<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman: I&#8217;m &#8216;Grateful&#8217; Senate Democrats Changed The Rules So That I&#8217;m Not Singled Out For Punishment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 05:34:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mim</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5349478</link>
		<dc:creator>mim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5349478</guid>
		<description>Well, at least he&#039;s not an ingrate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, at least he&#8217;s not an ingrate.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5349478', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sacopenapa</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5349424</link>
		<dc:creator>sacopenapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5349424</guid>
		<description>Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5349424', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MusicLover</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5349092</link>
		<dc:creator>MusicLover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 02:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5349092</guid>
		<description>Having Joe Lieberman as - CLEARLY - the most powerful person in the United States Senate scares the shit out of me and REALLY pisses me off. 

Nothing changed on November 4. Nothing at all. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. 

I WANT MY GODDAMN MONEY BACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having Joe Lieberman as &#8211; CLEARLY &#8211; the most powerful person in the United States Senate scares the shit out of me and REALLY pisses me off. </p>
<p>Nothing changed on November 4. Nothing at all. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. </p>
<p>I WANT MY GODDAMN MONEY BACK!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5349092', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348870</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348870</guid>
		<description>Harry Reid: &quot;I&#039;m grateful for the exemplary oral sex that Joe Leiberman performed on me and the entire Democratic leadership. I think the bruises on his knees are a sign of his willingness to work in a bipartisan, yet fair manner.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry Reid: &#8220;I&#8217;m grateful for the exemplary oral sex that Joe Leiberman performed on me and the entire Democratic leadership. I think the bruises on his knees are a sign of his willingness to work in a bipartisan, yet fair manner.&#8221;<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348870', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game of Life</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348730</link>
		<dc:creator>Game of Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348730</guid>
		<description>Who cares about his one stinkin vote, which will probably go to the repugs.

Dems get a set.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares about his one stinkin vote, which will probably go to the repugs.</p>
<p>Dems get a set.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348730', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: future</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348686</link>
		<dc:creator>future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348686</guid>
		<description>How can these Senators, &lt;strong&gt;behind closed doors&lt;/strong&gt;, justify keeping this this human being in the United States Senate?  All Lieberman has ever done is stoked the war flames and regurgitated fascist republican credos accross the halls of the Senate.  He is not a good man and our future depends upon having the most intelligent and just progressives in the United States Senate.  Get rid of Lieberman and begin squeezing the pus out of our Senate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can these Senators, <strong>behind closed doors</strong>, justify keeping this this human being in the United States Senate?  All Lieberman has ever done is stoked the war flames and regurgitated fascist republican credos accross the halls of the Senate.  He is not a good man and our future depends upon having the most intelligent and just progressives in the United States Senate.  Get rid of Lieberman and begin squeezing the pus out of our Senate!<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348686', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gummitch</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348684</link>
		<dc:creator>gummitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348684</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;impeachcheneythenbush Says:

gummich - then does this meet your criteria? The Senate Democratic caucus is NOT like a big club or fraternal organization, otherwise, I guess maybe you and I could join. &lt;/em&gt;

If you get yourself elected to the Senate, I bet you&#039;ve got a shot.

Take heart, though. It appears that the Connecticut Democratic Party might &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hcu-ctlieberman-1118,0,3159706.story&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;take things into their own hands.
&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>impeachcheneythenbush Says:</p>
<p>gummich &#8211; then does this meet your criteria? The Senate Democratic caucus is NOT like a big club or fraternal organization, otherwise, I guess maybe you and I could join. </em></p>
<p>If you get yourself elected to the Senate, I bet you&#8217;ve got a shot.</p>
<p>Take heart, though. It appears that the Connecticut Democratic Party might <a href="http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hcu-ctlieberman-1118,0,3159706.story" rel="nofollow">take things into their own hands.<br />
</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348684', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348652</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348652</guid>
		<description>gummich - then does this meet your criteria?  The Senate Democratic caucus is NOT like a big club or fraternal organization, otherwise, I guess maybe you and I could join.  

