Huckabee: I’m not ‘pro-gay.’
Huckabee: I’m not ‘pro-gay.’
During the presidential campaign, far-right conservative columnist Ann Coulter made a hobby of criticizing former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee as insufficiently conservative, including claiming that the virulently anti-gay Huckabee was “pro-sodomy.” This past Saturday, when Huckabee hosted Coulter on his Fox News show, he tried to rebut her charges, declaring the he was not “pro-gay”:
HUCKABEE: I am not, as you characterized me in one article, pro-gay, pro-sodomy. That is so not me.
COULTER: Yes, there was a Supreme Court decision. You said you agreed or disagreed with. Yes, I got you on that Mike Huckabee.
HUCKABEE: Nope. You didn’t. I am definitely not pro-sodomy. I promise, scout’s honor.
Watch it:
As ThinkProgress has previously noted, as governor of Arkansas, Huckabee pushed an amendment to ban sodomy in the state in order to “protect the traditional family structure.”
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
Dispatches from Bizarro World…
January 12th, 2009 at 5:46 pmRepublicans sure are obsessed about gays and anal sex. Makes you wonder???
January 12th, 2009 at 5:49 pmSilly question time. If Ann Coulter gives a man a blow job, is he guilty of sodomy?
January 12th, 2009 at 5:50 pmWho in heck gave Huck a Teevee show?? And Hooda’s on the right track…
January 12th, 2009 at 5:52 pmugh!
January 12th, 2009 at 5:52 pmtranslation: Ann, you were unfair to me. I’m just as mean and nasty as you. please tell your flying monkeys to love me!!!!
Oh my. It’s like Alien vs. Predator.
A christianist conservative has to defend a (barely) nuanced position before a critic who brooks no nuance. If it didn’t involve Ann Coulter, it might even be worth watching.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:54 pmWell the guy must really be holding a grudge against his p#nis that’s for sure.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:54 pmAs revolting as the thought may be is having anal sex with Coulter gay or what?
January 12th, 2009 at 5:54 pmI think you’ve broken the conservatron code.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:55 pmits embarrassing that ann coulter gets so much face time on television in our country.
it’d be on thing if she had these ideas with some respect for facts, but she is pure rhetoric. I’ve read a few chapters from some of her books, one of her chapters on vietnam was one of the most embarrassing things i’ve ever read. I am by no means a vietnam scholar, but even i read things in there and was like… wow, that is totally not factual.
i’ve seen a clip of her saying she admires joe mccarthy! the woman is proud of mccarthyism.
there are no words for the kind of filth that spouts from the mouth of ann coulter.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:55 pmdbadass Says:
As revolting as the thought may be is having anal sex with Coulter gay or what?
I’m guessing coyotes all over the country are thanking her for taking the new bottom spot.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:55 pmI don’t know if that’s even possible with her head wedged so firmly up there.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:56 pmYes and Larry Craig isn’t gay either wink wink. Look Rev. Huck is not what he preaches and he knows it. He is a true Freak and uses Religion to get over for the quick buck. He’s into killing animals and that sure isn’t Godly. To all the men out there don’t go in a men’s room if Rev. Huck is there.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:57 pmBesides, I seriously doubt there is enough alcohol in existence to make Ms. Coulter a viable option. Puking and sex generally don’t mix.
January 12th, 2009 at 5:57 pmCareful, Huckie – Mannie’s got a knife – and she knows how to use it…
January 12th, 2009 at 6:02 pmWhere is Daryll? Maybe he was hit by a bus or something.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:03 pmMaybe he’s still trying to figure out what God’s cock tastes like.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:05 pmThat’s what you get for having Coulter on your show. Drink every time somebody says “sodomy.” Man, if I were God I’d come down on a cloud just to disavow that I even know these people.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:09 pmGod says its s’od’o'me to think these clowns might actually have a clue.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:12 pmAssuming she isn’t a dude, I still don’t want to have vaginal sex with her either…
January 12th, 2009 at 6:12 pmAnd remember, The Huckster was the GOPer that sooo many Dems thought was nice and reasonable.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:12 pmKeep this on file for 2012.
“Traditional family structure”?
That’s a really baroque way to say “anus.”
January 12th, 2009 at 6:14 pmfox gives huckabee a tv show to keep him in mind for the conservatives in the next election…R. Ailes must think huck has a chance, after all he is a ordained minister (neo-con anyone…anyone?) and knows Chuck Norris personally!
A. Coulter writes a book every 6 months..the RNC buys most of the books, stores them in a warehouse, next to Orielly’s books, and Dick Morris’ books, (etc. etc…)Then, fox introduces them as “Best selling Authors” with opinions that should be heard…
January 12th, 2009 at 6:15 pmHate sells…
it’s just the Lee Atwater style of politics…
Geeeeeez! Just typing the names of some of these mouth breathing/knuckle draggers makes me feel grimy and in need of a shower…..
Must have confused the pro-sodomy with the pro-gaybashing…sorry guv. You too mAnn.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:16 pmSo, according to Huckabee, straight couples never take it in the butt? Bah hahahahahaha! Uh huh. Yeah, okay. Whatever.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:16 pmA phrase comes to mind: “He protest’s too much”. I know there is a fancier way to say it, but when I look at the way Huckabee and Coulter run from ‘Teh Gay’, they both must be attracted to their own sex – not that there is anything wrong with that. Face it, they are both what they say they hate. That does explain why they are both so angry and judgemental.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:19 pm[A]s governor of Arkansas, Huckabee pushed an amendment to ban sodomy in the state in order to “protect the traditional family structure.”
Hmmmm. What *I’d* like to know is how …exactly… were they planning to uh, *enforce* that law? Having officers sneak around and peek into peoples’ bedrooms?? Hidden cameras?? What??
C’mon, Huckie, DO tell!!
January 12th, 2009 at 6:19 pmHUCKABEE: Let me be clear: I am not pro-gay. I never have been pro-gay, I love my wife and my family.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:21 pmYeah, I think Coulter likes guys.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:23 pmAnother silly question. Why is it the Republicans are so concerned about sex but think violence is a good thing? Does it lend credence to the theory about early potty training?
January 12th, 2009 at 6:24 pmI wish someone would ask Huckleberry if he’s ever had anal sex with his wife and if so why is that ok for him but not for others?
I emailed Bush once and asked him that but he never wrote back. Not sure why.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:26 pmHey Huckleberry,
Don’t take that BS from her. One of the few people in the world that I dislike a lot more than you is Ann Coulter.
Thrill me and lay down on her with some old-fashioned holy roller st*$. Start with the way she abuses her body–the temple of the lord–with smoking and liquor–dancin’ and wears the clothes of a harlot.
Next, lay down the good stuff about her lusting and whoring after self-degrading men (google “armcandy”)–lying down in the dirt with the purveyors of sin and shame.
Give it to me, brother.
You are not going to convert me, or her, but it could be thoroughly amusing.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:28 pmWhen any group of people are hell bent on inspecting YOUR life for faults, you can be sure they are only doing it to hide their very own problems.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:28 pmI gave little credence to the idea that ANN COULTER is a tranny until I realized that her pseudonym is a thinly veiled anagram for NO REAL CUNT!
January 12th, 2009 at 6:31 pmI love the “Scout’s Honor” crack.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:31 pmThese people want less government everywhere but in the bedroom apparently.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:32 pmOk, I can’t resist just a teeny bit of trollery.
How does one conceive a Repubilican baby?
A cookie for the first right answer.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:32 pmNow I’m convinced Daryll is dead!
January 12th, 2009 at 6:33 pmHuckabee is the ultimate in being a hypocrite. He jumps all over Mann Coulter for lying about him and then he encourages her to go after her “real target”, liberals. I’m sure he will have no problem with the lies Mann Coulter tells about the Democrats.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:34 pmHuck who? And who’s the b*tch, Anne who?
January 12th, 2009 at 6:37 pmCOULTER: Yes, there was a Supreme Court decision. You said you agreed or disagreed with. Yes, I got you on that Mike Huckabee.
well that’s covering the bases… whichever way, she got you, huck…
she got you to put her on your show…
January 12th, 2009 at 6:37 pmrealpatriot Says:
A. Coulter writes a book every 6 months..the RNC buys most of the books, stores them in a warehouse, next to Orielly’s books, and Dick Morris’ books, (etc. etc…)Then, fox introduces them as “Best selling Authors” with opinions that should be heard…
And then when they can’t give away the books they send them to be shredded. The don’t return them to the publisher for a refund because that would affect the sales figures in the end.
