Comments on: New UK Memos Support ‘Sexed Up’ Iraq Dossier Claim

By: sacopenapa

sacopenapa — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 18:41:03 +0000

Tony Blair is a WAR CRIMNAL! He should be prosecuted for it! Like the USA, the UK has no moral credetials to call Mugabe or any other criminal for their crimes, until the UK prosecutes it own War Criminals.
It is absurd, ’surrealistic’, criminals and hypocritical to have this man part of the ‘Middle Eats peace’. He has given full support to the Terrorist State of Israel during the MASSCRE of 1500 women, children and civilians in Gaza last December. Blair should hang from a noose for crimes against humanity and War Crimes! I don’t trust one single word that comes from this SOB!

By: Fontsdeleon

Fontsdeleon — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 04:57:09 +0000

These people have created unimaginable human suffering on a grand scale. For what? To satisfy a lust. That’s what it looks like to me.

By: Molly

Molly — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:39:44 +0000

#9 Interesting thought. Our past 8 years of govt. style and MSM coverage make me think of crack addicts on speed. Just when you think it can’t get any crazier…here comes bush again with that twitchy mouth and eyes darting side to side…and everybody just adores that style….so much you just want to have a beer with him.With that crazy bush speak. Nobody expects hinm to make sense because because…

By: DICKERSON3870

DICKERSON3870 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:48:35 +0000

HOW DO YOU “SEX UP” THIS?

BUS TO CHIRAC: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East”

FROM THE ARTICLE “When God Spoke to Me”: …..During those private interviews, Jacque Chirac had purportedly confessed to the journalist some personal remarks regarding the faith of George W. Bush that seemed quite daunting. He told the journalist that the latter called him twice beseeching him basically, in the name of their common “spiritual faith”, i.e., “Christianity”, to join the collective effort of the coalition being formed to wage a preemptive war against Iraq. In his first telephonic call he reportedly said to Jacque Chirac: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East” and then added that “the biblical prophecies are being fulfilled”…..

ENTIRE ARTICLE -
http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=14890

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 02:29:38 +0000

dbearton,
Oath trumps cowardice in my book.

While we may speculate a number of things as to why Impeachment fell off the table, the fact remains…
… Duty to the Nation and the People are paramount, otherwise you’re not serving FAITHFULLY!

By: dbearton

dbearton — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:14:30 +0000

Max, I would not be so sure. I am sure death squad Cheney talked to members of Congress. Remember the Criminal Cheney operates in the shadows.

By: dbearton

dbearton — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:07:29 +0000

Full public inquiry, Now!

By: wiley

wiley — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:47:51 +0000

In the vernacular “presumptive invasion” is perfect. In court, “preventive”.

By: Daddy-O

Daddy-O — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:44:03 +0000

Good article in The New Yorker as well.

By: Idyll

Idyll — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:09:37 +0000

THE MURDER OF DAVID KELLY

Part one of two

( This first part lays out the case from the evidence presented in the Hutton inquiry why the death of Dr. David Kelly was not by suicide. Part two will show the reasons, in this writer’s opinion, Dr. Kelly was killed.)

http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/101403_kelly_1.html

By: the brown acid

the brown acid — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:21:19 +0000

Trial, conviction, firing squad.
Live by the sword, die by it.

By: pete

pete — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:48:01 +0000

Hmmmm? I don’t mean to be pedantic either but, I think I’ll go with:

presumptive invasion

By: wiley

wiley — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:34:12 +0000

Not to be pedantic, Patriot, but it was a preventive war—what Hitler got busted for for invading Poland (though it wasn’t yet the supreme crime against peace when he did it). One “preempts” when an actual attack is imminent or taking place. The perception of a threat of a possible attack sometime in the future does not count. A manufactured threat of possible attack doesn’t count either.

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:29:19 +0000

MapleStreet,
http://www.petitiononline.com/BlairWar/petition.html

By: MapleStreet

MapleStreet — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:05:54 +0000

Is there any chance that, as Britain is just a short swim away from the Netherlands, that the Hague may do some investigating there ?

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:48:08 +0000

So I CAN become the President of the USA AND become an International WAR CRIMINAL…
… Because the Government of the USA is weak, feeble and IMPOTENT?

R E M E M B E R:
Republican did not take impeachment “OFF THE TABLE”!

By: nellre

nellre — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:31:36 +0000

A lie is a lie no matter what you call it.

A lie with a kernel of truth is worse, in my opinion, than an outright fabrication.

What should be done to the liars that caused 100s of thousands of deaths?

By: A Patriot Acting

A Patriot Acting — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:31:10 +0000

It is immoral and illegal to wage a pre-emptive war. That would be bad enough and warrent international tribunals. Then the facts emerge that the evidence that was pushed by both America and Great Britain to justify this pre-emptive war (in which case would need to be ironclad in lieu of actuallly being attacked first) has been intentionally distorted to the point of outright lies is not simply illegal it is treasonous for both parties of both countries. I hope for Blair’s sake his life was threatened by Cheney and he can proove it otherwise as was previously posted he may well swing next to Bush.

By: Max-1

Max-1 — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:27:08 +0000

DOWNING STREET DOCUMENTS

By: pete

pete — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:26:48 +0000

So, when Reichwhiners say “everyone thought Saddam had WMD”, they are wrong. Now that that’s cleared up, can we skip on to the indictments?