Think Progress

Ifill: The GOP Does Not Have Any ‘Breakthrough’ Candidates, They ‘Seem To Have Gone Backwards’

Last night, the Center for American Progress hosted a discussion between PBS’s Gwen Ifill and CAP President John Podesta about Ifill’s new book, “The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama.” After the event, Ifill sat down for an interview with ThinkProgress, where we asked her about the Republican party’s efforts to reach out to African-American voters.

During her talk with Podesta, Ifill said that she didn’t believe that RNC Chairman Michael Steele’s race was the motivating factor behind why Republicans elected him. In the interview, Ifill said that “they weren’t so caught up with the idea of Barack Obama being black that they were going to sacrifice their need to come back just to elect a black guy.”

“They needed someone that could articulate what the Republican brand still is,” said Ifill. “And he did that better than the other guys running for office.” Asked if she saw any “breakthrough” candidates in the Republican party, Ifill responded bluntly, “not yet”:

IFILL: In fact, we seem to have gone backwards. I mean, we used to have J.C. Watts in the House, but now there are no black Republicans in Congress. At all. That’s a step back. In order to change that direction, there has to be recruiting going on. I think there is recruiting going on at some lower levels, but they’ve got some ground to make up.

Watch it:

Former Oklahoma representative J.C. Watts, whom Ifill mentioned, retired from Congress in 2002. Since then, no African-Americans have been elected to Congress on the Republican ticket. According to Pew Research in March 2008, the share of African-Americans identifying themselves as Republican has stayed steady this past decade at around 4 percent.

Transcript:

THINK PROGRESS: Well, first of all, I was just wondering if you could follow up a little bit on your comments that you were talking about, brought up Michael Steele and you said you didn’t think he was necessarily elected because he was African-American and I was just wondering if you could follow up a little bit on that more.

IFILL: I think the Republican Party is at a point where they have to, they just lost the presidency, they lost seats in the House and the Senate, they had to figure a way to comeback. And so, they weren’t so caught up with the idea of Barack Obama being black that they were going to sacrifice their need to come back just to elect a black guy. They needed somebody that could speak for them. They needed someone that could articulate what the Republican brand still is. And he did that better than the other guys running for office. He knew how to do that. He has been reliable and he knows how to play the politics of getting elected. So I think all of that had much more to do with it than race — his race — or the party’s desire to reach out to black voters.

THINK PROGRESS: And do you see a breakthrough candidate in the GOP right now?

IFILL: Not Yet. In fact, we seem to have gone backwards. I mean, we used to have J.C. Watts in the House, but now there are no black Republicans in Congress. At all. That’s a step back. In order to change that direction, there has to be recruiting going on. I think there is recruiting going on at some lower levels, but they’ve got some ground to make up.



38 Responses to “Ifill: The GOP Does Not Have Any ‘Breakthrough’ Candidates, They ‘Seem To Have Gone Backwards’”

  1. Chuck Feney says:

    No progress?

    A. Alan Keyes
    B. Michael Steele

    I rest my case.


  2. belac says:

    That’s what embracing your ‘base’ will get you… it tends to debase your party and alienate any potential new members…

    That being said, it’s a strategy I whole heartedly support in regards to the Republicans!

    Palin/Rush 2012!!


  3. raynman says:

    Two names

    That’s progress

    Wow, set the bar high!


  4. normalasf says:

    Wait a minute! Isn’t this the hack who gave softball questions to Obama and made John McCain cry?

    /snark


  5. RandomChaos says:

    CF,
    Umm, these two are not NEW to the repugs. And I SERIOSLY doubt we will ever see any person of color from that side of the isle put forth as a presidential hopeful.


  6. RandomChaos says:

  7. normalasf says:

    Whoops! I guess she made Sarah Palin cry (it was the VP debate.)


  8. Chuck Feney says:

    Random Chaos said at #5 “CF,
    Umm, these two are not NEW to the repugs. And I SERIOSLY doubt we will ever see any person of color from that side of the isle put forth as a presidential hopeful.”

    Yeah, that is what I meant. No progress? Yep, no progress.


  9. MCMetal says:

    A FRESH BOLD….. Says:
    ——————————————————————————–

    belac Says:

    Palin/Rush 2012!!

    Finally, some sense from the belac man.
    You, Sir, are the PATRIOT OF THE DAY!!

    February 18th, 2009 at 5:16 pm

    Because that ticket is sure to insure a Democratic landslide ………..


  10. avchavis says:

    The GOP has gone backwards, especially since they listen to Rush Limbaugh, hold Gov. Palin in high esteem and have Cantor releasing all kinds of foolish, divisive ads. What non-white American would want to be a part of the GOP/Rethuglican party with their rascist supporters?!


  11. J 4 lD says:

    They’ve been backwards ever since Regean. I hope they continue in that direction perpetually.

    Hey guys, check out my new blog at http://plunditry.com


  12. krazeeinjun says:

    …but now there are no black Republicans in Congress. At all. That’s a step back. In order to change that direction, there has to be recruiting going on. I think there is recruiting going on at some lower levels, but they’ve got some ground to make up.

    I wonder if that “lower level recruiting” is using this as an incentive:

    http://www.pe.com/imagesdaily/2008/10-16/racist16_400.jpg

    Just saying . . .


  13. RUCerious says:

    Palinienation will be laughed off the campaign trail in 2011.
    Bobby Jindal will be revealed as a religious kook light weight, you know, another Huckster…

    They’ll have to come up with some fresh new turds to show off.


  14. RUCerious says:

    Great idea about Palin/Rush, but somehows I don’t see him running under a female…Too much of a mysoginist.


  15. StratRat says:

    And Cantor is starting to feel a little full of himself. He thinks he is Newtie, Jr. Anytime a GOP guy starts making noise about being the future, you can bet an indictment is close behind. The GOP. Your ever shrinking minority, sure to be microscopic very soon.


  16. fletc3her says:

    I don’t believe in quotas, but I do think that the extent to which our representation mirrors our demographics is a good indicator of how color blind our nation is becoming. By that standard, the 43 current black Senators and House members is a shadow of the 72 members our national demographics would suggest.

    If about 13 percent of America is black and 4 percent of black people are Republicans, you could still reasonably expect there to be at least one black Republican in the House or Senate. Minorities are under represented in the Republican party even for their relatively small membership in the party.

    However, the situation for women is truly bizarre. Demographics would suggest that as many as 268 Congress people might be women, but there are only 92 currently serving. Only 22 of those are Republicans!


  17. stewarjt says:

    Where was this Gwen Ifill during the Biden – Palin debate?


  18. Above the Clouds says:

    Allow me to repeat the Malcolm X statement (to paraphrase): “You can’t stab a man in the back, pull the knife half-way out and call it ‘progress.’” The GOP have nothing for America today and they had nothing before.


  19. Mathazar says:

    Perhaps we could trade Roland Burris for Olympia Snowe.


  20. tombaker says:

    WAAAAYYYYYYYYYY Backwards.

    “Reverse” is what the “R” stands for.

    “D” stands for Dollars. And Drive.

    Thanks Righties!!!

    (cha-ching)


  21. cmac says:

    We? Who’s we? Ifill’s a Republican?

    She always seemed to let an awful lot of talking points go by unchallenged during her Friday night talking-heads schmooze. I thought I was imagining it.


  22. cmac says:

    Oh, and while we’re on it, I don’t remember JC Watts being any big prize. Didn’t he call Democratic blacks race-hustling poverty pimps, or some such delightful thing?

    Seems like a jerk to me.


  23. Anacher Forester says:

    C’mon, everybody knows Gwen Ifill’s a shill for the Dems.

    -AF
    Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud


  24. woke says:

    Chuck Feney Says:
    No progress?

    A. Alan Keyes
    B. Michael Steele

    I rest my case.

    Uh, tell us what offices these gentlemen were ELECTED to as Republicans and for how long?

    Case closed, like your mind apparently, eh?


  25. woke says:

    Apologize if I missed your sarcasm, Chuck. LOL


  26. maxamillion says:

    Republicans had better hire a better recruiting coordinator. I don’t see ANY new african americans moving their way anytime soon.


  27. katy says:

    OT – but the headlines at googlenews caught my interest…
    it’s back, again:

    White House: Obama Opposes ‘Fairness Doctrine’ Revival
    FOXNews – 3 hours ago
    A White House spokesman tells FOXNews.com President Obama opposes any move to bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine. President Obama opposes any move …

    Obama Restates Opposition to Return of Fairness Doctrine
    Broadcasting & Cable, NY – 43 minutes ago
    By John Eggerton — Broadcasting & Cable, 2/18/2009 2:49:01 PM MT A White House spokesperson, in an e-mail to B&C, said Wednesday: “As the President stated …

    http://news.google.com/?ncl=1304253416&hl=en&topic=h

    check out all the FOX links… they are really worried…


  28. Chuck Feney says:

    woke wrote “Apologize if I missed your sarcasm, Chuck. LOL”

    Apology accepted. My bad for not making the sarcasm more clear.


  29. dbadass says:

    A FRESH BOLD:
    Drudge’s hat is stupid…


  30. wiley says:

    The party of pointy white hats need a lot more than black candidates to win a black constituency.


  31. SKdeA says:

    “…They needed somebody that could speak for them. They needed someone that could articulate what the Republican brand still is. And he did that better than the other guys running for office. He knew how to do that. He has been reliable and he knows how to play the politics of getting elected.”

    Um, the guys that says, “You have no reason – absolutely none – to trust us, to believe anything we say” is the best they could come up with?


  32. joe cantwell says:

    what no olby?

    *

    “poat”

    :)


  33. Imichael says:

    This obvious. The reason is they have no breakthrough candidate is because they have no new blood. This younger generation is not buying into the RNC. You may not like their clothes, their music, or lifestyle but give them credit for seeing through the RNC nonsense.


  34. Jess Wonderin says:

    reminds me . . . so how many chickens on the KFC Board?


  35. 5150 says:

    Eric Cantor in the House, Bob Corker in the Senate.


  36. kassandrasduplex says:

    Me thinks Gwen has finally revealed her political bias. Another nail in the “liberal media bias myth” coffin. Seems to me I recall reading something some years back about how during the Reagan “revolution” the media moguls began firing reporters with humanites degrees and replacing them with MBA degree holders. So the environmental beat, human interest beat, labor news, all the left or center left social topics were covered by right wing pro-business reporters.
    At least one of the fired reporters ended up killing himself. He was essentially blacklisted for being too left.


  37. DallasNE says:

    It seems like the African-American’s that sign on the the Republican philosophy are either there by preferential treatment (Clarence Thomas), or get locked out when they attempt to influence policy (JC Watt, Colin Powell). I’m still trying to figure out Condi Rice. She was outwardly qualified but inept and ineffective as both National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. I don’t yet know enough about Steele but have been unimpressed thus far.


  38. BearCountry says:

    I can’t watch gwen awful; she is such a repug shill. My wife and I gave up watching week in review because the people she gets to be on are also such repug shills: LIEasson, juan o’reilly, et. al. In fact, we don’t watch the newshour because of these same people. awful’s handling of the VP debate was totally without merit.

    steele’s ability to articulate the repug “brand” is so good that he had to lable himself a Dem to run for his last office. Just biz as usual for repugs, I guess.



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2009 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll