WOW you really are an idiot arent you? More severity of storms is one of the aspect of this problem. It isnt as simple as Global Warming though NO ONE but the brainwashed rightwing industry shills deny it IS overall getting warmer. Only MORONS and those paid to disagree do. As for valid points. Where are they. Dont tell me what the industry shills told you to think THIS WEEK. Show me the peer reviewed studies. Those on the clear scientific consensus side have about a thousand. Where are the peer reviewed studies from you deniers? THAT is how science is done. NOT by fooling the rubes from a podium. THAT is how rightwing brainwashing is done. Congratulations being stupid enough to be brainwashed.

When this whole thing started I saw a quote from an oil industry shill saying their mission will be accomplished when there is DOUBT on the Climate change issue. I guess enough fools think Limbaugh and Hannity are as respectable a voice on this issue as ALL THE SCIENCE DONE BY REAL SCIENTISTS IN PEER REVIEWED STUDIES. That is world class gullible but then you wingnuts never were that bright

Not surprising on Inhofe’s part. He’s just making it up as he goes along, anyhoo.

How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic

http://gristmill.grist.org/skeptics

Just as Inhofe can only find a relatively few scientists to join his anti-global warming crusade, out of the tens of thousands of scientists worldwide, the Swift Boat Liars could only field about 250 fellow liars out of the over ten thousand members of the Swift Boat Association.

Similarly, Inhofe has included some “scientists” on his list who want their names removed as well as some “scientists” who aren’t even climatoligists, just as the Rocky Mountain News reported before the November 2004 presidential election, that several of the Swift Boat veterans demanded that their names be removed from the Swift Boat Liars smear campaign against Sen. John Kerry.

Inhofe is just as much a liar as all the Swift Boat Liars.

If someone says something you don’t agree with you just call them names and give no value to anything they say.

LOL Try being a liberal on a conservative blog!

Here at TP, you can give scientific evidence and there will be value in it. Give scientific evidence in conservative blogs and you will be derided and expelled.

bravo!

CageyCretin,

We’re going off the rails on the Crazy Train!

Have you ever heard of the word shill? We get quite a few of them here. Global Warming is very serious and when the shills/trolls show up spewing already debunked memes we get a little tired of it. If you want to put forth a reasoned, factual, argument you will find a lot of good discussion here. We are very short of patience with those that are full of shit.

December 23rd, 2008 at 3:38 pm
___________

We’re certainly open minded and willing to listen to others objectively. However, these “others” — like yourself — who visit every global warming thread have nothing of value in anything you say. Ever. You’re not presenting any new data or perspectives or theories that are worth listening to. You’re recycling the same garbage talking points that have been pushed by ExxonMobil and their science-denying allies for years.

Trust me, we’ve heard them all: “Global warming is a myth,” “It’s the sun,” “It’s real, but it’s not man-made,” “It’s warming on Jupiter/Mars/Pluto,” “It’s snowing in Des Moines today,” “The CO2 rise lags behind temperature rise in ice cores,” “We breathe CO2 therefore it’s not a bad thing,” “They said there was global cooling in the 70s,” “Al Gore has two dozen private planes,” “There’s global warming but it’s a good thing cause I’m cold,” etc. There’s not an original, open-minded, worthwhile thought in any of these comments – they’ve all been thoroughly debunked, yet you science deniers continue to use them.

So here’s the challenge – give me an original, objective argument against the broad consensus of the IPCC – not just the details, because even among the climatologists and other scientists who comprise the IPCC there are differences in findings and opinions and predictions — that’s how science works. Find me a plausible, scientifically-based argument that gives me a reason to doubt the IPCC’s conclusion, and I’ll consider it objectively.

If are unable to do this, I’ll just rest happy in my quite correct assumption that you’re another science-denying idiot troll with nothing of worth to say on the topic.

-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud

What are you talking about?

Sincerely,
666lattes