sikis
porno izle
porno videolar
porn videos

March 5th, 2009 at 1:14 am

LOL……..You’re a joke.

A respected former maker of fighter jets talks of the ineffectiveness of the F-22 , which you stupidly and without qualification , claim is a “deterrant” , when it obviously isn’t viewed that way by someone with wayyyy more knowledge and experience than your pathetic rube ass on the subject ; and you’re trying to argue that because he didn’t use the specific word “deterrant” , nor touch upon that specific subject , that is grounds for “proving” you corrrect.

That is laughable on its face alone , let alone all the time (and lies) in your posts that you’ve wasted on it.

Hey retarded Wright Brother ; you believe an unseen and unused aircraft is going to intimidate anyone ?

LOL…….Yeah , keep posting on your knowledge of “military matters” , stupid shit ………….

Well that’s cool, but I’d like to know more. I was unaware that fighters used radar for much more than target aquisition. And while I’m more familiar with passive than active detection, I don’t see how a phased array radar would significantly improve a fighter’s performance unless it was a missile to missile intercept. Your brother’s AWACS is supposed to handle the threat eval, not the fighter.

March 5th, 2009 at 1:04 am

Why would anyone need to state the word “deterrent” itself , when they are talking about the limitations of the F-22 ; much less not comparing it favorably to an F-16 , nitwit ?

BTW

Check out my post above ; says a lot about all the (stupid and baseless) prattle you’ve been posting , eh dipshit ?

March 5th, 2009 at 12:58 am

So much for your baseless (and stupid claim(s)) , jerkoff ……

U.S. jet fighters in Iraq also spend a significant amount of time performing what’s called “show of force” missions, which are basically attempts to fly over insurgents and scare them away. With the exorbitant costs of modern jets and fuel, F-16s might be just a little too expensive to be used as scarecrows. (Although, at $100 million per plane, F-16s are relatively affordable compared to other platforms like the $350 million F-22 Raptor, which hasn’t flown a single mission in Iraq or Afghanistan).

http://www.armscontrolcenter.org/policy/iraq/articles/091008_iraq_seeks_f16s/

Lots of “deterrant” there , huh rube ?

March 5th, 2009 at 12:43 am

Don’t look for Tracy the Magic Redneck Rube for any “hot discussion” ; he’s a typical lying sack of GOP shit and a colossal imbecile , and not much else………..

March 5th, 2009 at 12:42 am

If Sprey and Stevenson both agreed upon the limitations of the F-22 and gave bigger props to the F-16 , which they also didn’t claim was any type of deterrent , doesn’t it stand to reason that they don’t view the F-22 as any type of equal , much less a deterrent , nimrod ?

BTW

Your pilot never claimed the F-22 was a DETERRENT , you uncomprehending rube ………..

March 5th, 2009 at 12:37 am

And I still see that you’re an absolute moron , in dire need of Hooked On Phonics ; post where Captain Lohmiller EVER STATED THE F-22 IS A DETERRENT , you colossal imbecile.

And how does Banks repeating a White House press release make his statement credible , dipshit ?

Oh shoot, I was hoping for a hot discussion of beamforming..

March 5th, 2009 at 12:34 am

Because the partisan GOP chickenshit coward has nothing else…..

March 5th, 2009 at 12:26 am

You didn’t know it either , you dummy ; looking shit up and copying and pasting doesn’t mean you “know something” , you ignorant twit.

And pansy Tracy ; the only “lid” being nailed shut is your own , especially after being shown repeatedly you have lied , and insisting otherwise.

Not to mention the other insipid and stupid piss you’re posting along with it………

March 5th, 2009 at 12:23 am

The article repeatedly had Sprey AND James P. Stevenson talking about the limitations and ineffectiveness of the F-22 ; that kind of indicates to those with brains that it isn’t as wonderful as you are stupidly trying to claim , much less a “deterrant” to anything , you stupid shit .

And it isn’t as if Sprey issued these conclusions of his a decade and a half ago , jerkoff ; and he is far more credible when it comes military fighters than the 2 bozos you’re laughably attempting to present as “proof” for your ridiculously stupid claim ……….

God , you’re a moron.

March 5th, 2009 at 12:20 am

LIAR

You have posted not one pilot’s TESTIMONY that has actually PILOTED the F-22 , and that referred to it as a “deterrant” , you moron ……….

I already posted the info on Col. Ronald Banks , and he has NEVER FLOWN an F-22 …….

Keep lying and digging that hole , a-hole………

March 5th, 2009 at 12:05 am

Looking up a particular definition doesn’t prove you’re more knowledgeable on military matters , stupid ass..

You’ve proven that you’re merely a useless , brainless little mouthpiece for the GOP and the military industry .

March 5th, 2009 at 12:03 am

How many missions did Dr. Rebecca Grant or Loren B Thompson ever fly , jackass ?

How many fighters did they ever even BUILD ?

And Sprey doesn’t work nor ever did for a partisan propogandist company , you sorry little rube………

Know what the “expert” you are attempting to tout’s PhD is in ?

Dr. Rebecca Grant received a PhD in INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ; yeah , that certainly qualifies her above Sprey , who designed and built fighters , doesn’t it ?

Stupid little rube …….

March 4th, 2009 at 11:49 pm

Hey moron

Are “scientists” who work for the oil companies looked upon with credibility when they give their assessments on the impact the oil industry has on the enviroment ?

And I mean by intelligent people , not ignorant , moronic , gullible GOP rubes like yourself.

WHO SHE WORKS FOR AND WITH , disqualifies her immediately ; get a clue , and stop with the same stupid type of (non)reasoning you have tried to use here regarding the horseshit Chimpy administration………..