suzysmom Says:
wayne , read your bio on the zoo
you really are a wingnut
faggot too, right?

If you really are a mom then you should be prosecuted for child abuse. Any child that has to live in the same house that you live is being abused.

flagged, suzy’smom, freedom of speech does not include hate speech. You are a criminal who needs to be put in jail. You promote hatred and violence.

You are just a stupid rightwing troll too ignorant to even THINK about telling us what to do. Why dont you go pour yourself a nice hot cup of STFU

Some 2004 wealth distribution stats from:

http://www.faculty.fairfield.edu/faculty/hodgson/Courses/so11/stratification/income&wealth.htm

The wealthiest 1 percent of families owns roughly 34.3% of the nation’s net worth, the top 10% of families owns over 71%, and the bottom 40% of the population owns way less than 1%.

The distribution of wealth is much more unequal than the distribution of income, especially when focussing on the bottom 60% of all households. The bottom 60% of households possess only 4% of the nation’s wealth while it earns 26.8% of all income.

———————–1983—–2004
Top 20%—————-81.3%—-84.7
4th 20%—————-12.6—–11.3
3rd 20%—————- 5.2—– 3.8
Bottom 40%————- 0.9—– 0.2

Besides, my sexuality is as irrelevant at hers. His. Its. Who knows when people hide behind fake names?

suzy,

I hope that one day, you grow up to be a more open-minded and intelligent woman that your mom apparently turned out to be. The world could use a few thinkers and not reactors.

I invite you to look at my bio at The Zoo

You know, I did when she said that. I detected no faggotry whatsoever. But I’m not a conservative, so perhaps my homo-sensory-apparatus isn’t as fine tuned to see it everywhere.

Jane, my wife, disagrees.

Inadmissable as evidence: Mrs. Haggard tried making a similar claim. You’ll have to do something else to prove your manly heterosexual manliness: go eat five pounds of raw steak and then punch a hippie, or whatever it is the cons do when their pants start to feel funny in the locker room.

Or, you know, just chill, because its only cons who have to be obsessed over whether anybody thinks (finds out) they’re gay or not.

.

suzysmom Says:

so you should be happy to pay more taxes.

I would be very happy to make enough money to pay more taxes than I do now. Unfortunately, I’m broke enough that I’ll end up paying less under Obama’s proposed tax plan.

And yeah, it is patriotic. Along with voting, it’s the primary way that most Americans help to participate in America as an entity. You should feel damn proud to submit your tax form every year, instead of being so upset that such horrible demands were placed on you by your country. I swear, when it comes to taxes, you cons sound like a 13-year-old being forced to do their chores.

how ya doin’ kooks?

gonna get some pats on the head from the boss for stickin’ up for ‘em against the big, bad commies?

trump gonna take you out to Red Lobster or something?

lapdogs.
bootlickers.
kooks.

g’night kooks.

I invite you to look at my bio at The Zoo (http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/contributors/).

Do you get the same thing out of that that suzysmom did? Mind you, I deliberately filled it with things that are not true, as should be obvious. Wingnut? Maybe. But, “faggot”? Jane, my wife, disagrees.

On the other hand, I do resent spreading my wealth to the lazy, the slobs, the welfare mothers, and the illegal aliens.

I’ll take it from these comments that you are middle class. So surely you shouldn’t mind if we leave your “wealth” alone and just invest the rich people’s wealth to increase economic opportunity for the lazy/slobs/mothers/aliens.

Wait – why do you hate motherhood?

.

suzysmom Says:

wayne , read your bio on the zoo
you really are a wingnut
faggot too, right?

That would be a “winggot,” you silly billy! (”Fagnut” was already trademarked by Rush Limbaugh)

FYI, “wingnut” specifically refers to radical right-wing ideologues. The equivalent term for a radical left-wing ideologue is “propellerhead,” although it sees far less use.

Is there any reason she can’t be both?

Wrong, and flagged, you homophobe.

February 1st, 2009 at 12:19 am

You got all of that out of reading a deliberately silly bio I wrote? The “faggot” part, too? I flagged you on that one.

And I have doubts that you are seriously happy with your income. I mean, you really, really defend the super-rich (the subject of this thread) way too much, as if you admired them. A lot of wealthy families (including the Kennedys) got their money doing illegal or immoral things. And you know that I could name more, but I won’t.

Are you in that top one percent of income “earners” (much of it from not working), or do you just wish you were? You seem to be defending them vociferously.