sikis
porno izle
porno videolar
porn videos

Now this is what an american presidency SHOULD look like. We’ve drifted so far beyond the pale under Dictator Bush that in only 50+ days, Obama’s presidency looks absolutely NOTHING like that of Herr Bush.

LMAO. You need to find a less biased source of inforation…
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/03/15/obama/

EugeneDebs Says:
So either they will treat them as POWs or they will take them to court to PROVE they planned authorized, comitted, or aided in the Sept 11 attacks or harbored such organizations or persons. GOOD. Things are as they should be.

You mean “GOOD Things as they have been for the past 8 years”

What sort of cult are you involved in here that you could quote the basis for Bush’s detainee policy, suggest it means POW status and court trials and then call this good, just because it’s being continued by Obama?

Really. Try explaining this without brainwashing being involved.

The Obama administration said Friday that it would abandon the Bush administration’s term “enemy combatant” as it argues in court for the continued detention of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, in a move that seemed intended to symbolically separate the new administration from Bush detention policies.

But in a much anticipated court filing, the Justice Department argued that the president has the authority to detain terrorism suspects there without criminal charges, much as the Bush administration had asserted. It provided a broad definition of those who can be held, which was not significantly different from the one used by the Bush administration. –NYT

Congratulations, you’re the new Fox News and it’s unquestioning followers.

ThinkPressrelease.

In its filing today, the government bases its authority to hold detainees at Guantanamo on the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, which Congress passed in September 2001, and which authorized the use of force against nations, organizations, or persons the president determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the September 11 attacks, or harbored such organizations or persons.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

So either they will treat them as POWs or they will take them to court to PROVE they planned authorized, comitted, or aided in the Sept 11 attacks or harbored such organizations or persons. GOOD. Things are as they should be.

Cat got yer tungue?

In its filing today, the government bases its authority to hold detainees at Guantanamo on the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, which Congress passed in September 2001, and which authorized the use of force against nations, organizations, or persons the president determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the September 11 attacks, or harbored such organizations or persons.

Does it strike anyone else odd that John Kerry finally makes a reappearance only after I announce to pete that I will be away at work. John Kerry definately knows whose his daddy…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not unless Rush told him so he doesnt

Darn I lost half my post again. The only qualifications for being president are to be thirty five years old a native born American and WIN THE ELECTION. You dont even have to have GONE to college to be qualified to be president. So what in the WORLD would his college records have to do with this.

Mr. Obama’s legal team is doing everything that it can, in our California case; to make sure that no one has access to
his college records!
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Ah because it is IRRELEVANT to what the court was supposed to be deciding? Try to keep up here Freddie

(/snark)

fred garvin Says:
Mr. Obama’s legal team is doing everything that it can, in our California case; to make sure that no one has access to
his college records!

Why would that be?

Correct me if I’m wrong, fred, but this seems like it’s an attempt to take this discussion in yet another direction.

Why would that be?

The Republic of Stupidity Says:
Seems pretty proper to me

Well, sure. You’re an extremist moonbat just like the rest of us… you prolly think we orta trust judges to administer the law.