Think Progress

Lousiana lawmaker advocates eugenics: Sterilize poor women, encourage rich to procreate.»

rep25.jpgThe New Orleans Times-Picayune reports that state Rep. John LaBruzzo (R) said yesterday that “he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied.” LaBruzzo worries that people receiving food and housing assistance “are reproducing at a faster rate than more affluent, better-educated residents”:

He said he is gathering statistics now. … “What I’m really studying is any and all possibilities that we can reduce the number of people that are going from generational welfare to generational welfare,” he said.

He said his program would be voluntary. It could involve tubal ligation, encouraging other forms of birth control or, to avoid charges of gender discrimination, vasectomies for men. It also could include tax incentives for college-educated, higher-income people to have more children, he said.

LaBruzzo said that mainstream strategies against poverty, such as education and family planning, “have repeatedly failed to solve the problem,” according to the Times-Picayune. “I don’t know if it’s a viable option…Of course people are going to get excited about it,” he said of his plan.

Digg It!

UpdateLaBruzzo's district is the same one that sent white supremacist and former leader of the KKK David Duke to the state legislature in 1989.
UpdateNew Orlean's City Business broke the story and reported that LaBruzzo made other racially-offensive remarks as well:
The black community will say this is some sort of race-based genocide. And there will be tremendous push back from the ACLU. They'll try to say these people are incapable of making such a decision when their life is in turmoil. That if you're dangling money in front of them, of course they'll make a decision that will affect them negatively. "My argument would be if they’re incapable of making a decision whether to cease reproduction are they capable of raising multiple children to be good citizens? And if they're incapable, maybe Social Services should take their children."
UpdateKay at Pushback writes, "This taps into something I wrote about earlier this month, inspired by how conservatives are often supportive of some women’s reproductive rights (like Bristol Palin) as long as they’re young, at least middle class, and white."



Sort Comments By: Top Rated | Date

122 Responses to “Lousiana lawmaker advocates eugenics: Sterilize poor women, encourage rich to procreate.”

  1. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    LaBruzzo said that Republican strategies against poverty, such as tax cuts for the wealthy and building more prisons, “have repeatedly failed to solve the problem”

    There. Fixed.


  2. Badmoodman Says:

    Lousiana lawmaker advocates eugenics: Sterilize poor women, encourage rich to procreate.

    - - Dr. Mengele would be so proud.


  3. Bobwurst Says:

    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.


  4. spencers mom Says:

    If he cuts off his own balls on live teevee, I’ll consider his ideas.

    PEACE


  5. Bobwurst Says:

    And notice he’s not offering money to guys who get a vasectomy.


  6. christopher wiwi Says:

    Is this guy for real? Typical re-puke ideaology.As I recall president Clinton took millions off of welfare, while Bushco has done just the opposite and then some with his cronyism and corruption.


  7. cavjam Says:

    Badmoodman Says:

    - - Dr. Mengele would be so proud.

    Damn. Stole my thunder.


  8. cavjam Says:

    Bobwurst Says:

    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.

    a) microsurgery is extremely expensive

    b) and the difference would be…?


  9. belac Says:

    LaBruzzo’s next ‘cutting edge’ idea?

    Feudalism…


  10. DidHeJustSayThat Says:

    I want to be outraged, but I know in the year in which the only avenue for republicans is to wage culture wars, I hold my breathe for the next outlandish republican’s self contradicting warped viewpoint.


  11. hussein toasterhead Says:

    Ohhh, I get it now. So when they talk about “family values,” they only mean “the right kind of families.”


  12. rastaman Says:

    HOW ABOUT WE STERILIZE REPUGLICANS AND THE GENERATIONAL ECONOMIC SCANDALS AND MELTDOWNS?


  13. Rich H Says:

    Off Topic.

    I just received a notice of a change in polling locations from the county registrar. We’ve never changed locations before and I wonder how many people received this notice.
    Imagine waiting in line for an hour, finding out your location has been changed, then having to return to work so you don’t have time to vote.
    Did I mention I live in a heavy republican district?


  14. Buckie Boy Says:

    Ever See the Movie Idiocracy?

    If not, you should.

    It is why we have such a stupid, ill informed populace.


  15. margerine Says:

    This kind of reminds me of that whole “athletes have athletic kids” concept. Rich people won’t necessarily have more productive or useful kids. Just watch Gossip Girl.


  16. Bilbo Hussein Baggins Says:

    He said he is gathering statistics now. … “What I’m really studying is any and all possibilities that we can reduce the number of people that are going from generational welfare to generational welfare,” he said.

    There are more ways to reduce the number of people who go on welfare from generation to generation than sterilizing them. How about we do something about our government so that everyone has an equal opportunity for a good education and a good job.


  17. writechic Says:

    You think he’s ever even heard of the word “eugenics?”


  18. hussein toasterhead Says:

    cavjam Says:

    a) microsurgery is extremely expensive

    September 24th, 2008 at 1:01 pm
    ______

    Who’s talking about surgery, here? You can get a claw hammer for like $6 at Home Depot. It’ll do the job just as effectively.


  19. themomcat Says:

    I’ll pay $1000 for this mouth breathing, twit to have a vasectomy.


  20. spencers mom Says:

    Rich H, I’d call your county Board of Elections right now and see if that notice is real.

    The GOP is going all out to destroy our democracy, and if you’re a registered Dem, I would not be surprised if this is targeted, and false, information.

    Let us know!

    PEACE


  21. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Bobwurst Says:
    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.

    Would it really make a difference?


  22. Ojore Says:

    This is about the sickest, most insulting thing I’ve heard of in some time.


  23. Bobwurst Says:

    Why not offer free contreception? Oh, that’s right, contrecption is murder. But trapping all those little babies up in the tubes where they’ll whiter and die is ok…


  24. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Ja wohl, mein Fuhrer!!!!!!!


  25. Bobwurst Says:

    ralph the wonder llama Says:
    Bobwurst Says:
    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.

    Would it really make a difference?

    If it’s done wrong, it might affect their ability to talk.


  26. 5th Estate Says:

    margerine: Rich people won’t necessarily have more productive or useful kids. Just watch Gossip Girl.

    G.W. Bush


  27. JMOHR Says:

    See, this is the same system that had in fact existed in the early 1900’s. I am so glad to see that our society is advancing. We are already getting rid of those stupid scientific beliefs in evolution, climate and civil rights. The Third Reich will be so proud. Hitler also encouraged the creation of a Master Race by economic incentives for the right people to reproduce.

    Thank God we do not follow those stupid precedents set after WWII in which income disparity was reduced, true opportunity was opened for all and we saw economic advancement, less poverty and a wonderful increase in the wealth of a nation as a whole.

    The plan presented should be adopted. Regulation of slave reproduction will ensure a reduction of inferior slave stock.


  28. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    hussein toasterhead Says:

    Ohhh, I get it now. So when they talk about “family values,” they only mean “the right kind of families.”
    __________

    Uh, I think you made a mistake in there, toasterhead.

    Didn’t you REALLY mean to say, ahem… “the WHITE kind of families”?


  29. Tawdry Says:

    Badmoodman, you’re so right, just one of the Boys From Brazil. Think someone named Lieberman will hunt him down?


  30. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    Hold on a sec…

    don’t the christianists say that sex should be engaged in only for procreation? I mean, that’s one of their standard arguments against gay marriage, right?

    So by sterilizing these poor people, won’t LaBruzzo be condemning those poor people to a life of sinful sexual relations?

    Not sure he’s thought this through completely.


  31. DidHeJustSayThat Says:

    John Edwards was on to something with his: Two America’s.

    I always wonder how these clowns ever got elected, and continued to get re-elected.

    Lindsey Graham and others recites GOP talking points that make them look foolish (read: we can see Russia from land right here in Alaska).

    This wouldn’t fly in MN, it just wouldn’t they’d be laughed out so quickly. The worst we get are Drillnuts - likely because it wouldn’t affect our state at all.

    I just wonder what the electorate is like in some of these places; Representative? Disconnected?


  32. shoeless Says:

    Don’t you all get it? It’s just another Republican joke, you know like the one about health care. Just wait a few days for the punch line.


  33. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Bobwurst Says:

    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.
    __________

    Uh, I believe this is something a proctologist would be suited for, no?


  34. aquarius2 Says:

    Didn’t Newt Gingrich propose something like this when he introduced his “Contract with America” or was it that he just wanted to remove children and place them in orphanages so they would not be exposed to “welfare” mothers.


  35. hussein toasterhead Says:

    The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    Uh, I think you made a mistake in there, toasterhead.

    Didn’t you REALLY mean to say, ahem… “the WHITE kind of families”?

    September 24th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
    _____

    Of course - I just figured that was a given.


  36. The Republic of Stupidity Says:

    ralph the wonder llama Says:

    So by sterilizing these poor people, won’t LaBruzzo be condemning those poor people to a life of sinful sexual relations?
    ____________

    And thereby validating GOOPer stereotypes of the poor? On the other hand, or perhaps more appropriately, IN the other hand, those GOOPers need their fantasies… when you’re as socially inept as these clowns, yer fantasies are the closest you come to real sex.


  37. Shayne Says:

    And then when we call them Nazis they get upset. $700 billion to bankers is good. $3 a day for food stamps to a child is horrendous.


  38. liberal traitor Says:

    LaBruzzo said that mainstream strategies against poverty, such as education and family planning, “have repeatedly failed to solve the problem,”

    That is of course, after the “Government doesn’t work” Party, also known as the Republicans, created NCLB, catered to the religious right and worked on abstinence only education, defunded struggling public schools, and attempted to put birth control and condoms in the same category as abortion…which they also want to get rid of…


  39. 666lattes Says:

    “Kill kill kill kill kill the poor!” -DK

    (Sssshhh dude, you weren’t supposed to announce the plan just yet.)


  40. upside99 Says:

    Let me take a SWAG here; He is representing a rich Suburban District, majority white, middle to upper class, ‘Christians’, Repug and NRA member.


  41. shoeless Says:

    …some of the tactics that the Nazis used were taken from United States practice (Piotrowski, 2000).

    In the early 1900’s, the United States had a eugenics program (http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000322_eugenics_feature.html). With that program, the U.S. was attempting to perfect the gene pool. The hopeful outcomes were that of a society without crime, mental illness, and homelessness. The idea was that if the degenerates of society were kept from having children that society’s problems would disappear.

    http://www.webster.edu/ ~woolflm/ forcedsterilization.html


  42. liberal traitor Says:

    5th Estate Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    margerine: Rich people won’t necessarily have more productive or useful kids. Just watch Gossip Girl.

    G.W. Bush

    SEE ALSO: Paris Hilton


  43. judyinnm Says:

    Ridding the world of poverty by attrition has been Republican policy from time immemorial - this is just one of their more atrocious propositions, so far. (I wonder how easy it would be to rid the world of idiots who think people’s value is only measured by their financial situation, by using this method.) As a practical matter, if there are no poor people to tax, how will they finance the tax incentives for the wealthy, to procreate?


  44. hussein toasterhead Says:

    What’s so horribly frustrating about this kind of grandstading is that it gets mixed up with real, legitimate family planning efforts that actually can help lift people out of poverty.

    Whether you’re in Louisiana or Lesotho, measures like encouraging young women to finish school, delay having children, and widen birth spacing do have some very positive effects on household income and health, and can help familes overcome the poverty traps that lead to this so-called “generational welfare.”

    But what this dipshit is talking about isn’t family planning. It’s poverty genocide. And it’s exactly the conflation of these two things that breeds distrust and noncompliance with legitimate family planning efforts.


  45. paleolib Says:

    Naturally this guy holds David Duke’s old seat in the legislature. If this doesn’t work his next proposal will presumably be to resurrect the nullification doctrine, get the legislature to declare the 13th amendment null and void and reinstitute slavery.


  46. Shayne Says:

    If this guy had any b@lls he’d offer $1,000 to castrate men. /sarc


  47. liberal traitor Says:

    As a practical matter, if there are no poor people to tax, how will they finance the tax incentives for the wealthy, to procreate?

    FU(KING BINGO!!!

    And on that topic, who would be around to fight in the wars needed to secure the profits of the companies these rich people work for?


  48. spencers mom Says:

    Bobwurst Says:

    Let’s offer a $1000 to any republican who gets a lobotomy.

    Insurance won’t cover the same procedure the second time around.

    PEACE


  49. StratRat Says:

    Wow…Just wow. For once I am speechless.


  50. shoeless Says:

    JMOHR Says:
    ——————————————————————————–
    Thank God we do not follow those stupid precedents set after WWII in which income disparity was reduced, true opportunity was opened for all and we saw economic advancement, less poverty and a wonderful increase in the wealth of a nation as a whole.

    Sounds like some kinda socialist conspiracy.


  51. misshusseinmolly Says:

    margerine Says
    September 24th, 2008 at 1:03 pm

    This kind of reminds me of that whole “athletes have athletic kids” concept. Rich people won’t necessarily have more productive or useful kids. Just watch Gossip Girl.
    __________________________________________________________

    I suspect Rep. LaBruzzo is counting on rich people having more Republican children, which is more important to him than productive or useful kids. Plans such as this one have generally been meant to increase the number of Republicans in the population and decrease the number of Democrats.

    But it seldom works. Mainly because not all Republicans are rich. A lot of them live in trailer parks, struggling to get by just as poor Democrats do. The other factor is that there are many well-educated, professional Democrats.

    Personally, I don’t think his program will get very far, even if he could get people on board with it. $1,000 doesn’t go very far these days, and it would take a lot more than that to get most people, even poor ones, to part with their baby-making abilities.


  52. Hardy Haberman Says:

    Why not just offer Republicans $1000 to be sterilized? Heck they do anything for money!


  53. Bluedahlia Says:

    If only rational people could start this kind of dialog we might get somewhere. Population is a major problem in the world. While agreed that this nutcase is one step away from some very bad things with some very bad motives behind it, the population problem does need to be addressed. Our planet is past it’s carrying capacity. Incentives for birth control for both sexes and all socioeconomic classes is a great idea. Incentives for rich people to breed, not so much. First we have religious extremists trying to make sure have limited choices about their reproductive health, then we have class extremists trying to start a new world order with this.

    I have come to the conclusion that in order for you to be heard, you have someone “important” to say the most outrageous things and then negotiate down from there. That way you still get what you want while the opposition is still reeling at how they averted the totally outrageous thing. It is all insane.


  54. liberal traitor Says:

    50. shoeless says:

    Yeah! I mean, Freedom, Liberty, Justice for all AND the pursuit of happiness AND equality AND reduced poverty? What are you, some kinda commie?


  55. drago Says:

    GOP = KKK


  56. IgnoranceIsNotBliss Says:

    Man, they aren’t even trying to hide it any longer are they? Discusting.

    If you guys haven’t seen The Republicrats, it’s pretty funny.


  57. 5th Estate Says:

    iberal traitor Says:

    5th Estate Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    margerine: Rich people won’t necessarily have more productive or useful kids. Just watch Gossip Girl.

    G.W. Bush

    SEE ALSO: Paris Hilton

    UNFAIR! (the rebuttal tape!).

    SEE ALSO: Mitt Romney’s sons, Meghan McCain,


  58. kasinca Says:

    Seems we had a guy over in Germany who had some similar feelings and ideas before the big WWII. Wasn’t that guy Hitler?


  59. tombaker Says:

    How about we outlaw Kristian Kracker Kraziness instead?


  60. Squeaky Wheels Says:

    That’s pretty outrageous, but it ain’t “eugenics”.

    Eugenics is based on the idea there are certain genetic differences that make it less desirable or more desirable that people with these traits reproduce.

    I think it’s a no-brainer that poor people have more important priorities than having children, but I simply advocate making family planning services available to all and letting the people themselves do the responsible thing.


  61. shoeless Says:

    Squeaky Wheels Says:
    ————————————————————-…I simply advocate making family planning services available to all and letting the people themselves do the responsible thing.

    Dang librul


  62. RantingTommy Says:

    How about we legalize drunk driving on the first Friday night of each month for about 6 months? (the rest of us will have to stay home those 6 nights)

    That will get rid of LOTS of rednecks, provide a boon to the automotive industry, and will ensure that afterwards, only two types of drivers will be left:

    1 - those that don’t drink and drive
    2 - those that do it well

    Eugenics you can believe in!


  63. Rich H Says:

    Spencers Mom,

    I just called and they asked too many questions, such as date of birth (what’s that got to do with anything - they didn’t even ask my address).
    Then I was told there were three different color notices sent, and since I received a white notice that my poling place might be changed again.
    Then I was urged to vote by mail.
    It seems awfully fishy to me.


  64. Doc Rock Says:

    Take LaBruzzo to a local vet and have HIM neutered.


  65. alphainfinityomega Says:

    spencers mom:

    I left a reply for you on the Keating thread.

    ¶ AIO

    (over and out for the day)


  66. Xisithrus Says:

    The reason for welfare is because minimum wage is legalized poverty.

    He should be careful what he plans because some wealthy people just might think he is poor and shouldnt procreate.


  67. Wayne Says:

    Rep. John LaBruzzo (R) said yesterday that “he is studying a plan to pay poor women $1,000 to have their Fallopian tubes tied.”

    Why does he sound like a politician from China to me?

    Oh, yeah, this is why, a 1998 hearing in the Subcomittee of International Operations and Human Rights about China using forced Sterilization and forced abortions on women.

    So when exactly did the Republicans become Communists?


  68. Hemlock for Gadflies Says:

    MEIN FUEHRER!

    I CAN TALK!

    profburgos.blogspot.com


  69. shoeless Says:

    Wayne Says:

    So when exactly did the Republicans become Communists?

    When it became profitable.


  70. Anonymouse Says:

    I have an aunt who, in addition to being an evangelical, believes that poverty is genetic - that the solution is to sterilize the poor. I haven’t had the patience to ask her how she reconciles this with her beliefs about birth control in general.


  71. Max-1 Says:

    .

    Classic Nazi tactics…

    The undesirables get “special” treatment.
    As is, sterilization, isolation, concentration…. etc.

    .


  72. IgnoranceIsNotBliss Says:

    Xisithrus Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    The reason for welfare is because minimum wage is legalized poverty.

    He should be careful what he plans because some wealthy people just might think he is poor and shouldnt procreate.

    If i remember correctly, the minimum wage in Louisiana is the same as the federal minimum wage.


  73. Mr Blifil Says:

    This falls under the Atrios Maxim which states: The only policy worth pronouncing shall be that which pisses off liberals.


  74. hanshiro Says:

    When we are planning for posterity, we ought to remember that virtue is not hereditary.

    ~Thomas Paine

    (p.s. I expect JahBruzzo to end up on Olbermann’s “Worst Persons” list…he’s a shoo-in.)


  75. shoeless Says:

    IgnoranceIsNotBliss Says:
    ——————————————————————————–
    If i remember correctly, the minimum wage in Louisiana is the same as the federal minimum wage.

    What a shame.


  76. Tired of being lied to Says:

    Have ANY of these supposed red-white-and-true-blue USA conservative patriots EVER read what happened in Germany following the Nazi rise to power in 1932? Anyone?

    Those who are too damn stupid (or stubborn) to learn from the mistakes of the past are blithely going to repeat those same mistakes.

    This smells like Lebensborn. Go ahead and use the Googles to find out more.


  77. joe cantwell Says:

    mystery solved.

    *

    Rep. John LaBruzzo (R)

    is Tracy__5.

    ^

    good luck.

    #


  78. ralph the wonder llama Says:

    shoeless Says:
    …some of the tactics that the Nazis used were taken from United States practice (Piotrowski, 2000).

    In the early 1900’s, the United States had a eugenics program (http://abcnews.go.com/onair/2020/2020_000322_eugenics_feature.html). With that program, the U.S. was attempting to perfect the gene pool. The hopeful outcomes were that of a society without crime, mental illness, and homelessness. The idea was that if the degenerates of society were kept from having children that society’s problems would disappear.

    There may be something to that theory, if the guy who wrote Freakonomics is correct. His theory was that the sharp drop in crime in the 90s had less to do with the good economy , and even less than that to do with “get tough” policies, and much more to do with the legalization of abortion in the early seventies.

    Big distinction, however; it wasn’t the elimination of anything genetic that led fewer poverty-stricken children to grow up into criminals. It was simply that fewer children were being born to parents ill-equipped to care for them.


  79. had enough Says:

    Lousiana lawmaker advocates eugenics: Sterilize poor women, encourage rich to procreate.»

    So obvious it is pathetic.

    Neglecting Katrina didn’t work for these people?

    These desperate racists need to come to terms that one day we will ALL be of one color.


  80. RUCerious Says:

    Repuke code for Sterilize the Black Women! Race warfare at it’s most elegant.
    Geez. These clowns have no shame.


  81. bitblt Says:

    Max-1 Says:

    .

    Classic Nazi tactics…

    The undesirables get “special” treatment.
    As is, sterilization, isolation, concentration…. etc.

    .
    September 24th, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    You do know that many think “Mr. Nazi” got his “intellectual permission” to do things like you list from Dr. Darwin, don’t you?


  82. RUCerious Says:

    It’s clear that the repukes aren’t having enough kids.

    Why do they hate sex?


  83. shoeless Says:

    They don’t. It’s their wives who hate it.


  84. barracks9 Says:

    It’s so embarrassing to admit I live in Louisiana - thanks to Mssrs. LaBruzzo, Vitter, Jefferson, et al.

    LaBruzzo was elected by the fine folks of Metairie, that armpit of a suburb between downtown New Orleans and the airport. It was the the home of the original white flight. However, this is not some upscale, affluent white-collar district.

    Sadly, he is saying what many folks there believe - especially in light of their post-Katrina population boom.


  85. mary Says:

    I didn’t realize that right-wing wackos took their cues from Darwin! Did you guys realize that? Who knew?!


  86. Witch1 Says:

    Just another day in bull shit bush and his wacko follower’s world..Trouble is we live in it also….There should be a people zoo where we could lock up all these fundie;s..BTW was this guy related to some of the arian nut cases.? He isn’t a blue eyed blond like they prefered but sound’s the same….People professing this madness must prove their case by example,…I could change him from a rooster to a chicken real quick…LOL…Blessings


  87. Zooey Says:

    bitblt Says:

    You do know that many think “Mr. Nazi” got his “intellectual permission” to do things like you list from Dr. Darwin, don’t you?
    September 24th, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    There’s a difference between EXCUSES and PERMISSION.

    Not that you’d understand, of course.


  88. squidbilly Says:

    Even white trash poor folks??? Dang, sounds like he’s willing to stop the procreation of his constituents, some of whom are also probably religious wackos to boot.

    Weird.


  89. darkness Says:

    You think perhaps the good state legislator’s parents were brother and sister?


  90. barracks9 Says:

    Zooey - bitblt got confused and thought he said “intellectual persimmons.”

    (BTW - glad you enjoyed my Andromeda Strain reference the other day!)


  91. dbadass Says:

    ah the partially consumed lunch entree…


  92. had enough Says:

    OT - financial alert: our dictator will speak tonight, another attempt at swindling money….asking for more funds shifted towards the very rich.


  93. Zooey Says:

    barracks9 Says:

    Zooey - bitblt got confused and thought he said “intellectual persimmons.”

    (BTW - glad you enjoyed my Andromeda Strain reference the other day!)
    September 24th, 2008 at 2:14 pm

    Well, now it’s completely understandable. :P

    I love movie references — especially when I get them. Thanks!!


  94. pbg Says:

    The fallacy of Social Darwinism is that, in natural selection, the ONLY factor that is selected for is how many offspring one has. Not how big a house one has, or how much bling. If you have few offspring, you’re an evolutionary failure.
    And as a history of the Rockefellers shows, having lots of offspring dilutes the economic dynastic power. Two generations after JDJr., and the large numbers of Rockefellers out there are not especially powerful. The thing that makes them a reproductive success makes them a failure in terms of power.
    The other part of Social Darwinism–besides the extermination of the poor–would require the smart and successful to marry other smart and successful people.
    But will rich men be denied marrying their pretty girls instead of the horse-faced stick-figured professor of mathematics? Of course not! So the rich get prettier and lazier, and marry other pretty people until the money’s gone.
    And of course they fully expect it to happen in one generation. If it were truly based on Darwin, results wouldn’t be seen for a hundred generations–which is about the length of human history.

    Social Darwinism is a nonsensical fallacy that predators grab on to to justify their behavior. Just like the Divine Right of Kings and the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.


  95. RaptureReady Says:

    Rep. LaBruzzo is on point. We need financially sound people to ensure that our economy survives, not enablers.


  96. Zooey Says:

    RaptureReady Says:
    September 24th, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    Hey Daryll,

    Is Tiffany knocked up yet? Gotta do your part…


  97. shoeless Says:

    bltbit won’t understand any of that. Like most Republicans, he assumes that the wealthy are genetically superior.


  98. Alectimmerman Says:

    Why is he only calling for women to be sterilized? It is exactly these sexist, oppressive ideas about women that have put us in this place in the first place. Heaven forbid he ask a man to be sterilized.
    Alec


  99. shoeless Says:

    RaptureReady Says:
    ——————————————————————————–
    Rep. LaBruzzo is on point.

    Daryll, I thought you were against birth control on religious principle. Man, is God gonna be pissed at you!


  100. misshusseinmolly Says:

    RaptureReady Says
    September 24th, 2008 at 2:31 pm

    Rep. LaBruzzo is on point. We need financially sound people to ensure that our economy survives, not enablers.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Daryll — if you want to keep your cover intact, don’t make comments like this one which are obvious snark. Remember that the main point of your performance is that you’re supposed to come across as a believable idiot.


  101. RUCerious Says:

    RaptureReady RupturedAlready.


  102. RUCerious Says:

    Perhaps we should round up all of St D’s churchgoing congregation and make sure they’re first in line for said sterilization.
    That would solve one problem, wouldn’t it?


  103. misshusseinmolly Says:

    barracks9 Says
    September 24th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    LaBruzzo was elected by the fine folks of Metairie, that armpit of a suburb between downtown New Orleans and the airport. It was the the home of the original white flight. However, this is not some upscale, affluent white-collar district.
    ___________________________________________________________

    Waitaminnit — are you saying that LaBruzzo’s constituents are exactly the people he wants to quit breeding? Is he deliberately committing political suicide, or is he counting on the people in his district to be stupid enough to believe they don’t fall in the group he’s targeting?


  104. barracks9 Says:

    misshusseinmolly Says:

    Waitaminnit — are you saying that LaBruzzo’s constituents are exactly the people he wants to quit breeding?

    Naw, he just wants SOME of his new constituents to stop breeding. He likes his base that got him elected, with their gun racks and LSU bumper stickers (even tho’ no one in the family has ever matriculated).


  105. Bilbo Hussein Baggins Says:

    Rich H Says:
    Spencers Mom,
    I just called and they asked too many questions, such as date of birth (what’s that got to do with anything - they didn’t even ask my address).
    Then I was told there were three different color notices sent, and since I received a white notice that my poling place might be changed again. Then I was urged to vote by mail. It seems awfully fishy to me.

    It does sound fishy. But the last advice is good. Get an absentee ballot from your registrar of voters and vote absentee. Just make sure you get it from the registrar.

    John McCain’s campaign is sending absentee ballots to Democrats with an incorrect return address.

    Just when you think they have gone as low as they can go, they prove you wrong.


  106. hussein toasterhead Says:

    bitblt Says:

    You do know that many think “Mr. Nazi” got his “intellectual permission” to do things like you list from Dr. Darwin, don’t you?

    September 24th, 2008 at 1:56 pm
    ________

    From a deliberate misreading of The Ascent of Man and On The Origin of Species, perhaps. However, the field of eugenics has almost nothing to do with actual evolutionary science.


  107. Bilbo Hussein Baggins Says:

    had enough Says:
    OT - financial alert: our dictator will speak tonight, another attempt at swindling money….asking for more funds shifted towards the very rich.

    He and his merry band of thieves must be in panic mode by now. Now only are the Democrats not buying what he has to sell, his Republicans aren’t buying it either.

    I can only think that the Republican legislators got an earful from their constituents on this financial meltdown and they see their jobs on the line here. That’s good, that is the way it should work.


  108. sacopenapa Says:

    I hope the USA afro american community will vote in great numbers on this election! I hope people don’t forget KATRINA!


  109. LibertyLover Says:

    And what constitutes a “Poor Woman”? I mean will there be door to door searches to see how many kids one has? Or what one’s salary is? Or what one’s living conditions are?

    OR like I suspect, does this nimrod only mean brown-skinned people?


  110. hanshiro Says:

    95. RaptureReady Says:

    Rep. LaBruzzo is on point. We need financially sound people to ensure that our economy survives, not enablers.

    I guess that excludes the formerly affluent “newly poor” of the financial meltdown. After all, if the FBI finds the skeletons and/or the congress delays bailing these overextended piffle CEOs out of the holes they’ve dug for themselves, I can think of no better candidates to test-drive this program.

    We don’t want that kind of financial bungler, the type that brings a nation to its capitalistic knees, to be saved, much less multiply, now do we?

    Paulsen, you’re up right after Labruzzo….


  111. hussein toasterhead Says:

    sacopenapa Says:

    I hope the USA afro american community will vote in great numbers on this election! I hope people don’t forget KATRINA!

    September 24th, 2008 at 3:22 pm
    ______

    I’m sure they will. Their votes might not all count, but they’ll be voting in record numbers.


  112. hivanh Says:

    Wait a minute! You guys are kidding, right? You got this off the front page of The Onion, right? Oh, crap.


  113. ThomasMc Says:

    GOP, NAZI, what’s the difference?
    Not a hell of a lot, anymore.


  114. Rich H Says:

    Hi Bilbo,

    Thanks for the advice. I’m just worried that with a mail in ballot, they’ll just through it away.


  115. tbone Says:

    And Dems are elitist?


  116. stateofthedivision Says:

    My guess is he’d make an exception for poor Christian women doing their QuiverFull duty, producing more Christian soldiers.


  117. EugeneDebs Says:

    RaptureReady Says:

    Rep. LaBruzzo is on point. We need financially sound people to ensure that our economy survives, not enablers.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    You are a sick disgusting piece of human garbage. A soulless moron without a shred of decency. What we need is soulsick morons like YOU to promise not to breed and contaminate out genepool with your sick twisted ignorance and hatefilled stupidity. You are an embarassment to our entire species. An actual human being that got to know you would sicken and puke at the thought of you being thought of as a human being like they are. You are a stupid, depraved, disgusting, moron and I pity anyone that for any reason has to be in your presence


  118. T R L Says:

    Damm Im from louisiana and I thought the only one we actaully had to be ashamed of is diper david vitter damm when can I be more wrong then again he is a so called family values rethug need I say anymore .hell even our dems arent worth a damm yella bellied blue dogs….

    Mccain/pailin
    four more years of BuSh


  119. Sambadaddy Says:

    Rep. LaBruzzo needs an intervention conducted by Warren Jess.


  120. EugeneDebs Says:

    Sambadaddy Says:

    Rep. LaBruzzo needs an intervention conducted by Warren Jess.
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    He needs a lobotomy performed with a chainsaw


  121. barrelhse Says:

    Take away his money, then cut his balls off.


  122. MichaelVick Says:

    About time. Let me first state that I’m neither a Democrat nor Republican. This should have been put into law years ago. It’s getting ridicules that there are so many low income people have kids to just get more welfare. This needs to come to an end. If you cannot afford to have a child that you shouldn’t. Stop wasting the tax payers money on these parents and children who are already a menace to society. They also need to put into law that any parent that is $5,000 behind in child support to have their reproductive organ chopped off so they can stop littering the world with their offspring.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)



Reports

imageTopic Cloud


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll