Think Progress

When asked whether extraordinary renditions will continue, Panetta answers without hestitation: ‘No.’

Last week, the LA Times published a story asserting that President Obama “left intact” the CIA’s authority to carry out extraordinary renditions. (The unfounded claim was thoroughly debunked.) At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Intelligence Committee today, Leon Panetta, Obama’s pick to head the CIA, declared decisively that the CIA would not carry out extraordinary renditions:

SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA): Will the CIA continue the practice of extraordinary rendition by which the government will transfer a detainee to either a foreign government or a black site for the purpose of long-term detention and interrogation, as opposed to for law enforcement purposes?

PANETTA: No we will not.

Watch it:

Panetta made the distinction between “extraordinary rendition” to indefinitely hold detainees for interrogation — and torture — and law enforcement rendition. As Scott Horton wrote, the earlier rendition program under President Clinton “regularly involved snatching and removing targets for purposes of bringing them to justice by delivering them to a criminal justice system. It did not involve the operation of long-term detention facilities and it did not involve torture.”

Transcript:

FEINSTEIN: Will the CIA continue the practice of extraordinary rendition by which the government will transfer a detainee to either a foreign government or a black site for the purpose of long-term detention and interrogation, as opposed to for law enforcement purposes?

PANETTA: No we will not because under the executive order signed by the president, that kind of extraordinary rendition, where we send someone for the purposes of torture or for actions by another country that violate our human values — that has been forbidden by the executive order.

Update When Sen. Richard Burr asked Panetta if the president had the authority to order torture, Panetta replied, "No one is above the law":
I understand the powers that the president has under Article II, and they are broad powers, but nobody is above the law. Nobody is above the law. And I think that even the President of the United States has to abide by the statutes and by the laws passed by the Congress. So yes, he has broad authority under Article II, but I do not think he can violate the laws of this country.
Update Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) read aloud part of Dick Cheney's comments to Politico yesterday, in which he insisted that the United States was less safe under President Obama. Panetta responded:
I was disappointed by those comments because the implication is that somehow this country is more vulnerable to attack because the President of the United States wants to abide by the law and the Constitution. I think we're a stronger nation when we abide by the law and the Constitution.


53 Responses to “When asked whether extraordinary renditions will continue, Panetta answers without hestitation: ‘No.’”

  1. Hoodathunk says:

    Crap, Leo, you didn’t leave a back door.

    Nice job.


  2. dbadass says:

    Damn!
    I really love how Iggy Pop lays down “Sixteen”. Extraordinary rendition indeed!


  3. paleolib says:

    Obviously, this means the American Taliban Party will have no choice but to filibuster the nomination.


  4. RandomChaos says:

    I particularly like the part “Noone is above the Law”

    I predict mass evacuation to Paraguay in the near future for the BushCO Criminal Cabal.


  5. PatrioticLiberalChristian says:

    Nobody is above the law.

    Then, I should assume that some members of the Bush Administration will be under indictment?


  6. RandomChaos says:

    And this too..
    “I think we’re a stronger nation when we abide by the law and the Constitution.”

    Go Boy!!


  7. PatrioticLiberalChristian says:

    I think we’re a stronger nation when we abide by the law and the Constitution.

    Hear, hear! Amen! etc.


  8. tokin librul says:

    Via Yahoo/AP:

    WASHINGTON – CIA Director nominee Leon Panetta says the CIA interrogators who used waterboarding or other harsh techniques against prisoners on the authority of the White House should not be prosecuted.

    Panetta told a Senate panel on Thursday that those individuals should not be prosecuted or investigated if they acted pursuant to the law as presented by the attorney general.

    However, Panetta says that if interrogators went beyond the methods that they were told were legal, they should be investigated and prosecuted.

    And since everything everybody did was cleared by a compromisaed and criminal DoJ, everything’s hunky-dory, I guess…

    We Must Look Foreward…yadda yadda yadda


  9. owlbear1 says:

    Dick Cheney’s warning is CLEARLY more than enough reason for the Whitehouse to issue a Code Orange and Nationalize the banks.

