Comments on: Gingrich Says Israel Should Set A Deadline For Attack On Iran

By: ID_Neon

ID_Neon — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:25:45 +0000

So if Iran gets a Nuclear Weapon what then Democrats? Do you bend over and take it in the butt?

By: Quizmos

Quizmos — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:33:35 +0000

Just what is the definition of war mongering? Here, the American People can see and hear Mr. Gingrich gambling the lives of their children using the scare tactic of an imaginary nuclear Iraq (weapons of mass destruction) argument.

I suggest that Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity are greater threats to America than Iran is. The question is, what are the brave American people willing to do in terms of a preemptive action against them? There is still a law against war mongering, though laws that are not enforced have little effect on those willing to break them.

By: Fred

Fred — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 15:25:09 +0000

republicans hate facts

great points……..keep em on the ropes. They can only stick to their fantasy if we allow it.

By: curious

curious — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 05:27:17 +0000

And we should listen to this man,why?

By: Anacher Forester

Anacher Forester — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 03:23:41 +0000

Gringich is the new McCain. He’s identified a vacuum within the GOP and he seeks to fill it. Newt’s hoping that he can ride his new revolution to the White House. Like McCain he doesn’t realize he’s too tainted and too late to pull it off.

Expect Newt to get crazier in the build up to 2012.

-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud

By: dasm

dasm — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 02:15:18 +0000

Gingrich– it’s time to realize the vast majority of Americans, and a huge majority of the world, detest you & all you stand for. Either find a new persona or you will soon fade into obscurity. People no longer want hate, fear & war mongering, and the glorification of killing others. You are rapidly becoming obsolete. Seriously, anyone who activiely promotes war, as Gingrich & many REpub chicken hawks do, should be the first ones sent to participate in the war they promote– a new law to be enacted. Practise what you preach, walk the talk, etc.

By: SKdeA

SKdeA — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:32:38 +0000

NILAPSTICK Says:

Who has shown responsibility when it comes to nuclear weapons? Everyone who owns them so far.

Well, everyone except us…

By: Game of Life

Game of Life — Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:24:49 +0000

Mark701 Says:

Yup, just like a chickenhawk to go bucking for a war he’ll never have to fight in. The only ones who will make out from this kind of conflict are the oil companies after Iran starts targeting oil tankers leaving the Gulf. I think Newt would approve.

And repugs will swear that they are following “terrorist” into Iran.

Israel has the US backing via millions of dollars, shared intel and high tech weapons. Israel has hundred of nukes already.

I say even up the score then let them go at it.

By: Nevar

Nevar — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:35:48 +0000

“For goodness sake the US and Israel don’t even have an ordinary criminal extradition treaty!”

It makes the exchange of goods and services so much easier without all that messy legal stuff…

U.S. Diplomat: “We caught 6 of your spies this week, they’ll be on flight 666 tomorrow, coming in from JFK.”

Israeli Diplomat: “Six you say? I’ll notify the IDF, have them clean up a half dozen of yours. Where do you want them sent? Baghdad? No problem. Shalom.”

By: Nevar

Nevar — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:27:21 +0000

NILAPSTICK Says:
“History does have a way of repeating itself.”

My comments were observations, not fan-fare. I’m not a fan of extremism in any way shape or form.

By: 5th Estate

5th Estate — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:23:04 +0000

witch1… thanks very for the compliment at #66. I just can’t understand the ‘rationale’ behind the US/Israel relationship which seems inexplicably ossified and which remains permanently unexamined despite changing circumstances.
For goodness sake the US and Israel don’t even have an ordinary criminal extradition treaty!

By: livelongandprosper

livelongandprosper — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:43:49 +0000

Hey rhf, great comments!

By: Juan C.

Juan C. — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:32:38 +0000

Good to read you here Juan….Blessings

Hey, Lady Witch, I’m honored just to be here. ;)

By: dbadass

dbadass — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:10:38 +0000

So Israel needs nukes so that it has the power to protect itself but Iran just wants nukes to nuke stuff? Is that what I am to believe?

By: NILAPSTICK

NILAPSTICK — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:07:50 +0000

History does have a way of repeating itself. Accept this time they have the power to protect themselves. You sound like a fan of Hitler, Nevar. Maybe Hezbolah also!

By: NILAPSTICK

NILAPSTICK — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:05:07 +0000

I didn’t say Iran Mary. Where did I say “Iran and Israel have been to the negotiating table”?

Huh, I guees you didn’t know that.

By: Nevar

Nevar — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 22:02:21 +0000

NILAPSTICK Says:

How many times does Israel have to go the negotiating table?

Just once, with sincere intent.

How many times have they given in, only to be attacked again and again?

They never give in, they only shuffle the conditions for achieving concessions. And they attack, again and again. And blockade, and put up fences.

The only way Israel will not be attacked is by leaving Israel.

History has a way of repeating itself.

By: mary

mary — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:58:59 +0000

Israel’s been to the negotiating table with Iran?

Huh, I didn’t know that.

By: scytherius

scytherius — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:51:42 +0000

Fortunately, in a little over 30 days, no one will be listening to serial christian adulterers, liars, torturers, etc. anymore. Oh, and not Fox News either.

By: AlphaLiberal

AlphaLiberal — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:51:14 +0000

“Blood ‘n Guts Gingrich”.