Ann Coulter under investigation for voter fraud.
By on Feb 8th, 2009 at 9:53 pm
Ann Coulter under investigation for voter fraud.
Connecticut’s Elections Enforcement Commission is undertaking a “thorough investigation” of right-wing pundit Ann Coulter for potentially breaking the law by voting in Connecticut while living in New York City, according to a commission spokesperson. Officials are responding to a formal complaint filed by Coulterwatch.com blogger Dan Borchers. “For over 10 years, Ann Coulter has gotten away with illegal, immoral and unethical behavior, ranging from plagiarism to defamation, perjury to voter fraud,” Borchers wrote.
View Most Popular
Advertisement
What We're About
What We're Fighting For
What We're Fighting Against
Featured
Subscribe to the Progress Report
Topic CloudView topics sorted by popularity
Afghanistan
Bachmann
Beck
Boehner
Bush
Business
Cheney
Civil Rights
Congress
Corporate Ethics
Dobbs
Education
Election
Energy
Environment
Ethics
Fox News
Gingrich
Global Warming
Health Care
Immigration
International Relations
Iraq
Justice
LGBT
Lieberman
Limbaugh
McCain
Media
Military
O'Reilly
Obama
Palin
Pelosi
Politics
Race
Radical Right
Religion
Steele
Stimulus
Tea Parties
Technology
Terrorism
Veterans
Women's Rights
Visit Our Affiliated Sites
Reports
In-depth studies on select topics
Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.
ArchivesBlog Roll
Coulter is a lying, bigoted, hate-mongering creep. Hopefully she’ll be put away for a long time.
February 8th, 2009 at 9:56 pmIs anyone honestly shocked by this? Honestly?
February 8th, 2009 at 9:58 pmTypical It’s Not Wrong If You’re A Republican.
But hasn’t this “woman’s” 15 minutes expired ages ago
February 8th, 2009 at 9:59 pmI didn’t realize Ann was nominated for a cabinet position. This is all you have? Obama can’t find any dems who actually pay taxes to serve in his cabinet, and this is the best you can do is go after Coulter. We survived 4 years of Jimmy Carter, I hope we can survive 4 years of the clown B Hussein.
Look at all of the right-wing websites that chase after any human being associated with the left-wing, regardless of whether or not they serve in the incumbent administration. Don’t be such a hypocrite, my friend. When something controversial happens to a member of the side you oppose, of course it will be reported and ridiculed.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:10 pmI hope we can survive 4 years of the clown B Hussein.
Do you have some sort of obsession with Obama’s middle name, or do you want to disrespect those with an Arabic-sounding surname/middlename, etc? Hussein actually means “handsome” in Arabic, so I suppose you like President Obama’s appearance?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:12 pmProud Says:
________________
Nice try at redirecting the conversation. If you want to control the topic, start your own blog. The TOPIC of this thread is that fraud Coulter.
I think it’s hysterically funny that this shrill, vituperous phony might turn out to be guilty of the very thing she pillories Dems for endlessly.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:14 pmFlag the troll, do not feed him.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pmProud – shame on you. Making fun of our President. You are unpatriotic, unAmerican and probably a terrorist.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:17 pmDidn’t she pull this crap in FL also? A typical Republican harlot. One of those ‘I’m above the law’ kind.
Oh, and careful P of his pp. You’re talking about the President of the United States, soldier.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:19 pmAs for Coulter, she promotes herself as an entertainer and that all the hate that she spills is suppose to be “jokes”. Well the joke is on her because she is not funny. As a matter of fact, she may be a terrorist. After all, she threatened a Supreme Court justice.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:21 pmThe first step is for the judge to send her a sternly worded letter. No one hopes more than I that she is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, but I’ll believe it when I see it.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:22 pmBack in 2004, there was a movie where the dead solders that returned from the Iraq war returned to life just so that they could vote and they didn’t vote to re-elect Bush. There was a character in the movie that had to be Ann Coulter and these zombie solders killed her on the way to the polls. It was gruesome but it showed that even dead people find Coulter disgusting.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:24 pmAnn Coulter is a sad and sorry human being with nothing worthwhile to contribute. Why do the fine people at Think Progress pay her any homage?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:25 pmApologies – solder should be “soldier” Sometimes the brain and fingers are not coordinated.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:25 pmProud:
You bring up Carter, during whose administration the stock market went up 6.9% (in annualized returns), but seem to have no problem with the 8 year disaster we just went through. So that means 2 things.
1. You are a willful liar and a complete and utter moron who only cares about his marginalized party that is bankrupt of any ideas
February 8th, 2009 at 10:25 pm2. See #1
MAnn Coulter under investigation and it is about time!
February 8th, 2009 at 10:29 pmHow depressing for repubs. They’re going into a new season with a lineup line up that includes an overweight junkie, Grandpa McImpotent, a bleach blonde virago who shows up in most medical textbooks under “Botched Sex Changes,” Bill O, and a group of House Republicans that would make most Southern mobs look like the Algonquin Round Table. Oh and don’t forget their new power forward, Michael Steele. The Olden Polynice of message discipline.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:30 pmLoo Hoo. Says:
Why do the fine people at Think Progress pay her any homage?
______________
Schadenfreude? I just hope Ann is treated fairly under the applicable laws.
Teehee…
February 8th, 2009 at 10:30 pmLTdan Says:
——————————————————————————–
Liberals have stooped to an all time low, you would think them having a democrat liberal progressive as their PRESIDENT would stop them from doing such childish things like this.
Like what,LTdan.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:31 pmHummm… looks like the trolls are still drooling over Coulter. They keep trying to change the topic.
Coulter is old news and she is boring. This story is only important because it would be good to see justice finally served upon someone that feels she is above the law.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:32 pmTrolls are renowned for being dumber than dumber. Industrial strength flagging should get rid of Proud, if “John Kerry” serves as an inspiration.
Hey Proud, do that thing you did on To Catch a Predator. Remember, you tried to run away but got zapped from a distance with a taser. Your flopping was h i l a r i o u s.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:32 pm“LTdan Says:
Liberals have stooped to an all time low, you would think them having a democrat liberal progressive as their PRESIDENT would stop them from doing such childish things like this.”
So you support voter fraud?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:33 pmyou would think them having a democrat liberal progressive as their PRESIDENT would stop them from doing such childish things like this.
oh hell… just wait till the REAL investigations begin!
February 8th, 2009 at 10:33 pmyou cons ain’t seen nothin’ yet!
LTdan Says:
Liberals have stooped to an all time low, you would think them having a democrat liberal progressive as their PRESIDENT would stop them from doing such childish things like this.
Remember, up is down with the trolls. If they criticize profusely, you’re really making progress. GO PRESIDENT OBAMA!
February 8th, 2009 at 10:34 pmLTdan Says:
Liberals have stooped to an all time low…
__________
Huh? Please explain this.
Did we suggest poisoning judges? No, wait, that was Coulter.
Did we suggest Tim McVeigh should have bombed the NY Times Building? No, wait, that was Ann Coulter.
Did we suggest women shouldn’t be allowed to vote? No wait…
So… what low did we stoop to?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:35 pmAbout time she gets busted.
Does anyone know what the max prenalty is for voter fraud?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:37 pmExcellent TRoS,now if you could put that in re-puke speak the Reich might understand it.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:38 pmProud Says:
I am sure this whole scandal involves Rove, Cheney, and of course Haliburton. I just hope we can come together and survive this crisis.
Don’t make it harder than it is. Ann Coulter simply committed voter fraud. That explains the energetic smear on democrats: accuse your opponent of doing the same thing you’re doing. That makes getting caught less noticeable because attention is heavily cast elsewhere.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:40 pmProud Says:
I am sure this whole scandal involves Rove, Cheney, and of course Haliburton. I just hope we can come together and survive this crisis.
Nope. Voting in a district that she didn’t live in is all Ann Coulter’s doing all by her little self. Time for her to take responsibility for her own actions, don’t you think?
February 8th, 2009 at 10:41 pmShe might be able to sell a few books from jail, God knows she’s spiraling into oblivion otherwise…
February 8th, 2009 at 10:48 pmThere is no Rethug too heinous for the trolls to show up and defend.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:48 pmwhy is she everywhere? go away please. the same 10 people making the same arguments over and over and over again. i dont care if shes arrested or just sentenced to not showing up on tv anymore, just go away
February 8th, 2009 at 10:48 pmGood point moondancer, she probably committed voter fraud just to get her name in the press. That’s what has beens do.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:48 pmI should tell you something when the troll defense of Coulter here amounts to few nonsensical statements (that would be you LTdan)and a rivulet or two of sour grape drool.
February 8th, 2009 at 10:55 pmPoor Ann, the lonely bitter kind of skank no one dates and puggie wankers gulp viagra hoping for a chance to . . . anyway, isn’t THIS what she claims ACORN did???
February 8th, 2009 at 10:55 pmThat Dude has a hairy big bulge
in his adams apple – gross!
Just the sound of his screechy whiney voice makes me run for the channel changer immediately!!
February 8th, 2009 at 11:00 pmJust one question for dAnn culter
boxers or briefs, dude?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:02 pmProud, the drool is going to ruin your keyboard.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:03 pmProud Says:
Thank you all for acknowledging that Ann truly does have great power and influence over weak minded liberals.
____________
Great power? Because we’re all laughing at her?
Have you ever even TRIED to read an Ann Coulter book?
Ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid, ibid…
The most unGodly gibberish imaginable. I once took the time to read both of Limbaugh’s books, one of Hannity’s, one of O’Reilly’s… Charin, Bruce, Malkin, Savage. I keep hearing you wingnutters whine that we don’t even give your idols a chance. I did. Only convinced me I was right about them.
If you feel you’re headed in the right direction by following the likes of Coulter, please, proceed.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:07 pmI’d ask Cattle Prod to explain this jibberish, except I know there’s no explaining it. It’s all just the output of a malfunctioning Troll Comment Randomizer.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:08 pm“Proud Says:
Thank you all for acknowledging that Ann truly does have great power and influence over weak minded liberals. I know her incredible success is all thanks to you and your obsessions. So once again thank you and keep up the good work.”
The person defending ANN COULTER calling others weak minded, that’s rich.
Next you will explain to us how that draft dodging, drug addict, thrice divorced Rush is the poster child of patriotism and family values.
To live in such willful ignorance…..
February 8th, 2009 at 11:08 pmThat would explain the utter lack of coherence in his postings.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:08 pmd Says:
Does anyone know what the max prenalty is for voter fraud?
________________
Penalties for Voter Fraud In CT:
The criminal penalty for fraudulently voting when not legally qualified or for voting more than once when qualified is a fine of $ 300 to $ 500, one to two years in prison, and disenfranchisement.
Not to mention being the butt of way too many jokes on late night television…
Maybe Ann can cadge some tips from Martha Stewart about how to decorate her cell on a pittance, or do her time like a stand-up con, or make a shiv from a toothbrush…
February 8th, 2009 at 11:13 pmThere’s one bag ugly, two bag ugly, coyote ugly…then there’s Coulter ugly. Can you even imagine what it would be like to wake up with a horrible tequila hangover, roll over and find that skank in the same room?
Of course, if you have never had sex with another human before, it wouldn’t be so bad. Hell, you might even be Proud enough to defend that piece of shit on a blog.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:13 pmnanlichi Says:
Of course, if you have never had sex with another human before, it wouldn’t be so bad.
____________
I knew it… I knew it. Someone just HAD to bring up Glen Beck, didn’t they?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:15 pmWhy don’t they go after a group like ACORN that promotes voter fraud instead of going after one person?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:19 pmWhy don’t they go after the illegal aliens that voted in the last election?
I’ve known people who vote in a different state than where they lived because they never changed their residency. There is nothing illegal about that.
They just want to shut her up. If they do that to her now they may come after youj next.
Got it, don’t say Vagina…Ann Coutler is still an IDIOT and a butt munch..not to mention the fact that she’s more offensive that what I’m saying…ALOT
February 8th, 2009 at 11:20 pmMaybe the regressives have a point with their “tough on crime” posturing. After all, if the loverly Ms. Coulter had been prosecuted and punished for her voter fraud in Palm Beach, she wouldn’t have felt so free to break the same law again, in yet another jurisdiction.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:21 pmIt’s kinda cute how the regressives get their backs up over ACORN.
It’s like when a puppy intently stalks a paper bag. And then the paper bag wins.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:22 pmIs there a way to respond to comments here?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:25 pmblclem, the dittoheads really are a bunch of dolts. If one of those accusations you make were factual charges would have been filed. Idiot.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:25 pmReally ralph, no matter how many times we try to explain it to them they just don’t understand. And at the same time they can’t understand why we think it’s funny that Trannie is being investigated.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:26 pmblclem Says:
Why don’t they go after a group like ACORN that promotes voter fraud instead of going after one person?
___________
Ummm… because the shrill wingnutter claims of rampant voter fraud have turned out to be… well… pretty much false?
http://www.hubdub.com/m31836/What_will_the_outcome_be_of_Ann_Coulters_voter_fraud_investigation
“The overwhelming evidence is that fraudulent voter registrations do not lead to fraudulent voting,” said Wendy Weiser, a deputy director specializing in voting rights at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice. “It’s a big resource drain on election officials, but it doesn’t affect the outcome.”
