Goldberg: ‘A man needs a humorless feminist like a fish needs a bicycle.’
Goldberg: ‘A man needs a humorless feminist like a fish needs a bicycle.’
On Monday night, after Helen Thomas asked a question at President Obama’s news conference, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly mocked her by comparing her to “the Wicked Witch of the East.” During his show last night, O’Reilly responded to the outrage over his comments, saying that he’s “a nice guy” because he could have called her “a pinhead.” Later in the show, right-wing media critic Bernard Goldberg chimed in, claiming that “a man needs a humorless feminist like a fish needs a bicycle.” Watch it:
Transcript:
O’REILLY: The play is about 30 yards from me. We’ve invited Will Ferrell. We don’t expect to see him, but he is invited.Now, Helen Thomas. You know, Bernie, I know I’m a mean guy, and –but what do you think?
GOLDBERG: Let me first say a man needs a humorless feminist like a fish needs a bicycle, OK? So that’s No. 1.
But it’s interesting to me that these left-wingers, who — who didn’t say a word when their fellow left-wingers called George Bush a moron, when they called Dick Cheney a fascist, when they called Sarah Palin a racist, and when they threw Oreo cookies at Michael Steele because he had the nerve to be a conservative black man. They didn’t say a word about all of that.
So here’s my political analysis, and feel free to bleep this. Screw them. Screw them. They are unimportant people. They are on important people who shouldn’t be taken seriously.
When you made a good-natured joke, I very seriously said that Helen Thomas’ 15 minutes were up during the Lincoln administration. And you know what? If they want to take shots at me, and if they want to take shots at you, they need to know one thing: they’re throwing spitballs at battleships.
O’REILLY: But they never — they never learn. They do it, and then we get a segment at the top and two other segments out of it. Everybody sees it. Everybody knows how absurd it is. I should send Media Matters a little — I said Helen Thomas flowers already, because I have nothing against Helen. I want to send them a cake, but I want something to be inside the cake, and I might get…
GOLDBERG: You should send them flowers: black, dead roses.
O’REILLY: But they never learn, Bernie. They’re still doing this crap, and the poor lady who came in, who is a very courageous woman, she buys into this nonsense. She doesn’t know it’s a George Soros generated, you know…
GOLDBERG: They’re humorless. They’re humorless.
O’REILLY: Right.
GOLDBERG: Bill, they’re humorless, and they’re unimportant, and they’re un-serious.
O’REILLY: All right, we’d love to talk to Tina Fey about satire sometime, but I don’t expect to see her.
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
wait… these people are going after HELEN THOMAS?
really?
The woman has been a fixture of political journalism for 40+ years!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:12 am“What? Wha’d I say? It was just a joke!”
Standard right-wing rationalization number 4
February 12th, 2009 at 11:12 amStupidity, ignorance and hate knows no bounds with these clowns.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:13 am“George Soros is behind it”
Standard right-wing rationalization number 6
February 12th, 2009 at 11:14 amShorter Goldberg: Why do I need a real woman when I have an inflatable doll… and/or a good, strong, right hand?
February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 amBig fan of Helen Thomas here. I was glad Obama called on her.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 amNo fan of O’Reilly or Goldberg. I don’t think they respect women.
Bernard Goldberg chimed in, claiming that “a man needs a humorless feminist like a fish needs a bicycle.”
– - Trying to find logic and common sense among Fox talking heads is a bit like feeling around for a quarter on the floor of a dark movie theater. The reward is not worth the search
February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 amUmmm… did ANYONE ever do this? I think my weekly memo from the ‘militant left wing’ has been getting blocked by my spam filter. Is Goldberg just making stuff up?
February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 amYou’d think they’d just drop this entirely. It’s not like she did anything specific in recent memory that would rile them up. They’re essentially picking on her for no reason… It’s childish.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:15 amYes, deebaser, Goldberg is just making stuff up.
Well, to be fair to Goldberg, Steele made stuff up and Goldberg is just ignoring the evidence that it’s made up and propogating it further.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:17 amralph the wonder llama Says:
“George Soros is behind it”
__________
Geez, Ralph, I thought you were just being snarky when you dropped Soros into the line… but Dild did indeed manage to turn the whole thing into “it’s a Soros plot”. Why aren’t these to hospitalized, or at least under arrest?
February 12th, 2009 at 11:17 amOh I C WUT HE DID THAR… He took a Steinem quote that wasn’t funny 30 years ago and reversed it for teh lulz…
FAIL!
(Jonah Goldberg reduces my intellectual capacity to LOLCats levels)
February 12th, 2009 at 11:19 amBut it’s interesting to me that these left-wingers, who — who didn’t say a word when their fellow left-wingers called George Bush a moron, when they called Dick Cheney a fascist, when they called Sarah Palin a racist, and when they threw Oreo cookies at Michael Steele because he had the nerve to be a conservative black man. They didn’t say a word about all of that.
So? George Bush IS a moron, Dick Cheney IS a fascist, and Sarah Palin IS a racist, and we’re throwing cookies at Michael Steele cause that scrawny dude needs to eat something.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:20 amNEXT UP ON FOX!!!
SOROS, MOORE, AND HELEN THOMAS CAUGHT ON TAPE PLOTTING NEXT ATTACK IN WAR ON CHRISTMAS!!! WHO’S NEXT ON THEIR HIT LIST? THE EASTER BUNNY?
February 12th, 2009 at 11:20 amGoldberg and O’Reiley…a couple of partisan hack entertainers, jealously knocking one of the true journalists left in America. Personally, I think if given the opportunity Ms. Thomas could kick both of their pathetic @sses up and down the halls of FAUX Snooze. Now THER is a slamdown I would pay money to watch!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:20 amTHER s/b THERE (natch)
February 12th, 2009 at 11:20 am“Screw them. Screw them. They are unimportant people. They are on important people who shouldn’t be taken seriously.”
- classic projection.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:21 amoh….bernard goldberg… I guess maybe neocon goldbergs are my kryptonite.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:21 amIf you’re espousing to be serious journalists (Fox), isn’t it bad form to talk shit about an elder colleague? I mean, someone who’s credentials and experience are pretty much undisputed (Helen)?
Isn’t this in violation of the old adage, “Don’t shit where you eat.”????
Just asking….
February 12th, 2009 at 11:22 amGoldberg: But it’s interesting to me that these left-wingers, who — who didn’t say a word when their fellow left-wingers called George Bush a moron, when they called Dick Cheney a fascist, when they called Sarah Palin a racist, and when they threw Oreo cookies at Michael Steele because he had the nerve to be a conservative black man. They didn’t say a word about all of that.
Point one: Bush IS a moron.
Point two: Cheney IS a fascist.
Point three: I don’t recall anyone calling Sarah Palin a racist.
Point four: No one ever threw Oreo cookies at Michael Steele. This is a conservative urban myth.
Point five: Goldberg would like all of us to take responsibility for the statements of individuals who profess to be liberals. Can we then tag him with responsibility for Jim D. Adkisson?
After all, Adkisson identified Goldberg as an inspiration in his manifesto.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:22 amdeebaser,
“Is Goldberg just making stuff up?” – that would be – yes.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:23 amO’Reilly aka “Bill O The Clown” has sunk to an all new low! WTF you pasty faced MF – leave Ms. Helen alone! These guys are so full of themselves! Humorless idiots equal Goldberg and O’Reilly!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:23 amDammit HTH! It used to be TRoS who kept gettin’ the drop on me. Now I gotta keep an eye on you too?
February 12th, 2009 at 11:24 amAlso, one correction; HTH just called Sarah Palin a racist, so I am forced to withdraw Point three.
The rest of it stands, however.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:24 amThe anti-Feminism of the Fascists is as reactionary and destructive as its anti-parliamentarism. It is an attempt by appeals to unthinking prejudice to catch the ear of the unemployed man
February 12th, 2009 at 11:27 amperhaps the creationists and intelligent designers are on to something. Humans and dinosaurs did coexist! We coexist with them to this day!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:27 amWell, I run to the rock just to hide my face
And the rocks cried out, no hiding place
There’s no hiding place down here
the right wing is running scared
February 12th, 2009 at 11:28 amWhere does fox find these neanderthal losers?
Billo and the dimwit can only hope to amass a life as interesting and successful as Helen Thomas. Why would women even watch these clowns.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:31 amWe need to ignore these GOPWarpigs.
They are irrelevent!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:31 amLividLib Says:
perhaps the creationists and intelligent designers are on to something. Humans and dinosaurs did coexist! We coexist with them to this day!
February 12th, 2009 at 11:27 am
__________
There’s just never a good iron-based meteor around when you need it.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:35 amThe witch he refers to was Glenda wasn’t it. I think the wicked witch was of the West or texas.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:37 amYeah – stop picking on poor old Helen Thomas…
But what did she mean by calling the Taliban and Al Qaeda “so-called terrorists” – huh?
News Flash – they ARE terrorists Helen.
She may not be a pinhead – but that comment was pin-headed.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:38 amGoldberg: But it’s interesting to me that these left-wingers, who — who didn’t say a word when their fellow left-wingers called George Bush a moron, when they called Dick Cheney a fascist, when they called Sarah Palin a racist, and when they threw Oreo cookies at Michael Steele because he had the nerve to be a conservative black man. They didn’t say a word about all of that.
Missed the point entirely, Goldberg, didn’t you? Not one of these was based on their appearance, like BOR’s comments were. And the Steele thing never happened. All of the things that Goldberg lists are “Observable Facts” based on actions, not superficial appearances.
If Goldberg wanted to make an equivalent point, he should have criticized the people that liked Palin as a candidate because she was “HOT” looking… oh, wait, that was mostly Republicans… can’t criticize the Repubs….
February 12th, 2009 at 11:39 amGoldberg would know something about being humorless.
Sheesh.
Hey, Ralph, sorry I missed the real-time whipping of that new wingnut yesterday. Have to say though, the number of rookie mistakes from young Tom was pretty embarrassing.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:40 amFred Says:
Fox News host Bill O’Reilly mocked her by comparing her to “the Wicked Witch of the East.”
The witch he refers to was Glenda wasn’t it. I think the wicked witch was of the West or texas.
Glinda, the good which, was from the North. The house that Dorothy Flew dropped on the Wicked Witch of the West’s sister, who was the wicked witch of the east, but one never actually see anything of her except her shoes… if I remember the Wizard of Oz correctly.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:42 amNews Flash – they ARE terrorists Helen.
—
I’ll bet they feel they are freedom fighters. You know sort of like those Contras.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:43 amTrace, we have to talk about this concept of “absolute fact” you seem to carry around…
See, what you just said there? That’s your opinion.
Insisting it’s “absolute fact” doesn’t change that. See what I’m saying? The difference between “opinion” and “fact”?
Opinion is subjective, meaning that it is true for you but may not be true for others.
Fact is objective, meaning it is true in an objective, deterministic world. A Fact is true across the Reality-Based Communty™, while opinion is personal.
Let’s stop there for now and if you can get this one small thing down, maybe we can move on to the next step in your slow evolution as a thinker.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:43 amdbadass,
Yeah – I remember the Contras crashing planes into office buildings in downtown Moscow because the Soviets were supporting Ortega’s troops.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:46 amDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
But what did she mean by calling the Taliban and Al Qaeda “so-called terrorists” – huh?
News Flash – they ARE terrorists Helen.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:38 am
_____________
Only until we start bribing them.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:46 amOy. Way to miss the point of the thread, TiredTread.
O’Reilly displayed his lack of respect for women and for his elders (and betters) and then he brought on his drinking buddy Bernie to yuck it up about how “feminists” should lighten up and not get so bent out of shape every time some pinhead calls them a witch.
I see you’re taking that commitment to “serious debate” as far you’re able.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:46 am…..and The Planet needs conservatives as much as a global volcanic erruption.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:47 amGive me a break !
Folks, TiredTread has bestowed upon us a clear definition for “terrorist”.
It refers to those who crash planes into buildings, and no one else, apparently.
So suicide bombers in Israel — not terrorists. Car bombers in Baghdad — not terrorists.
And Jim Adkisson, the Knoxville church shooter who specifically targeted liberals — not a terrorist.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:50 amLibertyLover Says:
So, if you are correct, and I bow to your knowledge on the issue then that means that after all of these years oliely finally got one thing right…….that’s a milestone for him.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:51 amIf the terrorists were truly freedom-fighters, they would be attacking the oppressive despots that run their own countries – better yet, they would throw off the shackles of the Franco-Anglo created nations that were drawn up by the same Colonial-minded folks we revolted against 233 years ago.
Maybe we’d even lend them a hand.
But instead, they project their problems onto the US and Israel because we are “infidels” i.e. non-Muslim.
They won’t go after their own “leaders” because they know they will be given the same treatment they dish out – beheadings, public execution, etc. – easier to go after the US and get their day in court.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:52 amDontTreadOnMe2009
February 12th, 2009 at 11:52 amI take it that you piss the subjective nature of the term “terrorist” Did not the king feel the nonloyalist colonists “terrorists”
DontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
Yeah – I remember the Contras crashing planes into office buildings in downtown Moscow because the Soviets were supporting Ortega’s troops.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:46 am
___________
Hijacking airplanes isn’t the ONLY method of terrorism, you know. Indiscriminately kidnapping and torturing and raping and executing civilians – all atrocities reported by Human Rights Watch as being committed by the Contras – are also acts of terrorism.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:53 amralph – that statment was a comparative one – not exculsionary by any stretch…
your examples are terrorism as well.
Anyone who intentionally attacks innocent civilians for political gain, or revenge even would qualify in my book.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:53 amSo if you’re saying that what qualifies one to be a terrorist is flying a plane into a building there are no terrorists, they’re all dead.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:53 amBut instead, they project their problems onto the US and Israel because we are “infidels” i.e. non-Muslim.
—
February 12th, 2009 at 11:54 amI don’t suppose it would have anything to do with their perception of our historical foreign policy decisions in the region…
ralph – I thought he called her a witch because of her pinhead comment about “so-called terrorists”
This piece was a reaction to the reaction – I was trying to get at the root.
And since when did you regressives get so sensitive? RepubsHateFacts can out spew Uncle Bernie any day.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:56 amDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
But instead, they project their problems onto the US and Israel because we are “infidels” i.e. non-Muslim.
They won’t go after their own “leaders” because they know they will be given the same treatment they dish out – beheadings, public execution, etc. – easier to go after the US and get their day in court.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:52 am
___________
The vast majority of terrorist attacks DO happen against the leaders of these countries, which is why they tend to occur in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, etc. It’s a rarity that terrorist groups will cross borders – let alone oceans – and attack another state.
It’s certainly not easier to go after the US, and it’s damn near impossible for them to get their day in court, as the folks at GITMO will attest.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:57 am.
Sexism…
… A defining characteristic.
.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:57 amThere has never been any confirmation from contemporaneous witnesses that Oreos were thrown at Steele. Building maintenance and security deny knowledge of any such problem. That never stopped Steele’s supporters from maintining that “the air was thick with them.” I wish ALL conservatives would bring up the Phantom Oreo Cookie issue as often as possible, like every five minutes. Steele has been running from it for a long time now. If they screw up badlly enough, they may just force him to comment publicly.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:57 amIt’s absolutely my opinion. But I didn’t say it was “absolute fact” now, did I?
I’m perfectly qualified to express my opinion. In fact, I’m better qualified than anyone else to do so. Now, if I go and overstep my bounds and try to claim that my opinion is “absolute fact”, then you’ll have some room to criticize — as long as you cease expressing your opinion as “absolute fact”.
Glad we got this straight, T_5.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:58 amDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
Anyone who intentionally attacks innocent civilians for political gain, or revenge even would qualify in my book.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:53 am
________
Good! So you agree, then, that George Bush and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are terrorists, then, since they attacked innocent civilians in Iraq for political gain AND revenge.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:58 amhhmmmmm, now why would orally fear helen thomas soo much? could it be that dildo’s fragile ego knows he’s a mere flash in the pan journalistic joke being shown up by a career journalist who’s also an american icon? orally is a pathetic turd.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:59 amYou don’t mess with Helen Thomas, get it? Now STFU.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:59 amThen, by your own definition, the example that dbadass provided of the Contras fits that term, despite what you tried to claim.
February 12th, 2009 at 11:59 amWow, picking on Helen Thomas, way to step your game Bill O. What question did Bill ask at the press conference? Or, did he not attend?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:00 pmDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
“And since when did you regressives get so sensitive? ”
but mention angry trannie annie coulter was born with a cocknballs and watch him scream.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:00 pmThe folks in Gitmo WILL have their day in court – you watch – Obama promised…
And yes – we ARE complicit in the support of the despots and deserve the wrath of muslim world – I think it’s time that we remedy that and support liberty and freedoms in those nations – unfortunately those “nations” are the artificial creation of Western Europeans and that is at the root of the conflict as well.
But if they choose to intentionally target innocent civilians – they are a terrorist – and so is anyone else who does, for whatever reason, ideology or religious belief.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:01 pmBullshit. You were trying to excuse the sexist comment.
O’Reilly would not have called David Gregory a “wicked witch”.
Um… you guysare the regressives. Nice try at Orwellian Newspeak. Do you guys have like a Learning Annex course that teaches you these techniques?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:01 pmTOO LATE> Most of them are near death or insanity from the treatment they’ve endured. Idiot.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:02 pmHere treadless:
H/T Max-1 link on ThinkFast.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:06 pmand so is anyone else who does, for whatever reason, ideology or religious belief.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:06 pm—
So it seems we are in agreement then that the Contras were terrorists? She that goofy jellybean guy wanted me to believe otherwise…
Nah Bozo – I don’t like Coulter either… but calling her names is ok but Ms. Thomas is off limits? explain, plz…
First the Contras were not a unified military body – they were a bunch of rag-tag gangs glued together by the CIA – but yes, in those instances when one gang or another purposely targeted innocent civilians – yep, that was terrorism.
And yes, King George thought the colonialists were terrorists, but I don’t recall any direct, intentional attacks on Loyalist civilians…
February 12th, 2009 at 12:06 pmSo Tracy, are you going to defend Dick Cheney now?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:07 pmTracy__5 Says:
You said Cheney IS a fascist. In all caps no less. You aren’t going to attempt to pull a Clinton are you?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:03 pm
___________
That is an absolute fact.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:07 pmTracy__5 Says:
You said Cheney IS a fascist. In all caps no less. You aren’t going to attempt to pull a Clinton are you?
_________
And what… come on your prom dress?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:07 pmhussein toasterhead Says:
“Good! So you agree, then, that George Bush and Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are terrorists, then, since they attacked innocent civilians in Iraq for political gain AND revenge.”
I’m sure retread will also agree that the Bush Administration’s concerted media propoganda efforts and constant scare tactics employed to keep American citizens in line with his agenda and for continued political gains in his conquest of a permanent majority would also fit his definition of terrorism as well.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:08 pmI’ll type this slowly for you, Tracist:
you said “it’s an absolute fact that they are unimportant” (emphasis mine)
See the problem here? You attested to this opinion being an “absolute fact”.
THAT’S what makes it wrong-headed.
Please show me where I said that it was an ‘absolute fact” that Cheney is a fascist?
Generally, a reader who has a sophisticated understanding of the English language in its contemporary state would recognize when someone states an opinion in a forceful way, as opposed to when they’re trying to assert an ‘absolute fact”. I understand that you’re not one of these readers, and I don’t expect you to be. That’s why I’m trying to help you out here, so you’ll make less of a fool of yourself next time.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:08 pmTreadboy, how do the detainees, dead at the hands of torturers directed by Donald Rumsfeld, get their day in court? I’ll wait.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:09 pmReichWingers don’t understand why people think they are racists and sexist pigs…
…they think it is just other people not understanding what they are trying to say.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:09 pmBeavis and Butthead are really showing their age, huh folks?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:09 pmso tell me Ralphie boy,
Why is calling Helen Thomas sexist, but calling Coulter a Tranny isn’t?
Your argument has apparently looped back on itself.
And YES – radical wingnut that blow up abortion clinics or churches ARE terrorists!!!!
February 12th, 2009 at 12:10 pmralph the wonder llama Says:
Dammit HTH! It used to be TRoS who kept gettin’ the drop on me. Now I gotta keep an eye on you too?
___________
Teehee!!! Tag team, ralphie… we gonna tag team ya!
February 12th, 2009 at 12:10 pmIn an actual conservative country, Bill O’Reilly would be called out in the street as a dishonorable blakguard and either challenged to a duel or thrashed in public.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:10 pmBut while ol’ Bill constantly pumps for conservative mythology, he comfortably takes advantage of the liberal loosening of strictures to sit in his sheltered hole and do things a 19th century gentleman would get a rapier through the heart for.
“Tracy&Tread” – wasn’t that a buddy action movie with Stallone and Swayze?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pmSo, Ralph – we could say that you are an uneducation, pathetic, indigent, toothless moron…
as long as it is an opinion?
More regressive double-speak if you ask me.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pmOh that’s cute. The troll has a crush. How long have you been a stalker bennie?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pmDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
dbadass,
Yeah – I remember the Contras crashing planes into office buildings in downtown Moscow because the Soviets were supporting Ortega’s troops.
_____________
WTF? This is just plain silly.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:12 pmBecause Annie is a Tranny. And that’s a fact. If not trans-gender, trans-human.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:13 pmDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
So, Ralph – we could say that you are an UNEDUCATION…
__________
Hmmm… tap… tap… got irony?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:14 pmYour argument has apparently looped back on itself.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:14 pm—-
You mean like your terrorist thing?
Sorry baldtread, double-speak is a conservative thing. That’s a fact.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:15 pmNo dbadass – I have no problem calling a terrorist a terrorist whatever their stripes…
Apparently Ms Thomas does…
And nobody here will dispute her wrong-headed comment.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:16 pmSorry Shayne – the sword cuts both ways…
February 12th, 2009 at 12:16 pmThe day Helen Thomas says that grieving widows enjoy their husband’s deaths, or “jokes” about poisoning a Supreme Court justice, then you can have a field day with her.
Or maybe if Helen Thomas is someday quoted as saying, “Press passes can’t be that hard to come by if the White House allows that old tranny Annie Coulter to sit within yards of the President,” you’ll have leave to call her vile names.
But as long as she’s just doing her job, holding presidents accountable (including Obama, by the way) then you just look like a mean-spirited bully.
kinda like Bill.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:17 pmFlag TreadtheStupidTroll folks – Off topic, trolling
February 12th, 2009 at 12:17 pmShe didn’t say they WERE NOT terrorists.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:19 pmSorry but I don’t have a “sword”. And I’m guessing what you have is a pocket knife at best.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:19 pmHey ecto,
Did ya notice the Stimulus Conference Committee had no women on it?
They shoulda stuck with quotas – then everyone would have been represented
February 12th, 2009 at 12:20 pmWell said ralph!
February 12th, 2009 at 12:20 pmOf course you could say it. And others who happened to hear or read those words would evaluate them in terms of what they know about me and how closely that opinion aligns with their vision of reality.
And they would then judge the value of the opinions of the speaker in that light.
I’m perfectly comfortable with that.
Y’know, it really shows a lack of imagination when you can’t even think up your own epithet for the other side, and have to steal ours for you. It’s kinda pathetic.
In my opinion.
And no one asked you.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:21 pmThese people are beyond ugly.
Imagine being afraid of a 4′9″ 89 year old woman. What a bunch of pussies they are.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:21 pmBillo is just jealous the she has more journalistic integrity in her little toe than he has period.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:21 pmNo dbadass – I have no problem calling a terrorist a terrorist whatever their stripes…
—-
February 12th, 2009 at 12:22 pmThen how do you explain #39?
I think you two are saying the same thing, Shayne. “Regressive” and “conservative” being essentially synonyms, after all.
Hey! Common ground achieved!
February 12th, 2009 at 12:22 pmBuckie – why don’t you try reading my posts?
so what connotation does “so-called” mean to you???
she might as well have said “alleged terrorists” – so I guess we need to go arrest them, bring them back here and have the resurrected Johnny Cochran defend them before we can call them terrorists?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:23 pmdbadass – explained it at 49
February 12th, 2009 at 12:24 pmCoulter uses the same vile rhetoric that you want to use on a respectble journalist….one of only a handfull left in this country.
Comparing coulter to Helen is very offensive. You should be very ashamed off yourself.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:24 pmHas anybody noticed that the right-wing calls Helen Thomas old, refers to her as the “Wicked Witch of the East”, and they fling assorted other names and taunts — yet nobody has any legitimate criticism of how she does her job?
Yes, we’ve called Bush, Cheney, and Palin a variety of names, too — I admit it. But it’s always been accompanied by legitimate criticism of specific actions they have taken, not just for the sake of meanness (I don’t remember the Oreo cookies flung at Steele — perhaps I missed that).
When your criticism is comprised solely of playground taunts, I’d say you’ve lost your argument.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:24 pmSo they’re terrorists because YOU say they are. Oh no, because they’re brown people.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:25 pmSteele recently admitted the Oreo cookie allegeations we’re fake.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:25 pmOK Molly, here ya go…
Helen Thomas is a pinhead because she apparently doesn’t think Al Qaeda members hiding in Pakistan are terrorists.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pmdbadass – explained it at 49
—
February 12th, 2009 at 12:28 pmSo you would say allowed on these pages that Reagan was wrong and a supporter of terrorists. Is that correct?
You didn’t miss a thing, missmolly – it never happened.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:28 pmShayne,
Your expectation that my thinking is so one-dimensionally racist show how one-dimensionally prejudiced your thinking actually is.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:29 pmYou can prove that allegation, right?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:29 pmAloud not allowed. Damn, my multitasking sucks
February 12th, 2009 at 12:30 pmYeah – I never heard about the Oreo thing either – guess I’m not getting that Tard I.V. you all expect I was hooked up to, eh?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:31 pmActually, TiredTread, Shayne offered TWO explanations for your conclusion. Therefore she has at least a two-dimensional “expectation for your thinking”, whatever that means.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:31 pmTracy__5 Says:
“- classic projection.”
But it’s an absolute fact that they are unimportant.
Wow, for the first time I agree with something that Tracy the idiot troll says. Billo and Goldberg and their ilk are unimportant and that’s a fact.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:31 pmdbadass,
I wouldn’t say Reagan was a terrorist – I would say the CIA funded a number of gangs and some of those gangs engaged in terrorism. And when that was discovered their funding should have been cut off in favor of those who were actually engaged in combat with Ortega’s troops.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:33 pmDontTreadOnMe2009 Says
February 12th, 2009 at 12:26 pm
OK Molly, here ya go…
Helen Thomas is a pinhead because she apparently doesn’t think Al Qaeda members hiding in Pakistan are terrorists.
___________________________________________________________
Link, please? And make it from a credible site — not one of the wingnut blogs where most of the stuff is either made up or spun in a fanciful manner.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:34 pmI didn’t say he was a terrorist. I asked if he supported terrorists. So yes or no and if yes it strikes me as immoral. What do you think?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:36 pmYes, I can prove that the venerable Ms Thomas called the Al Qaeda members hiding in Pakistan “so-called terrorists”
Didn’t ya watch the news-con?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:36 pmralph the wonder llama Says:
DontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
OK Molly, here ya go…
Helen Thomas is a pinhead because she apparently doesn’t think Al Qaeda members hiding in Pakistan are terrorists.
You can prove that allegation, right?
Actually Helen Thomas did refer to them as “so-called” terrorists, and I’m not exactly sure why she did that because it would lead people to think that she doesn’t view AQ and the Taliban as terrorists.
I think it was a boneheaded move by Thomas, but it certainly did not deserve the demeaning treatment Billo the Clown and his ilk have heaped on Thomas.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:37 pmReally, I’m still waiting for you to explain how the dead detainees from Gitmo are going to have their day in court. I asked you way back at #70.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:37 pmmore lies parading as fact…..prove it or admit you are just a run of the mill liar.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:38 pmOh sure, but you’re not a racist. I am pretty sure that if Reagan was a brown man from a mid-east country you’d say he was a terrorist.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:39 pmBilbo –
I agree – it was a pin-headed comment – but she is not a witch.
But he does have the right to say what he wants.
As much as RepubHateFacts has the right to call me all the names he wants.
So let’s get over it and get on with fixing this economy and raising our standing in the world, yeah?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:39 pmShayne,
Obviously I was referring to the detainees who are still alive.
How many have died by the way – link please?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:39 pmDontTreadOnMe2009 Says:
Yes, I can prove that the venerable Ms Thomas called the Al Qaeda members hiding in Pakistan “so-called terrorists”
February 12th, 2009 at 12:36 pm
_____________
And what’s wrong with that? They’re called terrorists by some people, but not others. And the United States has a long history of picking and choosing who we call terrorists versus who we call freedom fighters, despite the fact that their tactics and atrocities are often quite similar.
Hence “so-called.”
February 12th, 2009 at 12:39 pmBill — stop hurting America, and Helen Thomas, a national treasure.
STFU, Bill, really.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:40 pmYou know what she said but you don’t know what she thinks. That’s a fact.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:41 pmShayne,
Your weak attempts at branding me a racist tell me that perhaps you have not come to terms with some internal racist tendencies you have.
A good therapist can help with that.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:42 pmAs do we.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:43 pmUntil you do, and from a reputable source, you have relegated yourself the rhealm of lying liar. Now that you have claimed that you can prove it then you abolutly must or wear the brand of liar……your choice.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:43 pmhttp://pubrecord.org/torture/677-declassified-dod-documents-suggest-detainees-were-tortured-to-death.html
February 12th, 2009 at 12:44 pmThat link is for you tread. You think I’m the racists that needs a therapist. That’s funny. Want to take a vote?
February 12th, 2009 at 12:46 pmrepugs like idiots are talking about a woman who is an shining example of US history.
The truth, honesty and fair play aren’t just liberal concepts repugs.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:47 pmBesides retread why are you right wingers so sensitive about being called racists. I thought it was a badge of honor among your people.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:48 pmMan. That was a really weak attempt.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:48 pmReally ralph I don’t know how to relate to people who are in such denial.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:49 pmDontTreadOnMe2009,
interesting “manifesto” you got there, tread.
anything else you’d like to say before
they lock you up and throw away the key?
• • •
February 12th, 2009 at 12:56 pmIt looks like he went away jc.
February 12th, 2009 at 12:57 pmShayne Says:
It looks like he went away jc.
*
back to solitary.
to work on the “manifesto”.
*
February 12th, 2009 at 1:01 pmfox news producer busted.
well at least he’s not a
“humorless feminist”.
^
February 12th, 2009 at 1:08 pmhttp://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2009/0210093foxnews1.html,
shouldn’t you be calling a lawyer?
*
February 12th, 2009 at 1:16 pmtracy…?
:)
February 12th, 2009 at 1:17 pmTracy__5 Says:
t5, you think you are what, the voice of reason? Seriously dude, defending the indefensible is not noble…..it’s pathetic.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:17 pmFred Says:
Tracy__5 Says:
t5, you think you are what, the voice of reason? Seriously dude, defending the indefensible is not noble…..it’s pathetic.
*
tracy should have a lawyer
to defend him.
* * *
February 12th, 2009 at 1:18 pmOh, this is hood. Tracist thinks he’s caught me in a hypocritical statement.
Only problem is… see at the top of each comment, Trace? Where it says “so-and-so Says:”
That identifies the TP poster who made the comment.
Now go check whose name appears at the top of the comment you cited. Go ahead, look. We’ll wait…
(ralph hums, opens a Pepsi, checks watch)
Back already? Whew, that was fast, Trace! I bet you’re the fastest kid in your grade.
Now, what did it say?
… feeling pretty stupid about now, aren’t ya, Trace?
Not to worry. We don’t think any less of you. Now run along.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:22 pmMy bad — should have been “Oh, this is a hoot”.
No racist implication intended. Sorry, Tracist.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:24 pmTracy__5 Says:
“Billo and Goldberg and their ilk are unimportant and that’s a fact.”
But they are more important that anyone here at TP or you and that’s a fact.
trace,
you’ll need a link for that “fact”
here.
*
February 12th, 2009 at 1:27 pmMost intelligent people acknowledge that the blogospehere and the internet played the deciding hand in the elections……
You are probably wrong, huh? Why am I not just shocked….seriously?
February 12th, 2009 at 1:28 pmTrace… don’t you have something to say to me…?
February 12th, 2009 at 1:29 pmRepubliscum: a touch of crass.
We need repugs like Darryl needs testes.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:31 pmWe’re not here to prove anything to you t5 unit. We are here to debunk your irrational claims…..it’s fairly easy.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:31 pmA civilized, rational, credible person would admit when they are wrong. You need to come clean with Ralph or, well I was going to say it would lower our opinion of you but……
February 12th, 2009 at 1:33 pmI’m not even sure what this is supposed to mean.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:35 pmThat’s all you have to say? No acknowledgment that your transparent charge of hypocrisy fell flat because you confused my post with Husseintoasterhead’s?
I mean, come on, Trace — that’s pretty embarrassing. You’ve got to be embarrassed right about now.
Of course, embarrassment is a function of self-respect. Maybe I shouldn’t assume that you have any.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:38 pmTracy__5 Says:
So far my claim hasn’t been debunked much less challenged….at least by someone serious.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
__________
Speaking of debunking your moronic claims, I just SCHOOLED you in the Darwin thread. Just fyi.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:41 pmLet’s review, shall we?
HTH was the author of post #75 (as noted by Tracist).
ralph the wonder llama was the author of post #78 (not recognized by Tracist).
Can everyone see the problem with Tracist’s proposition here?
February 12th, 2009 at 1:42 pmWe’ve only claimed it was our opinion. Our task is to prove that you are wrong for defending the indefensible……not your stupid claim that he is not a fasist.
We have done that about 40 times but you seem to have a learning disability.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:44 pmwell, I’m not sure what “ones Goldberg was referring to” means, either.
But I can guess that you’re implying that I’m not that bright.
You could be right — perhaps your statement is conceptually beyond my capacity for understanding it.
Or perhaps, since it doesn’t really follow strictly the rules of contemporary English grammar, your statement is at fault.
Something to consider.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:45 pmt5, willfully ignorant and proud of it. Didn’t we just have a national leader with the same charactor flaws?
February 12th, 2009 at 1:46 pmis trace glenn beck?
look deep inside…
compelling video evidence here.
* * *
February 12th, 2009 at 1:47 pmHey Ralph, the rabid dog thinks he smells blood when it’s just his own rabid foam he smells.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:48 pmNot sure what I have to “defend”. I stated my opinion in a strong fashion. I did not explicitly state that is was an ‘absolute fact” as you did with your opinion. I think I’m on pretty strong ground there.
You, however, made the embarrassing mistake of claiming that the author of post #75 contradicted himself in post #78, even though the two posts were written by different people.
It’s looking more and more like you don’t have any self-respect. This would hardly come as a surprise to anyone here.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:49 pmFred, I think you’re on to something. I’m just not sure that what he smells is rabid foam.
That’s certainly not what I can smell when he’s around, I’ll tell you that much.
February 12th, 2009 at 1:50 pmAnd you STILL haven’t shown me where I stated it was absolute fact (to use your own quaint phrase).
Give it up Trace. You’re only embarrassing yourself further with each post.
Although, maybe from your perspective you’re thinking, “how much worse could it get?”
February 12th, 2009 at 1:53 pmYou skipped my point about your sentence failing to follow accepted rules of English grammar.
But by the looks of this follow-up, perhaps that’s because you don’t KNOW the accepted rules of English grammar.
For instance, what does “you are so vain that you don’t your are a part of the “unimportant people” eventhough you are” mean, in plain English?
February 12th, 2009 at 1:57 pmSo, Trace, is it your position that whenever someone makes a simple statement of “A is B”, this is to be taken as an assertion of “absolute fact”?
Is it not possible that one could state “A is B” as an opinion, without identifying it as such?
“I think I’m on pretty strong ground there.”
Uh, not you aren’t. You are trying to do the same thing that everyone saw right thru when Clinton tried it.
So, Trace, if you say “It’s cold out” but Sarah Palin thinks you’re nuts because she just came from Juneau where it was -5, and it’s only 35 in Traceytown, can see slam you for stating something ridiculous as ‘absolute fact” or could you claim that it was your opinion that 35 is cold because you weren’t in Juneau?
It’s always fun to watch those who are deadly certain of uncertainties try to argue their cases simply insisting that it’s certain.
I do have to give you credit for today’s Most Imaginative Application of “Clinton Did It™”.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:06 pmTracy__5 Says
Do you have OCD? Let it go, you lost. Your logic is flawed and you can’t let it go….
February 12th, 2009 at 2:06 pm14 Points of fascism: The warning signs
Here Tracy, really we’re tired of doing all your work for you but maybe this will help.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:10 pmTracist, I understand what “is” means.
I also understand how language works.
I recognize that when someone says something is an “absolute fact”, that is supposed to mean something specific.
If saying “A is B” is the same thing as saying “A is B and that’s an absolute fact”, then why would anyone ever need to say “and that’s an absolute fact”? Why did you feel the need to type it as part of your declarative? (And mistakenly, as it turned out.)
February 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pmdesperation means you lose, invoking the “Clinton did it” meme is desperation.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pmTracist, when did I ever declare myself to be important?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:11 pmOh, I see. I understand writing a lot better when all the words are there.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:12 pmTo all you kids who don’t know how the “feminists have no sense of humor” meme got started—Susan Brownmiller, in a press meeting addressing her groundbreaking book on rape said, “Rape isn’t funny.”
Ha ha ha—-isn’t that hilarious—feminists have no sense of humor. ah ha ha ha
Pigs.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:14 pmTracy__5 Says:
No and yes you would have to identify it as such or at the least offer evidence to back up your assertion.
___________
Goody… let’s make sure we hold Faux to THAT standard…
February 12th, 2009 at 2:20 pmThe Republic of Stupidity Says:
Goody… let’s make sure we hold Faux to THAT standard…
__________
Ooops… silly me. Faux has already gone to court and won the RIGHT TO DELIBERATELY LIE and call it “news”. Heh… my bad.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:23 pmWhy? What makes you think we care what you think?
You come here and literally drop trow and show yer ass for hours and then want us to care what you think? Really?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:23 pmWhy is that important to you?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:26 pmDid you mean enunciate? I make as many typos as the next person but when you’re so busy acting superior you should really spell check.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:26 pmI guess you do get paid a nickel a post.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:30 pmYou’re just spamming now Tracy, you’re going to be #6 pretty soon.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:30 pmWell, at least you save some of that wasted time by leaving out the odd word here and there, or by using the wrong word and not proof-reading. that must save you a ton of time.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:30 pmTracy__5 Says:
“Oh, I see. I understand writing a lot better when all the words are there.”
I just wish I didn’t have to waste time by having annunciate on things that you should be able to figure out prior.
* * *
too much caffeine?
too much red bull?
trace…?
*
February 12th, 2009 at 2:31 pmCan you explain how my ability to vote makes it important to you?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:32 pmNah, he’s given up on the higher numbers thing. Now he’s just adding an extra underscore between “Tracy” and “5″.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:33 pmTracy__5 Says:
#214
“Why is that important to you?”
You guys actually get to vote!!
February 12th, 2009 at 2:28 pm Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
Tracy__5 Says:
#214
“Why is that important to you?”
Because you guys actually get to vote!!
*
so you’re finally learning about democracy?
good for you, trace. share it.
^
February 12th, 2009 at 2:33 pmTracy__5 Says:
And MSNBC and most of all TP.
________
uh… refresh my memory… when did MSNBC and TP sue in court for the right to lie and WIN?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:34 pmt5, get a nintendo or a guitar. We usually send the kids outside to play if the weather is nice….beat it.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:37 pmTracy__5 Says:
I know you guys don’t care but as far as I am concerned, you guys are here strictly for my entertainment.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
__________
Oh really? Well I just entertained your ass back to the Lower Paleolithic age in the Darwin thread.
How come you’re not responding? Cause you’re too chicken, or cause you’re just out of drivel?
I’m gonna say both.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:37 pmWell, if it were directed to a serious individual it might be, but it’s directed to you, so no.
But I’d still like to know — how exactly does my ability to vote make it critical for you to confirm my lack of importance?
Do you think that information will affect my vote in any way?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:37 pmralph the wonder llama Says:
Tracist, I understand what “is” means.
I also understand how language works.
I recognize that when someone says something is an “absolute fact”, that is supposed to mean something specific.
Not to mention, that if “is” means “it’s an absolute fact” it would be redundant to write “it is an absolute fact” because “is” already means “an absolute fact”. Whew.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:39 pmHmmmm. I’m not a “humorless feminist” at all!
Heck, if I had the chance to hit either of those stupid mooks over the head with a baseball bat, I’d laugh like a loon! That’d be the funniest thing EVAH!!
February 12th, 2009 at 2:39 pmFred Says:
t5, get a nintendo or a guitar.
_________
Fred… I object to this comment. I LIKE guitars and I don’t want them demeaned like this. Now, substitute a banjo or accordion in that statement… no problemo!
February 12th, 2009 at 2:40 pmLeftside Annie Says:
Heck, if I had the chance to hit either of those stupid mooks over the head with a baseball bat, I’d laugh like a loon! That’d be the funniest thing EVAH!!
___________
I see your point. Heck… you just made me laugh… out loud ta boot!
February 12th, 2009 at 2:41 pmIt is impolite to answer a question with a question. Oops, I forgot who I was speaking to.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:41 pmFred Says:
t5, get a nintendo or a guitar. We usually send the kids outside to play if the weather is nice….beat it.
*
as long as trace is here
then we know he isn’t
harming the children.
^
February 12th, 2009 at 2:44 pmwhining and crying to moma that bubby said this or that is not dissenting opinion…..take a class after you change your diaper.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:44 pmShayne Says:
Tracy__5 Says:
#224
“Can you explain how my ability to vote makes it important to you?”
That’s a serious question?
It is impolite to answer a question with a question. Oops, I forgot who I was speaking to.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:41 pm Recommend (0) | Report Abuse
Tracy__5 Says:
#229
“uh… refresh my memory… when did MSNBC and TP sue in court for the right to lie and WIN?”
Refresh my memory which court sided with Fox?
*
right on cue.
*
February 12th, 2009 at 2:45 pmThis really is the Tracyneedsattentiondesperately thread, isn’t it?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:46 pmI know, it’s my favorite pastime…..but they make cheap ones. The problem as I see it is that even if t5 had a guitar he would think it was a planter…..his brain just aint right.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:47 pmLeftside Annie, anyone who knows you, knows you ain’t one a them humorless feminists.
God love ya!
February 12th, 2009 at 2:48 pmYeah, but I wouldn’t get near their testicles, even with Rumsfeld’s scalpel.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:53 pmTracy__5 Says:
Refresh my memory which court sided with Fox?
___________
Glad to school ya there, sonny, or ma’m, as the case may be.
http://www.relfe.com/media_can_legally_lie.html
In February 2003, a Florida Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with an assertion by FOX News that there is no rule against distorting or falsifying the news in the United States.
FOX: RIGHT TO LIE
Posted by dav at 2004 September 9 01:43 PM
File under: News
http://www.2dca.org/opinion/February%2014,%202003/2D01-529.pdf
Pretty much everyone who cares about Truth is of the opinion that FOX “News” doesn’t put much stock in it. I wasn’t aware until reading this summary of a recent court ruling that FOX had set its lawyers out to defend its right to lie to its viewers though.
During their appeal, FOX asserted that there are no written rules against distorting news in the media. They argued that, under the First Amendment, broadcasters have the right to lie or deliberately distort news reports on public airwaves. Fox attorneys did not dispute Akre’s claim that they pressured her to broadcast a false story, they simply maintained that it was their right to do so.
__________
Tomato.. tomato… (It’s a spoken thing…)
The 2nd link goes directly to the Court’s opinion.
No doubt, t5 will engage in an absolutely STUNNING display of verbal gymnastics trying to make it appear that Fox, and the Court, really didn’t come to that conclusion…
Later all… don’t beat t5 up too badly.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:53 pmI see this thread has no officially come full circle… let the celebrations commence!
Tracy__5 Says:
It was a joke!
ralph the wonder llama Says:
“What? Wha’d I say? It was just a joke!”
Standard right-wing rationalization number 4
February 12th, 2009 at 2:53 pmTracy this thread is about Helen Thomas, O’Reilly, and Goldberg, not about you.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:54 pmTracy__5 Says:
How would that be possible when either one would take it out of your hands before hand?
_________
Wow… what a razor sharp retort…
February 12th, 2009 at 2:55 pmReally, you want to volunteer your crotch just to see if she can accomplish this feat?
February 12th, 2009 at 2:55 pmWait — you didn’t SAY “this is a joke” or “this is my opinion”.
Therefore, by your own stated standards, it was intended to be read as an expression of “absolute fact”.
Right?
THanks to belac for spotting the end point in this session.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:56 pmSorry all, no=now officially in #251… I try and use the “W” key as sparingly as possible these days (it deserves a rest after being abused for 8 years) and sometimes that bites me…
February 12th, 2009 at 2:56 pmI suspected you were both these trolls since you disappeared so abrubtly this morning. Thanks for the confirmation.
February 12th, 2009 at 2:57 pmAnyone wanna bet that t5 isn’t feverishly pouring over that court doc I posted a link to, desperately hoping some way to parse it out and make it sound like it doesn’t say what it does?
When t5 reads, do it move its lips? And do it read de big words out loud, repeating them several times until it understands them?
“Ka… ka… ka-moo… ka-mmooknee-kate?”
February 12th, 2009 at 3:08 pmTracy__5 Says:
And how does the fact that you were wrong that Fox didn’t bring the suit, i.e. do the suing, prove that MSNBC and TP don’t lie on a daily basis?
_____________
HAH!!! TOLD YA SO!!!
Somebody owes me some money!!!
February 12th, 2009 at 3:09 pmThat Tracist is really quick on the draw, ain’t he?
And whut a dead-eye! He’s just like the kid from A Christmas Story with his Official Red Rider carbine-action 200-shot Range Model air rifle.
February 12th, 2009 at 3:25 pmralph the wonder llama Says:
That Tracist is really quick on the draw, ain’t he?
Tracy does have a point — why bother to respond, ever?
February 12th, 2009 at 3:33 pmTracy is taking talking points from joe the plumbre
February 12th, 2009 at 3:43 pmFred Says:
LibertyLover Says:
So, if you are correct, and I bow to your knowledge on the issue then that means that after all of these years oliely finally got one thing right…….that’s a milestone for him.
I don’t think that he is intentionally right, probably only accidentally so. But the Wicked Witch of the East did have a history of tormenting the Munchkins, which is Michelle Malkin’s job now, I think.
February 12th, 2009 at 4:05 pmThis one lady, Ms.Thomas, stood up to GWBush and for that he never asked her another question. Yeah, he tried to act tough and walk like a gunslinger but he was afraid to let Helen Thomas ask him a question. Real tough guy!
Second Point: Helen is of Lebanese descent. She does not cowtow to the Israeli strangle hold on our government. Goldberg on the other hand is a pure Zionist who will not tolerate any disention about Israel being a nuclear power.When Thomas asked Obama “What other country in the middle east has nuclear weapons?” she became open game for the “Jews are a protected species” crowd.
February 12th, 2009 at 4:14 pmWanna try that sentence again, Trace? I know grammatical precision isn’t a priority of yours, but it usually helps others understand WTF you’re trying to say.
February 12th, 2009 at 4:16 pmTrace, when you got nothin’ it’s usually best to say nothin’.
Thats what I’ve found, anyway. But, like I said, it doesn’t appear that you could do any further damage to your reputation around here, so what the hell, huh?
February 12th, 2009 at 4:17 pmDefinitely paid by the post.
February 12th, 2009 at 5:55 pmWhat are all these wing-nut obstructionist (trace5 and company) doing here beside running interference for the sexist pigs Goldberg/O’Riely? I mean, these guys are throw backs to the friggin’ Beat generation establishment types who never got it then, won’t get it now and never will in the future–
I pray these freaks of nature are not breeders because if they are, the wicked witches will have to hunt down their spawn and make them scrub with something to get that icky republican off their hands! Fayh!
Nasty! Fayh!…how many times have you kids been told not to respond to republican wing nuts who post here? They have germs! You don’t know where they’ve put their mouth and had their hands! Everybody, go wash, right now! And you wing nuts, go home! Go watch O’Reily while you get you make icky all over yourself.
February 12th, 2009 at 6:24 pmBernard Goldberg is the very definition of “disgruntled employee”. He blames liberals for his career going in the tank. He should not be presented as some kind of “neutral observer” or even a “journalist”. From now on, whenever Goldberg appears on the screen, the graphic below should say something like:
BERNARD GOLDBERG
February 12th, 2009 at 6:51 pmStill carries chip on his shoulder
The trolls certainly are having trouble tracking today. Sheesh…
February 12th, 2009 at 7:08 pmFaux News is a pile of shit! Bill O’Reilly is a pile of shit! What else can you say.
February 12th, 2009 at 7:22 pmdbearton Says:
Faux News is a pile of shit! Bill O’Reilly is a pile of shit! What else can you say.
February 12th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Sean Hannity is a pile of shit…
February 12th, 2009 at 7:27 pmGlenn Beck is a pile of shit…
You get the idea…
humorless and unserious? yet another reason why conservatives should not be allowed to speak, not to mention govern.
February 12th, 2009 at 9:08 pmHa, I will get the last word on t5……t5, you are an idiot.
February 12th, 2009 at 9:52 pmBetter hope you don’t run into me t5, at least I’m not an idiot.
By the way, you will never get the last word, ever, on any thread here. I will follow you and post a followup every time “my friend”
February 12th, 2009 at 10:25 pmWhere you at pus, I’ll come to you.
being an internet tough guy is easy, you can even pretend to be intelligent on the internet. You have never convinced anyone but you can pretend.
February 12th, 2009 at 10:54 pmbartlebee would have cleaned the floor with your weak ass.
You are systematically scared to death, a real weak wienie, a pushover that girls tease and make fun of.
February 12th, 2009 at 10:59 pmSo Tracy_5, Do you understand cladistics now?
February 13th, 2009 at 12:17 amFred, I see you are still keeping the sociopath troll_5 in line. It does have some kind of weird thing about finding dead threads to post in. Sadly, it was probably abused as a child. Hopefully it will seek the help it needs to recover.
February 13th, 2009 at 12:59 amAll this because women laugh AT Bernie, rather than WITH him.
Poor wittle limpy dick.
February 13th, 2009 at 1:07 amGREAT
sikis
April 26th, 2009 at 2:10 pmporno izle
porno videolar
porn videos