sikis
porno izle
porno videolar
porn videos

The interest in using methane is growing but it is slow. It is cheap, easy to produce and store and as long as there is shit, people or critter, there is gas.

The Constant Weader at http://www.RealityChex.com

COProgressive Says:
Okay, someone please explain to me how digging, mining, or drilling carbon based fuels that have been buried in the earth for millions of years, and then burning them in our atmosphere releasing CO2 into the air we breath makes sense.

Someone please explain to me how burning carbon based fuels for energy can be cleaner than energy from the Sun, wind or tides.

Someone please tell me why we are still burning dirty fuel?

1. It’s cheap
2. It’s easy

OProgressive Says:
Alejandro Says:
And there are no hydrogen refilling stations along the way.

Now here’s an opportunity in the waiting. What is this, the chicken or the egg theory? No Hydrogen cars because there’s no hydrogen refilling stations, or no hydrogen refilling stations because there are no hydrogen cars.

But there is another problem. The oil companies don’t want the gas stations to sell alternative fuels. You can’t find E85 fuel and BIG OIL stations. Here in Colorado only small independents stations sell E85. Do you think BIG OIL would spend the money to add hydrogen pumps at their GAS stations?

There is no hydrogen.

Or more accurately, there is no hydrogen that you can produce without also producing CO2, at least not in large quantities.

Then you have the energy balance problem. It takes energy to produce hydrogen. Then it takes more to compress it and store it and transport it.

Hydrogen is not an energy source and is a terrible fuel.

Those of you concerned about climate change may already know that one of the more significant changes an individual can make is to reduce the consumption of meat. In an article yesterday (“Meat is Murder on the Environment”), New Scientist reported on a study by Ogino and colleagues in this month’s Animal Science Journal that analyzes, in detail, beef’s environmental impact. It concludes:

A kilogram of beef is responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions and other pollution than driving for 3 hours while leaving all the lights on back home.

(It should be noted that the three-hour drive is based on emissions from European cars; the fuel efficiency of American cars is much worse and so the equivalent driving time would be less in the United States.)

http://imparo.wordpress.com/2007/07/19/vegetarianism-vs-meat-eating-and-global-warming/

Or even better, why do we still heat water, producing steam, to spin turbines? Even in a “nuke-u-lar” reactor, the nuclear fuel is simply used to produce heated water???

The whole means for electric power generation needs an overhaul.

Lamar Alexander is a tool and fool, and the people of Tennessee are stuck with him for another 6 years.

The beat goes on.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Barack_Obama_statements_on_coal

It’s not just Tennessee, as this tip I gave you 18 hours ago shows:

Toxic coal ash piling up in ponds in 32 states
By DINA CAPPIELLO (Associated Press Writer)

From Associated Press

January 09, 2009 3:47 AM EST
WASHINGTON – Millions of tons of toxic coal ash is piling up in power plant ponds in 32 states, a practice the federal government has long recognized as a risk to human health and the environment but has left unregulated.

An Associated Press an@lysis of the most recent Energy Department data found that 156 coal-fired power plants store ash in surface ponds similar to the one that collapsed last month in Tennessee.

Records indicate that states storing the most coal ash in ponds are Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Georgia and Alabama.

[dang filter!]

Built upon antiquated mining and mineral resource laws, private companies, and now corporations, are able to extract phenomenal wealth from the resources which by good rights belong to the citizens of the land. It’s cheap, they exert power over the legislatures, and they exploit labor and land.
It’s way past time for mineral and energy resources to be nationalized, for the good of all, and end the obscene profits and environmental disaster of the robber baron corporations.

If we think the spills and pollution in this country are a disaster, they’re little more than a spot on the carpet compared to every other oil, coal and mining area of the world.

Now here’s an opportunity in the waiting. What is this, the chicken or the egg theory? No Hydrogen cars because there’s no hydrogen refilling stations, or no hydrogen refilling stations because there are no hydrogen cars.

But there is another problem. The oil companies don’t want the gas stations to sell alternative fuels. You can’t find E85 fuel and BIG OIL stations. Here in Colorado only small independents stations sell E85. Do you think BIG OIL would spend the money to add hydrogen pumps at their GAS stations?

Someone please explain to me how burning carbon based fuels for energy can be cleaner than energy from the Sun, wind or tides.

Someone please tell me why we are still burning dirty fuel?