    Go Big, Barack!!


  10. owlbear1 says:

  11. Buckie Boy says:

    Dick Cheney says – What this is outrageous! How can we keep America safe without torture and kidnapping anyone we please?
    America voted in Terrorist loving Democrats and now will reap what they sow.
    There’s going to be a mushroom cloud above an American city any second now.
    There are thousands of terrorists just out side our borders just waiting with briefcase nukes and chemical weapons waiting for us to not torture anymore, then boom, we will all be dead!!! You just watch and see.

    Fcuk off Dick


  12. HungryHungryHippo says:

    Ahh, It feels good to have people at the top that base critical decisions about our country on the Constitution and not on whatever happened in the most recent episode of 24. Panetta has already earned my approval.


  13. tokin librul says:

    Dr. Hussein Matt Says:

    Yes! The adults are in charge.

    Where is tokin to whine about this?
    February 5th, 2009 at 4:00 pm

    What flavor’s the Kool-Aid in there Matt…I’ll get the Dims to send you a case of it…


  14. spencers mom says:

    I think we’re a stronger nation when we abide by the law and the Constitution.

    Yes, let’s stop being the nation of “do as we say, not as we do.”

    PEACE


  15. mk3872 says:

    Wow, someone who actually GETS it in charge @ CIA? What a concept!

    But … WAIT … did he pay all of his taxes?? Did his wife?? Did his kids? How about his cousins?? That’s what America REALLY cares about!!


  16. coskibum says:

    I know I’m off thread but The President is laying the law down!



  17. Hoodathunk says:

    Panetta says:
    but I do not think he can violate the laws of this country.
    I think we’re a stronger nation when we abide by the law and the Constitution.

    Nuff said.


  18. robbez_92107 says:

    I guess we’re about to find out if Dick Cheney still has the man sized safe and if it has Panetta sized room still left within.


  19. McWars says:

    Rule of law out of the way, let’s get to the real deal. Did Panetta pay the tax on that Pancetta sandwich he had the other day?


  20. Hoodathunk says:

    No he didn’t McWars. A street person bought it for him from cadged coins. His IRS burden.


  21. atsegga says:

    The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.

    $30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
    $550 billion: U.S. Defense budget


  22. Marie says:

    The LA story was debunked last week, but not too many people heard about it. Rachel Maddow’s guest explicitly explained the difference between lawful rendition, and “extraordinary rendition” a la Bush&Co.
    I am quite relieved to hear of Panetta’s replies today.
    I am also relieved that Darth Cheney words were also cited and specifically denounced.


  23. RandomChaos says:

    TP,
    Please do something about the damn “Borgen Project” SPAMMER.
    It is obviously a BOT. Since all the post are the same, only the poster name changes at times, I would put in a posting filter for “The Borgen Project” , that would stop this junk.

    Thanks
    RC


  24. dbadass says:

    F uck the Borgen Project, let the Privacy Center handle global poverty


  25. ohplease says:

    “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”
    “We do not torture.”
    “Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.”

    Call me paranoid if I don’t believe everything the government says.


  26. Nevar says:

    ohplease Says:

    don’t forget “I’m not a crook!”
    ;)


  27. NOLIESPLEASE says:

    Clinton is not the country….he is an individual and if a individual wants to deny having sex….what the fcuk is it to you?????

    We do not torture…is a government/international policy that was broken.

    As per the weapons of mass destruction, that was a government agency that provided facts to which were cherry picked to produce evidence that was based on lies.

    SO TWO OUT OF THREE WERE GOVERNMENT ISSUES….INDIVIDUALS ISSUES DON’T COMPARE MY FRIEND!!!


  28. tokin librul says:

    Listen, if Darth Cheney predicts an assault, believe him.

    He organized the last one…


  29. Shayne says:

    The newest type of trolling, where Obama isn’t progressive enough is hilarious since it’s done mostly by right wing nuts. Yeah, I’m talking to you tokin.


