Think Progress

Abramoff sentenced to four years in prison.

Today, U.S. District Judge Ellen Huvelle sentenced disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff to four years in prison “on conspiracy and other charges after federal prosecutors recommended leniency due to Abramoff’s cooperation in pursuing corruption cases against lawmakers and former administration officials. He faced a maximum of 11 years under a plea deal reached in 2006.”



20 Responses to “Abramoff sentenced to four years in prison.”

  1. Bilbo Hussein Baggins says:

    White color crime certainly pays. If he had robbed a 7-11 of a sixpack, he would have gotten 10 years.


  2. help.me.jebus says:

    maybe now he can lobby the inmates not to rape him.


  3. help.me.jebus says:

    can’t wait for Rove, Libby, Mike Hayden, Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush to join him


  4. beemerr90s says:

    I’d trade 4 years in prison for the millions he made and political power he bought. In a heartbeat. What a disgrace.


  5. raynman says:

    I wonder if the ink will even be dry on his pardon papers the night after the election?


  6. Chris L says:

    Four years from now, he will win the republican nomination for president, and begin campaigning against Obama.


  7. IBTunion4obama says:

    That’s great news. I mean, the media was making a buzz about Palin’s speech until we heard about this news AND

    “The number of Americans who registered for unemployment benefits last week rose to 444,000, near a five-year high, according to data compiled by the Labor Department”.


  8. pete says:

    I wonder if a pardon will take that long, raynman. Why on Earth would Chimpy be thoughtful enough to wait for the election? I’m sure that he is eager to protect “his guy” from a single day’s incarceration and Flippy’s campaign isn’t likely to stop him.


  9. Oval12345678 aka James K. Sayre says:

    Thank you for the timely information on the sentencing of Jack Abramoff, corporate lobbyist. to four years imprisonment. Perhaps TP could remind us of all his many contacts and connections of corruption to members of the House, the Senate and the White House. It must be quite a long Roll of Dishonor.


  10. LividLib says:

    i’ve got the perfect “going-to-the-pokey” gift for the SOB – abstinence pants!


  11. whirlaway says:

    I think it is an even better idea for GW Bush to pardon Abramoff before November. That will give McSame a chance to say that he “strongly” opposes Dumbya on this issue…


  12. the east beast says:

    Hopefully Abramoff is only the first of many.


  13. stateofthedivision says:

    Abramoff is a step above Abu Ghraib’s Lyndie England, but this reeks of the the usual Bush investigation, where the big dogs are kept out of the study’s scope.

    The NRCC lost nearly a million dollars from embezzlement. Their investigation didn’t include top management or the Executive Committee.

    Repugnicants play fast and loose with other people’s money. Wwhen caught red handed, they ramp up damage control.


  14. joe cantwell says:

    he needs a pen pal.

    trolls?

    *

    thank you.

    $


  15. krazeeinjun says:

    Here’s hoping that whatever cooperation he’s provided to investigators that got him that reduced sentence puts a few more GOP crooks behind bars.

    Just saying . . .


  16. donmyers says:

    I hope is joined by the thousands of others who stole from us.


  17. Doc Rock says:

    Was the leniency recommendation for cooperation in terms of what he revealed or for what he didn’t?


  18. wizard2000 says:

    “Do the crime, do the time.”

    Of course, it is interesting to note how the Justice Department handled Abramoff’s sentencing compared to former Gov. Siegelman’s sentencing.

    Abramoff: leniency.

    Siegelman: throw the book at, calling for the maximum.

    But, but, some might say, Abramoff “cooperated,” helping with multiple criminal cases against a multitude of culture of corruption Republicans.

    However, you see, Abramoff “cooperated” in another way.

    How many trips did he take to visit Bush and Cheney in the White House? What did they discuss?

    With all this talk about the Justice Department “getting” compromised/corrupt public officials through the “cooperation” of Jack Abramoff, why the silence about all the contacts Abramoff had with White House public officials?

    Ooooh, that’s what they mean by Abramoff “cooperating” and why his sentence was reduced so much from that required by law.

    “Do the crime, do the time” just doesn’t seem to apply to Republicans, especially inside the corrupt Bush/Cheney White House. Remember Scooter Libby?


  19. kasinca says:

    They should send Grover Norquist and Tom DeLay to keep him company.


  20. sacopenapa says:

    Lock the bastard and throw the keys away!



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll