Think Progress

On ‘The View,’ McCain Falsely Claims Palin Never Requested Earmarks As Governor Of Alaska»

Appearing on “The View” today, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) falsely claimed that Sarah Palin never requested earmarks as the governor of Alaska. “Not as governor she didn’t,” McCain told Barbara Walters after she noted Palin “took some earmarks”:

WALTERS: What is she going to reform specifically, senator?

MCCAIN: Well, first of all, earmark spending, which she vetoed a half a billion dollars worth in the state of Alaska.

WALTERS: She also took some earmarks there.

BEHAR: A lot.

MCCAIN: No, not as governor she didn’t, she vetoed…

WALTERS: As Mayor.

MCCAIN: Well, look, the fact is that she was a reform governor.

Watch it:

McCain’s claim that Palin never accepted earmarks as the governor of Alaska is divorced from reality. In fact, she actively sought them:

– Though Palin did reduce Alaska’s earmark requests, “in her two years in office, Alaska has requested nearly $750 million in special federal spending, by far the largest per-capita request in the nation.”

– In March 2008, Palin wrote an op-ed in the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner, saying that her “role at the federal level is simply to submit the most well-conceived earmark requests we can” and that her reduction of requests was a response “to the changing circumstances in Congress.”

– In February 2008, Palin’s office sent Sen. Ted Stevens (R-AK) “a 70-page memo outlining almost $200 million worth of new funding requests for the state.”

– In her most recent earmark requests, “Palin requested millions of federal dollars for everything from improving recreational halibut fishing to studying the mating habits of crabs and the DNA of harbor seals.”

As ThinkProgress has noted, Palin has requested earmarks of the very type that McCain routinely mocks while on the campaign trail. As Walters pointed out, Palin was also a big fan of congressional pork as the Mayor of Wasilla, even hiring a lobbyist to help secure them.




Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

56 Responses to “On ‘The View,’ McCain Falsely Claims Palin Never Requested Earmarks As Governor Of Alaska”

  1. Badmoodman Says:

    How much money would it take to provide earmarks for all Americans at the same rate that Sarah Palin bagged them for Wasila? On an annual basis?

    A mere half a trillion dollars.

    Exact number $422,302,519,152.


  2. tom Says:

    When will the press take off the kid gloves and start calling “BS” on the Pentacostal Pork-barrel Princess of Wasilla?

    If McNumbNuts wants to make a big issue out of earmarks, then he needs to live with the consequences of his stupidity. Failin’ Palin is no “reformer”; she is just a “new, improved” version of the same old corruption and sense of entitlement that has plagued Alaska ever since it achieved statehood.


  3. pbg Says:

    An ad I’d like to see:
    Sarah Palin in Matthew Lesko’s question-mark suit doing late-night TV ads.


  4. 49erDem Says:

    The real question is what will it take for the mainstream media to change its McCain narrative from “straight-talker” to “bald-faced liar.”


  5. StratRat Says:

    McSame - Palin, Lies You Can Believe In.


  6. RickD Says:

    It really is weird seeing the Senator from the most earmark-averse state of the 50 (and I’ll give McCain credit for that) teamed up with the governor of the state that is the most earmark-friendly. Alaska is #1, Arizona #50.

    Weird. Must be confusing for McCain.


  7. McWars Says:

    Drop the reform rhetoric, McStain. Even the press munching on your hot dogs isn’t buying it.


  8. Game of Life Says:

    This was a good show. The women lit mcchimpy’s ass on fire. It was great.

    They did a great job at showing his lies.


  9. Bob Says:

    Later today, John will be on the Gulf Coast of Texas telling everyone there’s no wind and it’s not raining.


  10. spencers mom Says:

    She kept the phu*cking money for the bridge to nowhere!

    It’s really as simple as that! Let’s call it what it is: FRAUD!

    If I took out a mortgage and said that money would be used to purchase a house, but used the money to buy, well, anything else, I’d be in prison.

    As a taxpayer, especially one who doesn’t get annual checks back from my state government, I want my phu*cking money back from Palin’s Alaska!

    PEACE


  11. upside99 Says:

    RickD Says:
    It really is weird seeing the Senator from the most earmark-averse state of the 50 (and I’ll give McCain credit for that) teamed up with the governor of the state that is the most earmark-friendly. Alaska is #1, Arizona #50.

    Weird. Must be confusing for McCain.

    No, RickD, it just shows how far down the sewer Johnny Boy has sold his soul to be POTUS. And it will be written up in future history books about his sell-out, too. What a sad legacy to leave behind, maybe even worse than Dubya’s.


  12. Max-1 Says:

    .

    WOW…

    Palin is a reformer because she reformed Alaska and will reform D.C.

    Whoda-thunk it!

    .


  13. Queequeg Says:

    Hurry, that man needs a prescription of Aricept, quick.


  14. bebop Says:

    So did Barbara or one of the other panelists point out that Palin had IN FACT requested earmarks including studying the DNA of seals? If not shame on them for not doing the research necessary to refute McCain’s lies(or ignorance.) As long as the MSM is lazy the McCain policy of fibbing will succeed.


  15. RUCerious Says:

    Gotta keep a careful eye on those criminalistic, whambamthankymaam harbor seals…


  16. ObamaIsOur44thpres Says:

    Every time McCain and Palin lie - and it’s very often-the media and the democrats need to immediately call them on it and debunk the lies with the truth. They can’t let one lie escape to the ears of the American people.


  17. Alecto Says:

    I wish one of the interviewers would ask him. Will VP Palin be pushing for a wind fall profits tax from Oil companies just as she did while Gov of Alaska? Gawd knows we all could use the money. Each Alaskan received $1,200.
    http://hotair.com/ archives/ 2008/ 08/ 11/ palin-backed-alaskan-windfall-profits-tax/

    But, is not the money, the same money we then spend at the pump to get back next year in a win fall profit tax? Why can we not just have lower pump prices?


  18. margerine Says:

    Honestly, this is The View. I’m not going to get crazy if they’re not asking every last hard question. I’m not sure why that should be their responsibility when there are shows completely focused on news that have done far less.


  19. Innocent Bystander Says:

    McCain is aware that there are things called historical records that contradict his statements, right?

    Oh well, just another example of his version of straight talk. Normal people call them lies.


  20. Alecto Says:

    margerine Says:

    Honestly, this is The View. I’m not going to get crazy if they’re not asking every last hard question. I’m not sure why that should be their responsibility when there are shows completely focused on news that have done far less.

    Remember,
    It is the Daily Show and the Enquirer that are now the true reporters. So, the View….?


  21. mongo Says:

    Can someone please tell me: where are biden and obama?

    Intrade is now showing a republican win, 53% to 46% likelihood repub over dems.

    They need to step up their level of forcefulness, or they are going to get completely run over by the lying republicans, who will simply go for every opportunity to get in front of a camera and microphone to lie about their records, lie about what they’ll do to “reform” washington, and trash democrats every chance they get.

    Obama and Biden need to get moving; their convention is over, they need to get people’s attention.


  22. christopher wiwi Says:

    He was a POW,ya know…….he was under enhanced interrogation for 5 years.


  23. Uncle Ho Says:

    The ’straight-talk’ express my ass!
    It should be renamed the ‘lie-like-a-rug’ show.


  24. limbaughs pilonidal cyst Says:

    It might have been better if she had paid more attention to the mating habits of teenagers, rather than crabs.


  25. hanshiro Says:

    McCain’s biggest threat doesn’t come from Al-Qaeda or Islamic Terrorists…

    it’s fact-checkers


  26. RUCerious Says:

    How is she going to be an agent for change?
    Here’s an article on today’s First Read at MSNBC
    MORE PALIN STORIES

    RAPE KITS: “When Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla, the city billed sexual-assault victims and their insurance companies for the cost of rape kits and forensic examinations,” AP writes. “Palin had been in office for four years when the practice got the attention of state lawmakers in 2000, who passed a bill to stop it. Former Democratic Rep. Eric Croft, who sponsored that bill, said he was disappointed that asking the Wasilla Police Department to stop charging didn’t work. Maria Comella, a McCain-Palin campaign spokeswoman, said Palin ‘does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test.’ … Alaska routinely has the nation’s highest rate of sexual assault.”

    My emphasis above.

    So, even though her town’s police did this for four years, and it was only when the state legislature had to pass a bill to stop Wasilla from doing it,

    Palin ‘does not believe, nor has she ever believed, that rape victims should have to pay for an evidence-gathering test.’

    BULLSHIT.


  27. Alecto Says:

    And now Track is ONLY in the Army because he was arrested for vandalizing school buses, and actually had to spend his last year in HS out of state in Michigan, and the only way NOT to spend jail time was for him to sign up. So, he is not the “Gung ho” patriot as she makes him out to be. He was forced into it.
    http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/ cgi-bin/ readart.cgi?ArtNum=4216
    Truly disgusting parent. I can only wonder what Willow will end up doing. Probably killing Trig while mommy is away galavanting around playing Margaret Thatcher. Another fascist broad.


  28. Dharma Says:

    Cindy McCain was horrific. First, she sneered and said the number of house they have are not a part of the campaign, that she was lucky enough that her parents did well by her…

    Than she said the Russians are the bad guys and that they killed hundreds of women and children.

    OMG. LIE LIE LIE. That doesn’t even make sense as the South Ossetians want to be Russians. We are being lied to about the Georgian conflict and Cindy just threw out terrible propaganda to make the american women hate Russia for something they didn’t do. It was Georgia (and let’s not forget who McCain’s advisor is, a lobbyost for the Republic of Georgia).

    Of course, Elisabeth (a.k.a. “Nazi girl”) was almost sucking on McCain’s weiner for the show.


  29. Cal Malenky Says:

    Johnnie doesn’t use the internets so he doesn’t know how fast his lies can be refuted.


  30. Alecto Says:

    Of course, Elisabeth (a.k.a. “Nazi girl”) was almost sucking on McCain’s weiner for the show.

    Yeah, I think we need to pull a Neo-con on the View and have a write in campaign to get rid of NaziBarbie.
    Is there a website that tracks TV show advertisers?

    Or we can just voice our disgust here:
    http://abc.go.com/site/contactus.html


  31. Max-1 Says:

    .

    Looks like Palin Reformed her family pretty well, too:

    Track… Reformed vandal…
    Bristol… Reformed virgin…

    .


  32. bebop Says:

    I know its only the view but if you have serious guests and ask them serious question and they lie then you MUST call them on the lie


  33. SpoxLogic Says:

    The ladies of the View did a much better job of holding McCain’s can to the fire than any of the MSM. Shouldn’t it be the other way around?


  34. Rich H Says:

    When asked about the tone of his campaign last night, McCain said it didn’t have to be this way. It was all Obama’s fault for not agreeing to town meetings.
    When will someone smack him down.
    What bullshit. I felt my head starting to spin.


  35. christopher wiwi Says:

    Family Values, lies and GOD what more could you ask for the REICH?


  36. spencers mom Says:

    SpoxLogic, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert do a better job reporting facts than any other “news” show, network or cable.

    And they’re not even journalists!

    Catch on, MSM, if you want to retain some shred of credibility!

    PEACE


  37. tubino Says:

    RickD, Alaska is not “earmark-friendly.”

    It is earmark-AGGRESSIVE, as in working very hard with lobbyists to secure earmarks.

    Which IS one thing we elect politicians to do, but since McCain declared this one area to reform, then it doesn’t give him the right to lie about it.

    The real problem is the diversion of research funding from peer-reviewed process to earmarks, i.e. from scientific merit to political patronage system. It went HAYWIRE HUGE in the current administration of Mayberry Machiavellis.


  38. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Cal Malenky Says:

    Johnnie doesn’t use the internets so he doesn’t know how fast his lies can be refuted.
    __________

    Heh… good one… and you might actually be right about that.

    Perhaps John’s first move as POTUS, should the GOOP steal this one too, will be to outlaw “facts”. After all, they just get in the way of a good narrative.


  39. Doc Rock Says:

    Send this to the “View” and see if they’re willing to correct the record! Oh, wait, MSM!


  40. carl2 Says:

    I need clarification here, because I want to make sure I have my facts straight. There seems to be a conflating of “requesting” and “accepting” earmarks. The article says:

    McCain’s claim that Palin never accepted earmarks as the governor of Alaska is divorced from reality. In fact, she actively sought them:

    “Accepted” and “sought” are NOT the same thing. I realize this is a semantic distinction. She isn’t against them if she *sought* them. But if she *sought* them but didn’t *accept* them as governor, then what McCain says is technically true, if fundamentally dishonest.

    Here’s what I want to know before I call the McCain campaign liars: What earmarks did Palin *accept* as governor?

