I think it would be humorous to ask some of the right wing’s dumb Rush-bots and assorted lickspittles what they think the term “clean coal” really means,

If you want to argue with someone, (or stereotype an entire group of people) you will sound far less ignorant if you know what you are talking about. But then again, if you knew what you were talking about, you would write something useful instead of a 4 or 5 line smart-a** remark.

Many republicans and democrats support “clean coal”. Even our “savior” Barack supports it. I, like most republicans and democrats I know, realize that “clean coal” is a lie. I would also like to point out that we knew it was a lie long before buddy Al spoon fed us the obvious information.

Dumb people on both sides also support wind power (which will never be cost effective even though the fed continues giving huge subsidies to the industry and will have to forever to keep the things operational… It amazes me that some people don’t seem to understand that the money for these subsidies is being taken from all of our paychecks before we even get them…)

People on both sides also support solar power which is promising but not there yet. I work with several businesses that are developing more efficient solar cells and solar integration systems currently. The industry as a whole is making huge strides.

I see no argument here between liberals and conservatives in any of these areas, but you can make one up if you want…

Nuclear power, however, is (for the most part) being pushed for by conservatives, and being stalled by liberals… The current technology is safe, and it can be made even more safe. With the subsidies that are given to wind power and other crap, the next generation of nuclear plants could be made. The next generation will be able to use the radioactive waste from the current plants and will produce non-radioactive waste. It is also obviously a zero emission technology.

The great thing about subsidizing this technology is that once the technology is being used, it will be cheap enough to pay for itself (unlike wind power which is as much of a joke as “clean coal”). It will also help get rid of current radioactive waste.

I hope you all enjoy this. From what I have seen, it is one of a small minority of non-whiny posts on this entire site…

-Develop and Deploy Clean Coal Technology.

Obama’s Department of Energy will enter into public private partnerships to develop five “first-of-a-kind” commercial scale coal-fired plants with clean carbon capture and sequestration technology.

It smells like money. That’s all they think about.

That’s what the dumb-asses in a valley south of here say about their stinking paper mill — while they drop like flies from respiratory illnesses.

But that’s a whole lot of “ifs” and it pisses me off that they’re touting “clean coal technology” when no such thing exists.

PEACE

barracks9 Says:

“Clean Coal” is the most ludicrous oxymoron in the language.

Ranking just above: Legal Brief
Amtrak Schedule
Justice Rhenquist

And Conservative Think Tank

Smells good too! yeah, like a dogs ass smells good to another dog.

As for “clean coal”, I’ve never understood how that is a possibility.

Now, I’m for exposing “clean coal” as the fraud that it is, and I think this is a good campaign for doing that; it’s just you’ve reminded us all yesterday that things are probably more contrived from above than you want them to sound.

Ranking just above: Legal Brief
Amtrak Schedule
Justice Rhenquist

While clean coal does not currently exist, I support efforts to research making it clean (which is what Obama seems to be promoting). Even failure may result in knowledge that can be used elsewhere. Serendipity has been one of the best components of science.

NOT EVEN UNDER THEIR BANNERED “GREEN” CNN “PLANET IN PERIL” SPECIAL REPORTS