&lt;em&gt;The 110th United States Congress, which began January 4, 2007:
Affiliation 	Members 	Note
	Democratic Party 	&lt;strong&gt;49 This figure is not the Democratic Caucus of the United States Senate. The Caucus numbers 51. 	&lt;/strong&gt;
	Republican Party 	49 	
	Independent 	1 	Bernie Sanders caucuses with the Democrats.
	Connecticut for Lieberman Party 	1 	Joe Lieberman caucuses with the Democrats.
	Majority 	2 	The Democratic Caucus is in the majority.
Total 	100&lt;/em&gt;

Check this out to.  This isn&#039;t the first time Lieberman has made threats toward his previous party.

&lt;em&gt;In the months between the election and the swearing in of the Congress, Sen. Joe Lieberman (Connecticut for Lieberman Party-CT) initially refused to rule out caucusing with the Republicans, which could have put control of the Senate in doubt.[6] A similar situation happened in the Great Senate Deadlock of 1881.[7] In the event of tied parties, control of the chamber would belong to the party of the Vice President—the President of the Senate.

In February 2007, rumors again circled that Senator Joe Lieberman would caucus with the Republicans if Democrats forced a vote in the Senate on the Iraq War.&lt;/em&gt;

http://dictionary.sensagent.com/United%20States%20Senate/en-en/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gummich &#8211; then does this meet your criteria?  The Senate Democratic caucus is NOT like a big club or fraternal organization, otherwise, I guess maybe you and I could join.  </p>
<p><em>The 110th United States Congress, which began January 4, 2007:<br />
Affiliation 	Members 	Note<br />
	Democratic Party 	<strong>49 This figure is not the Democratic Caucus of the United States Senate. The Caucus numbers 51. 	</strong><br />
	Republican Party 	49<br />
	Independent 	1 	Bernie Sanders caucuses with the Democrats.<br />
	Connecticut for Lieberman Party 	1 	Joe Lieberman caucuses with the Democrats.<br />
	Majority 	2 	The Democratic Caucus is in the majority.<br />
Total 	100</em></p>
<p>Check this out to.  This isn&#8217;t the first time Lieberman has made threats toward his previous party.</p>
<p><em>In the months between the election and the swearing in of the Congress, Sen. Joe Lieberman (Connecticut for Lieberman Party-CT) initially refused to rule out caucusing with the Republicans, which could have put control of the Senate in doubt.[6] A similar situation happened in the Great Senate Deadlock of 1881.[7] In the event of tied parties, control of the chamber would belong to the party of the Vice President—the President of the Senate.</p>
<p>In February 2007, rumors again circled that Senator Joe Lieberman would caucus with the Republicans if Democrats forced a vote in the Senate on the Iraq War.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.sensagent.com/United%20States%20Senate/en-en/" rel="nofollow">http://dictionary.sensagent.com/United%20States%20Senate/en-en/</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348652', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluestatedon</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348602</link>
		<dc:creator>bluestatedon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348602</guid>
		<description>Well, Obama and the Senate Dems just saved me a bunch of money, and it wasn&#039;t on car insurance, it was on future campaign contributions.

Given that Obama and the Senate Dems have signaled that it&#039;s really no big deal to them if someone actively supports Republicans like John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Norm Coleman, I&#039;m puzzled why I should care about, much less contribute to, Al Franken. If Norm Coleman is good enough for Joe Lieberman, and Barack Obama and Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are fine with Joe&#039;s support for Coleman, who cares about Al Franken enough to give him money? Or, for that matter, Martin or Begrich?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Obama and the Senate Dems just saved me a bunch of money, and it wasn&#8217;t on car insurance, it was on future campaign contributions.</p>
<p>Given that Obama and the Senate Dems have signaled that it&#8217;s really no big deal to them if someone actively supports Republicans like John McCain, Sarah Palin, and Norm Coleman, I&#8217;m puzzled why I should care about, much less contribute to, Al Franken. If Norm Coleman is good enough for Joe Lieberman, and Barack Obama and Howard Dean and Hillary Clinton and John Kerry are fine with Joe&#8217;s support for Coleman, who cares about Al Franken enough to give him money? Or, for that matter, Martin or Begrich?<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348602', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gummitch</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348600</link>
		<dc:creator>gummitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348600</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;impeachcheneythenbush Says:

Gummich - It’s a caucus. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen — which is why Oregon’s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)

Wrong. This is the definition of what the Senate Dem Caucus is - and incoming freshmen should NOT have been included. They are NOT senators yet!&lt;/em&gt;

I frankly don&#039;t care what Wikipedia offers as a definition. The Democratic Caucus is not a government institution; it&#039;s a &quot;caucus&quot; and they can include whoever they want. Obviously, because they did. It&#039;s like a big club or fraternal organization, and they get to define membership as they choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>impeachcheneythenbush Says:</p>
<p>Gummich &#8211; It’s a caucus. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen — which is why Oregon’s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)</p>
<p>Wrong. This is the definition of what the Senate Dem Caucus is &#8211; and incoming freshmen should NOT have been included. They are NOT senators yet!</em></p>
<p>I frankly don&#8217;t care what Wikipedia offers as a definition. The Democratic Caucus is not a government institution; it&#8217;s a &#8220;caucus&#8221; and they can include whoever they want. Obviously, because they did. It&#8217;s like a big club or fraternal organization, and they get to define membership as they choose.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348600', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musk</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348584</link>
		<dc:creator>Musk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348584</guid>
		<description>Everytime Lieberman speaks it&#039;s like tearing a scab off.  I guess I need to quit listening to that weasel.  I don&#039;t know how Connecticutt can stand it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everytime Lieberman speaks it&#8217;s like tearing a scab off.  I guess I need to quit listening to that weasel.  I don&#8217;t know how Connecticutt can stand it.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348584', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348580</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348580</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Gummich - It’s a caucus. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen — which is why Oregon’s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)&lt;/em&gt;

Wrong.  This is the definition of what the Senate Dem Caucus is - and incoming freshmen should NOT have been included.  They are NOT senators yet!

&lt;strong&gt;The Senate Democratic Caucus (or Conference) is the formal organization of the current 49 Democratic Senators in the United States Senate. In the 110th Congress, the Democratic Caucus includes two independent senators that formally caucus with the Democrats for the purpose of committee assignments and Senate organization, bringing the total membership of the caucus to 51. &lt;/strong&gt;The primary organizational front for Democrats in the Senate, its primary function is communicating the party&#039;s message to and unifying all of its members. Caucus leadership consists of Senator Harry Reid (NV) as Chairman and Senate Majority Leader, Senator Dick Durbin (IL) as Whip or Assistant Majority Leader, Senator Charles Schumer (NY) as Vice-Chairman, and Senator Patty Murray (WA) as Secretary.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Caucus_of_the_United_States_Senate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Gummich &#8211; It’s a caucus. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen — which is why Oregon’s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)</em></p>
<p>Wrong.  This is the definition of what the Senate Dem Caucus is &#8211; and incoming freshmen should NOT have been included.  They are NOT senators yet!</p>
<p><strong>The Senate Democratic Caucus (or Conference) is the formal organization of the current 49 Democratic Senators in the United States Senate. In the 110th Congress, the Democratic Caucus includes two independent senators that formally caucus with the Democrats for the purpose of committee assignments and Senate organization, bringing the total membership of the caucus to 51. </strong>The primary organizational front for Democrats in the Senate, its primary function is communicating the party&#8217;s message to and unifying all of its members. Caucus leadership consists of Senator Harry Reid (NV) as Chairman and Senate Majority Leader, Senator Dick Durbin (IL) as Whip or Assistant Majority Leader, Senator Charles Schumer (NY) as Vice-Chairman, and Senator Patty Murray (WA) as Secretary.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Caucus_of_the_United_States_Senate" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Caucus_of_the_United_States_Senate</a><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348580', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BaxterJ</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348576</link>
		<dc:creator>BaxterJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348576</guid>
		<description>Interesting that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.entertonement.com/collections/7626/Lieberman-Keeps-Homeland-Security-Chair&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the &quot;secret&quot; ballot has already been leaked&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that <a href="http://www.entertonement.com/collections/7626/Lieberman-Keeps-Homeland-Security-Chair" rel="nofollow">the &#8220;secret&#8221; ballot has already been leaked</a>.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348576', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the brown acid</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348528</link>
		<dc:creator>the brown acid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348528</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;spineless....f!@#%ing....democrats!!!!&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>spineless&#8230;.f!@#%ing&#8230;.democrats!!!!</strong><a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348528', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348524</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348524</guid>
		<description>Merkley&#039;s office scrambled to say he didn&#039;t challenge Joe&#039;s chairmanship.  

Boy, Lieberman&#039;s crack photographer/blackmailing staff works quick.  Not even sworn in yet, and Joe has the goods on him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merkley&#8217;s office scrambled to say he didn&#8217;t challenge Joe&#8217;s chairmanship.  </p>
<p>Boy, Lieberman&#8217;s crack photographer/blackmailing staff works quick.  Not even sworn in yet, and Joe has the goods on him.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348524', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348522</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348522</guid>
		<description>The TPM piece mentioned &quot;Jeff Merkley, the new Senator-elect from Oregon&quot; as attending.  

To hit 55, all but two current and Senators elect would have to vote.

57-2=55</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The TPM piece mentioned &#8220;Jeff Merkley, the new Senator-elect from Oregon&#8221; as attending.  </p>
<p>To hit 55, all but two current and Senators elect would have to vote.</p>
<p>57-2=55<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348522', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gummitch</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348516</link>
		<dc:creator>gummitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348516</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;impeachcheneythenbush Says:

Still makes no sense. He shouldn’t have voted, since he isn’t sworn into the Senate yet. The Democratic Caucus was 51 in the Senate, and that included Lieberman and Sanders (both Independents). So it’s still FOUR too many votes!&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s a &lt;em&gt;caucus&lt;/em&gt;. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen -- which is why Oregon&#039;s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>impeachcheneythenbush Says:</p>
<p>Still makes no sense. He shouldn’t have voted, since he isn’t sworn into the Senate yet. The Democratic Caucus was 51 in the Senate, and that included Lieberman and Sanders (both Independents). So it’s still FOUR too many votes!</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a <em>caucus</em>. They can invite whoever they want and include whoever they want. In this case, they included the incoming freshmen &#8212; which is why Oregon&#8217;s Jeff Merkley was there to speak against coddling Lieberman. (And I thank God again I live in Oregon, because both our Senators were opposed to this.)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348516', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348502</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348502</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Someone inside the closed door meeting will have to come clean as to who attended and voted. It’s clear they don’t want the vote record revealed.

I can only glean information from published stories. One might think a progressive website would have the connections to find answers, especially one with relationships to John Podesta.&lt;/em&gt;

Yes indeed.  There should have been no more than a total of 48 votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Someone inside the closed door meeting will have to come clean as to who attended and voted. It’s clear they don’t want the vote record revealed.</p>
<p>I can only glean information from published stories. One might think a progressive website would have the connections to find answers, especially one with relationships to John Podesta.</em></p>
<p>Yes indeed.  There should have been no more than a total of 48 votes.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348502', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stateofthedivision</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348480</link>
		<dc:creator>stateofthedivision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348480</guid>
		<description>Someone inside the closed door meeting will have to come clean as to who attended and voted.  It&#039;s clear they don&#039;t want the vote record revealed.  

I can only glean information from published stories.  One might think a progressive website would have the connections to find answers, especially one with relationships to John Podesta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone inside the closed door meeting will have to come clean as to who attended and voted.  It&#8217;s clear they don&#8217;t want the vote record revealed.  </p>
<p>I can only glean information from published stories.  One might think a progressive website would have the connections to find answers, especially one with relationships to John Podesta.<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348480', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: impeachcheneythenbush</title>
		<link>http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/comment-page-2/#comment-5348450</link>
		<dc:creator>impeachcheneythenbush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/18/lieberman-chairmanship-2/#comment-5348450</guid>
		<description>Make that seven votes too many...Lieberman wouldn&#039;t have been allowed to vote (I assume!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that seven votes too many&#8230;Lieberman wouldn&#8217;t have been allowed to vote (I assume!)<a href="javascript:void(0)" title=""  onmouseover="window.status=''; return true" onmouseout="window.status=''; return true" onclick="ddrc_popup('http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=5348450', 400, 400)"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