Best seller lists are a crock because they are based on how many books that publishers sell to book stores, not how many books the stores actually sells. I think Amazon has one of the only lists that are based on number of books sold. Unfortunately Mann Coulter does make it into their top 10 for a week or two after she publishes a new book. What that says about some people in this country is something I don’t want to contemplate.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:40 pmShayne Says:
Now I’m convinced Daryll is dead!
Could we be so lucky?
January 12th, 2009 at 6:41 pmQ: Why wasn’t Bernard Madoff sent to prison today?
A: Because prisons were built to punish poor people.
Financier Madoff stays in penthouse, avoids jail…
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Financier-Madoff-stays-in-apf-14035501.html
January 12th, 2009 at 6:52 pmHuckabee reminds me of the guy Bush appointed as some great mind on an FDA committee on Reproductive Health, Hager, who was anally raping his wife for years (http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050530/mcgarvey/print).
Loved the comment, “sodomy is so not me!”
January 12th, 2009 at 6:56 pmMANN COULTER: I am definitely pro-sodomy.
Why of course you are…fella.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:12 pmDoes this look to anybody else like they’re hitting on each other? ‘Cuz that’s what it sounds like to me.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:22 pmAh I was wondering. Is heterosexual sodomy okay? See I have this friend that was ah just sort of ah wondering if that was ah like okay…
January 12th, 2009 at 7:25 pmicky vs. yucky
who will win?
only foxnoose viewers will ever know
January 12th, 2009 at 7:25 pmex-gov Biblebee is clearly not “pro” gay – he’s more of an amateur part-timer like Larry Craig.
on the other hand, ann coulter (who is a man in drag) is a raging (albeit self-loathing) Pro.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:28 pmWell, you know the legal definition of “sodomy” includes oral sex as well as @nal sex.
That’s one way Huck might have found the clitoris — even by mistake…
January 12th, 2009 at 7:39 pmAnd that is why the modern American Conservative movement is failing. It used to be that Conservatism meant cutting government spending, freeing up restrictions on business, and having a strong military. Now it means:
“I am pro-life, I am very pro-2nd admendment, and I am not pro-gay, pro-sodomy”
That is not “conservative” that is “christian”
January 12th, 2009 at 7:41 pmWhy doesn’t the Arkansas Baptist Right-wingnut shove family structure up his ass! These Baptist Bible thumbers don’t know shit from shinola, they are a bunch of hypocrites.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:42 pmIf there is a God, doubtless he put these parody religious ‘representatives’ in the world to cull out the terminally gullible and ignorant.
He later added the GOP and ‘Diet’ soda…..
January 12th, 2009 at 7:43 pmHey Zooey,
January 12th, 2009 at 7:44 pmCheck it out. I got to say it in #9. Do you think I should risk it all and try and say a nal y sis or should I just take me winnings?
Coulter couldn’t get sexed in Attica with a fist full of pardons!
And, Huckababy…he may not have been Prom King but 10 to 1 he was “Queen” of the Hop!
Coulter’s head is so up her butt she uses Preparation H for eyeliner and goes to a proctologist for dental work.
Huckababy puts K-Y Jelly on his breakfast biscuits.
Coulter had made the centerfold Necrophiliacs Monthly every month since 2005!
January 12th, 2009 at 7:51 pmRepublicans need to put sodomy laws on the books to protect the families in name. Then after a good nagging session by a significant other or fellow adulterer, it’s off to break the sodomy law post haste.
It’s funny that the GOP fears Arab terrorists #1 and gay & lesbian people #2.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:53 pmWow, for a moment I read the headline as, Huckabee: “I’m not gay!” and I was going to argue that. But I now see my mistake.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:58 pmdbadass Says:
Hey Zooey,
Check it out. I got to say it in #9. Do you think I should risk it all and try and say a nal y sis or should I just take me winnings?
I was shocked to see THE WORD used (twice, I think) in someone’s comment earlier today.
Let me try: analysis
January 12th, 2009 at 8:03 pmanalyst?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:05 pmb itch doesn’t work but I never use it except to mean complain. Anybody wanna try dooshbag?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:07 pmThis shows you how low this man is. That he would even talk to Coulter much less explain himself to her. As if she has some credentials or important enough to deserve an explanation of anything.
What a loser. And there are people that wanted this man to be President. She will be out there just as long as people like Huckabee will talk to her. Of course I wouldn’t talk to this man either. None of them are worth the time or news print.
The only reason this man is against sodomy is because he had done it so often, it is old stuff.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:14 pmThe “scout’s honor” comment is just phucking creepy from a true homophobe.
Jebus really phucks up people….
January 12th, 2009 at 8:14 pmif you want to know why no one takes Progressives seriously, just read the last 61 posts to this thread. I would think you could pull your collective heads out of the sewer and carry on an intelligent conversation; it looks like that is asking too much. Evidently, if Progressives can’t call Christians crude names and talk about anal sex a lot, they have nothing to say. Have a nice day! :)
January 12th, 2009 at 8:19 pmIf we were to have an intelligent conversation we couldn’t do it discussing these two morons.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:20 pmsam adams Says:
call Christians crude names and talk about anal sex. Have a nice day! :)
Huh. I hadn’t made that connection till now!
January 12th, 2009 at 8:22 pmsam adams Says:
Poor Sam. No one takes progressives seriously? If you haven’t noticed, you’re in the distinct minority, and condescension from a loser is hilarious.
More please.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:26 pmI didn’t call anybody any crude names… I did question whether or not Coulter was a chick or a dude. Was that wrong?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:34 pmWhen will Huckabee and the rest of these right wing crazies learn to mind their own damn business? What the hell are they going to do next? Start spying on folks in their homes to find out if they’re committing acts of sodomy??? They’re so obsessed I’m beginning to think that Huckabee might be a closet homosexual – I mean no disrespect to homosexuals.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:35 pmWhat’s the matter, Sam? Too cowardly to defend your assertion?
Why am I not surprised?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:43 pmWho the hell gives a huck what these two people think?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:46 pmI agree with bogglesthemind Huckabee is referencing a statement he made two years about somthing he did even further back.
The whole thing qualifies as OFN.
On a more recent note jerks in France are trying to firebomb synagogues.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1054808.html
January 12th, 2009 at 8:51 pmWhat gives. Is John Kerry doing all the training these days?
January 12th, 2009 at 8:51 pmsam adams Says:
…call Christians crude names and talk about anal sex a lot…
Dude, they started it, we’re just staying on topic. There are plenty of more important topics, each easily reachable from the home page. But if Huckabee and Coulter are going to get into a fight over who hates butt-sex more, then we’re going to make fun by speculating on which of them loves it the most.
That is interesting, how you drop into the most lightweight thread currently on the home page, just to complain that we have nothing interesting to say. I don’t notice you saying anything in any of the other current threads.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:57 pmLooks like Huckabee got the strap on treatment from Coulter.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:03 pmMy response to this thread is, who cares? Ann Coulter!? Mike Huckabee!? I can understand FOX giving either one of these two clowns a forum, but does TP have to? We have more pressing issues in this country than whether or not these two agree on how much one or the other loves anal sex and how conservative they are. Must be a slow night at TP.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:43 pmYeah, it’s okay. It can even be pretty good.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:57 pmdbadass Says:
Ah I was wondering. Is heterosexual sodomy okay?
Only if it’s done right. ;)
January 12th, 2009 at 10:15 pmThis is simply too much information. I could care less if he likes it up the ass or not. Mike Huckabee can suck my ding-a-ling. Ann Coulter can watch but she can’t touch this.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:24 pmOk..I know it has been addressed, but I have to address the Ann Coulter stupidity. I mean obviously the gay-sex/sodomy (non)issue is stupid on so many levels, but why does Ann get to be on TV so often?
“I got you on that one”? (S)he didn’t even know what “Supreme Court decision” or even whether he agreed or disagreed, yet I am supposed to believe that (S)he is informed enough to know someone ELSE’s position on the topic? (S)he, couldn’t even paraphrase the supreme court decision. I wish she would just go away. Her stupidity wouldn’t bother me so much if I didn’t think so many people believed her.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:24 pmSays Huckabee, “I am definitely not pro-sodomy. I promise, scout’s honor.”
I feel reassured. I mean he said, scout’s honor. That’s like altar boy’s code.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:35 pmBecause traveling carnivals don’t have freak shows anymore.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:36 pmHUCKABEE: I am definitely not pro-sodomy.
Good to know Huck hasn’t lost his amateur status.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:42 pmhe tried to REBUTT her charges. Is TP indulging in puns?
January 12th, 2009 at 10:56 pmWhere ISRupture Ready? This is the perfect subject for Daryll.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:04 pmI would like to think threads with the word gay in them struggling to break 100 is a sign of the times.
dbadass also wonders if bit thinks this is reflective of the possibility that no one really cares what their neighbor is doing so long as it doesn’t mess with property values….
January 12th, 2009 at 11:09 pmFound it. OK, here’s where Mr. Coulter explains “her” complaint about Mr. Huckabee.
Has to do with three words regarding a five year old SCOTUS case: “he said the majority opinion ‘probably was appropriate.’”
The case seems to be Lawrence v. Texas. I guess Coulter claims it mandates pinko buttsecks or something.
OK.
So what’s really being discussed here is whether the government can kick in your door while you’re having sex and verify that the proper orifice is being used before sending you on your way, citizen.
To say that’s illegal, “probably was appropriate.” Therefore, I’m getting Huck’s back on this one. So to speak. Maybe it’s sinful, maybe God is going to hurl your eternal soul into a burning lake of flame for doing it, but that still doesn’t mean the gubmint gets to throw you in jail for it. After all, “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”, right?
Ann? “She” just likes it to be outlawed like that.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:17 pmI continue to be confused by why a god would give a shit what goes on in my bedroom or anyone elses. What is the deal with that part? Shouldn’t gods be sitting around on clouds thinking about really serious shit or just bowling with other gods? I suppose they have to handicap all those Hindu gods what with the extra arms and all…
January 12th, 2009 at 11:24 pmHey Mike … sorry you’ve never gotten a hummer.
You probably should have gotten one instead of conceiving that weirdo kid of yours. You know the one that likes to torture animals. The world would have been better served had that wad hit the wifey’s throat.
January 12th, 2009 at 11:40 pmHonestly this is disturbing… A former and most likely future presidential candidate using a news channel as a permanent propaganda tool, inviting on supposed “critics” to highlight his own credentials as a future candidate… Remember when Chris Matthews was rumored to be running for Senate and how his position on MSNBC was an obvious conflict of interest? This is the same sickening deal… Coulter as Emmanuel Goldstein/Lewis Prothero – that outside voice (enemy or friend) that the reasonable candidate must counter… The Rovian era still lingers… beware
January 13th, 2009 at 1:18 amIf someone asked me if I was “pro-heterosexual”, I would answer “What in the hell kinda question is that? What does that mean, anyway?”.
Is someone supposed to answer “No, I think all gays should be taken out and shot!”? Is someone supposed to say “Yes, I think everyone should become gay!”?
What Ann and Mike mean in conservative code is that they favor discrimination against homosexuals—an unconstitutional violation of the XIVth Amendment. I thought conservatives main concern was preserving our FREEDOM?
Maybe Mike meant he was not a gay pro. Yuu know, like conservative Jeff-Jimmy Gannon-Guckert.
January 13th, 2009 at 2:30 amThe gayest gay in the world isn’t as obsessed with gayness as Republicans are. A scholar researching homosexuality is not as obsessed with the subject as these weird people. No wonder they screwed up everything when they got into government.
The political right poses a massive public health problem for America. No group of people so obsessed with ANYTHING should be allowed to vote, much less run for office.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Paq_fIxPCM
January 13th, 2009 at 5:42 amlet’s face it, repukeliscums think any sex not involving meth and prostitutes is a sin.
