upright left Says: Of course you would guess that, but you’d be wrong. PRWORA ended the cycle of lifetime welfare. That was the goal of most conservatives who complained about welfare. Some people believe it’s inhumane to keep people perpetually dependent. ;)

Actually, you’re wrong. Again. Under Bill Clinton, due to how great things were for everyone, welfare went from 13 million recipients down to 5 million. Under Bush – the numbers went back up.

Conservative policy is the problem, not welfare.

March 11th, 2009 at 3:31 pm
______

Yeah, the Clinton presidency with Repub congress were some good years, including PRWORA. PRWORA reduced the chances for people to abuse welfare and make it a way of life for generation after generation. That was the conservative objection to welfare, not those who used it as temporary assistance as it was intended. That’s why it’s no longer as much of an issue. But, of course, your response was just a dodge as usual, wasn’t it? ;)

A separate study on pay-for-performance schemes in the Annals of Family Medicine, found that doctors resented the intrusion of such plans on the doctor-patient relationship.

In Britain, physicians said the emphasis on computer systems and data collection crowded out communication with patients. In the United States, physicians said they resented the structure of the audit and payment systems, which sometimes distorted the process of care.

Actually, you’re wrong. Again. Under Bill Clinton, due to how great things were for everyone, welfare went from 13 million recipients down to 5 million. Under Bush – the numbers went back up.

Conservative policy is the problem, not welfare.

Heads up to all of the Democrats who want to block the Obama agenda. Obstructionism and the failure to address serious issues is what makes people hate Congress.
The American people want change, not the same old tired games on Capitol Hill. We expect that from the Republicans. Don’t let the Blue Dogs and conservatives in the Democratic Party be the roadblock to change.

I’m sorry, but WHO NAMES THEIR CHILD ‘LARCENIA’???

Moreover, wouldn’t you be a bit hesitant to VOTE for someone named ‘Larcenia’???

March 11th, 2009 at 10:26 am
______

Dangerous ground there, bud.

What I really want to know is this: How big of a markdown in price did Bush give the MBA? Or, perhaps…did HE pay THEM to allow him to give a speech?

ha ha

Someone did in 1992, and it was very clear that poor people are falsely accused of being a burden to our society. I guess since we have become less tolerant of racism, Conservatives had to find someone else to hate…

March 11th, 2009 at 9:23 am
______
Of course you would guess that, but you’d be wrong. PRWORA ended the cycle of lifetime welfare. That was the goal of most conservatives who complained about welfare. Some people believe it’s inhumane to keep people perpetually dependent. ;)

http://washingtonindependent.com/29959/federal-whistleblowers-not-protected-in-stimulus-bill

“But on exactly what the administration does and does not favor on the benefits and coverage side, you should not expect and you will not be receiving definitive answers from me,” Orszag said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/10/AR2009031001207.html?hpid=sec-health

Time police, save us!

First let’s see the results of ‘banks bailouts’ of Bush,and the big money which is yet to be spent of Obama’s huge first stimulus.

We cannot run our overnment on ’stimulus’ spending.
Either we cut expenses…or increase revenues.

But Congress members of both parties are not feeling the crunch, they are getting in fact an automatic pay raise every year.
Pelosi has been a miserable Speaker,from start.

But getting serious. Let me guess that if a man has sex with a beast, he goes to jail, but if he has sex with a prostitute she goes to jail. Yep, I was right, it must be Florida, I can’t see how my logic is screwed….