George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism (indicated in my blog).

George W. Bush did in fact commit innumerable hate crimes.

Bush was absolute evil.

Bush is now like a fugitive from justice.

Bush is a psychological prisoner.

Bush has a lot to worry about.

Bush can technically be prosecuted for hate crimes at any time.

In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

“GEORGE W. BUSH IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN U.S. HISTORY” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG

If Zuckerman, et al, have taken the Pledge of Allegiance, then they are traitors. These clowns should move to Israel where they will not be betraying their country.

Has OBL NOT stated a pan-Islamic superstate is his ultimate goal? Wasn’t that why Saddam invaded Kuwait – to control more of the world’s oil supply?

nope…. saddam invaded kuwait because they were drilling across the border and stealing iraqi oil
_______________

http://www.studyworld.com/biography/historical_figures/saddam_hussein.htm

All of this was attractive and irritating to Saddam who would and did use a fraction of his army to attack and invade Kuwait in which it only took the Iraqi army 6 hours to reach the capital city. They had after their invasion about 19% of the world’s known oil reserves.

Historically Iraq had claimed that it had a right to Kuwait. “They were jealous that Kuwait was in control of the two islands needed for a deep water shipping port:the Bubiyan and Warbah islands.”4 These islands along with some parts of Kuwait were a part of Mesopotamia which the Ottoman Turks conquered. “The Ottoman Empire was defeated during World War I and the British made their “own lines in the sand”, dividing up the land according to their own strategic needs and in the process recklessly dividing up ancient communities and boundaries that had been recognized for decades.”1 Most of Mesopotamia became Iraq and some other parts to Kuwait. In 1961, Kuwait became independent and the Iraqis threatened to invade except that British troops kept the peace. This was to be the first of many border skirmishes which include Iraqi missiles fired at Kuwaiti oil installations and the reflagging of Kuwaiti oil tankers during the Iran-Iraq War in which U.S. ships patrolled the Persian Gulf and Kuwaiti tankers were reflagged with U.S. flags.
_______________

so am i to understand that you don’t think any of what you said is rational but merely a potential justification for US foreign policy towards the middle east?
_______________

Boy… do you ever specialize in “snide”. perhaps you’d care to explain what the hell you even mean w/ this comment.
_______________

it would seem that you’re implying a lot here too with very little substance. considering you’re using an idea of osama bin laden to justify 100 years of US foreign policy… most of which happened before said idea was propagated.
________________

I DIDN’T use an idea of OBL to justify 100 years of US foreign policy. You SAID I did. You’re a little unclear on who said what here, aren’t you?
________________

On the other hand, the Brits HAVE been diddling around in the ME for 100 years now…

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/oil/2003/0425byzantine.htm

Dogged British Determination

Among the foreign powers the British, seeing Iraq as a gateway to their Indian colony and oil as lifeblood for their Imperial Navy, were most aggressive in their pursuits in Mesopotamia, aspiring to gain physical control of the oil region. Winston Churchill, soon after he became First Lord of the Admiralty in 1911, declared oil to be of paramount importance for the supremacy of the Imperial Navy. Churchill was educated about the virtues of oil by none other than Marcus Samuel, the founder of Shell.

Dang… look at that. EXACTLY I what I said… dont’cha just HATE it when the facts back you up?
_________________

my issue with what you’ve said here is that you’ve appeared to have been adamantly defending an idea that seems like its only support comes from osama bin laden and people who promote his ideas as a fear tactic.
__________________

Go read both articles I linked to… if you’re adult enough to accept how wrong you were.

I went all reichwing on YOU?

Up yours… :-D!!!!

“President Barack Obama has signed an executive order presidential determination allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to resettle in the United States. Sure, what can go wrong when we allow hundreds of thousands of people who have been, as Mark Steyn memorably described, “marinated” in a “sick death cult,” who voted for Hamas, and 55% of whom support suicide bombings live here and at the American taxpayers’ expense:
By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza.
The “presidential determination” which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4.
President Obama’s decision, according to the Register, was necessitated by “the urgent refugee and migration needs” of the “victims.”
Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.”

….

…what?…..

Why are you glaring at me?…. I got the dust buster…

oh.

Here (pulls some out of pocket)…

Here…. I’ve got the dust buster (Whhhiiirrrrrrrr………..)

I hear ya’.

I am hoping that this administration will tell Israel that as long as they act like terrorists towards Gaza and the Palestinaians, that we will no longer give them any kind of aid.

“I don’t believe that we should be in a position at this point to do anything to strengthen Hamas,” Zuckerman said. “We surely know what Hamas stands for as I say they are the forward battalions of Iran.”

This quote really pissed me off. How is getting humanitarian aid and helping Gaza rebuild doing something to “strengthen Hamas”. I guess their idea of not strengthening Hamas would be to allow all those people to die. When did Israel and it’s rabid supporters become such bloodthirsty terrorists?

Cry me a river… on yer own time.

says the kid whining about being misunderstood hahaha

i’m not crying, i’m just trying to understand what the hell your point is at this point hahaha.

“The centerpiece of the secretary of state’s tour, announced Thursday by the State Department, will be a March 2 fund-raising conference for the Palestinians in Egypt.”

I was pleasantly surprised to see this. It is mostly because of support for Israel that I can’t wholeheartedly support Clinton and Obama. But this is a good thing, and though it may not look like much to us, it’s probably huge to Israel.

Cagey, there is a reason that the billionaire Bin Laden, et al, were in caves in Afghanistan. The majority in the Mideast ran them out of town. The Islamic Brotherhood was run out of Egypt. There were huge demonstrations—the streets were filled with people chanting “No to fundamentalism!” If it were not for war and grueling poverty, fundamentalism would probably be fading fast in the Mideast. The majority certainly disagree with terrorist attacks on civilians.

nope…. saddam invaded kuwait because they were drilling across the border and stealing iraqi oil

he actually asked our permission first.

his goal was not to control the world’s oil or to create a pan islamic state.

so am i to understand that you don’t think any of what you said is rational but merely a potential justification for US foreign policy towards the middle east?

it would seem that you’re implying a lot here too with very little substance. considering you’re using an idea of osama bin laden to justify 100 years of US foreign policy… most of which happened before said idea was propagated.

my issue with what you’ve said here is that you’ve appeared to have been adamantly defending an idea that seems like its only support comes from osama bin laden and people who promote his ideas as a fear tactic.

but it would appear that maybe you’re saying that you merely think other people believed this…

perhaps the problem is that you might have been able to express yourself a bit more clearly then?

i’m just trying to understand, you’re the one who’s gone all reich-wing on me hahaha