    (Note: I posted the same comment over at the Washington Monthly.)


  41. Alecto Says:

    She ACCEPTED the $27 Million that was EARMARKED for the bridge to nowhere. She decided NOT to build said bridge to nowhere, and she KEPT the money, and spent it on other road constuction projects.


  42. Alecto Says:

    http://www.reuters.com/ article/ vcCandidateFeed7/ idUSN3125537020080901?pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=10272

    “Last year, Palin announced she was stopping state work on the controversial project, earning her admirers from earmark critics and budget hawks from around the nation. The move also thrust her into the spotlight as a reform-minded newcomer.

    The state, however, never gave back any of the money that was originally earmarked for the Gravina Island bridge, said Weinstein and Elerding.

    In fact, the Palin administration has spent “tens of millions of dollars” in federal funds to start building a road on Gravina Island that is supposed to link up to the yet-to-be-built bridge, Weinstein said.

    “She said ‘thanks but no thanks,’ but they kept the money,” said Elerding about her applause line.

    Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, a Republican who represented the Kenai Peninsula city of Homer, is also critical about Palin’s reversal on the bridge issue.

    “You don’t tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it,” said Phillips, who supported Palin’s opponent, Democrat Tony Knowles, in the 2006 gubernatorial race.

    A press release issued by the governor on September 21, 2007 said she decided to cancel state work on the project because of rising cost estimates.

    “It’s clear that Congress has little interest in spending any more money on a bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island,” Palin said in the news release. “Much of the public’s attitude toward Alaska bridges is based on inaccurate portrayals of the projects here.”


  43. spencers mom Says:

    Alecto Says:

    She ACCEPTED the $27 Million that was EARMARKED for the bridge to nowhere. She decided NOT to build said bridge to nowhere, and she KEPT the money, and spent it on other road constuction projects.

    It was $233 million, not $27, but yes, she did keep it for her own pet projects.

    PEACE



  44. had enough Says:

    Does gramps even know he is spreading LIES…There doesn’t appear to be anyone home in that pea brain of his.


  45. Game of Life Says:

    RU@26

    This is old news, but nevertheless relevant.

    Think about the breach of confidentiality in billing the victim and insurance.

    what a cocky hockey lipstick pig.


  46. jb Says:

    Lying fu(king piece of $hit.


  47. thomthum Says:

    In a later statement from Palin: “Oh THOSE earmarks? I’m sorry…I thought earmarks were the things they put on moose to track them….my bad…”


  48. drago Says:

    Is McCain lying about this or is he just completely out of touch with reality?

    Either way, his horrible judgment had rendered him unfit to serve.


  49. bigeugene Says:

    He was completely lying when he said she isn’t for earmarks. Her requests for earmarks for Alaska for 2009 are right on her OWN GOVERNOR WEB PAGE! Seal DNA research request included (remember how McCain has been mocking an earmark for Bear DNA research?):

    http://www.gov.state.ak.us/ omb/ 09_omb/ budget/ FFY09%20Summary%20of%20Fed%20Request.pdf


  50. carl2 Says:

    @Alecto, @spencers mom
    Thanks - I appreciate it. Did she actually get any of those other earmarks she asked for?


  51. kasinca Says:

    The mainstream media, who is always accused of being libera, should tell the truth. JOHN MCSAME IS A G*D D^MNED LIAR.


  52. bigeugene Says:

    And she didn’t fire that chef either. Another lie.


  53. stewarjt Says:

    A new film starring the Republican ticket is titled “Clueless and Cluelesser.”


  54. USpace Says:

    Some Democrats will love that Palin took earmarks, just like the King of Earmarks, Joe Biden.
    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    politics is religion

    feeling is most important
    thinking is not required

    .
    absurd thought -
    God of the Universe says
    claim to care for people

    call yourself progressive
    bad policies hurt poor folk
    .


  55. EugeneDebs Says:

    USpace Says:

    You are an idiot and a liar. Your stream of conciousness inanity is noted but please try to maintain some level of coherence when posting. We already get you are intellectually challenged so forget about trying to be profound. Higher BRAIN function is obviously beyond you just shoot for making sense. Making stupid baseless assertions like you did about progressive policies hurting the poor only outs you as a hivemind moron who knows you are too stupid to think for yourself so parrots the Rush Limbaugh show. Grow up or go away and let the adults talk


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll