Comments on: McCain ‘Lipstick’ ad pulled from YouTube due to possible copyright violation.

By: belac

belac — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:55:48 +0000

Oh, Belac I could think of a dozen words you would have to “Google” to understand what they ment. Don’t even. You’re no Jeopardy champ.

Oh Tracy, always thinking of me… thanks Champ!
I eagerly await the list… while you’re putting it together could you also explian to me how ‘progressive tax codes’ are evil?
I’m not sure I agree that they are killing America, but hearing you explain might kill me, I just about died of the giggles up there…

By: unionave

unionave — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 10:40:07 +0000

If you like the way things are done now Mr Bank Robber (JM Dillinger) himself will give you more of the same .

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:44:56 +0000

Oh, and if my previous comment appears, I’d like to add that McCain’s website says nothing about drilling to alleviate Americans’ high gas prices.

Ruh-roh…

By: alpuz3

alpuz3 — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:28:41 +0000

Tracy__5 Says:

“Like McCain?

I agree.”

No, like Obama saying $250 is the threshold. I think that’s his number. McCain was to toungue in cheek when he said $5 million.

I’d hold off on the whole McCain was too tongue in cheek line until this whole drugs and hookers thing blows over there, Trace.

By: had enough

had enough — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:10:46 +0000

Voting for McCain because of taxes is not a legitimate reason unless you are one in the $200K? -$250K income level.

Q: Why do people support McCain unliss in the upper incomelevels?

A: they are misinformed or prejudice.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:08:09 +0000

If torture works, McCain’s confessionals are the truth.

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:04:28 +0000

And McCain just can’t help himself:

http://www.johnmccain.com/#tab1

He’s running the ad on his site, complete with Couric.

By: dbadass

dbadass — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:01:37 +0000

Tracy_5
What is your specific problem with taxation? Do you just not like contributing to the common good or what. How would you suggest a government be funded?

By: dbadass

dbadass — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:58:31 +0000

#87 makes no sense. Might you explain this Tracy_5?

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:57:51 +0000

Mr. McCain’s plan will significantly ease the tax burden on American families with children by doubling the personal exemption to $7,000 from $3,500.

So, no relief for the above-mentioned – but a doubling of the personal exemption for the wealthiest families in the country.

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:55:24 +0000

From the WSJ, regarding McCain’s plan:

Mr. McCain’s plan will significantly ease the tax burden on American families with children by doubling the personal exemption to $7,000 from $3,500. This means a larger percentage tax reduction for families with smaller taxable incomes, and specifically helps families in the middle income levels. And a President McCain will enable people to keep more of their earnings by preventing Congress from raising tax rates.

So, gay couples, singles, and older workers would see no benefit.

And exactly how would he be able to to that, with a veto-proof House and Senate?

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:46:41 +0000

No, that you would be soooooo concerned about someone misspelling a word.

Actually, I was merely commenting on the tendency of critical people to neglect their own work. I said it was a law of the internet – meaning applicable to all (including me).

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:40:54 +0000

Couple of hours? Unless your attention span isn’t that long.

Do your research, and get back to me. I’ll be buzzing around…

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:39:25 +0000

Why are you so concerned about typos and not the essence of the post?

That you’re so gosh-danged smart, that you could recite words someone would have to look up?

That essence?

Riiight.

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:36:56 +0000

No, like Obama saying $250 is the threshold. I think that’s his number. McCain was to toungue in cheek when he said $5 million.

Wrong.

Obama stated that the government considers those in the $45,000-80,000 range – unless you can post a quote that proves your assertion?

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:35:07 +0000

So, what about McCain’s tax plan specifically meets your approval, Tracy?

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:33:28 +0000

Didn’t think that those who are hard up for criticism would care so much.

What the hell are you babbling about?

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:31:52 +0000

Sure….that’s what you guys always say when things aren’t going you way. Cry me a river.

Look at the sampling and methodology of any poll you think favors McC. They don’t take into account the huge swell of new democratic registrations.

Cooked.

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:29:54 +0000

It’s better than some snob politician telling me what “rich” is.

Like McCain?

I agree.

By: barfly

barfly — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:29:01 +0000

Typo? I take it you have never made a mistake? Are you really that hard up?

I’ve made plenty – but I proof read first, and you don’t see them.

Lazy?