John McCain and Sarah Palin are hand-feeding the beast, inciting the lynch mobs, tacitly encouraging the assassination of an American presidential candidate.

I have never, ever in my life been more ASHAMED – and absolutely enraged.

THEY ARE TRAITORS TO THIS COUNTRY.

Obama-Biden are the wiser and stronger team to solve the crucial challenges we have in this nation and abroad !

Despicable

It’s the Law and Order thing to do.

comrades? Damn that is so old school. Anybody still say pinko or reds?
__________

Only trolls trying to pass…

Excellent job ros, I was just formulating a response to this hit piece that takes the facts out of context.
__________

Thank youuuuuu… thank yooooooou verrrry much, Fred!

That little POS from Youtube is quite slick, huh? Clearly, the folks behind something like that are very determined to float their agenda at all cost. It is indeed up to folks like us to root that sort of crap out and refute w/ FACTS.

It’s kinda like christains who have twisted their bibles to read that killing people is ok.

It happens more and more every day because the McCain campaign entices it to happen more and more every day.

Q U E S T I O N:

When shouts of “TERRORIST” are called in response to a comment made by John or Sarah and neither John nor Sarah quell these sentiments, THAT is tacit approval for such sentiments to be going on in the first place. If the McCain campaign are against this language in the first place, WHY DO THEY TOLERATE IT, in the first place?

.

Who voted for deregulation??
____________

The Youtube this phony links to is really, really dishonest. Here’s the truth about S. 900, “Comrade”…

From Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm-Leach-Bliley_Act

Congressional history of the Act

The bills were introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (R-TX) and in the House of Representatives by James Leach (R-IA). The bills were passed by a 54-44 vote along party lines with Republican support in the Senate and by a 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. Nov 4, 1999: After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. Democrats agreed to support the bill after Republicans agreed to strengthen provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act and address certain privacy concerns.[1] The final bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8-1 and in the House: 362-57-15. This ‘veto proof legislation’ was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999[2]

S. 900 was introduced by Republicans. The Republican majority in both houses passed it at the time. John McCain voted YES for the bill when it first came up on the Senate floor.

McCain DID NOT vote against the final version. He simply didn’t vote.

Yes, Clinton signed it, IN THE FACE OF VETO-PROOF GOOP MAJORITY.

Gee, is your little Youtube shi’ite bomb just little misleading, or what?

And as for McCain and regulation of Freddie Mac, we find this:

http://mpandgs.blogspot.com/2008/09/on-john-mccains-warning-about-fannie.html

John McCain’s 2005 “Warning” About Fannie, Freddie & Dems “Blocking” Regulation

A bit late passing this along, but John McCain’s claim that he issued a warning against the excesses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the 2005-06 legislative year was given a “barely true” by Politifact. On 25 May, 2006, Senator McCain signed on as a co-sponsor to Chuck Hagel’s effort to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (which Senator Hagel intoduced in January, 2005) following the publication of “a 340-page report from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.”* However, as Politifact points out,
his attempts to depict those efforts as some sort of early warning that could have lessened the current credit crisis just don’t wash. All McCain was talking about then was the potential fallout of accounting troubles in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. He didn’t say anything about a freewheeling climate among creditors that had major financial institutions becoming badly leveraged on bad loans.
Additionally, those rumors that Democrats alone blocked GOP proposal, S.190, to regulate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? Questionable claims, for the bill never got out of committee:
Last Action [July 28, 2005]: Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Status: Dead
So the bill was never brought to a full Senate vote. Recall that the Republicans were the majority in 2005-06, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs consisted of 11 Republicans and 9 Democrats (for a full listing of the members of the 2005-06 Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, see this entry at Sourcewatch). In other words, the proposal could have been voted out of committee and brought to the Senate floor had the GOP members had supported it.

And so on and so on and so…

But yer right about one thing, “Comrade”…

You can find all sorts of things on Google! ;-D!!

The ideal point of the Patriot Act is to quell this very sort of ‘birthing’ terrorism in a domestic sence. Wasn’t that the justification for taking rights away?