January 13th, 2009 at 5:46 amI think the day will come when you’re embarrassed by that statement, Gov. Huckabee. I hope it comes soon too–scout’s honor.
January 13th, 2009 at 8:33 amMan, I always miss out on the fun after 5pm.
January 13th, 2009 at 8:38 amCOULTER: Yes, there was a Supreme Court decision. You said you agreed or disagreed with. Yes, I got you on that Mike Huckabee.
Well, mAnn sure has her facts straight, doesn’t she. No arguing that.
HUCKABEE: Nope. You didn’t. I am definitely not pro-sodomy. I promise, scout’s honor.
Eerily ironic that your brought up “scouts” and sodomy. Freudian slip, Huckabuck?
And WTF is “pro-sodomy”? Meaning a normal healthy sex life that doesn’t include missionary?
Well then, hell yea I’m pro-sodomy!!! (A little hint for you, Huckapuck. Sodomy is not exclusively reserved for homosexuals. Just because you ain’t getting any, doesn’t mean no one else is!)
I mean, just because somebody sets your gaydar off big time doesn’t mean he’s pro-gay, mind you. Just sayin’.
January 13th, 2009 at 8:43 amLet’s not forget that breeders do sodomy too, not just the gays. If Huckabee has missed out on the pleasures of oral sex, then no wonder he’s so angry all the time.
Ditto for the horsey whore of neoconservatism. When Mike Huckabee isn’t conservative enough for ya, just who is?
January 13th, 2009 at 9:06 amI have a theory.
That men who don’t like to perform oral sex (sodomy) on their wives, are usually suppressing their homosexuality.
The nether regions of a woman scares the bejeebus out of them.
10 to 1 odds that Daryll has never “went down” on his fantasy wife, Tiffany!
January 13th, 2009 at 9:11 amThis are exactly the people and the thinking that got us in the horrible mess we’re in now. It is time for them to sit down and shut up.
January 13th, 2009 at 9:12 am______
DRxJ Says:
HUCKABEE: Nope. You didn’t. I am definitely not pro-sodomy. I promise, scout’s honor.
Eerily ironic that your brought up “scouts” and sodomy. Freudian slip, Huckabuck?
January 13th, 2009 at 8:38 am
______
Not at all. Normal people still think of the boy scouts, and their pledge, as a wholesome organization that gives boys the chance to have learn and have fun. The taint of the infiltration by those who would abuse those boys isn’t the image most people have of scouts. ;)
January 13th, 2009 at 9:39 amThe taint of the infiltration
A boy scout’s taint is less than one inch long.
What was your point?
January 13th, 2009 at 9:55 amit’d be on thing if she had these ideas with some respect for facts, but she is pure rhetoric. I’ve read a few chapters from some of her books, one of her chapters on vietnam was one of the most embarrassing things i’ve ever read. I am by no means a vietnam scholar, but even i read things in there and was like… wow, that is totally not factual.
January 13th, 2009 at 11:05 amuptight right says:
Normal people still think of the boy scouts, and their pledge, as a wholesome organization that gives boys the chance to have learn and have fun.
Yes, just like “normal” people still think of the Catholic church and their priests, as a wholesome organization that give Christian boys and girls the chance to learn and have fun.
January 13th, 2009 at 11:10 amDNFP:
January 13th, 2009 at 11:10 amThe point? That normal adults don’t think of young boys in sexual ways. Sorry to break it to you, bud. ;)
You know who is pro-gay? Ann Coulter. For some time now, she has been quite the fixture in West Hollywood or Chelsea. It is not unusual in the slightest to see her out and about in the surrounded by a gang of her gays.
She is a hypocrite who has chosen “right wing” for her image in order to sell books and make a quick buck.
January 13th, 2009 at 11:31 am______
DRxJ Says:
Yes, just like “normal” people still think of the Catholic church and their priests, as a wholesome organization that give Christian boys and girls the chance to learn and have fun.
January 13th, 2009 at 11:10 am
______
Yes, normal people recognize that the aberrant behavior of child molestors within a group doesn’t negate the goodness of the rest of the group or the organization.
January 13th, 2009 at 3:06 pmNow what percentage of those molestors and victims were male?