucket

hellinabucket — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 02:51:49 +0000

Halerpin is still hurting for when Hewitt “insulted” him by being called a liberal.

By: jb

jb — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:27:30 +0000

A drowning man will grasp at straws.

By: EugeneDebs

EugeneDebs — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:20:37 +0000

Halperin taking abject stupidity to all new levels

By: barfly

barfly — Mon, 25 Aug 2008 00:04:48 +0000

If McCain’s houses are investment properties, the Obama oppo team should find out when they were purchased, and put out a campaign ad, showing how much his investments have lost in the last four years.

By: kasinca

kasinca — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:56:35 +0000

Black is white, bad is good, war is peace, etc. You get the picture. These Rovian morons read 1984 and the MSM is allowing them to use it as a prop. The fourth estate is absolutely owned by the reichwingnuts.

By: jasperjava

jasperjava — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:33:16 +0000

Halperin: what… a… friggin’… TOOL.

It’s ALWAYS good news for the Republicans.

Watergate? Good news for the Republicans.
Iran-Contra? Good news for the Republicans.
Hurricane Katrina? Good news for the Republicans.
The Iraq War fiasco? Good news for the Republicans.

I’m so SICK of the so-called “liberal” media. With very few exceptions, they’re a bunch of blow-dried brainless twits.

By: COProgressive

COProgressive — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:13:28 +0000

I saw that this morning and almost spit out my coffee through my nose. This type of blather is truely Rovian, spin your negatives into positives any way you can, and spin your opponents strong point into weaknesses. You all know, of course, that Karl Rove is working for the McSame as Bush campaign from behind the green curtain. He’s out of sight for the McSame as Bush campaign because his negatives are lower than his product, the shrub.

So, when ever you hear this kind of BS from a Repuglican mindless mouthpiece, know it’s Rove Talking Points, Rove Talking Points, ROVE TALKING POINTS!

Tell everyone, this is ROVE BS TALKING POINTS!

By: McWars

McWars — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:12:29 +0000

Hi Bilbo, I suppose she didn’t want to be on the record as passed over for Biden. So yeah, she didn’t want any inquiries unless she was guaranteed to make the cut. That would have been telling Obama to consider no one else. Hillaresque now goes alongside Shermanesque.

She asked not to be vetted unless she was going to be picked, the two officials said, speaking on a condition of anonymity to describe the private discussions.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/23/20522/6066/822/573785

By: pete

pete — Sun, 24 Aug 2008 22:02:02 +0000

That’s later in the song Wayne.

The World would be a better place
If the stupid and greedy were fed
To the poor and huddled masses…