Well I just can’t believe I’m late to this party.

So let me understand this. The goal of marriage is to procreate, therefore marriages that don’t lead to procreation shouldn’t be allowed??? Should woman past child-bearing age be allowed to marry?

Once again, religion brings out the most stupid of humans.

October 20th, 2008 at 1:24 pm

Whoa, slow down there! You’re injecting logic into religion, and everyone knows that logic and religion just don’t mix!

That’s a line I used one time to a co-worker who was explaining that marriage was for a man and woman who wanted to have children. Needless to say, he didn’t like logic being applied to his opinion. He also made the comment that any man who ever had sex with another man at any point in his life was automatically a homosexual. Of course, I had to respond with “Well, I’ve never had sex with a woman, so by your logic if I were to ever try it out, I would immediately become a heterosexual, right?”

For some reason, logic only applies to right-whiners if it supports their assertions. If it does not, then it isn’t considered an acceptable argument.

Go figure.

/For those who don’t like the pic, after all, “I’m not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can’t do, should and should not dobut I certainly can express MY opinion on what I feel is best”….

/For those who don’t like the pic, after all, “I’m not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can’t do, should and should not dobut I certainly can express MY opinion on what I feel is best”….

You’re getting too deep for McPalin and her sycophants/supporters.

No, RaptureReady, OUR (as in ALL citizens of the USA) laws are NOT in the new or old testament. OUR laws are in the Constitution of the United States, the Bill Of Rights, and on the books as far as what passes congress and the president’s veto power.

The laws you refer to apply only to those who ascribe to Christianity, which is NOT everyone. There are plenty of Buddhists, Muslims (some who die in the service ‘fighting for our freedoms’ just like other faiths by the way), Jews, Agnostics, Atheists, Pagans, Wiccans, Shintoists, Taoists, Native American spiritual cultures, etc etc in this country too. Do they have to subjugate themselves to the will of Christianity? That kind of goes against the “no establishment of state religion” thing doesn’t it? People of other faiths should no more be expected to follow the ‘laws’ set by Christianity than Christians should be subject to the laws of those other faiths.

The only laws we are ALL subject to are the laws that WE ALL make.

Long story short, take your religion and shove it where God tells it it’s naughty.

lol

——————————————————————————–
With the assistance of Governor Palin.
October 20th, 2008 at 12:33 pm

Further evidence of Daryll’s moral relativity. How very weak, Daryll. God hates weakness.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-4wQfQtpDAc&eurl

Ok, whatever.

I’m not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can’t do, should and should not do.

So which is it, honey?

If a god speaks to you, you are insane

And why won’t Shara release her health records?

Could it be that the newborn is her daughters?

And again, how’s that “God told me that Phuckabee is going to our next President” working out for you?

That way, they can try to have it both ways ?