Think Progress

EXCLUSIVE: Maliki Suggests Bush Pushed To Extend U.S. Presence In Iraq To Help McCain

bushmccainweb2.jpgLast July, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said U.S. troops should be out of Iraq “as soon as possible” and endorsed Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) withdrawal plan. Obama “talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right time frame for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes,” Maliki told Der Spiegel magazine.

Days later, as Obama wrapped up meetings with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad, Iraqi government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh reiterated his government’s stance, saying “the end of 2010 is the appropriate time for the withdrawal.”

Negotiating the post-UN mandate security agreement with Iraq, Bush argued for more time and both sides ultimately agreed that all U.S. troops would be out of Iraq by the end of 2011, not 2010, even though Bush has said previously that “if they were to say, leave, we would leave.”

Why did Bush go back on his word? A source tells ThinkProgress that White House communications staff were concerned that Maliki’s endorsement of the 2010 time line would damage Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) presidential campaign. Indeed, during an interview with Iraqi television last week (according to an Open Source Center translation), Maliki suggested that the U.S. presidential elections played a role:

Actually, the final date was really the end of 2010 and the period between the end of 2010 and the end of 2011 was for withdrawing the remaining troops from all of Iraq, but they asked for a change [in date] due to political circumstances related to the [U.S] domestic situation so it will not be said to the end of 2010 followed by one year for withdrawal but the end of 2011 as a final date.

In fact, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said that as part of the security agreement, Bush wanted U.S. troops to stay in Iraq even longer. “It was a U.S. proposal for the date which is 2015, and an Iraqi one which is 2010, then we agreed to make it 2011,” Talabani said.

But by endorsing Obama’s time line, Maliki indirectly slighted McCain, who has consistently and strenuously argued against setting a withdrawal date and has even said he wouldn’t mind having U.S. troops in Iraq for 100 years. But Maliki’s new position has left McCain scrambling, first saying its “a pretty good timetable,” but then denying he used “the word timetable” and later settling on “anything is good.”

Despite Bush’s constant refrain that commanders, not politics, will decide the course in Iraq, it seems that trying to help his party retain the White House is more important.

Digg It!

UpdateThe Wonk Room's Matt Duss notes: "I would say that I'm shocked, but of course, this is the way that the Bush administration has always treated national security, as just another piece in a political game."



Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

29 Responses to “EXCLUSIVE: Maliki Suggests Bush Pushed To Extend U.S. Presence In Iraq To Help McCain”

  1. unbelievable Says:

    Is anyone actually surpised by this?

    Republicans cannot win on their own merits. Cheating is all they have left.


  2. DieNowForPeace Says:

    McBush and McChimpy: Peas in a pod.


  3. unbelievable Says:

    A source tells ThinkProgress that White House communications staff were concerned that Maliki’s endorsement of the 2010 time line would damage Sen. John McCain’s (R-AZ) presidential campaign.

    No more so than McCain and Palin have damaged their own campaign by lying, spinning, and continuing to represent the greedy corporations...


  4. spencers mom Says:

    Obama really needs to use that picture in future ads.

    Seriously.

    PEACE


  5. larkohio Says:

    Bush wanted to help McSame. How nice. Bush must be the worst president in American history. He has created such a mess that it will take 20 years to recover. John McCain will just continue to channel Bush. Let's elect Obama.


  6. unbelievable Says:

    spencers mom Says: Obama really needs to use that picture in future ads.

    LOL!

    Aside from McCain's freaky grimace scaring the bejeezus out of young children, the two of them look like the cojoined twins - sharing one pea-sized brain - that they really are. :)


  7. Arctic Ghetto Says:

    Ole chipmunk cheeks says that anything is good. Even not being a fan of McCain it is embarrassing to watch him struggle to get through a paragraph without flubbing it.


  8. hussein toasterhead Says:

    Anyone want to start a betting pool on how many posts before a troll posts that debunked New York Post article about Obama from last week?


  9. shoeless Says:

    satirev Says:

    What’s far more disgusting and immoral is that Bush would “play politics” with the lives of our soldiers...

    What's new?

    THE GOP: Playing politics with the lives of our soldiers since Sept. 11, 2001.


  10. Doc Rock Says:

    Don't kid yourselves, the ultimate goal is controlling Iraqi oil for Chevron, et al.


  11. YouCantHandleDaTruth Says:

    Bush using the lives of our soldiers for political points?!??!?!

    NAW!!!!

    NEVER!!!


  12. A Patriot Acting Says:

    Caption Contest:

    Bush "Lends McCain a Hand" at GOP Fundraiser
    At a recent fundraiser for the McCain campaign, George Bush reportedly gave McCain an under-the-table hand job. McCain was overheard whispering to the President during the act, "Wow, first hand experience with Executive Pivilege is better than I thought it would beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!" Bush reportedly replied, "Be cool Johnny, try to keep a straight face like me."


  13. LibertyLover Says:

    Considering that we invaded Iraq for political reasons so that Bush could be a War president, is it really any wonder that Bush would want to stay in Iraq for political reasons? Bush cares so little for human life that he would commit troops so that he could play at being a president.


  14. suziq Says:

    The gop has been playing poliics with soldiers lives since Nixon used Viet Nam to get re-elected. Nothing is new under the sun....


  15. misshusseinmolly Says:

    A Patriot Acting Says
    September 23rd, 2008 at 10:50 am
    _______________________________________________________

    I think you nailed it. And I blame you for all the people who came running to my desk to find out why I was laughing so hard.


  16. And the beat goes on Says:

    And the capture of Osama bin Laden before the election? Black ops are going on in the regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan now. There was never any question in my mind that Bu$hit was using the armed forces for political gain. Perhaps not showing pictures of soldiers killed during these illegal operations are for his benefit. He's the one who would appreciate "out of sight, out of mind."


  17. misshusseinmolly Says:

    I think it's absolutely obscene that the primary reason we are there -- apparently -- is so our leaders can talk about how we're "winning".

    I can see future slogans now -- "proudly winning in Iraq since 2003" -- like it's a carpeting business or something.

    And that if McCain/Palin got in, they would keep their "winning in Iraq" scenario going for as long as possible to wring every last drop of political capital out of it, until there's nobody left who can be fooled anymore.

    The fact that we're dealing with human beings doesn't even matter. Every American should be outraged.


  18. Kay Says:

    Caption: "McBush and the Chymp are in luv"


  19. Kay Says:

    They said last night on CNN if Obama were white he would have a commanding lead over McStain.

    Racism is alive in well in the Fascist States of America.


  20. cha cha cha Says:

    McCain/Palin = Walter/Donny from "The Big Lebowski"


  21. Kay Says:

    Osama Bin Laden is probably playing golf right now with Daddy Bin Bush I in Dubai. (Isn't there a tournament sponsored by the Carlyle Group, KBR, BlackWater USA, Bechtel, Haliburton etc.)---


  22. Kay Says:

    Vote Pallid/McStain: RIP USA~

    (their slogan should say "Country Club First!" not "Country First")

    What a couple of sheisters!


  23. Max-1 Says:

    .

    100 years of car bombs does not a Japan or Germany make...!

    .


  24. kasinca Says:

    McSame and Dubya = kill Americans and Iraqis for political fodder. That is what we are dealing with...murdering scumbags.


  25. RWeSafer Says:

    TREASON!!


  26. csavage Says:

    Isn't this the same party that was just a week or so ago accusing Barack Obama of interfering with troop withdrawal during his trip to Iraq???


  27. ewoman Says:

    If I had a family member who was killed in Iraq, I'd be furious. No, I'd be more than furious, because I didn't have a family member in Iraq at all, and I'm still furious about this.


  28. dan_allnews Says:

    We have met the enemy and he is... Bush.


  29. derDunkelRover Says:

    I wish I shared your optimism that truth will win out over race baiting and lies.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll