Think Progress

Center for American Regress?

By Satyam Khanna on Dec 17th, 2008 at 9:51 am

Center for American Regress?

Politico’s Ben Smith reports that the RNC is staffing up for a new, in-house think tank designed to revive the party’s “policy heft.” The think tank will be named the Center for Republican Renewal, and it is the result of many inside the conservative movement viewing the 2008 electoral failures as “in part, a product of stale ideas.” Campaigning for a second term, RNC Chairman Mike Duncan said that the think tank is part of his “10-point plan” to make the GOP “an accelerator of change.”

Update RNC officials aren’t the only ones cooking up a right-wing think tank. President Bush is planning to launch an institute attached to his presidential library that will promote his vision.


32 Responses to “Center for American Regress?”


  1. hanshiro says:

    The problem with the republican think tank is that they view them not as nouns, but as cause-and-effect. Whatever they put their thinking process to….tanks.

    or…

    It’s their all-purpose foreign policy solution: Think ‘TANK.’

    *rimshot*


  2. 5th Estate says:

    Suggestions for Republicans:
    Stop lying
    Stop trying to appeal to morons
    Stop creating limited interest wedge issues
    Stop using religion as a crutch for your policies

    Basically. stop being Republicans


  3. The Dogfather says:

    The goopers may want to think of themselves as an “accelerator for change,” but their transmission for change is stuck in reverse…


  4. stewarjt says:

    President Bush is planning to launch an institute attached to his presidential library that will promote his vision.

    In fact. President Dinkledonk’s vision is the same as Mr. Magoo’s.


  5. shoeless says:

    The Republican’s 10-point plan

    1.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    2.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    3.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    4.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    5.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    6.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    7.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    8.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    9.Tax cuts for the wealthy.
    10.Tax cuts for the wealthy.


  6. Perry logan says:

    1. Genetic editing.


  7. shoeless says:

    5th Estate Says:
    ————————————————————-
    Basically. stop being Republicans

    Maybe they could start calling themselves Federalists again.


  8. joe cantwell says:

    i believe that troll tim vacalukalik

    would be well qualified to head

    up such a think tank.

    *

    he’s all about change.

    *

    good luck tim.

    ^


  9. 666lattes says:

    Problem 1: It sounds like they are just looking for policies that will get them back in power as opposed to one’s they actually care about… I can picture them all now, just sitting around asking eachother what they should be caring about… which is certainly understandable because they are only capable of caring about themselves and their wealth.

    Maybe they could stick to opposing things like the Wall St. bailout. Although I’m certainly not their target audience, I actually agreed with them on something for once.


  10. Chuck Feney says:

    “…a new, in-house think tank designed to revive the party’s “policy heft.”

    Due to an editing error the above phrase should have read:
    “policy of theft”


  11. LibertyLover says:

    George Bush has a vision?


  12. Uncle Ho says:

    There are NO moderate or liberal Rethugs. They all have been hounded out of the GOP as Rinos by the extremist fanatics.

    In fact, the base believes they got whumped in the last election because they weren’t radical enough, and must become even MORE extremist.


  13. paleolib says:

    Please, please, please GOOPers give Mike Duncan a second term at the RNC. Please keep advocating the economic policies of the Hoover administration, the foreign policy of Napoleon and the social platform of the Spanish Inquisition from now until the end of time. I know there are some nutty people in this country and I want them all where I can see them. Your party will do fine.


  14. konchster says:

    right-wing think tank is the definition of oxymoron


  15. 5th Estate says:

    shoeless Says: “Maybe they could start calling themselves Federalists again.”

    No, I think they should re-brand themselves with a made-up meaningless but warm and fuzzy sounding name, like “Altria” until they can sort out their platform.
    Then they can invent a new name which of course what actually mean what every thinks it should mean.


  16. DNFP says:

    “…Renewal”

    At least they’re showing signs of self-awareness.


  17. ElBruce says:

    Conservatism by definition doesn’t have new ideas. Conservatism in practice doesn’t have ideas at all. All they’re going to do is try to whip up a new flavor of sugarcoating to put on the same steaming pile of old “ideas.”


  18. stateofthedivision says:

    They want to eliminate the SEC and lower corporate taxes to zero. Whose pocket are they in?

    A new stink tank is a great way to get sponsors. Pony up Sheldon Adelson, after Bush steers more taxpayer money his way.


  19. 5th Estate says:

    ElBruce Says: Conservatism by definition doesn’t have new ideas

    Quite so. Their frame of reference is a nostalgic and unrealistic view of the past. Their problem now is that they have run out of glorious pasts to point-to as “the way things should be.” They can;t get past the supposed perfection of the “Leave it to Beaver” 50s because they’ve been complaining about every other decade after that and they have failed in every attempt to prevent change.


  20. Yankeluh says:

    Promote his vision? How exactly does one promote astigmatism?


  21. cmac says:

  22. shoeless says:

    5th Estate Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    shoeless Says: “Maybe they could start calling themselves Federalists again.”

    No, I think they should re-brand themselves with a made-up meaningless but warm and fuzzy sounding name, like “Altria” until they can sort out their platform.
    Then they can invent a new name which of course what actually mean what every thinks it should mean.

    Well, it took the country 50 years to forget how much they hated the Federalists, so they could come back as Republicans. How long do you think it will take for the country to forget how badly the Republicans suck?


  23. stateofthedivision says:

    So that’s what Karl Rove did at the White House Hanukkah party. How many of those in attendance did he hit up for the new policy stink tank? Hopefully, they didn’t invest with Bernie Madoff and have something left to share.

    Iraqi Shoe Tosser-continues in custody, brother believes the judge visited his cell due to prisoner beatings.

    $50 billion Ponzi Schemer-free on bail


  24. MapleStreet says:

    WOW! All these Think Tanks from the party that runs on a lack of thought

    The Rovian campaigns I’ve seen have been to fear monger and get knee jerk reactions.


  25. The Republic of Stupidity says:

    5th Estate Says:

    No, I think they should re-brand themselves with a made-up meaningless but warm and fuzzy sounding name…
    ___________

    The Chia-ites?


  26. marlow says:

    Republican Renewal? Don’t look now, but that dead horse you’re whipping just exploded with maggots.


  27. helenahandbasket says:

    Republican Renewal? Orwell would be proud.


  28. calavzma says:

    already said by Elbruce in 18… but i wanted to elaborate.

    What change could conservatives propose, wouldn’t that make them in essence no longer conservative.

    here’s the merriam-webster definition of conservative.
    1: preservative
    2 a: of or relating to a philosophy of conservatism bcapitalized : of or constituting a political party professing the principles of conservatism
    3 a: tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions : traditional b: marked by moderation or caution c: marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners

    the key is in #3 “maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions.

    there must be some serious thinking on how we can change and stay the same, i’m glad republicans are spending there efforts on that catch 22 instead of issues or serving the people… did i say people? i meant big business


  29. WillowOrchid says:

    Not “stale” ideas, FAILED ideas. There, fixed.


  30. Robt says:

    ” named the Center for Republican Renewal “.?

    What happened to all those snapping conservative names that claim they are the chosen ones?

    Like instead naming this;

    ” Republican reinvention of American patriotism for the elite “.


  31. marlow says:

    Find something you can make people scared of, blame it on someone/something you disagree with, lie cheat and steal wherever you can, and do whatever else it takes to claw your way back into power. You’ve already done that one, so what’d next?



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll