Franken leading Coleman by more than 250 votes.
By on Dec 19th, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Franken leading Coleman by more than 250 votes.
As of 3:02 this afternoon, Al Franken was leading Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) by 257 votes in the senate race recount. FiveThiryEight’s Nate Silver projected Franken would ultimately win the recount with a margin of at least 70 votes.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Glenn Beck
Global Warming
Guantanamo
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Sweet! Now pray for an aneurism when Billo and pus-gut Rush hear about it.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:24 pmI don’t see why Coleman doesn’t just concede. He’s going to need time to deal with the FBI investigation into his funny money.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:24 pmThe wailing, and gnashing of teeth, on local Reich-radio is fantastic! But, what’s really gratifying is that it’s the first time that I really feel my single vote is significant. If Al wins, and proves faithless, feel free to blame me.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:27 pmAnd, on an off topic story, Bristol Palin’s Mom got arrested on drug charges. I just hope that Bible Spice’s second grandchild isn’t affected as severely as the first.
http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/crime/story/628010.html
December 19th, 2008 at 4:30 pmOne of the contested ballots said “thank you for counting my vote”. Coleman’s camp said that surely couldn’t be valid. The MN voting board disagreed. One board member then said to the ballot, “you’re welcome”. Humor is the best answer to this nonsense.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:31 pm#4, pete,
Nice link…
December 19th, 2008 at 4:37 pmrogerD, I had heard that before and wondered what the logical connection was for the challenge. What makes the ballot not valid?
If anything, it should be counted twice because the person really, really wanted to vote for Franken.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:37 pmNate Silver is amazing — GO FRANKEN!!
December 19th, 2008 at 4:37 pmBig Al in the Senate, and we’re one vote closer to cloture proofing. Muck you Fitch!
December 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pmpete Says:
And, on an off topic story, Bristol Palin’s Mom got arrested on drug charges. I just hope that Bible Spice’s second grandchild isn’t affected as severely as the first.
http://www.adn.com/ news/ alaska/ crime/ story/ 628010.html
December 19th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
That’s Bristol’s future mom-in-law. :)
December 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pmBut if she’s lucky, Bristol will grow a brain and run for the hills…
Wedding rehearsal dinner party, how awkward!
December 19th, 2008 at 4:39 pmPoor Bill O’Reilly. I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:41 pmHURRAH!!!
Go, Al!!
December 19th, 2008 at 4:41 pmZooey Says:
That’s Bristol’s future mom-in-law. :)
But if she’s lucky, Bristol will grow a brain and run for the hills…
December 19th, 2008 at 4:38 pm
With that combination of genetics and environment? Bristol stands a better chance of being Raptured at the alter.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:42 pmI worked at SNL when Al was a writer. Davis of “Franken and Davis” was also a writer and both are very nice down home people. Very smart.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:42 pmDon’t.
December 19th, 2008 at 4:46 pmRUCerious, you obviously doesn’t recognize American family values. Just because you didn’t have a 9 month old pregnant bride and the groom’s mother wearing a shiny ankle bracelet in case she bolts. And little sister carrying Mom’s last (or should I say latest) whelp.
I bet you didn’t serve moose balls for appetizers either did you?
December 19th, 2008 at 4:46 pmFlying Spaghetti Monster makes Minnesota recount appearance
:)
December 19th, 2008 at 4:51 pmMoose balls? No, but we considered Rocky Mountain Oysters!
December 19th, 2008 at 4:55 pmStill OT:
I wonder if Levi’s Mom volunteered to provide the “Wedding Crystal”?
December 19th, 2008 at 5:02 pmPaul Wellstone, your seat is almost safely back in good hands. We miss you Paul!
December 19th, 2008 at 5:03 pmLevi’s Mom thought the wedding plans needed to be “tweaked” just a little.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:05 pmnormalasf Says:
Poor Bill O’Reilly. I almost feel sorry for him. Almost.
For me, it’s not even close, not even on the menu. Both of my shoes are flying at O’Lie-ly!
December 19th, 2008 at 5:07 pmHere it comes, O’Lie-ly:
…
December 19th, 2008 at 5:10 pm.7II?I
..$87?????D.
. Z7?$?+++++7NN… …..
. .7DDN+I??++++==NDDD7.. $DNNDDDN.
$8DDD8DND8D+7N8===DDDDDDDDDDDNDDDDI=
O88DDDDNNDND8DNDDOODO=MDNNDNNNNNNNNND?7I
.+DDDDDDDDDNDDDDDN88ZZ7ZN8DNNNNNNNNNNNDD?I77
. .,ONNNNNNDNNDNNNDNDDDDDD88OZ$Z8ZNDODNDDDNNNNNNNDD+?I$$
.DMNNNNNNNNNNNDDD8DDD888ZZZOOOD$OOD8OZDNNDDNNNNNDO+?I$N7
DDMNNNNDNNNNNN8ND87OO8OZOZZ++=++NDD8DDDDNNNNDNNDNN=?7NN$
.NDNNNNNNNNN8NNDN88D8ZZ+=,,:=++++?$88DD8DNNNNNNNNNNNNNN:Z
8NMNDNNNDNN8DO8D888Z=+++=~=~~==++++?88DDDDDDNNNNNNNNND:ZO
$8NNNND8D888ODD8888OZ=+++==~===+++++I88DDDDDDDDNNND,77$D8
.DDNNNNNDDN8DOOD8888OZ~++++====~++++?IO8DDDDDDDD8I777ZDDD
,ND8DNNNNND88O8O8D8OOZ=+++++====+????7Z8DDDDDNI8888DDDDN
.7D8888NNNDDD8DDDD888O+?+?+?+++?~7$ZOO888888888888DDDDZ
.,ID88888O8NDDDD8D88OZO$ZZZZOOOOOO8OOO8D888O8DO88DD7,.
…Z78O888888888OOOOOOZZZOOZZ$ZOOOOO888888DZ$I7=….
.,$?O88ZZZZZZOOZZZ$??I+~,…
…….
nanlichi Says:
rogerD, I had heard that before and wondered what the logical connection was for the challenge. What makes the ballot not valid?
I believe the Coleman camp tried to claim it was an “identifying mark,” which is not allowed per an outdated Minnesota election law.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:19 pmDr. Hussein Matt Says:
CZ-1 Says:
Here it comes, O’Lie-ly:
huh?
Um, my ASCII shoe art didn’t come through the commenting process very well, did it? Oh well. It was the thought that counted.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:21 pmYour thoughts have been counted.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:34 pmThey were clear enough in intent, I doubt if the canvassers will reject them.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:35 pmThanks CZ-1.
December 19th, 2008 at 5:45 pmAnd Norm Coleman took another issue to court. This time it’s about the so-called double counted votes. Funny thing about Norm, when this subject first came up weeks ago Norm and his Attorneys fought to have all the votes counted. Now that he is losing, he wants only the votes where they could find the original and the duplicate counted. This will take around 100 votes away from Al Franken. Not enough to make Coleman the winner, but hey, Coleman has to fight for every vote.
How many of you think that Coleman will concede when it’s called for Franken? You know, like Coleman asked Franken to concede “for the good of the state” after the original count, even though the recount was mandatory.
December 19th, 2008 at 6:04 pmCZ-1 Says:
nanlichi Says:
rogerD, I had heard that before and wondered what the logical connection was for the challenge. What makes the ballot not valid?
I believe the Coleman camp tried to claim it was an “identifying mark,” which is not allowed per an outdated Minnesota election law.
You are right, most of Coleman’s were for identifying marks. The canvassing boards only disallowed a ballot with an “identifying mark” if it came close to identifying the person who made the vote. One of Coleman’s challenges was a ballot where someone wrote “Thanks for counting my vote!”. Now that’s ironic. A lot of Coleman’s other challenges were ones where there was just a blot somewhere on the ballot. Then there were his challenges where someone voted for McCain and Franken. Coleman actually challenged those votes as the voter really intended to vote for Colemnan! They didn’t buy it.
December 19th, 2008 at 6:14 pmnanlichi Says:
rogerD, I had heard that before and wondered what the logical connection was for the challenge. What makes the ballot not valid?
A vote is not valid if the canvassing board couldn’t figure out the voter’s intention. I watched a lot of the canvassing live on the internet yesterday and it was fascinating what Coleman challenged. But a valid challenge would be that all the bubbles on a ballot were fully filled out, but the one by Franken’s name was barely marked. That vote was not awarded to Franken because it wasn’t apparent that was the voter’s intention. Most of them were really clear what the voter intended.
Coleman challenged way more than Franken and withdrew fewer frivolous challenges because that kept him in the lead when they started their final determination. It was a way to psych people out and a way for him to claim that the vote was stolen since he was ahead before the final count.
One thing Franken being ahead might make happen is for Coleman to cooperate in the counting of the absentee ballots since they are his only hope of winning at this point.
December 19th, 2008 at 6:19 pmNorm Coleman is a big fat idiot.
December 19th, 2008 at 6:36 pmThis is why we vote–each and every one of us.
December 19th, 2008 at 7:03 pmNorm Coleman
December 19th, 2008 at 7:14 pmis
Going
to
the
Grey Bar Hotel next Year!
You mean, the Repuke scum lords couldn’t fix this one enough to steal another win?
How nice.
December 19th, 2008 at 9:38 pmJust as I predicted…
Democrats just keep “finding” more votes until they win.
Simple. As predictable as the sunrise each day!
December 19th, 2008 at 10:48 pmTim Vaculik Says:
You are such an ignorant punk. There are no questionable votes you lying sack of shit. They just COUNTED ALL OF THE VOTES. We all know how much you Republicans HATE when that happens.
December 19th, 2008 at 11:12 pmTim Vaculik Says:
Just as I predicted…
Democrats just keep “finding” more votes until they win.
Simple. As predictable as the sunrise each day!
Do you know how this process works or are you just being contrary?
December 19th, 2008 at 11:24 pmweb_geek Says:
He is being Timmeh. He ONLY posts what he has been PROGRAMMED to regurgitate. My guess is Hannity or the Oxymoron put THIS one into what I will generously call his brain
December 19th, 2008 at 11:31 pmThank you God & Paul Wellstone for looking down on us Minnesotans & removing Norm Coleman & sending him to prison. I can hardly wait for the day when O’Reilly, Coulter, Limbaugh, Hannity & any other GOP Franken haters will have to kiss his Blue-Democratic, Senatorial arse.
December 20th, 2008 at 12:57 pmAl: If you win this one, whatever you do, don’t fly private or commuter… Please…
December 30th, 2008 at 1:04 pm