CNN Thinks Only The Top Five Percent Of America’s Income Earners Count
CNN Thinks Only The Top Five Percent Of America’s Income Earners Count
In an interview with former NBA star Charles Barkley today, CNN host Wolf Blitzer discussed the respective tax plans being offered by Sens. Barack Obama and John McCain. This is the on-screen graphic that CNN displayed during the interview, which the network represented as the “average tax bill change”:
The graphic above only displays the “average tax change” on incomes above $161,000 – the top five percent of income earners in the nation. The graphic is therefore deceptive and misleading, as it suggests that McCain’s tax plan offers a greater benefit than Obama’s. In reality, for most Americans, Obama’s tax plan would offer three times the benefit.
Here’s the impact of McCain and Obama’s tax plan on incomes below $161,000 – the part that CNN left out:
| MCCAIN | OBAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Income | Avg. tax bill | Avg. tax bill |
| $112K-$161K | -$2,614 | -$2,204 |
| $66K-$112K | -$1,009 | -$1,290 |
| $38K-$66K | -$319 | -$1,042 |
| $19K-$38K | -$113 | -$892 |
| Under $19K | -$19 | -$567 |
Using his deceptive chart, Blizter tried – but failed – to get Barkley to voice his opposition to an increase in taxes on the wealthiest Americans to pay for national priorities:
BLITZER: If Obama has his way, you would spend another $701,885 in taxes. $700,000 above and beyond – you pay a lot of taxes right now if you’re making millions of dollars a year as you are. How do you feel about that?
BARKLEY: Well, I think that if you’re rich — I thank God I’ve been very successful — if you’re rich, you’re always going to be rich. If we pay more in taxes, I got no problem with that. If you’re making that kind of money, a couple hundred thousand dollars here or there are not going to change your life.
Let’s be realistic. I’ve been very fortunate and blessed. I did a great job of saving my money. But I got no problem if I’m making that type of money, paying more in taxes to be honest with you.
Watch it:
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
BARKLEY: Well, I think that if you’re rich — I thank God I’ve been very successful — if you’re rich, you’re always going to be rich. If we pay more in taxes, I got no problem with that
Good retort Barkley
August 26th, 2008 at 5:35 pmMany thanks to Charles Barkley for expressing a patriotic desire to help our society instead of an over-riding self-interest and greed.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:35 pmNot sure how a graphic showing McFiveAndaHalfYears offering a quartermil+ tax break to people earning over $2.9 mil a year helps the Republicans but the concept of asking Sir Charles about it is priceless. I assume they will balance this out by asking Michael Jordan to assess the candidates’ energy plans.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:37 pmServes him right, wtf was he asking Charles Barkley about this anyway.
Since when does being a sports star and having the almost obligatory money that goes with it have anything to do with being an expert on the tax policy of Presidential candidates.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:38 pmNice try, you dried up old barstid.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:41 pmto paraphrase Barkley:
“…and if they have a problem with that, FCUK EM!”
(from an interview he gave recently published in Men’s Journal)
August 26th, 2008 at 5:42 pmIs this the best political coverage Exxon can buy? Maybe they can tap Michael Phelps on foreign relations?
August 26th, 2008 at 5:45 pm49erDem Says:
——————————————————————————–
Many thanks to Charles Barkley for expressing a patriotic desire to help our society instead of an over-riding self-interest and greed.
In other words, thanks to Charles Barkley for not becoming a Republican.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:46 pmI’ve never heard one celebrity, actor, musician or athlete, say they wouldn’t be happy to pay more taxes. The only people who seem to complain are those that inherited their wealth and think they have everything coming to them and nobody anything.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:46 pmStar Trek’s Mr Spock sez, tax breaks for the few must be sacrificed for the interests of the many.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:49 pmI may have to vote for “The Round Mound Of Rebound” one of these days if he runs for statewide office. He went to Auburn, and I’m a Crimson Tider!
August 26th, 2008 at 5:51 pm“CNN Thinks Only The Top Five Percent Of America’s Income Earners Count”
The fact that Wolf Blitzer is a Republican is not news. The amazing story is that 40% of the bottom 95% of America’s income earners think only the top 5% count!
August 26th, 2008 at 5:51 pmCould Blitzer be more of a tool? Was he born a tool, or did he achieve tooldom?
August 26th, 2008 at 5:52 pmHow many shekels does Blitzer think he’s going to take with him when he goes?
====
August 26th, 2008 at 5:54 pmWolf, how about a piece on the history of tax rates in the U.S.? Highlight rates paid during wartime. Now that would be more informative than a celebrity athlete interview. But a bow to Mr. Barkley for his answer.
August 26th, 2008 at 5:57 pmSo it’s now obvious Blitzer demeans, even hates anyone earning under $161,000 a year, and panders to the rich. Why does Blitzer hate middle class & poor Americans? Someone needs to confront him with this. With this garbage from Blitzer, plus the CNN innuendo this morning– “did Michelle Obama really mean what she said??” CNN is revealing itself to be REpub friendly, McCain friendly, and totally out of touch with most Americans. Sad to see CNN go down the tubes like this, trying to be another Fox, the epitome of trash opinionated lies.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:00 pmMy goodness how can a national TV NT so blatantly misrepresent the facts ?The Obama camp ought to go public with CNN’s bogus charts.Shameless.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:01 pmdasm Says:
——————————————————————————–
Why does Blitzer hate middle class & poor Americans?
When you become a Republican it’s automatic. If you are middle class or poor,and you become a Republican, then you hate yourself.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:08 pmAnyone who isn’t completely lazy about getting their news can see right through their fluff and spin. I really don’t know why I was so surprised by their abominable coverage of the Convention last night.
The worst part about CNN is that it still somehow manages to avoid being generally viewed as the Fox News-lite that it truly has become. sacrificing real journalists to help the bottom line = FTW!
August 26th, 2008 at 6:09 pm666lattes Says:
Anyone who isn’t completely lazy about getting their news can see right through their fluff and spin.
What’s disturbing is that at least half of the American public IS completely lazy and can’t (or won’t) see through their fluff and spin.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:15 pmI’m still waiting for Fran Townsend to comment on the DNC. That CNN stable is full of right hooved horses. Will she whinny or snarl when her turn at the microphone comes?
August 26th, 2008 at 6:17 pmWOW, just super wow…Thank you Charles Barkley for being a true patriot, I have to say that I truly respect you much, much more now…I always thought most pro spots guys were all about greed, thank you for showing a very touching human side….this actually made my day.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:21 pmCNN’s coverage has been abyssmal–it is unwatchable to me. I have found PBS with Jim Lehrer and Mark Shields to be fair and informative. MSNBC is like an insane asylum and all the anchors (except Rachel and Keith) have major issues! Talk about fragile egos.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:22 pmI highly recommend George Lakoff’s latest book. He contrasts the Strict Father model Republican Party vs. the Nurturing Parent Democratic Party.
Those who want the illusion of firm structure and strict rules go for the Republicans, regardless of family income. If they’re poor they may ended up hating themselves, as effort always equates into success and poor results are due to individual failings. As the Strict Father knows how to get his way, Republicans understand marketing. They know how to get their message across.
George encourages Democrats to use empathy and collaboration to address problems systemically. He clearly calls for new frames, new narratives to engage the public. There’s much more to his message, well worth checking out.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:27 pmMy only problem with more taxes is more wasteful spending. Which the government is more than capable of performing this task with ease.
I wish one person could point me to a Government agency that is run efficiently. I guess for the life of me can not think of one.
If the Government ran health care if would be a disaster in the area of the Titanic or the Great Flood.
I wish one candidate would introduce a flat tax. Everyone pays 10%. All corporations would pay 15%.
But No we have a tax system they can not even understand, Sounds like a great idea to give them more of are money and let them decide what they should spend it on, Like maybe $6000.00 Toilet seats.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:29 pmI’ll second the recommendation of PBS, tanglewood. Personally, I don’t subscribe to cable so it’s my main tv news source anyway. Heck! Even that condescending gasbag Brooks can sound, relatively, rational when he’s on with Lehrer.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:30 pmGood for Charles Barkley. That must have been frustrating for poor Blitzer. It’s too bad that Barkley didn’t ask where the rest of the taxpaying citizens were.
Besides, many of the people in their tax bracket pay no tax at all because of all the income sheltering schemes they are involved in. Just like the 63% of corporations that pay no income tax. Think of what we could do with all the money we are NOT collecting from corporations.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:30 pmJoewarmer Says: He is an idiot with a sheet of Reichwing talking points that he can type from all day long.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:31 pmI cant understand why anyone would take putz blitzer seriously he is only worried about his face time and his paycheck and to bow and scrape for his corprate masters hope ya get fleas in that thing on ur face u call a beard
August 26th, 2008 at 6:32 pmI guess the Truth hurts!!!
August 26th, 2008 at 6:33 pmstateofthedivision Says:
Wolf, how about a piece on the history of tax rates in the U.S.? Highlight rates paid during wartime. Now that would be more informative than a celebrity athlete interview. But a bow to Mr. Barkley for his answer.
Actually I read something recently that if corporations paid the same tax now they paid in the 60’s (when they were doing quite well and growing by leaps and bounds), we could pay off the national debt in a little more than a year. I wonder why the Democrats don’t hammer on how little the corporations pay in taxes. McCain likes to say that corporations take their business over seas because they are taxed to death here. Then how can he account for the 65% of corporations who pay no taxes.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:34 pmThis Washington Post chart shows the much steeper tax breaks Barack Obama provides working and middle class Americans.
Families at every income level up to $110,000 would see a bigger drop in their taxes under Obama’s plan than McCain.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:36 pmJoewarmer Says:
If the Government ran health care if would be a disaster in the area of the Titanic or the Great Flood.
Oh really. Then how can you account for the fact that Medicare is run with 5% overhead and the for-profit health insurance companies run with a 50% overhead? Also, do you hear our Senators and Congress people complaining about their health care? No? It’s government run health care.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:36 pmJoewarmer Says:
I guess the Truth hurts!!!
No, you just pull crap out of your butt and sling it on TP, no facts, nothing to back it up, just Reichwinger bull crap…as usual.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:38 pmThis Washington Post chart shows the much steeper tax breaks Barack Obama provides working and middle class Americans.
Families at every income level up to $110,000 would see a bigger drop in their taxes under Obama’s plan than McCain.
I guess i have a question, how is Mr Obama going to pay for the health care program, while cutting taxes? I guess we can just print more money or if you still have checks left, Lets go shopping.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:38 pmJoewarmer, here’s a hint;
we have plenty of genuine right-wing trolls who are more than capable of making their side look foolish.
We don’t need your amateurish efforts to discredit them.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:42 pmI really wish this new troll would get with the program.
First of all, troll, it’s kind of stupid to assume a program which hasn’t reached a final configuration is a “disaster”. Such an assumption means that one would reject a “perfect” plan. Also stupid.
Second. It’s funny you should use the example of the “$6,000.00 toilet seat” as an example since, like most trollish gibberish, that particular story was debunked. The “toilet seat” in question was a component of a bathroom for a zero gee environment.
The problem with a bathroom in a space vehicle is that if it doesn’t work, everybody dies and the space vehicle crashes or carries the frozen crew for all eternity. So, a seemingly “wasteful” expenditure is really nothing of the sort.
That being said, there are plenty of examples of government waste. And, just off the top of my head, I would offer Social Security as an example of a competently designed government service. Despite the worst efforts of generations of greedy, incompetent, politicians; it continues to provide it’s services.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:43 pmWho says i am a Right-wing Troll?? I guess you should read what i wrote as i think none of my ideas have ever been mentioned by a republican.
As they would make sense as it seem Common sense on this forum is in short supply.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:45 pmGotta wonder if Charlies Barkley could see that graphic, most likely not.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:46 pmI vote for Charles Barkley to be the Sen. from AZ…we really like him here in Phoenix!! Now HE’S a straight shooter!
August 26th, 2008 at 6:46 pmRUCerious Says:
Gotta wonder if Charlies Barkley could see that graphic, most likely not.
No he wouldn’t unless they had a monitor feed within his sight.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:49 pmcommon sense? Why are so many so over confident? I can take no argument seriously no matter it’s nature when the source of the argument relies more on their own boorish self image rather than objectivity…
August 26th, 2008 at 6:49 pmThat being said, there are plenty of examples of government waste. And, just off the top of my head, I would offer Social Security as an example of a competently designed government service. Despite the worst efforts of generations of greedy, incompetent, politicians; it continues to provide it’s services.
I guess i would not call it Competently Run, As their are more than few example of people getting checks that were deceased.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:49 pmLOL! Another troll, and a cut-rate version at that, blathering about “common sense”. I love it!
You see, troll, the problem with your “logic” is that you are wasting your time trying, unsuccessfully, to denigrate people who are desperate to begin fixing the massive damage done to our society by a generation of greedy, incompetent, politicians.
That’s why we call you troll.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:51 pmI vote for Charles Barkley to be the Sen. from AZ…we really like him here in Phoenix!! Now HE’S a straight shooter!
Wasn’t he known more for his rebounding?
August 26th, 2008 at 6:52 pmBut he woudl make a strong opponent for McCain- a rebound specialist who’s strong on defense… I like it.
Good evening dbadass. How’s tricks?
I tell ya. I almost feel sorry for this troll. It’s hardly worth bashing as it seems so adept at bashing itself. Kinda like ol’ Flippy McSpin, working too damn hard to separate himself from former “strongly held positions”.
August 26th, 2008 at 6:54 pmBTW, troll. I didn’t say there were not problems with SS, including fraud within and without. But, the fact remains that it continues to operate pretty much as it should as long as people don’t try to creatively use the funds for other purposes.
To rule out trying something because of the fear it may not work is cowardly and stupid. That’s another reason we call you troll.
August 26th, 2008 at 7:00 pmWow, the troll pool is getting low, they are sending in the logic challenged one.
Do your other teenage friends have work for the summer at the RNC also?
Are they short changing you with the 5 cents a post pay scale?
Do the local dogs hate you?
August 26th, 2008 at 7:01 pmJoewarmer Says:
If the Government ran health care if would be a disaster in the area of the Titanic or the Great Flood.
Why don’t you ask Congress how badly their Government-run healthcare program is working? They all seem quite happy with it. And that is one of the programs being presented by the Democratic Party, but NOT by anyone in the republic party. Does that mean that none of the Repug Congress members are happy with their program?
August 26th, 2008 at 7:03 pmThe graphic is therefore deceptive and misleading, as it suggests that McCain’s tax plan offers a greater benefit than Obama’s. In reality, for most Americans, Obama’s tax plan would offer three times the benefit.
TP, talking about deceptive and misleading graphics?
That’s a howl.
The Drum Major survey is also deceptive and misleading, yet Think Progress pulls it out whenever they want their opinions validated.
That the survey is hokier than a three-dollar-bill doesn’t seem to matter – when it makes their case.
August 26th, 2008 at 7:26 pmWe’re all the richer thanks to guys like Charles Barkley:
“Let’s be realistic. I’ve been very fortunate and blessed. I did a great job of saving my money. But I got no problem if I’m making that type of money, paying more in taxes to be honest with you.”
Blessings to him for that statement.
August 26th, 2008 at 7:43 pmLet’s start by abolishing the Dept. of Homeland Security and Bush Jr’s Faith-Based Initiatives office & personnel, places where corruption, mismanagement and spectacular incompetence reign supreme.
And since corruption is something the Bush Jr Administration doesn’t worry about when it comes to raping the taxpayers and US treasury, let’s also focus on every single “no bid” contract this Administration has signed.
No doubt, you’ll favor aggressive criminal sanctions against the war profiteers and those who profited off of the Katrina response, but have so few positive results to show for their malignant responses.
August 26th, 2008 at 7:51 pmWell damn TP, they were talking to Charles Barkley so they used the upper most salaries.
So where’s the beef?
August 26th, 2008 at 8:11 pmThe problem with all of these charts is that they don’t reflect what is happening to the national debt. We should look at that as if each citizen owes a part of it. Tax “breaks” are, in essence, borrowed money. During eight years of Bush Tax breaks, my share of the national debt went up $20,000. My family nets $75,000 a year. A family of 4 had a debt increase of $80,000. In our tax bracket, looking at it from the stand point of my children’s generation and as a middle class American, all of these tax cuts are BS in terms of the future. Taxes are our responsibility as citizens. I’m tired of them being used as a false statement of how much a candidate loves us. Give me some reality please!
August 26th, 2008 at 8:38 pmBARKLEY: Well, I think that if you’re rich — I thank God I’ve been very successful — if you’re rich, you’re always going to be rich. If we pay more in taxes, I got no problem with that. If you’re making that kind of money, a couple hundred thousand dollars here or there are not going to change your life.
Amen, brother!
August 26th, 2008 at 8:44 pmha ha – Charles Barkley didn’t follow along with Blitzer’s talking point script
CNN lies
August 26th, 2008 at 9:07 pmI think Sir Charles has a good idea where he fits in society. He said that he should not be a role model. That gets quoted. But, then he said the role models should be your parents, teachers, ministers, etc.
Barkley has a schtick on television. He tries to be outrageous and that is why it is fun to watch him, even if he hates your team.
August 27th, 2008 at 1:58 ampoor wolfie needs to get himself some new research monkeys. otherwise he should have known better than to ask charles barkley of all people about republicans and the economy — and not because barkley ain’t no guru:
August 27th, 2008 at 3:41 am
more from barkley:
August 27th, 2008 at 3:49 am
Msg to troll:
My father died 14 years ago.
My mother still receives is SS checks because that’s the way the system is supposed to work fcukwit.
The World is a big, complicated place for tiny minds like yours.
August 27th, 2008 at 6:35 amSorry Belac…I actually meant “Straight Talker” as in Straight Talk Express ( the one we DON’T get from McCain)but I guess that still works!:)
August 27th, 2008 at 8:34 amJoewarmer Says:
I wish one person could point me to a Government agency that is run efficiently. I guess for the life of me can not think of one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Medicare has a MUCH lower overhead than HMO’s. Rural electrification was brilliantly handled. Your complaint is another regurgitation of a mindless rightwing talking point.
If the Government ran health care if would be a disaster in the area of the Titanic or the Great Flood.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You know this HOW? We have the most dominant military in the history of the world that is a GOVERNMENT PROGRAM. Just mindless hivemind repitition. Rent a brain cell.
I wish one candidate would introduce a flat tax. Everyone pays 10%. All corporations would pay 15%.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Screwing the working man and the poor. The Rich get more OUT of our system check out the Bear Stearns bailout THOSE stockholders wont be hurting, meanwhile if your Mom and Pop store goes bankrupt Uncle Sam wont be helping out. Capital Gains are already taxed at a lower rate than my labor. IF we even START talking about a flat tax it would need to be a flat tax on disposable income. NOT just income.
But No we have a tax system they can not even understand, Sounds like a great idea to give them more of are money and let them decide what they should spend it on, Like maybe $6000.00 Toilet seats.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You still dont get it. Why do you think things like that happened? Because the Pentagon couldnt find a Home Depot? NO because a HUGE part of our economy is about public cost turning into privat profit. The Pentagon understands very well that a big part of their function is to do the R and D for hightech and be a conduit for subsidies for corporations. That is OUR tax dollars being funneled into rich peoples pockets. It is SYSTEMIC. You would KEEP that part of the system but RAISE taxes on the poor and middle class to drop them on the Rich and corporations. I make a lot of money and dont really spend much time whining about having to pitch in to pay for having a society.
August 27th, 2008 at 8:47 amJoewarmer Says:
I guess the Truth hurts!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How would you know? You wouldnt know the truth if it bit your SACK and stole your wallet.
August 27th, 2008 at 8:49 amJoewarmer Says:
As they would make sense as it seem Common sense on this forum is in short supply.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So you come to add to the IGNORANCE quotent is THAT it? MORON
August 27th, 2008 at 8:51 amj swift Says:
Serves him right, wtf was he asking Charles Barkley about this anyway.
Since when does being a sports star and having the almost obligatory money that goes with it have anything to do with being an expert on the tax policy of Presidential candidates.
I’m sure they didn’t ask him as a Tax Expert you dolt. Barkley is also involved in local government and I think is contemplating a run for Govenor of Alabama. That fact alone makes his opinion on the matter more valuable than yours AND since he does have tons of money, the tax plans DO effect him.
I think it’s nice that Barkley isn’t blinded by the voracious sense of greed AND entitlement shown by many in the top earning percentiles.
Swift you ain’t my friend…
August 27th, 2008 at 11:36 ambarfly Says:
The graphic is therefore deceptive and misleading, as it suggests that McCain’s tax plan offers a greater benefit than Obama’s. In reality, for most Americans, Obama’s tax plan would offer three times the benefit.
TP, talking about deceptive and misleading graphics?
That’s a howl.
The Drum Major survey is also deceptive and misleading, yet Think Progress pulls it out whenever they want their opinions validated.
That the survey is hokier than a three-dollar-bill doesn’t seem to matter – when it makes their case.
Oh barf, go back to the Drum Major thread and whine about it, or you can actually contribute something to the topic at hand – you lil jerk!
August 27th, 2008 at 11:37 amCoincidence that McCain’s planned taxbreak for his income bracket covers his household expenses?
August 27th, 2008 at 12:00 pmThis is another example that the “old world jounalism of Murrow, Cronkite and Rather is dead and buried. In the case of the Time Magazine reporter Ms Tumulty, she seems to think the finding out the who, what, where, when and how have been replaced with a steno pad, which she records what ABC said in rebuttle to the complaint of Congressman Kucinich. There is a great disconnect with what happened and the points made by ABC. She asks little of no questions to ABC. She takes what is handed to her and repeats it vebatim and then calls that reporting. I call is stenography. Lida Sohbet sohbet sesli chat Gelinlik Modelleri
January 11th, 2009 at 11:31 amIf you’re referring to Karl Schwarz’ articles, if they are true, how will we ever know unless the news media gets involved without bias? The military under orders not to speak out may never convey Karl Scharz’ expose’. Sesli Sohbet If Cheney was truly involved in 9/11 and protected in some way, then he’s being protected by what may be going on in the Caspian Sea area as well. That pre-9/11 August 10, 2000 article drives the point home to me that Cheney had a vested interest in the oil at the Caspian Sea area (before 9/11). Fx15 From all I’ve read in Schwarz’ articles, he claims the Taliban was working on a deal with Argentina with that pipeline in the Caspian Sea area and UNOCOL wanted the deal instead. Orjinal Lida It’s too much to get into here and I’m not able to convey in here what Schwarz has presented in his articles. Sikis Dig into Schwarz’ articles to learn more about the unnamed soldier’s experiences related to so-called Black Ops missions in the Caspian Sea area in Schwarz’ article. What Schwarz had to present in this article is an eye opener: kurtlar vadisi pusu izle
January 30th, 2009 at 2:32 pmThank you very much.
February 2nd, 2009 at 4:50 pmsesli chat
sesli sohbet
sesli chat
sesli sohbet
I want suits in Colorado, New Jersey, and any other state where illegal suppression campaigns are being conducted. And some real looks at the polling methodology would also be eye opening.
mynet
February 4th, 2009 at 2:25 pmdizi izle
sohbet odalari
ttnet sohbet
If you’re making that kind of money, a couple hundred thousand dollars here or there are not going to change your life.
February 9th, 2009 at 3:16 pmyo nunca habia visto a Eugenio Derbez haciendo el papel de malo pero esta pelicula esta muy bonita y si le cae ambos papeles pero lo disfruto mas cuando hace el papel de comedian
March 12th, 2009 at 8:27 amk?z oyunlar? | araba oyunlar? | flash oyun | oyun sitesi
engage in handcrafted Jewelry,cheap jewelry,jewelry wholesale,wholesale handmade jewelry,wholesale pearl jewelry,wholesale gemstone jewelry wholesale jewelry | handmade jewelry | jewelry wholesale | handcrafted jewelry | crystal jewelry
March 24th, 2009 at 9:11 pmThank you very much.
April 15th, 2009 at 10:02 amsesli chat
sesli sohbet
Sesli Sohbet
April 16th, 2009 at 3:02 pmSesli Chat
Sesli Sohbet
Sesli Chat