Think Progress

Afghan Foreign Minister Says ‘The Majority Of Afghans Still Support’ International Troop Presence

A recent ABC/BBC/ARD poll released earlier this month found that Afghans’ support of U.S. and NATO forces’ efforts in that nation is tumbling. Just 47 percent said they had a favorable view of the United States, down from 83 percent in 2005. Only 37 percent said that most people in their area support NATO and the International Security Assistance Force; 67 percent supported ISAF in 2006.

Today, ThinkProgress interviewed Afghanistan’s foreign minister, Dr. Rangin Dadfar Spanta. We asked him about the poll’s grim findings and how NATO and the Afghan government “can win back the hearts and minds of the Afghan civilians.” Spanta disputed the poll’s results, claiming that a majority of Afghans still support the U.S.-led international coalition:

SPANTA: Now, this is the opinion to places that you ask the people, the ordinary Afghans, the majority of all the Afghans still support the presence of the international community because they believe that the international community came to Afghanistan after two and a half decades of tyranny in my country…and the international community brought us liberation. This is still the perception of the people of Afghanistan

Watch it:

Spanta later said that Afghan Defense Minister Abdul Rahim Wardak and Gen. David McKiernan, top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, have agreed that Afghan forces will be more “involved” in the “preparation [and] implantation of military action on operations,” including “arresting Afghans in house searching” to ensure more respect for the culture of Afghans.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates has suggested recently that the U.S. lower expectations for its mission in Afghanistan by “setting standards far below the sweeping desires of regional democratization that were a foundation of Bush administration national security policy.” Spencer Ackerman notes that, during a later event hosted by the Center for American Progress, Spanta criticized this new approach, calling it “reductionist” and warning that “any reductionist policy is bound to fail.”



25 Responses to “Afghan Foreign Minister Says ‘The Majority Of Afghans Still Support’ International Troop Presence”

  1. Undecided says:

    Isn’t it good to feel wanted .


  2. Hoodathunk says:

    dog forbid the US listen to the Afghan people and look for ways to help them build the country they would like.


  3. backup says:

    This is a good interview. Nice job. Who’s right? Spanta or the polling data?


  4. belac says:

    Who’s right? Spanta or the polling data?

    What’s more accurate? One person’s opinion of public support or a poll of public support? I’ll let you decide for yourself…

    …but we’ve taken a poll and determined that it is more accurate in measuring public opinion than your opinion.


  5. Jackie says:

    The Bush puppets in Afghanistan are looking forward to getting the money that the US gave Iraq. Some Americans who object to the Stimulus Package had no problem giving away 1 Trillion dollars to Iraq and saying they don’t have to pay it back. Now Afghanistan will hold an election and if it’s not fixed the Bush puppets will be out. President Obama will have to deal with the new President that the people elect. It’s stange how the Taliban and George W. Bush were such good friends that Bush even had then in the US as his guest now their the enemy. Maybe President Obama can broker a peace deal as he’s not looking to stab them in the back like Bush/Cheney. The Taliban now know Bush befriended them only to build a pipe line for oil in Afghanistan. Bush/Cheney had brought chaos and lies to the World now it’s time for Obama/Biden to clean up the mess.


  6. hellinabucket says:

    It appears that Mr. Spanta is careful to say “International community” when describing what his country still supports. The US (although being the vast majority that makes up the “International community”) is largley viewed as causing more havoc and mindless destruction than the Taliban.


  7. sacopenapa says:

    The Afhegan Foreigner Minister knows very well that he only represents a small section of Afhegan in Kabul. He knows his puppet government pretent to rules over a small section of that city. The Afhegans want ‘Foreigner Invaders and occupiers’ OUT! And gess what, Oba/Bush/Oba can surge as much as he wants, Afhegans will prevail as they always did since the time of Alexander the Great!


  8. spencers mom says:

    Good to know that in Afghanistan people lie en masse to pollsters while their leaders know their hearts and minds.

    “Who you gonna believe, me or your lyin’ eyes?”

    PEACE


  9. sacopenapa says:

    5 jakie
    Obama/Biden are not moving to clean up the mess, but to continue with Bush’s policies and the infamous Oil Pipeline… Obama is changing right?!


  10. hussein toasterhead says:

    sacopenapa Says:

    And gess what, Oba/Bush/Oba can surge as much as he wants, Afhegans will prevail as they always did since the time of Alexander the Great!

    February 26th, 2009 at 1:10 pm
    _________

    What are Afhegans?


  11. hussein toasterhead says:

    hussein toasterhead Says:

    What are Afhegans?

    February 26th, 2009 at 1:17 pm
    __________

    If you’re talking about some sort of Afghan Vegan, I don’t believe you’ll find any.


  12. Max-1 says:

    .

    … Of course the USA has always been at war with South West Asia/Middle East.

    .


  13. RantingTommy says:

    at least Obama is putting the costs of the “wars” into the budget instead of the dishonest off-the-books approach that Bush took to hide the costs from the people


  14. EliHarold says:

    Apparently this guy doesn’t watch the interviews with Afghan civilians on Al Jazeera where they countless times have gone “We want the US occupation out, we are tired of our fathers,mothers,sons,daughters,brothers and sisters etc etc getting bombed by their so called “smart weapons”


  15. winddancer says:

    Frankly, I think it’s too late for any positive gain by the West in Afghanistan. It got blown when the U.S. moved their focus and money to a “war of choice” in Iraq. We’ve had nothing but a puppet government in there since our invasion and the Afghani government controls (and not even completely) Kabul. Karzai’s own family (his brother) is evidently involved in the drug trade, and the entire government is rife with corruption. Combine that with Bush’s support of Musharraf for years in Pakistan, and there’s been a royal SNAFU. Going back further of course is the U.S. financial support (and CIA covert actions) during the Afghan-Russian war including empowering bin Laden at that time. We consistently have wound up creating our own monsters. All the policies of the past number of years has done nothing but strengthen the terrorists, as well as strengthen Iran’s influence in the region by toppling Iraq’s former government. Frankly, I’d be tempted to turn the whole mess over to Iran at this point, and let them deal with it.


  16. Barbera says:

    We are welcome now and we get to see photos of Obama’s war dead too.

    Change we can believe in!


  17. Jackie says:

    #9 sacopenapa

    Sorry I forgot the Bush White House propaganda Dept. reported something different. I just happen to get my information from the troops in Afghanistan who are there and really know what’s going on. As a Military Mom who had a child in both Iraq and Afghanistan news comes more up to date and correct from both Iraq/Afghanistan . But after reading your comment I understand it’s better to believe the lie and deal with the truth. FYI at President Karzi’s swearing in his first order of business was to sign the US pipe line as the US get to work right away. Now I know that wasn’t released for you to read but as my son was there to join in the celebration I think he and his fellow soldiers know more then you or I who were safely at home in the USA. Don’t worry more of the truth will come out soon and it will be big news to you but old news to Military Families with children overseas.


  18. Alejandro says:

    Liberated? So they could STILL kill people for their religious beliefs?


  19. Alejandro says:

    #17 Jackie:

    Don’t forget the poppies.


  20. dbadass says:

    We are welcome now and we get to see photos of Obama’s war dead too.

    —-
    Oh shit did Obama start a war? I am so sick of these wars being started by these presidents… Geez, Only a few days in and already starting a war… Wait a minute… Didn’t this war start…


  21. ElBruce says:

    It’s “reductionist” to not want to overthrow every country in the Middle East? Yeah…


  22. EugeneDebs says:

    Barbera Says:

    Obama didnt START the war you ignorant brainwashed parasite


  23. Tim43 says:

    No doubt the Afghans want the troops to stay. Their Opium business has never been better since the international troop presence has kept the warlords from fighting each other.

    Now the warlords work together to grow, process and ship opium based products abroad. Most of it reaches our high school and college campuses which explains why our educational system can’t even compete with third world countries anymore.


  24. ElBruce says:

    Barbera Says:

    We are welcome now and we get to see photos of Obama’s war dead too.

    Change we can believe in!

    Did Obama campaign on ending the war in Afghanistan? Because as I recall during his campaign he was promising to heat that one up.

    You’ve probably forgotten this every time it’s been told to you, but the war in Afghanistan was the one that’s generally considered to be “just,” in that they were ruled by the Taliban who was sheltering Al Qaeda who attacked us on 9/11/2001. The war in Iraq there was no reason for.

    .

    Tim43 Says:

    Most of it reaches our high school and college campuses which explains why our educational system can’t even compete with third world countries anymore.

    That part there, it’s crazy. There does not happen to be a huge wave of heroin addiction sweeping our schools and harming our educational performance compared to other nations. I mean, it sounds like a cool story, but it just ain’t the case.


  25. katy says:

    … the sweeping desires of regional democratization that were a foundation of Bush administration national security policy.”

    who the hell did they think they are???



Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2010 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report



imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll