<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court rules against Ohio Republicans in &#8216;voter fraud&#8217; case.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:48:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tombaker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290904</link>
		<dc:creator>tombaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290904</guid>
		<description>27 - nice al - you have a graph to interpret for that one, too? you&#039;re quite the empiricist, i see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>27 &#8211; nice al &#8211; you have a graph to interpret for that one, too? you&#8217;re quite the empiricist, i see.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290904', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombaker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290900</link>
		<dc:creator>tombaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290900</guid>
		<description>geena - why hasn&#039;t the president been following the law since 2000, when he swore he would? - don&#039;t you smell a rat? why can&#039;t the president just play by the rules as they&#039;re written?

if you&#039;re going to go out and joust, you&#039;d better get the horse, the armor, and the lance FIRST, geena - otherwise you just look silly and lose real quick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>geena &#8211; why hasn&#8217;t the president been following the law since 2000, when he swore he would? &#8211; don&#8217;t you smell a rat? why can&#8217;t the president just play by the rules as they&#8217;re written?</p>
<p>if you&#8217;re going to go out and joust, you&#8217;d better get the horse, the armor, and the lance FIRST, geena &#8211; otherwise you just look silly and lose real quick.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290900', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290748</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290748</guid>
		<description>Crap! Here&#039;s the link.

http://truthaboutfraud.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap! Here&#8217;s the link.</p>
<p><a href="http://truthaboutfraud.org/" rel="nofollow">http://truthaboutfraud.org/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290748', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290744</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290744</guid>
		<description>BTW. If one is really concerned about voter fraud? This site has lot of info and their sources look legit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW. If one is really concerned about voter fraud? This site has lot of info and their sources look legit.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290744', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290696</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290696</guid>
		<description>As I read it, geena, Ohio has been following the law. They have been maintaining a data base as required. What the GOP was suing for was the unlawful exclusion of voters based on &quot;questionable&quot; registrations. Virtually all of those &quot;questionable&quot; registrations are cases where someone has moved, changed party affiliation, use two or more variations on their full name (When I sign my name, for instance, I include my middle initial but, I don&#039;t include it when filling out forms that don&#039;t ask for it.) or had their handwriting misinterpreted.

The opinion of the SCOTUS is that it&#039;s unlawful to exclude a voter because of a minor discrepancy in a registration form. Especially since there are safeguards in place to prevent fraudulent votes at the polls.

Finally, unless I missed something, the Obama campaign had nothing to do with the dispute. The GOP raised the issue, were rebuked, and then forced the issue all the way to the SCOTUS. Then the SCOTUS ruled against them. The GOP attempt to disenfranchise voters has failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read it, geena, Ohio has been following the law. They have been maintaining a data base as required. What the GOP was suing for was the unlawful exclusion of voters based on &#8220;questionable&#8221; registrations. Virtually all of those &#8220;questionable&#8221; registrations are cases where someone has moved, changed party affiliation, use two or more variations on their full name (When I sign my name, for instance, I include my middle initial but, I don&#8217;t include it when filling out forms that don&#8217;t ask for it.) or had their handwriting misinterpreted.</p>
<p>The opinion of the SCOTUS is that it&#8217;s unlawful to exclude a voter because of a minor discrepancy in a registration form. Especially since there are safeguards in place to prevent fraudulent votes at the polls.</p>
<p>Finally, unless I missed something, the Obama campaign had nothing to do with the dispute. The GOP raised the issue, were rebuked, and then forced the issue all the way to the SCOTUS. Then the SCOTUS ruled against them. The GOP attempt to disenfranchise voters has failed.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290696', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bentley1</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290660</link>
		<dc:creator>bentley1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290660</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I smell a big rat, the rethugs.
Only a right winger would support voter supression.
Is geena a new  troll or an old one reincarnated for the 34th  time?
tony and lido</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I smell a big rat, the rethugs.<br />
Only a right winger would support voter supression.<br />
Is geena a new  troll or an old one reincarnated for the 34th  time?<br />
tony and lido<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290660', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geena</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290622</link>
		<dc:creator>geena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290622</guid>
		<description>Why was the Secretary not following the law in the first place?  She&#039;s known the law since 2002, six years ago, and she&#039;s caught with her pants down at the 9th hour?  No one smells a rat in all this with her erratic behavior pertaining to questionable voter registrations?  What&#039;s wrong with allowing them to be verified?  Why is Obama and his supporters afraid to follow normal election rules and procedures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was the Secretary not following the law in the first place?  She&#8217;s known the law since 2002, six years ago, and she&#8217;s caught with her pants down at the 9th hour?  No one smells a rat in all this with her erratic behavior pertaining to questionable voter registrations?  What&#8217;s wrong with allowing them to be verified?  Why is Obama and his supporters afraid to follow normal election rules and procedures?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290622', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bullsmith</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290600</link>
		<dc:creator>Bullsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290600</guid>
		<description>You&#039;d think Rick Davis would maybe respect the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d think Rick Davis would maybe respect the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290600', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McWars</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290546</link>
		<dc:creator>McWars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290546</guid>
		<description>Thank you, SCOTUS. This throws out the GOP&#039;s attempt to pad their screams of voter fraud when Obama wins. 

You have NOTHING, GOOPERS. &lt;strong&gt;NOTHING. &lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, SCOTUS. This throws out the GOP&#8217;s attempt to pad their screams of voter fraud when Obama wins. </p>
<p>You have NOTHING, GOOPERS. <strong>NOTHING. </strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290546', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tombaker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290476</link>
		<dc:creator>tombaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290476</guid>
		<description>well there we go -- a scotus decision for SarahP, that she can disagree with, to put on her list for that next big interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well there we go &#8212; a scotus decision for SarahP, that she can disagree with, to put on her list for that next big interview.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290476', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingCranky</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290466</link>
		<dc:creator>KingCranky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290466</guid>
		<description>The next GOP talking point will be that results can&#039;t be fully trusted, as there aren&#039;t enough accurate voting machines, equipment, personnel and funding for the results to be taken legitimately.

In which case, the Repubs have no one but themselves to blame for refusing to fix these problems when they called all the shots in DC.

The GOP had no problems with underfunding and faulty equipment when they had a chance to remedy the issue, now that the party is looking at a very long exile in the political wilderness, they should be spared NO sympathy for being screwed by their own stupidity.

The Republicans whine about being &quot;victims&quot; of their own self-inflicted fiascoes, which makes their off-key caterwauling even more enjoyable when their BS bites their asses.

Remember,

Bad news for the GOP=GOOD News for the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next GOP talking point will be that results can&#8217;t be fully trusted, as there aren&#8217;t enough accurate voting machines, equipment, personnel and funding for the results to be taken legitimately.</p>
<p>In which case, the Repubs have no one but themselves to blame for refusing to fix these problems when they called all the shots in DC.</p>
<p>The GOP had no problems with underfunding and faulty equipment when they had a chance to remedy the issue, now that the party is looking at a very long exile in the political wilderness, they should be spared NO sympathy for being screwed by their own stupidity.</p>
<p>The Republicans whine about being &#8220;victims&#8221; of their own self-inflicted fiascoes, which makes their off-key caterwauling even more enjoyable when their BS bites their asses.</p>
<p>Remember,</p>
<p>Bad news for the GOP=GOOD News for the USA.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290466', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290446</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290446</guid>
		<description>The importance of this reversal cannot be overemphasized. While it is simply a procedural matter, in which the Supreme Court essentially finds that the Republican Party of Ohio cannot establish standing in the case—and therefore has no right to bring the complaint—it establishes a precedent not only for the Circuit Court which overseas Ohio, but for the nation.

There can be no more cases brought to the Federal court system by parties without standing or a clear likelihood of establishing such standing. It&#039;s as if the referees took the ball and said, &#039;game over&#039; because one of the two teams was not a league member, and therefore could not participate in play.

Small technical checkmate, but a win for the good guys, nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of this reversal cannot be overemphasized. While it is simply a procedural matter, in which the Supreme Court essentially finds that the Republican Party of Ohio cannot establish standing in the case—and therefore has no right to bring the complaint—it establishes a precedent not only for the Circuit Court which overseas Ohio, but for the nation.</p>
<p>There can be no more cases brought to the Federal court system by parties without standing or a clear likelihood of establishing such standing. It&#8217;s as if the referees took the ball and said, &#8216;game over&#8217; because one of the two teams was not a league member, and therefore could not participate in play.</p>
<p>Small technical checkmate, but a win for the good guys, nonetheless.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290446', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leftside Annie</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290402</link>
		<dc:creator>Leftside Annie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290402</guid>
		<description>Up yours, GOoPers!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up yours, GOoPers!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290402', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IgnoranceIsNotBliss</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290342</link>
		<dc:creator>IgnoranceIsNotBliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290342</guid>
		<description>If this makes the McCain campaign unhappy, how do you think they feel about the FBIand the DOJ getting nervous about this so called national investigation? I betcha they&#039;re crying in their cereal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this makes the McCain campaign unhappy, how do you think they feel about the FBIand the DOJ getting nervous about this so called national investigation? I betcha they&#8217;re crying in their cereal.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290342', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnfyounger</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290340</link>
		<dc:creator>johnfyounger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290340</guid>
		<description>I think it would be pretty hard to make an effective argument there .... although I guess that doesn&#039;t mean someone won&#039;t try.  Isn&#039;t there a post here about Rush Limbough turning on the Fox &quot;All Stars?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be pretty hard to make an effective argument there &#8230;. although I guess that doesn&#8217;t mean someone won&#8217;t try.  Isn&#8217;t there a post here about Rush Limbough turning on the Fox &#8220;All Stars?&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290340', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paleolib</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290338</link>
		<dc:creator>paleolib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290338</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Re the Update&lt;/em&gt;

As an Ohio taxpayer I respectfully suggest that unless the McCain campaign, the RNC and the Ohio Republican Party wish to pay for the amount of work the clowns on the 6th Circuit ordered to be performed in the impossible time frame of three days, they and especially Rick Davis go F.U.C.K. themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Re the Update</em></p>
<p>As an Ohio taxpayer I respectfully suggest that unless the McCain campaign, the RNC and the Ohio Republican Party wish to pay for the amount of work the clowns on the 6th Circuit ordered to be performed in the impossible time frame of three days, they and especially Rick Davis go F.U.C.K. themselves.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290338', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: progressive homeschooler</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290298</link>
		<dc:creator>progressive homeschooler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290298</guid>
		<description>How long before we start hearing that the SCOTUS is in the tank for Obama?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How long before we start hearing that the SCOTUS is in the tank for Obama?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290298', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lurker</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290300</link>
		<dc:creator>lurker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290300</guid>
		<description>Voter fraud is BS. How many people are you going to get
to try to pull off voting as someone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voter fraud is BS. How many people are you going to get<br />
to try to pull off voting as someone else?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290300', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paleolib</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290296</link>
		<dc:creator>paleolib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290296</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;hil_1&lt;/em&gt;

The Order is an unsigned per curiam opinion about two paragraphs long. No dissent is noted which means it was unanimous. Brunner only requested a stay. The Court blew away the (Republican) 6th Circuit decision in its entirety. This is a pretty emphatic sign by the Court that it doesn&#039;t want to go back into the business of deciding elections this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>hil_1</em></p>
<p>The Order is an unsigned per curiam opinion about two paragraphs long. No dissent is noted which means it was unanimous. Brunner only requested a stay. The Court blew away the (Republican) 6th Circuit decision in its entirety. This is a pretty emphatic sign by the Court that it doesn&#8217;t want to go back into the business of deciding elections this year.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290296', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnfyounger</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/comment-page-1/#comment-5290290</link>
		<dc:creator>johnfyounger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 17:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/10/17/scotus-ohio/#comment-5290290</guid>
		<description>thank goodness for that ruling.  I hope this story gets it&#039;s due in the press and there is proper juxtaposition with all vastly overemphasized BS about Acorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank goodness for that ruling.  I hope this story gets it&#8217;s due in the press and there is proper juxtaposition with all vastly overemphasized BS about Acorn.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5290290', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