  30. tokin librul says:

    Yeah, I’m talking to you tokin.

    You drunk on the kool-aid, child…

    I been fighting the progressive fight longer than you been breathing.

    i been abbreviating, but shall i spell it out?

    ESAD, shitwhistle…


  31. Nevar says:

    There’s two ears on any given wingnut, a left one and a right one.


  32. dbadass says:

    Anyone feel the need to announce “I have been tokin longer than you have been librul”?


  33. Nevar says:

    are you passin’ that my way?

    By the way, bit was back on the Obama/Faith based discrimination thread, trying to canonize Patrick Henry


  34. EugeneDebs says:

    Nevar Says:
    ohplease Says:

    don’t forget “I’m not a crook!”
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    And the aluminum tubes can ONLY be used for gas centrifuges and The Atta meeting in Prague is pretty much confirmed. True the government has always lied to me. I am adjusted to that. At this point I will be happy if they stop lying to start wars


  35. dbadass says:

    Yeah, I saw but I had my bait in the gay marriage pond


  36. Nevar says:

  37. tokin librul says:

    Anyone feel the need to announce “I have been tokin longer than you have been librul”?
    February 5th, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    I have been stoned longer than most of you have been alive, i’d bet…

    Smoked it the first time in HS–1963 or 64…

    Steadily since 1968…


  38. Nevar says:

    Do you have an oxygen tank yet?


  39. tokin librul says:

    Nevar Says:

    are you passin’ that my way?

    Ear…

    My ol’ dad usta say a gentleman should be known for the quality of his intoxicants, and his generosity with ‘em…


  40. Nevar says:

    I half expected Daryll/Rapture Boy here with some security concerns…


  41. tokin librul says:

    Do you have an oxygen tank yet?
    February 5th, 2009 at 5:12 pm

    Yano, I quit tobacco 15 years ago, and that really helped…

    I got a bit of what I call ‘pot-asthma’…I cough especially on a bong…but my wind’s still pretty good…


  42. Nevar says:

    I quit it all about that long ago, it’s a good thing I did, cause now I’m wildland firefighter…
    Nothing like a good hit of pine pitch….


  43. tokin librul says:

    Nothing like a good hit of pine pitch….
    February 5th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Good on ya…you’re a brave fella…my courage went the way of my physical strength in the advance of age. I’m 63, got sciatica (nerve damage), bad lower back (15 years wearing a carpenter’s tool belt’ll do that), a coupla stents in my heart, AND A BAD ATTITUDE…
    (heh)


  44. Shayne says:

    Maybe your telling the truth tokin. Or maybe your just another one of those RNC junior college punks working for a nickel a post. You can be who ever you want to be here.


  45. Hoodathunk says:

    And all of this has some impact on how a person says the Constitution is what he holds near and dear? Sorry for your problems, tokin but your projection doesn’t hold true. You hurt, he’s trying.

    Lend a hand.


  46. Shayne says:

    And I’ve had a bad attitude longer than you’ve been a pothead.


  47. Hoodathunk says:

    Just what is the problem here? We have an appointee who agrees with the Constitution? Someone either explain it or give me drugs so I don’t care.


  48. Nevar says:

    lol, Shayne…
    ;)


  49. tokin librul says:

    Shayne Says:

    And I’ve had a bad attitude longer than you’ve been a pothead.
    February 5th, 2009 at 5:34 pm

    Shayneee, boy, I’ve held my breath longer than you’ve been alive…


  50. Max-1 says:

    .

    R E M E M B E R:
    “They hate us for our freedoms…”
    … And so on George W. Bush’s watch they attempted to debate, lobby, and legislate away foundational principles, values, and Constitutional Laws.

    .


  51. danps says:

    There’s a fairly insidious theme emerging that this is all about extraordinary rendition and torture. It isn’t, and it’s a bad idea to act like it is. I’ve posted more on the topic over here, but the short version is that Horton, hilzoy and others are missing (or ignoring) some pretty important points. Let’s not break out the champagne for the return of the rule of law just yet.




Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll