Comments on: Ingraham: Lawmakers who worry about the economic crisis are ‘girly.’

By: rocknerd

rocknerd — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:38:10 +0000

Hey, hasn’t Ingram been a feminist since Palin was nominated?

By: Leftside Annie

Leftside Annie — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:16:54 +0000

Jebus. What an idiot.

Yeah, it’s “girly” to take steps to avert a financial catastrophe, all right, just like it was “girly” to ignore the warnings that Osama bin Laden was planning to attack America using passenger jets.

Idiots.

By: Cal Malenky

Cal Malenky — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:09:19 +0000

Maybe McCain will hire her to help Phil Gramm remind us what a buncha whiners we are for worrying about whether we are going forward into the past.
The conditions resemble October 1929 – unregulated greed on Wall Street and borrowing on tiny margins. The only thing saving us from another Depression is what Democrats under Roosevelt set up in the 1930s. Phil Gramm did away with some of them, which is what got the banking sector where it is today.
Obama should hang Gramm around McCain’s neck like an albatross every chance he gets.

By: vat694848

vat694848 — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:12:08 +0000

Laura, what a bag of gas.

By: hussein toasterhead

hussein toasterhead — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:44:19 +0000

Bobwurst Says:

I thought neocons were against sexist language?
September 18th, 2008 at 9:06 pm
______

Me too! I mean, they’ve been feminists for like three weeks now – what gives? Have they given up the fight already?

By: Bartolo

Bartolo — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:22:21 +0000

One fact we need to recognize is that Harry Reid is indeed ‘girly’ and the sooner we replace him the better. Hillary?

By: Chocolate Jesus

Chocolate Jesus — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 07:19:06 +0000

> OT, but I just time traveled.

You must know J Titor, timetraveller extrardinaire…

By: Xisithrus

Xisithrus — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:49:17 +0000

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_fool_theory

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:33:03 +0000

Under Bill Clinton DJIA went up 350%. Under Dubya it went up 1%. Under Clinton 22 million jobs created. Under Dubya 5 million. Under Clinton unemployment went from 7.5% to 3.9% Under Dubya, from 3.9% to 6.1%. Under Clinton we went from record deficits to record surpluses. Under Dubya we went from record surpluses to new record deficits (-$407 Billion FY ending this month). Why do people vote Republican?

By: helenahandbasket

helenahandbasket — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:09:46 +0000

Methinks that Ms. Ingraham just lost her shirt in the market.

By: zuch

zuch — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:01:45 +0000

#17 barfly:

Patriotic Push stocks = corporate reach-around…

Reward incompetence, the republican mantra.

Yeah, prop up the stocks to save the a$$es of the fat cats. That’s the ticket.

I have more on this on my blog.

Cheers,

By: kasinca

kasinca — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:14:20 +0000

Laura, mAnn, and Sarah prove my thesis that there is something seriously wrong with women with (R)after their names. They are not really women but something that was not potty trained properly or dropped on their heads at an early age. Why would they be so hateful and against their own interests?

By: DallasNE

DallasNE — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:59:19 +0000

I will let her bottom fish with her own money all she wants. From where I sit, I would expect the Dow to sink below 10,000 at some time between now and the end of the year. Already, the Dow is below where it was on January 20,2001. There has been a lot of bottom fishing over the last 7 1/2 years. I’m not going into that cesspool.

By: STL Cynic

STL Cynic — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:42:59 +0000

Will people remember this ten years from now when whoever is in office wants to deregulate the financial industry? These people act like a “free market” is synonymous with Jesus or something. This blindly stupid belief in unfettered free markets and supply side economics has got to stop. Every time it blows up in their faces they blame it on greedy individuals or some fluke occurrence in the world. The economic benefits never trickle down. They always remain at the top of the economic chain. Unfettered free markets always result in monopolies. It’s the natural evolution of the market system. Only with regulation, do competitive markets occur.

If they truly believe on free market economics, why do they turn to government to bail them out?

By: LoraS

LoraS — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 03:27:50 +0000

It wouldn’t hurt this self-hating b..ch to be more “girly.”

By: Keith

Keith — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:51:50 +0000

Laura, it’s not lawmakers that are really worried—it’s ordinary Americans who cannot earn enough to live on. Call them “girly” and see what happens to you. Pretty soon, noone will be buying your ignorant books.

It’s at this point that I always like to remind people that David Brock was a good friend of hers and he said she seldom read a newspaper and did not have a single book where she lived.

By: DutchHenry

DutchHenry — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:33:02 +0000

What ideas beyond name calling to the Repukes have ?Zero zilch, nada.How can you believe in the country that is taking away your freedoms & aGovt that lies at every turn.Laura Ingram has serious issues.

By: tbone

tbone — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:21:46 +0000

OT, but I just time traveled. I posted a few minutes ago, but apparently I had already submitted my thoughts at 8:52 in post 15. ?

By: MapleStreet

MapleStreet — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:17:50 +0000

Seeing the collapse of huge financial institutions combined with the insistance to invest, invest, invest – I’m wondering if my stocks are part of a ponzi scheme and they are trying to get people in it so they can bail out with profits and the newer investors bearing the loses.

By: mk3872

mk3872 — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:13:03 +0000

And the right wingnuts once again prove their hypocrocy in regards to saying things insensitive to women, ie. “sexist”!!