In Coulter’s case, this current investigation is the result of ONE person filing a formal complaint. Heh… Ann must have made an enemy.
Saaaaaay… wasn’t that the reason Iglesias was fired down in N Mexico? The GOOP was pressuring him to proseculte some folks for NON-EXISTENT voter fraud, and when he refused to do so, Alberto and Goodling fired him?
Oouch’mon… as they say in Scotland.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:28 pmJust a little heads up Proud, when the neighbor kids point and laugh at you it doesn’t mean you have power over them. In your case it probably means it’s time for a diaper change.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:28 pmLoo Hoo, you can address them by name or paste their comments before yours.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:29 pmWow TRoS, aren’t you the master of understatement! Trannie must have made “AN” enemy? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:29 pmLoo Hoo. Says:
Is there a way to respond to comments here?
___________
Directly? No…
February 8th, 2009 at 11:29 pmTRoS, are you wearing your kilt?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:31 pmShayne Says:
TRoS, are you wearing your kilt?
___________
Why yes, Shayne… I am…
If this somehow involves me walking over and standing on that subway ventilation grate… it ain’t gonna happen…
February 8th, 2009 at 11:33 pmShayne, now THAT I’ve got to see – a polar bear in a kilt?!
February 8th, 2009 at 11:33 pmTRos blushes… but no one can see it THRU THE DAMNED FUR…
February 8th, 2009 at 11:35 pm“Coulter could not be reached for comment; however, her publicist did return our call and said that she will be returning this weekend from Costa Rica where she has been vacationing with Rush Limpballs and diddling little boys.”
February 8th, 2009 at 11:36 pmZero Says:
Just spell her name right, I’m sure she appreciates the pub.
______________
We all look forward to her first news conference after getting out of JAIL.
Will she have HATE and LIBS tattooed across her fingers?
I’d say she’ll come out of the can more buffed than Geln Beck… but hell, she already is.
What is it w/ the GOOPer men? Rush… KKKarl, Glen… pudgy, balding, squishy epicene frauds, who just loves themselves some war, as long as someone else goes and fights it.
Frankly, I’d be more afraid of Coulter and Malkin in an alleyway fight than the men.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:39 pmThanks, Shayne (59).
February 8th, 2009 at 11:42 pmDammit! Another sleepless night. Visions of Coulter, Beck, Proud of the orange hands, and TRoS in a kilt will haunt me till dawn.
TP at night is worse than watching the Exorcist before bed.
If I get fired, it’s all your fault. Maybe I can ask some of the trolls for things to do to fill the jobless days….
February 8th, 2009 at 11:42 pm“Clean-up on aisle Proud”
February 8th, 2009 at 11:44 pmnanlichi Says:
Dammit! Another sleepless night. Visions of Coulter, Beck, Proud of the orange hands, and TRoS in a kilt will haunt me till dawn.
____________
Sheesh… lump me in w/ Coulter, Beck and & Proud? What did I ever do to you?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:45 pm“…Visions of Coulter, Beck, Proud of the orange hands, and TRoS in a kilt…”
Nanlichi, are they all wearing kilts, or just TRoS? ;)
February 8th, 2009 at 11:45 pmOh, man! I got a mental picture of Prod’s Cheeto-stained fingers, and then, to my chagrin, realized that other parts of his body that he touches with his hands must be orange too.
Eew.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:46 pmCoulter would look better in a kilt than that silly black cocktail dress. And it would fit better with that macho bulge … in her neck! Yeesh.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:51 pmReally ralph, without a magnifying glass who would notice?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:53 pmIt gets worse Jane, it’s the SAME kilt.
Sorry TRoS, bad association. My bad. Those losers can’t hold a candle to you.
February 8th, 2009 at 11:53 pmI couldnt let this one go…
superid Says:
How depressing for repubs…Oh and don’t forget their new power forward, Michael Steele. The Olden Polynice of message discipline.
>> What a great line. The Olden Polynice of message discipline. I busted up :)
February 8th, 2009 at 11:54 pmMaybe that’s what the Cheeto dust is for? So he can find it in the dark?
February 8th, 2009 at 11:57 pmnanlichi Says:
It gets worse Jane, it’s the SAME kilt.
___________
Tap… tap… tap…
(best Brooklyn accent…)
“Do I amuse you? But I’m funny how? Funny like a clown?”
(pause…)
“What do you mean, funny? How am I funny?”
February 9th, 2009 at 12:03 amNo matter what you say, Ann Coulter is ugly and mean
February 9th, 2009 at 12:04 amralph the wonder llama Says:
Maybe that’s what the Cheeto dust is for? So he can find it in the dark?
___________
Like a night light? Eeeeeewwwww…
Don’t Cheetos have a shelf life of, like, 10,000 years?
No wait… that’s the HALF-life…
February 9th, 2009 at 12:05 amliberalinaredstate Says:
No matter what you say, Ann Coulter is ugly and mean
____________
And scary… very, very scary…
February 9th, 2009 at 12:05 amRWeSafer Says:
>> What a great line. The Olden Polynice of message discipline. I busted up :)
_____________
Yeah… saw that one too. Good ‘un.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:06 amTrannie Annie, I would love to see you locked up in some filthy lesbo lockdown with bad lighting. Big Bertha awaits with a toilet brush in her hand!
February 9th, 2009 at 12:13 amMy friends,
February 9th, 2009 at 12:13 amAnn Coulter spent her hard-earned money to burn up Interstate 95 from Florida to Connecticut to vote. What did Joe the Plumber ever do to you that you’d want to do something like that?
She crossed state lines, with a Florida address… and mebbe a minor.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:18 amIf Trannie gets send to prison Amanda we should all pitch in and send copies of her books to her cellmates.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:19 amFirst he’s from Scotland and now he’s from Brooklyn! TRoS, you’re quite the renaissance man!
February 9th, 2009 at 12:20 amShayne Says:
First he’s from Scotland and now he’s from Brooklyn! TRoS, you’re quite the renaissance man!
___________
That’s renaissance BEAR, Shayne… and what’s so unusual about a Scottish polar bear from Brooklyn? Did I ever mention that I’m Jewish?
February 9th, 2009 at 12:32 amOy! Or should I say howwwwwl!
February 9th, 2009 at 12:37 amSorry, I had to go dry my hair – which is MUCH thicker than Ann Coulter’s (and just as long – I had to get that dig in.)
Just one kilt? Oy!
So, getting back to blclem’s earlier statement…how could it NOT be illegal to vote in a different state? WTF is blclem talking about? According to him/her, then I could take a short, well-lit drive over to Connecticut, too, and vote against Lieberman next time he’s up for reelection? Well, I’ll be damned, if I had known that I would have done it in ‘06!
February 9th, 2009 at 12:43 amShayne Says:
Oy! Or should I say howwwwwl!
__________
Do you have ANY IDEA how hard it can be to find kosher blubber bits?
February 9th, 2009 at 12:44 amOff to bed, goodnight all.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:52 amI notice a lot of anger and name calling on this site. Why is that I wonder?
February 9th, 2009 at 1:03 amPINCH ME, I MUST BE DREAMING!!!!
Finally justice is going to be served to the criminal repukes who were unafraid as long as “Their God” Bush was keeping them safe.
Thank you Dan Borchers.
February 9th, 2009 at 1:30 amWillywoo Says:
I notice a lot of anger and name calling on this site. Why is that I wonder?
____________
Surely you jest. Have you been asleep the last eight years?
February 9th, 2009 at 1:34 amWillywoo, there is a lot of anger out there, childess name calling, venting and with good reason. My thinking is this. We all miss America as we Know her to be….A Country full of vigor, full of pride, full of intelligence, full of beauty, and we’ve lost our way and we’re looking to find our way back and it’s totally f**ked right now. Have a glass of wine, it makes a bit of difference in the short term…and then well….we can start complaining about that **** Coulter again..or Iraq…I’m going for another glass of wine…see you in venting world tomorrow. I volunteer at a food bank….it does make a huge difference….
February 9th, 2009 at 1:36 amThe Aryan wannabe will no doubt use the media coverage of this story to promote her book and spew more of her vitriol at anyone who does not share her warped, perverse view of the world.
February 9th, 2009 at 2:05 amLT Dan and Proud, your principles only revolve around IOKIYAR…
February 9th, 2009 at 3:27 amEvery now and then the wingers have a meeting, where they decide which Democrats need to be badmouthed…
At their last meeting, they obviously decided it was Jimmy Carter’s turn. Now every wingnut in the world goes around saying Jimmy Carter was the devil.
I suggest you smack wingers upside the head when they bash Jimmy, or any other Democrat. The days are past when we let degenerate traitors badmouth our people.
As always, the smears are dead wrong. An earlier commenter has noted that the the stock market went up 6.9% under Jimmy Carter. Also, job growth per year under Carter was the second highest of all recent Presidents:
Johnson 3.8%
Carter 3.1
Clinton 2.4
Kennedy 2.3
Nixon 2.3
Reagan 2.1
Bush 0.6
There you go. Apparently, ourt worst guy is several times better than their best guy.
Historians rate Jimmy Carter around 24th or 25th among Presidents–not terribly good, but nowhere near as bad as the Winged Ones would have us think. I think Jimmy’s Nobel Prize and continued popularity have freaked them out. ;)
Going Back in Time
February 9th, 2009 at 5:43 amHere’s the catch which angry trannie annie coulter should be aware of: when she was accused of this in florida, it was overlooked with a “nudge-nudge, wink-wink” since florida is not known to respect our tradition of free and open elections. Connecticut is a whole different story. if attorney genral blumenthal steps in, trAnn coulter should be very, very afraid since blumenthal doesn’t put up with any shady sheeyat.
February 9th, 2009 at 5:44 amThis skank needs to eat 1 of Limpball’s sandwich.
February 9th, 2009 at 6:59 amThis is what we really need now.
More of this skank on the airwaves the next few news cycles.
February 9th, 2009 at 7:10 amCoulterSkank belongs in jail.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:28 amCoulterSkank was once a man and OxyRush is taking hormones to become a female. Crazy stuff.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:30 amhttp://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.billofrights.html#amendmenti
bit’s impression is that many TP posters don’t think the above applies to BigAnn.
Dealing with Coulter, or Rush for that matter, is very simple. Since both Rush and Coulter make their livings expressing their opinion, one may purposefully, consciously not listen or not read their their opinions.
Interesting that almost immediately following the election of a Democrat President there are those who desire to limit First Amendment rights, especially the rights of Rush and Coulter. Is there something about the election of BHO that signalled a start to this denial of rigths?
Wasn’t that a Communists tactic – to undermine and silence all critics? And weren’t the Liberals going to take-out BigAnn by eroding her sponsor base?
Likely any legal move against Coulter will backfire. It’ll just give her grist for her mill, fodder for her cannon, acid for her pen.
Aside: Her article last week noted an interesting study on single mothers. The article references a study that said single mothers costs the US $112B a year. bit suspects that this isn’t a number that the Democrats would quote, since the Democrats rely on single mothers to produce Democrat voters.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:57 amWillywoo Says:
I notice a lot of anger and name calling on this site. Why is that I wonder?
People with really silly screen names ask a lot of really stupid questions.
February 9th, 2009 at 8:57 amYou’ll need to provide some biblical references to support your suppositions, bit.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:01 amGood Morning to ya Nevar,…..Noticed there is only 108 post’s for the coltergeist discussion…Her/his popularety has gone like the bad wind she/he is…Use to be we would get a feeding frenzie from troll’s that added up above 400….LOL..Guess she/he isn’t so popular any more….Have a wonderful day posting…Blessings
February 9th, 2009 at 9:06 amWillywoo, all the name calling is because ann coulter has earned every vile name that she can be called.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:07 ambit quotes First Amendment. bit then Says:
bit’s impression is that many TP posters don’t think the above applies to BigAnn.
bit’s impression would be wrong. bit thinks TP posters too stupid to know that as a private citizen, Ann Coulter has the same First Amendment rights as anyone else. But bit also emphasized the free press, so bit must be stupid enough to think that Ann Coulter is a journalist.
bit then also repeat another delusional remark:
Interesting that almost immediately following the election of a Democrat President there are those who desire to limit First Amendment rights, especially the rights of Rush and Coulter. Is there something about the election of BHO that signalled a start to this denial of rigths?
bit may think he’s been paying attention, but he has only been hearing the right-wing diaper-crapping pundits who claim that the Fairness Doctrine is coming back and it will mean the end of Rush and Hannity. bit would be an idiot to believe these people. bit not clever enough to understand that a Fairness Doctrine would only mean an end to their unchallenged formats, not an end to them. Unless, of course, bit is frightened that Rush and Hannity could not do a radio program in which dissenting voices had to be heard.
Your third person act is getting tiresome, bit, and your opinions are wholly lacking in reality.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:08 amSo much for the sanctity of marriage in America. Sanctity of marriage in America is a joke. Divorced republicans standing holding a bible, talking about the sanctity of marriage…..priceless but hypocritical to the max……
run your own life bltflotsom, if you could just do that then you would be contributing instead of lying and cheating.
February 9th, 2009 at 9:15 amdbadass wonders how bit’s quote is in anyway related to voter fraud
February 9th, 2009 at 9:16 amdbadass also wonders what the cost of single fathers might be
February 9th, 2009 at 9:27 amI sometimes wonder about that little black dress that barely covers her crotch. Do you think she has a collection of the exact same dresses, or does she always wear the same one? If the latter, it must be as smelly as her factless vitriol.
Shayne Says:
February 9th, 2009 at 9:28 amCoulter would look better in a kilt than that silly black cocktail dress. And it would fit better with that macho bulge … in her neck! Yeesh.
ralph thinks bitblt is jonesing for a gay-related thread on which he can deposit his standard biblical distortions and rationalizations.
ralph understands bit’s frustration, as sometimes it can be a long wait for that perfect thread to come along, and besides, since Daryll has been MIA lately, and bit has always been hesitant to post on a thread in which Daryll had not bestowed his Christianist Seal of Approval®, bit has been locked out of action for a while.
Still, ralph finds it disappointing that a stylish troll like bit has chosen to sully his reputation with a bizarrely un-bit-like misreading of either the First Amendment or TPer comments (or both) to somehow cast voter fraud as a free speech issue.
ralph is very disappointed.
ralph is impressed, however, by the effortless dismantling of bit’s attempt by Wayne S.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:46 amI really doubt this is a case of ‘voter fraud’ so much as it is ‘tax fraud’. For some reason I can see Coulter being more concerned with paying NYC taxes than voting for a CT congressman.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:49 amWayne thanks ralph for his kind words, and wishes ralph all the best. :)
February 9th, 2009 at 10:49 amralph is also disappointed to see bit adopt the juvenile use of the noun “Democrat” as an adjective.
ralph thought bit was a little more concerned with language standards than that.
Perhaps bit has subcontracted out his workload to a certain wannabe Latin king?
February 9th, 2009 at 10:50 amdeebaser Says:
I really doubt this is a case of ‘voter fraud’ so much as it is ‘tax fraud’. For some reason I can see Coulter being more concerned with paying NYC taxes than voting for a CT congressman.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:49 am
I believe CT residents pay lower state taxes than us NY residents. Hell, we pay taxes on everything (except for those few weeks out of the year when they allow clothes to be bought tax-free.)
No, I think she did it because she has zero respect for the law (despite being trained as a lawyer herself.) Did you know that she was one of Paula Jones’s lawyers in her lawsuit against Clinton?
February 9th, 2009 at 10:54 amIronic, isn’t it, that it’s the RED (aka Republican) states where the numbers of unwed teenaged mothers are the highest, eh, bittie?
February 9th, 2009 at 11:00 amWayne,
As an added bonus, NYC has an additional 7% income tax rate (on top of NY State income tax). Me thinks Coulter is a tax cheater.
February 9th, 2009 at 11:11 amCity residents get hosed…
February 9th, 2009 at 11:12 amFebruary 9th, 2009 at 11:34 am
· dbadass Says:
dbadass wonders how bit’s quote is in anyway related to voter fraud
February 9th, 2009 at 9:16 am
Can’t get one on you, dbadass. bit did note the information as an aside and as something Democrats would likely overlook. Had you read about this somewhere else?
· dbadass Says:
dbadass also wonders what the cost of single fathers might be
February 9th, 2009 at 9:27 am
This one should be obvious to even you dbadass. The cost of a single father is a single mother. Cost here would include the emotional vacuum in the lives of the mother and child, or children, as well as the societal cost inherit with a citizen who will likely be more of a taker than a giver; i.e., consumer vs producer.
Dr. Hussein Matt Says:
bitblt doesn’t seem to “think” the law applies to mAnn Coulter. How telling.
February 9th, 2009 at 10:15 am
What seems telling to bit, DrM, is that bit has not felt the need to call BigAnn convicted.
February 9th, 2009 at 11:51 amWillywoo Says:
I notice a lot of anger and name calling on this site. Why is that I wonder?
Because people like Ann Coulter have been working hard to pit every American against every other, and to tear down everything that America stands for. They have been far more successful in doing so than they have any right to be. That makes us angry.
Why would you wonder? Shouldn’t that be obvious? It also makes us angry that certain people either don’t see what these people are trying to do to America, or are just fine with it and pretend they don’t understand what’s going on.
.
bitblt Says:
Interesting that almost immediately following the election of a Democrat President there are those who desire to limit First Amendment rights, especially the rights of Rush and Coulter. Is there something about the election of BHO that signalled a start to this denial of rigths?
We’re talking about an actual law actually being broken. If you’re going to wave the 1st Amendment around as a defense like this, then you’re basically saying she could murder people and any attempt to stop her would constitute violating her civil rights. Just because you’re a pundit doesn’t mean you’re above real laws.
It’s very likely that she’s been doing this on purpose for some time now. I seem to recall there was something about her getting turned away from a couple of extra voting districts in 2006. Very likely she’s been intentionally breaking voting laws in the hopes of getting caught so she can cry and moan about mistreatment, while at the same time gaining a platform a for new round of tinfoil-hat fantasies about imaginary Democratic voter fraud.
.
Lora Says:
And it would fit better with that macho bulge … in her neck! Yeesh.
That small flap of skin there is actually to make room for the fact that Ann Coulter can unhinge her jaw to swallow prey whole.
February 9th, 2009 at 11:53 amnot to mention lying about her gender all these years.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:04 pmbitblt Says: “…the societal cost inherit with a citizen who will likely be more of a taker than a giver; i.e., consumer vs producer.”
This has become the whole basis of our capitalistic system. Consumerism, and having people in underdeveloped nations produce all of our goods for a dollar a day.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:05 pmDo you support this, or a more socialistic structure?
So let’s see. If the cost of a single dad is equal to the cost of a single mom, then I suppose the total cost is 2x the cost of a single parent regardless of gender
February 9th, 2009 at 12:14 pmralph notes that, while bit has seen fit to respond to some of the comments related to his post, bit has neglected to explain how voter fraud is a First Amendment issue, let alone how TPers criticism of Ann Coulter’s public statements relates to government-sanctioned censorship.
ralph’s suspicion that bit has subcontracted out his responsibilities grows stronger.
February 9th, 2009 at 12:16 pmbitblt Says:
We’re talking about an actual law actually being broken. If you’re going to wave the 1st Amendment around as a defense like this, then you’re basically saying she could murder people and any attempt to stop her would constitute violating her civil rights. Just because you’re a pundit doesn’t mean you’re above real laws.
.
.
.
Thought it was rather obvious. bit wasn’t responding to the initial TP post. He was responding to the attitudes displayed in the subsequent TPers posts. If fact the original TP post says this: “Connecticut’s Elections Enforcement Commission is undertaking a “thorough investigation” of right-wing pundit Ann Coulter for potentially breaking the law…” This would lead bit to believe the BigAnn has been neither charged nor convicted, which in our system of justice, means she’s not guilty.
If you’re going to wave the 1st Amendment around as a defense like this,…
bit did not offer the First Amendment as a defense for what BigAnn did – “…potentially break law.” bit really doesn’t know how you made this link, unless of course, Liberals are carrying this pre-crime pre-cognition too far.
This is one really big non-sequitur.
Care to interpret this for of us who don’t read through the “Liberal colored” glasses?
February 9th, 2009 at 12:19 pmIf by a wild stretch of imagination Coulter ended up doing a little jail time, would her Adam’s apple get its own cell?
http://jackrabbitcafe.blogspot.com
February 9th, 2009 at 12:35 pmA standard post from bit is usually “one really big non-sequitur”
February 9th, 2009 at 12:48 pmdbadass forgets were bit was relative to the 1st ammendment rights of that Bongs Hits For Jesus kid and the desire of that school to silence him. Might bit reming dbadass?
February 9th, 2009 at 1:46 pm“remind”
February 9th, 2009 at 1:49 pmSo let me get this absolutely straight, bittie — you’re truly stating that when law enforcement officials suspect that a law has been broken and/or a crime has been committed (voter fraud *is* a felony, after all), law enforcement officials aren’t supposed to investigate the alleged violator (Ann Coulter) on the grounds that it violates the alleged perpetrator’s (Ann Coulter’s) first amendment rights…?
Leftside Annie thinks bitblt is batshit crazy.
February 9th, 2009 at 1:51 pmRevoke ACs citizenship, put her on a plane to Iraq, and then on a no-fly list.
February 9th, 2009 at 5:22 pmThat ought to keep her out of view for a while…