Comments on: 26 newspapers that backed Bush in 2004 switch to Obama.

By: Doc Rock

Doc Rock — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:18:27 +0000

Did they apologize, too?

By: chasemonster

chasemonster — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:37:46 +0000

They only switched to Obama because he’s black.

By: Alejandro

Alejandro — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:46:57 +0000

Hmm, that doesn’t say anything good about Obama.

By: Chuck Feney

Chuck Feney — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:27:29 +0000

Now, how do we get the likely voters to read newspapers? Maybe we could a sensationalistic DVD in them that made the most outrageous claims and fed on people’s fears….Oh….wait…been done….never mind.

By: wearechange

wearechange — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:54:17 +0000

the news industry realizes it must continue selling papers after the presidential election. film at 11.

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:54:10 +0000

There is something to be said by the handwriting on the wall.

By: Gary Kleppe

Gary Kleppe — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:48:38 +0000

Newspaper endorsements almost always go to the candidate with more money.

By: robbez_92107

robbez_92107 — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:46:16 +0000

Wow. How UnAmerican of them, right, Rep. Bachman?

By: radiodujour

radiodujour — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:43:32 +0000

This is not a good sign for the Obama administration. This is the same group of newspapers that supported the invasion and mass slaughter of the Iraqi people.

If the votes are counted, Obama will win and it is my opinion that the only thing that will change is that our president will now be able to speak the english language which is something I admit.

Obama will handed the steering wheel to the Titantic, all of Wallstreet people that bought him to the dance will get their bailouts and I will be left drowning in a sea of inflation trying to keep my kids fed and in clothing.

By: RUCerious

RUCerious — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 19:36:14 +0000

the Los Angeles Times and Cleveland’s Plain Dealer that did no endorse either candidate in 2004.”

Is that the Scottish brogue comin out??