TAKE ACTION: Tell O’Reilly’s Advertisers To Stop Supporting The O’Reilly Harassment Machine
TAKE ACTION: Tell O’Reilly’s Advertisers To Stop Supporting The O’Reilly Harassment Machine
Fox News host Bill O’Reilly employs producers charged with the specific mission of ambushing and harassing those who have said critical things about him. O’Reilly has not only stalked and accosted ThinkProgress deputy editor Amanda Terkel, but he has also targeted at least 40 other individuals in much the same way.
If O’Reilly wanted statements from his opponents, there are alternative, more responsible ways of eliciting responses. Amanda was never asked to appear on The O’Reilly Factor, nor did the show ever reach out to ThinkProgress for comment prior to their decision to stalk her.
This isn’t “journalism” — it’s a mafia-style harassment operation. It’s a campaign of intimidation and an unethical practice that amounts to an invasion of privacy. As Amanda said of her own altercation with O’Reilly’s crew: “It was incredibly disturbing. The rest of the weekend, I was constantly looking over my shoulder, wondering how long they had been following me, if they’re still following me.”
We need to shut down the O’Reilly Harassment Machine. And the best way to do that is to demand that O’Reilly’s corporate advertisers — those who are helping to fund this operation — issue a clear statement explaining their opposition to O’Reilly’s brand of “ambush journalism.”
Click here to tell O’Reilly’s advertisers to stop supporting the O’Reilly Harassment Machine.
AT&T continually evaluates our advertising efforts to make certain that we are reaching consumers in effective and meaningful ways. We also make every effort to ensure that the content of the programming on the stations and outlets on which we advertise is in keeping with our corporate values and philosophy.
No word on whether O'Reilly's Harassment Machine is "in keeping with" AT&T's "corporate values and philosophy."
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog Roll
That dude is one creepy mofo..
March 25th, 2009 at 2:39 pmClick here to tell O’Reilly’s advertisers to stop supporting the O’Reilly Harassment Machine.
Done!
March 25th, 2009 at 2:41 pmOK its on now….speeking of NOW they need to stand up for and with these poor raped child of the right that have been abused by a Conservative upbringing and the one this Prevert is attempting to help, we also need to make sure OUR contributions to the charitable event EXCEED that of the Prevert. If the Prevert holds another event of the like we must show up at the event in greater numbers with greater contributions and blow him away, show him we can do even better at what he does. Its so much fun to beat these people at their own game. (I use the word “prevert” because of the closed court dox’s and I can’t prove the real word applies) but I know one when I see one!
March 25th, 2009 at 2:48 pmSent the email plus forwarded to 5 more. LET’S GET THE BASTARD!
March 25th, 2009 at 2:49 pmThere are two other tactics that would seem to be more effective. One that everyone can do and one that the victims of corporate media need to do on their own.
1. As horrific as it may seem, cancel cable and tell your provider it’s because you refuse to support corporate news. I haven’t had cable in many years and seldom miss it. This would have the dual benefit of putting the pressure on cable news to provide a better service and cable providers offering ala carte service. If I could pay for only the stations I want, I would sign up in a heartbeat.
2. His victims, and those targeted by other disgusting creeps in the media, need to start suing for slander.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:52 pmDone. End the GOP, end their lies, end their hate, unite America and give the power back to the citizens.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:53 pmSign me up. Hit him where it hurts – the wallet.
http://www.pufferfishblog.com/
March 25th, 2009 at 2:53 pmIsn’t it time people start following Jesse Watters and Billy around with a camera?
A little of see how they like it perhaps?
March 25th, 2009 at 2:53 pmClick here to tell O’Reilly’s advertisers to stop supporting the O’Reilly Harassment Machine.
DONE
March 25th, 2009 at 2:54 pmYeah…about that…
no thank you.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:55 pmJust goes to show you . . .
You can take the idiot out of “Hard Copy” but you can’t take the “Hard Copy” out of the idiot.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:56 pmThe last time I checked the news, AT&T’s “corporate philosophy” did not put a high premium on privacy.
March 25th, 2009 at 2:57 pmIt may be a shock to you, but a lot of progressives actually do quite well for themselves. Back in November there were a lot of makeshift ‘O’ logos on peoples office white boards around here.
I know you may find this not to line up to your experiences but not everyone on the internet is blogging from Mom’s basement.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:00 pmDone…Keep the pressure on….Blessings
March 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pmsent. Ill even stick with verizon even though Id <3 the iPhone.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:01 pmDr. Hussein Matt Says:
Klatu Says:
It amazes me that some of you can even wipe your own buttz.
It probably amazes you that anyone wipes their own arse because your mommy still does it for you.
*
nailed ‘em.
:)
March 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pmComplaining to the advertisers is one strategy. I prefer the direct approach. Perhaps TP should issue pepper spray to Amanda and its other contributors. If mentioning Andrea Makris doesn’t get the camera out of your face a little Aztec Fire Water sure will.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:07 pmremember, AT&T sells products, so these products are also involved in this!
Tell Apple they are supporting This!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:09 pmDogfight Says:
EndtheGop…you talk about the GOP lies, their hate….Just reread some of these blogs and u want to know about hate!!! Watch the name calling now that I am back…ask pastcaring!
*
“we’ll do it live!”
:)
March 25th, 2009 at 3:11 pmOh joy, Dogfight is back. Calling people names, then taking offense at being called names.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:15 pmKlatu Says:
Dr. Hussein Matt Says:
It probably amazes you that anyone wipes their own arse because your mommy still does it for you.
Nah, that’s what “undocumented workers” are for, fool.
***
let billy do it.
**
“we’ll do it live!”
:)
“alright go, go!”
*
March 25th, 2009 at 3:17 pmSomeone on the local Obama blog took on Fox’s sponsors during the campaign. Most of the responses were thank you for your thoughts, except for one. One of the cruise lines, and I don’t remember which one, wrote back and said (in so many words) stuff it. We advertise here because it reaches our target market and will continue to do so.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:18 pmDogfight Says:
Oh I get it here we go…it is ok for u lefties to use abbreviations but when someone does not subscribe to your ideology, it becomes ATTACK TIME…Boy, you all are pros attacking your opponents. Is this an English class?
*
english is your second language, eh?
ninguÌn problema
*
“we’ ¡el ll hace él vivo!”
*
March 25th, 2009 at 3:21 pmNettles Says:
Perhaps Ms Terkel should find a new line of work.
Amanda Terkel is excellent at her job. You, on the other hand, couldn’t get hired if businesses were scrambling for trolls.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:21 pmYou’ve called me illiterate and Joe Cantwell ignorant, for starters.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:21 pmA better way to stop Oreilly is to simply make sure if you’re writing about him that you carry some sort of video recording device with you at all times. A cell phone with a good built in video recorder is best.
Just have it with you and when his reporters show up, start filming.
Then, when you get to where you’re going, upload the recording of the ENTIRE ambush interview onto YouTube.
BEFORE Oreilly’s goons get to edit it, and show it.
That way he’s going to get tired of airing interviews that are already aired all over the internet, and in their entirety. Plus he’ll not be able to embellish or lie, because the video will be right there on Youtube, hours and even days before he ever gets to air it.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:22 pmAdvisory to trolls: Stop bringing the word “journalist” into this. We’re talking about the tabloid, mush-brain news corps that has done wonders for your room temperature IQ. It’s pretty well known that the right exploits the legitimate as a diversion from the illegitimate. We’re on to you, get off it.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:24 pmsomeone at fox news did this one time.
:)
they were reaching their “target market”
and will continue to do so.
:)
March 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pmDogflight Says:
wags…who have I called names too? Apparent, you lefties have a problem being called for what u stand for…
Well, “you lefties” is pretty good indication of name calling.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:26 pmOr when you posted “who have I called names, too?” were you meaning “who have I called names, also?”
Oh No Mr. Bill!!
Sheee’s Baaack.
After yesterday’s whuppin’ I thought dogfight would need to refuel.
I think she pulled a 16hr on TP didn’t she?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:27 pmIt doesn’t matter who you think plays and victim and what you think about facts, logic & an accurate time line of events. Dogfight, you ideology sucks, doesn’t work, and I don’t want backwoods idiots running the noble concept of government. Why don’t you get back to brush clearing? Your reflection has been voted out of our government, and the clean-up isn’t expected to end anytime soon.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pmAfter we get rid of the opposing party, we can finally have the everything goes government. If it feels good and your intentions are good what’s the problem with it, right?
Not just the intentions, but the results, watchdog. Lets get back to objective reality: it sure felt good for the republicans to have a free-for-all the last eight years in their corporate and military circle jerk, while everyone else are the bills. Hmmm, I seem to remember intentions being good post 9/11 for all of the lies and ensuing invasion. The only people who felt good are the upper class as they got richer.
Looks like the GOP is the winner for no impulse control. Please educate yourself. It’s sad to see a small cog like you trying to defend people who have no problem stealing from you, using you, and laughing all the way to the bank.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:28 pmLooks like I struck a nerve?!?
Hey, I think I will change my name to Dog Catcha!
Ha cha cha cha!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:29 pmHey, uh, Nettles, don’t post at that length again. FLAGGED.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:29 pmNettles.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:29 pmFLAGGED for disrupting a thread with your stupid ability to cut and paste!
watchdog Says:
EndTheGOP Says:
——————————————————————————–
Done. End the GOP, end their lies, end their hate, unite America and give the power back to the citizens.
After we get rid of the opposing party, we can finally have the everything goes government. If it feels good and your intentions are good what’s the problem with it, right?
*
“if it feels good do it!”
– george w. bush
:)
take it up with him.
**
March 25th, 2009 at 3:30 pmFunny you should ask after yesterday’s performance.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:31 pmHoly Shiite.
Nettles done gone got raptured.
That was quick, TP!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:31 pmDoggie doggie where are you?
Since I pwned you yesterday, I suppose you liked it and need a repeat?
I tell ya what, I’m gonna go eat lunch now, but I’ll come back later and bat you around a little, just to reinforce your victim mentality.
Stick around.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pmhey Dogfight, it’s embittering being around a bunch of GOP zombie trolls on a PROGRESSIVE site, for PROGRESSIVES, as you try to suck whatever intelligence there is out of a thread.
I cannot believe morons like you still believe those cable news shows are ‘left media.’ The stupid, it hurts…
March 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pmWait what? It was necessary for you to call him ignorant, and then complain about being attacked?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pmDogflight whines:
Why can u all have a good discussion w/o getting personal and spewing your dislike for the opposing view.
Here’s an idea.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:32 pmDon’t start posting with “you lefties”, calling others ignorant, and claiming we’re not real progressives.
That might help.
Name calling is actually slightly left pathetic than trolling. I mean, who comes to any site, trolls and then expects to be patted on the back?
There’s probably a term for it in the DSM somewhere.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:33 pmAT&T taps our phones for the Bushies, so of course Orally’s harrassment is “in line with their corporate values and philosophy”
March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pmCoe called to complain of email “harrassment?” I think I know what radio show he listens to at work.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pmDogfight Says:
pastcaring..You struck a nerve with me…I was just proving my point once again…watch the attacks get stronger and stronger..very amazing!!!! Why can u all have a good discussion w/o getting personal and spewing your dislike for the opposing view.
*
if that’s the way you feel
sign here.
*
thank you.
_-__
March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pmO’Reilly blamed the victim of a brutal rape and murder. It is there on tape and he is afraid to take responsibility for his own ignorant comments. To be truthful AT&T was already on my list of companies to try and avoid, but its good to know that AT&T supports someone who blames rape on the victim.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pmPersonally, I’m a moderate. I’ve never joined a political party and have registered as an independent my whole life. Over the years I’ve probably voted for more Republicans than I have Democrats. And yet…
I’m proud to say that I see the rot in the GOP. It began, in my experience, when I saw Ron Reagan humping Fallwell’s leg. And it’s gone downhill from there.
Do I hate Republicans? No. However, I do hate those who have contributed to the downfall of our country. I hate those who went to war with the wrong effing country. I hate those who have raped our economy. I hate those who use petty personal differences for political gain. And I really, really, hate morons who can’t see the damage that neoconsrvatism has done to our economy, innocent people, and our standing among civilized nations.
I spent 40 years convinced that our government didn’t order the torture of prisoners. I spent 40 years convinced that our government didn’t hold people in secret, indefinitely, and without trial or hope of acquittal. I spent 40 years convinced that we, as a nation, had the right to condemn others for their abuse of human rights.
All that has been pissed away. Your damn right I hate what’s been done to our country and those who perpetrated crimes in my name. I hate those who turned the U.S.A. into a rogue nation and I’ll never again be culpable in my silence.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:34 pmIt might help if the ‘opposing view’ were something other than talking points.
If you want a good discussion, you have to hold up your side of it.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:35 pmSpeaking of “playing the victim,” Fixed News actually posted a letter from an AIG honcho in which he claimed he had nothing to do with the credit defaults, and the talking heads treated it as a sob story and “support” that Wall Street is being unfairly victimized.
You know, you right wingers think you can pour trash on anything and nobody can point it out or fire back. If you offend, you will be tracked down and brought to justice in its various forms. Simple as that.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:35 pmI assume you have a source for this. I’ll wait.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:36 pmRealness, it happens all the time. When the facts get to the trolls, they throw a tantrum. Nothing new. Instead of knocking those who have sufficient reading comprehension, why don’t you work on yours?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:39 pmDogfight…if you can hold one thing in that atrophied brain of yours, you’d understand by now that there’s a great deal of criticism on here of the Democratic Party, to push it towards more liberal/progregissive/leftward/etc. In your black and white child mind, you actually think that you can dismiss the Democratic party for a few statements you heard from some AM radio station? school bell’s ringing…
March 25th, 2009 at 3:39 pmYou seem to have trouble with this whole ‘burden of proof’ idea. Here’s how it works. You make a statement, then show the evidence to support it.
Otherwise you’re either bluffing or making it up as you go.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:41 pmClick Here to tell O’Reilly’s advertisers to stop supporting the O’Reilly Harassment Machine.
DONE!
This is a fantastic idea! Hit O’SillyO in the wallet!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:41 pmDogfight Says:
Realness…Did u know most of the Wall Street executives are Democrats??
Always the easy route with you curtain jerkers, just pull something out of your asses.
Right-wingers make for the most famous cartoons, Nickolodeon doesn’t stand a chance.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:42 pmDogflight?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:42 pmStill waiting.
Looks like the stupid troll gets the daily talking points straight from Lush Rimjob.
Why did Wall Street support Democrats in the last election cycle? The same reason they supported Republicans before. In hopes of favored treatment from policy makers.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:42 pmWhat next from these Right Wingers? Dress code for women? Punishment for rape victims?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:43 pmDogfight Says:
——————————————————————————–
Sorry..ads will not stop advertising on O’Reilly…He is the number 1 on the Cable…and where is Keith O and Rachel M?
WHATEVA…HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT THIS WILL DO! YOU RIGHTWINGNUTCRAZIES LIE AND EXAGGERATE SO MUCH – I BELIEVE NOTHING WITHOUT SOME FACTS TO BACK THEM UP! PRODUCE SOME FACTS OR GET BACK!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:44 pmDogfight Says:
I will find it and REPORT back to u…and by the way, where are ur sources? Always demanding sources but never see yours.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
In other words, you’re going to sign out and munch on Cheetos.
BTW, it’s pretty telling that you first pull this contention out of thin air without a source. Wouldn’t one usually gain this information through a reputable source?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:47 pmThe more outrageous he is, the more attention he attracts. The more attention he attracts, the more people will pay to advertise there. Wherever money prevails,logic and justice lose. Stop beating this dead horse and move on to something in which you can actually make a difference.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:50 pmPost correction:
McWars Says:
Dogfight, it happens all the time. When the facts get to the trolls like you, they throw a tantrum. Nothing new. Instead of knocking those who have sufficient reading comprehension, why don’t you work on yours?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
March 25th, 2009 at 3:50 pmDogfight Says:
pastcaring..You struck a nerve with me…I was just proving my point once again…watch the attacks get stronger and stronger..very amazing!!!! Why can u all have a good discussion w/o getting personal and spewing your dislike for the opposing view.
With a name like Dogfight you seem to come ready for ‘attacks’. We had 8 years of opposing view ruling the land and the results are incredibly damning for those rulers. Yet we have Republicans calling the current government fascists and calling for impeachment of President Obama all the while forgetting how Republicans called any criticism of Bush anti American. It strikes me as incredible how many people are blind to this hypocrisy. Bill O’Reilly is but one cheerleader for this kind of hypocrisy. Here we have Dogfight complaining of attacks and name calling. Bill has been calling Democrats and Liberals and Progressives all kinds of names for years. Your damn right we are mad and it makes us more angry when we see ignorance show up on this blog every day.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:51 pmBill O’Reilly will not be held accountable for anything he says because he says so in a big loud voice.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:51 pmStill waiting on that source, Dogfight.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:52 pmDoes any one else find it terribly amusing when the Reichwhiners, after trying to belittle our new President with taunts about “the Messiah”, squeal like stuck pigs when we shine a light on the flaws in their own idols?
March 25th, 2009 at 3:53 pmKlatu Says:
The official democrat party website has taken notice and is helping out!! Woooo Hoooo!!
I told you this story wasn’t going away. You certainly didn’t help your cause to make it so when you and you ilk rushed over here to defend a sexual pervert and his stalking henchmen.
Now the “rule of law” party has written another thick chapter of hypocrisy. Sucks to be you — you made it possible!
March 25th, 2009 at 3:54 pmagain with the stupid, watchdog.
It is confirmed that Bush used illegal wiretapping to spy on American citizens, domestic non-profits, and even more. The tinfoil hat is not necessary, when the facts are already out. It’s starting to get humorous watching you try to flail around, looking for someway to prove your own ignorance on here, and you just keep getting more and more sad….
March 25th, 2009 at 3:55 pmOh, so AT&T, the brownshirted spies who sold us all out to bu$hCo, think we’re harassing them? That’s rich.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:56 pmDRxJ Says:
Dogflight whines:
Why can u all have a good discussion w/o getting personal and spewing your dislike for the opposing view.
Here’s an idea.
Don’t start posting with “you lefties”, calling others ignorant, and claiming we’re not real progressives.
That might help.
Oh, heck, where’s the fun in that? Much better to label the responses “hateful” and then escalate your own nastiness — all while whining away about being mistreated just because you have a different opinion. The pattern NEVER changes.
March 25th, 2009 at 3:59 pmWell, I’ll admit that my mind is closed to the idea of blaming rape victims for the crime committed against them.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:00 pmpete Says:
1. As horrific as it may seem, cancel cable and tell your provider it’s because you refuse to support corporate news. I haven’t had cable in many years and seldom miss it. This would have the dual benefit of putting the pressure on cable news to provide a better service and cable providers offering ala carte service. If I could pay for only the stations I want, I would sign up in a heartbeat.
Hi pete. My apartment actually gets free cable, yet I still have no interest in TV beyond Maddow & Olbermann. The internet has made lack of control of the flow information a foreign concept to me, and I’ve only become smarter for it.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:01 pmWags.
The troll’s source is Lush Rimjob, the ubertroll, himself. I’m afraid that once an idiot has accepted the Gospel of Lush it becomes impossible to hammer a conflicting point into their heads no matter how big a hammer one uses. Once assimilated by the Limborg they are forever lost to civilized society.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:01 pmYo dumbshi* dogfight #32,
Amnesty was proposed and passed by Reagan. Idiot.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:03 pmOh right, whatever he says must be factual.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:04 pmAll this dithering from various Right Wing Dogs and not once have they explained why it is OK for O’Reilly to blame rape on the victim.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:06 pmwatchdog, your rambling comes a little too late. You have a history, eight years of it, and you can’t simply prop yourself as an uncleansed party and pretend you are on equal footing as democrats. You have no new plans, no rational policies, and that compassion never came. Republicans won’t be back to trading power with dems anytime soon. You’re simply not in touch.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:08 pmMcWars Says:
Hi pete. My apartment actually gets free cable, yet I still have no interest in TV beyond Maddow & Olbermann. The internet has made lack of control of the flow information a foreign concept to me, and I’ve only become smarter for it.
Me too. I find it frustrating in the extreme to have my time ruled by the idiot box. Even if I decide to watch something informative on PBS I generally find myself online checking related sources and confirming, or refuting, their information.
Though I will admit I enjoy watching the gawdawful movies on SciFi when I’m at friend’s house. I have always had a passion for gawdawful movies, though I marvel that people are actually paid to make them!
March 25th, 2009 at 4:09 pmReagan’s Amnesty Program
March 25th, 2009 at 4:13 pmRight Wingers watch O’Reilly the way normal people watch bad sci-fiction, with a willing suspension of disbelief.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:16 pmAT&T sponsored CPAC, which had rabid, incendiary language from “conservatives”.
BillO fits with CPAC. Follow the money…
March 25th, 2009 at 4:16 pmSo, I guess balancing the budget has been a big priority the last 8 years less 60 days. Maybe blaming rape victims for the crime committed against them is the new GOP plan for balancing the budget.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:18 pmmr. coe’s e-mail address:
mcoe@attnews.us
*
my letter to him:
dear mr. coe,
your company supports and sponsors a program on the fox “news” network called “the o’reilly factor”. this program has waged a campaign of stalking and harassment against individuals (many private citizens) who have had the temerity to disagree with it’s host on his controversial opinions. “tof” then takes the video tape of these attacks, edits them to suit it’s purposes and plays them on their program. (the latest victim of this pogrom is amanda terkel. i hope you will take the time to read here story here.) this is a gross misuse of the public airwaves in order to support a partisan, right-wing political agenda. no responsible corporate citizen would sponsor such terror tactics. unfortunately at&t does. because of this i will boycott at&t’s products and services. i will not allow a penny of my money to go your company until “the o’reilly factor” stops these tactics or at&t withdraws it’s corporate sponsorship of. i hope you will pay close attention to this situation and do what is necessary to remedy it. at&t’s success as a company depends on the patronage of an american public that believes in fair play and the right’s of the individual against the will of the powerful. remember that these individuals, grouped together, represent a majority of your customers. please don’t risk losing them and jeopardizing at&t’s future success for something at&t must surely know is fundamentally wrong. i respectfully ask that you to have the courage to stand up and do the right thing.
thank you for taking the time to read this.
**
let’s get the ball rolling.
:)
March 25th, 2009 at 4:18 pmpete, I forgot C-SPAN2. I watch that but I don’t pick up PBS, unfortunately. I enjoy the book tv segments. I used to watch a lot of Law & Order when I had only an antenna, but I actually stopped watching it when cable came along. Odd, but I consider it a good thing. I got out of the couch-potato mode when I was 17, if I recall correctly.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:18 pmGee Watchdog #116
What the F* does the Bracero program have to do with Reagan passing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986?
It does have one thing in common. Rich land owners wanted cheap labor to harvest their crops. They wanted to exploit the workers and drive down wages. Sounds a little republican doesn’t it?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:20 pmMr. Coe from AT&T called to complain about our email campaign, saying it is “harassment.”
__________________________________________________________
If Mr. Coe plans to continue to support such an inflammatory and divisive person, he can expect this sort of thing.
I remember once upon a time when Ann Coulter was more offensive than usual (which says a lot), and advertisers on her website were targeted as a result by people who were fed up. Many of them advertised through a service that chose websites with the volume and the demographic they wanted, and they had no idea they were advertising on Coulter. Many of them took action to ensure they no longer would.
Mr. Coe (is he an actual decision maker or just a mouthpiece?) or his AT&T people can now decide if Bill O’Reilly represents their “corporate values and philosophy” or they can decide they will not spend their advertising dollars there. It’s a free country and they have a choice.
Oh, and another thing — Mr. Coe should be happy he’s just getting e-mails. His customers COULD be switching to Verizon in droves. Which scenario would he rather have?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:20 pmI love it. Someone calls for a boycott and pressure on advertisers and the trolls swarm like flies on poo.
Tells you where their priorities are, don’t it?
Clicked and done.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:20 pmdog this and dog that…
guess i’ll start wearing a flea collar when i stop by…
and watch my step more carefully.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:21 pmAin’t the size of the dog in the fight but the fight in the dog.
So how come Troll Central sends the chihuahuas? They gonna pee on our shoes?
Judging from their posts, yup.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:22 pmSo I’m confused Watchdog….are now done dismissing the wiretap illegalities by bringing the President’s complicity into it? something I don’t agree with in any party or administration? what ARE you saying? you’re just flopping around.
as for this gem:
Your absolutely right! No one but a liberal can justify getting out of a debt problem by going deeper into debt.
your stupidity shines bright, as there’s a helluva lot more wrong than just a ‘debt problem.’ i don’t want to burden you’re simplistic mind, but there’s de-regulation, illegal wars, lobbying… the list goes on and on. instead of just smearing your stupid over a thread, you should actually read something. You can start with the spending we did that helped to get us out of the Depression, and the backslide prolonging action when FDR decided to balance the budget too soon. Start there, please.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:24 pmAT&T continually evaluates our advertising efforts to make certain that we are reaching consumers in effective and meaningful ways. We also make every effort to ensure that the content of the programming on the stations and outlets on which we advertise is in keeping with our corporate values and philosophy.
Mr. Coe from AT&T called to complain about our email campaign, saying it is “harassment.”
Come on, you didn’t really think we were serious, did you?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:24 pmwatchdog Says:
Your argument might have a little more credit if your definition of ignorant was the same as Webster’s. But in this case its simply dissent of your closed minded ideology.
That’s all you got? My definition of ignorant different than Webster’s? You must not read your fellow troll dropping. Not much of a watchdog. I have seen the policies of the Republicans. I have seen the ideology of the Republican. If I disagree with them then I am closed minded? Seem like if those policies did well and the ideology was less centered on personal choices then I might be closed minded not to agree with them. If, on the other hand, the policies were a failure and ideology leads me to call homosexuals perverts and put the blame on rape victims, then I would be open minded to see the problems with those policies and ideology.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:25 pmwatchdog Says:
Your absolutely right! No one but a liberal can justify getting out of a debt problem by going deeper into debt.
Our plan is to invest for success, a permanent AMT fix, and change in accounting for the Iraq/Afghanistan operations. No more supplementals.
Tell me, why won’t the right put up their their ideas? Because even they would have to admit upon being pressed that their is more to it than meets the eye. President Obama is attempting to transform the budget process to something we can relate to away from the abstract.
Just what is your plan to cover the debt? That’s right, your party can’t admit it without being thrown deeper into irrelevance — you want to make the population suffer just to make a little progress on the balance sheets, while we want to invest in shoring up indicators of wellness and shore up the balance sheets in the long term and in full.
See, that isn’t so black and white, is it?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:27 pmYour absolutely right! No one but a liberal can justify getting out of a debt problem by going deeper into debt.
Ignoring the lack of understanding of basic English (watchdog, you really should quit cutting your ESL classes) since the Republicans got us into this debt, what exactly was their plan?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:27 pmI wonder if Dunkin Donuts considered the smear campaign and glut of emails decrying Rachael Ray and her scarf, supposedly proving the company’s alliance with Palestinian Terrorism.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:27 pmI got derailed by dogshi*. I forgot to mention count me as having signed.
It’s kind of suspected that At&t would back Fox and O’Reilly. They don’t think too much of our constitutional rights.
As for P&G I’m sure there are some nefarious headlines from the past I just can’t recall, so I typed p&g and lawsuit in Google and came back 3,490,000 entries.
I know it’s buried in there somewhere but I don’t have the time to look. If anyone else recalls a major scandal please post.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:28 pmI signed.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:30 pmI canceled AT&T more than a year ago and they are still harassing me with letter after letter trying to get me back. When I contacted AT&T they said they will not take me off their mailing list because I don’t have an account with them. AT&T is guilty of harassment plain and simple.
FU@# YOU AT&T QUIT HARASSING ME NOW!
March 25th, 2009 at 4:31 pmI signed.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:32 pmwatchdog Says:
Your absolutely right! No one but a liberal can justify getting out of a debt problem by going deeper into debt.
No one but a moronic conservative can oversimplify issues so much as to miss every facet of the problem. No one but an idiotic troll can get outraged and whine about problems the ideology they have supported created. Get lost you mangy cur…
March 25th, 2009 at 4:32 pmpass it on.
:)
March 25th, 2009 at 4:33 pmWere the CBO projections not bad when republicans were running things?
What kind of spending pays for itself which spending doesnt?
Certainly not the quagmire of the last six years.
How do you expect people to pay off any deficit and for future obligations when they are undereducated, unemployed & can’t afford their health care?
I’m a progressive because I’m for thinking things through. Republicanism isn’t attractive and doesn’t make sense to me. If it doesn’t work for Americans, it’s off the table. It’s not for any logical persons to be crushed under the weight of those who refuse to change.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:34 pmsigned, sealed, delivered baby!!
March 25th, 2009 at 4:35 pmsad, sad dummy.
turn off the radio and read a book.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:38 pmexcept for Ronald Reagan and George HW Bush, who were Marxo-fascists, right, dummy??
March 25th, 2009 at 4:38 pm**
146 comments in less than one hour?
this is catching on!
**
March 25th, 2009 at 4:39 pmSocialist mortgage system????? You mean the deregulated runaway greed that passes for legitimate Capitalism? And how exactly does blaming rape victims for the crime committed against them help with this problem?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pmReally? So Ronald Reagan’s friendship with Jerry Falwell was the “beginning” of the “rot” in the party?
You don’t think maybe some of that “rot” showed itself during, oh…lets say the Nixon years?
:|
Turned out he was a crook, ya know?
And lets not forget the McCarthy years.
Seems to me that the party’s been “rotten” for a lot longer than the Reagan era.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pmWhy can we?
Because this is America, that’s why can we. Duh.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:40 pmI mean really, if this is where we have to start off at, we’re never going to get anywhere on educating you, will we?
You think AT&T gives a damn about you? I have used them for over ten years for my phone and internet service at my company. I am constantly called(everyday) about upgrading our service package. I have asked at nauseam for the calls to stop. If they don’t care about me, they sure and hell aren’t going to care about you.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:41 pm@ Joe C. – It’s because we’ve designated that new “off-leash area” where the dogs are free to frolic and poop and bite kids’ faces.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:42 pmLooks like you’re barking up the wrong tree.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:45 pmI was young and misinformed, WAYNEBRO. I thought that Nixon was an aberration. I was wrong.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:45 pmHas anyone else noticed that once these trolls get in a bind that they leave for a while and then come back? Do you think that maybe they are going to get some help on what to say next? Or are they going some place to check out what the talking points are with what ever it is we are talking about at that time? Poor little ones.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pmSouthern Man 2 Says:
You think AT&T gives a damn about you? I have used them for over ten years for my phone and internet service at my company. I am constantly called(everyday) about upgrading our service package. I have asked at nauseam for the calls to stop. If they don’t care about me, they sure and hell aren’t going to care about you.
*
sm2,
copied and pasted your comments to:
mcoe@attnews.us
**
i’ll let you know his response when,
and if, i get one.
:)
btw, i changed “at nauseam”
to “ad nauseam” for you.
_-_
March 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pmYer damn right illegal wars helped get us here. Are you saying that all of the billions (trillions?) Bush put in as “emergency funds” didn’t contribute to our problems?
and lobbying by banks and corporations to further deregulate the market has and is one of the central problems of our corrupt economic system.
the debt created is a symptom- among MANY – of this corrupt system. Unemployment, falling consumer confidence, depreciated housing market, etc- A symptom of an illness. I’m not sure if you’re brain has progressed enough to grasp analogy, but I thought I’d try anyway.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:47 pmwatchdog:
Illegal Wars and lobbying got us here? Not the housing bubble created by our socialist mortgage system? And
loans that got bundled into marketable securities? sounds kinda like a debt problem does it not?
If you don’t realize that illegal wars cost a LOT OF MONEY, and that lobbyists lobby for GOVERNMENT FUNDED SUBSIDIES, then no, you don’t fully understand the scope of the problem. And if you don’t realize that by stopping all spending does NOTHING to create jobs and get people back to work, then you don’t fully understand the problem. If you think cutting taxes for those who are making more money than they need and believe that this will ease the deficit, then you don’t fully understand the problem. I could go on, but you are a boring a-hole.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:49 pmWhile I think O’Reilly’s harassment “journalism” is terrible, I feel like he started doing it as a reaction to what the right perceives to be Michael Moore’s tactics, which always get them up in arms. They can always point to Farenheit 911 or whatever and say “see the crazy left does it too!” to justify these stunts.
I think there’s something worse about the way O’Reilly does it, but I can’t quite put my finger on what the difference is. Can anyone help out here?
March 25th, 2009 at 4:52 pmPerhaps it’s because Moore does it in the context of more serious investigative journalism, and uses the street confrontation just to add a bit of humor to his movies. But I think O’Reilly would say they do it for the humor value too (even if it’s more mean-spirited). Perhaps the difference is just that O’Reilly is not very funny?
I might add, WAYNEBRO, that I was raised to believe that “conservative” meant cautious, thoughtful, and unwilling to mess with success. I still think that’s a pretty good approach to life. And it took me a while to realize that the neocons are reckless, greedy, radicals who don’t have a truly conservative ideal to share between them.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:53 pmWOW, “socialist mortgage system.” Private companies in their innovative streak come out with pick-a-payment-no-interest loans and the private brokers say “Sign on the dotted line, nothing to worry about!” and a year or two later the monthly payments skyrocket.
You call that socialism?
Clearly, we’re talking the largest failed business decision in American history, and overinflated home values drove people with stagnant incomes to exotic loans, because traditional fixed-rate loans were becoming out of their reach when you put 2 and 2 together. Did gluttony exist? Certainly, but scope of these defaults disprove the notion that bad decision-making on behalf of consumers caused the crisis — but it makes for an easy talking point to avoid the dirty work & analysis for you right-wingers!
Also, it doesn’t help that the chair of the public-private organization, or the Federal Reserve, endorsed these “innovative” loans.
Black-and-white doesn’t work very well, trolls.
March 25th, 2009 at 4:56 pmNo one forced the banks to make sub-prime loans and no one forced Wall Street to repackage the loans they weren’t forced to make, give them high ratings, and trade them as if they were something more valuable than debt.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:03 pmjoe cantwell Says:
——————————————————————————–
Southern Man 2 Says:
You think AT&T gives a damn about you? I have used them for over ten years for my phone and internet service at my company. I am constantly called(everyday) about upgrading our service package. I have asked at nauseam for the calls to stop. If they don’t care about me, they sure and hell aren’t going to care about you.
*
sm2,
copied and pasted your comments to:
mcoe@attnews.us
**
i’ll let you know his response when,
and if, i get one.
:)
btw, i changed “at nauseam”
to “ad nauseam” for you.
_-_
March 25th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Appreciate it. It will do no good however. I might start taping the calls and log them. Put them on a site for all to hear.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:04 pmPlay the tapes back to AT&T or better yet play the tapes of O’Reilly blaming the rape victim.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:06 pmDid anyone have the time to read what dogshi* had to post?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pmMaybe Doggie doggie needs a flagy flagy?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pmBill0=MikeM? Not even close.
Mr. Moore is an independent film maker who is pretty obvious about his agenda. Bill0 makes a false claim, of journalistic integrity and balance, while denying an agenda of any kind.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:07 pmif one more ‘dog’ pees on my leg I will turn them over to AT&T and let them answer the stupid calls.
Michael Moore does movies, well documented and pretty entertaining if you don’t mind crying over injustice. Bill O’Reilly takes up air space and provides nothing usable to anyone but trolls.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:08 pmDogfight flagged for OT Spam. I guess he can’t think for himself.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:08 pmDr. HM, I know it isn’t progressive or proper but could we please get a reason to flag for just plain irritating and stupid?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:09 pmMadoff is in jail, unlike Delay, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, etc.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:10 pmFlagged with pleasure!
March 25th, 2009 at 5:10 pmthe flock of ‘em think that if they post to annoy, that trumps substance.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:11 pmI use AT&T for my business, local & long distance, internet and cell phones. They treat me like a queen when I call them. Perhaps they ignore you because you sound like an ignorant hick. Just saying.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:12 pmWhat an idiot you are dogfright, to post right wing talking points.
No wonder you got pwned.
You’re not even being fun to kick around today.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:12 pmDogfight Says:
Matt…so typically…misinterpreting the law…Jesse Waters is a REPORTER…If you talk you have commited yourself.
Trying to find a loophole…She talked to Jesse. She could have walked off…What about Madoof…Your big contributor to your PARTY..If Republicans had been the recipient of Madoff, well, the libs news media would have every Republicans head!!
Babble, babble screech!
Watters is a producer. And a bad one.
Madoof doesn’t exist, train your fingers. Or check your typing.
You are a buffoon. (And not a very good one)
March 25th, 2009 at 5:12 pmThat’s cool. I just wanted to point out that the failures of the right wing did not begin with Reagan. The rot of the right has been dug in now since at least the days of Tail Gunner Joe.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:14 pmIf conservatives/independents of pete’s kind occupied the republican party, we wouldn’t have these problems. But the backwoods types and trolls occupying the republican party of today give no thought at having alienated moderates like pete. It’s a “last man standing” mentality to them.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:18 pmO’Reilly can imagine that he is a victim of a fantasy war on Christmas, so why does he blame a victim of Rape for the crime committed against her?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:19 pmWatch out all, dogfright has been away for awhile, she must be working two hands to mass copy and paste again.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:19 pmdogfight says: If Republicans had been the recipient of Madoff, well, the libs news media would have every Republicans head!!
Now why would anyone with any intelligence want a Republican head? Just an empty gourd with a babbling mouth. I’d rather have a burrito. That pinata ain’t worth the effort.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:21 pmDogfight Says:
Yes, you can thank Michael Moore going to all the European countries promoting his film, which was a total conspiracy theory at best. Of course, u lefties will say it was the Iraq war..but it seems the Congress approved the war…Then we had Democrat Senators, not to mention Pres Jimmy Carter (fine pres he was) going to foreign land criticizing our President during war time. Boy, now that is class..I see where you guys get views from.
Ever think of changing your name to dogfart? Smells better than your post here.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:22 pmNo wonder you are so clueless.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:25 pmYou still haven’t provided support for your first ‘fact’, now you want us to rebut a second unsubstantiated claim?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:27 pmGlad you like it.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:28 pmI’ll take that as a compliment, McWars. Actually, I would be willing to bet that there are probably as many ex-Republicans who support President Obama as there are life-long Democrats. The Reichwhiners have been busily driving any moderates away for decades. When a discussion leads into “what is conservative ideology?” I’m always reminded of a local Reichradio personality who got fired for hanging up on callers and banning them from his show.
He made the asinine comment that; “There’s no such thing as a moderate. Anyone who claims to be a moderate is just a librul who doesn’t have the courage to admit it”.
Well. About the only way to deal with that kind of idiocy is to leave the idot alone in the wilderness and hope he doesn’t spread rabies.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:28 pmWebbe see, dogfart. Three months ago it was unpatriotic to question a President. Today it is troll candy. Troops are still in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Was that turd you ate last night brown or brown?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:29 pmStill waiting for your proof.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pmDogfight Says:
Oh, saw all the Demos where on board for the war…TRY AGAIN!
They agreed with Bush with the intelligence he had to go on!!!
Give it a rest, dogfart. Even George admitted he lied about every reason he gave for the war.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:31 pmNew post: Ford Spokesman Apologizes for Pig-Headed O’Reily.
Eat that trolls.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:33 pmDogfight Says:
Matt..go to post 169…thought all of you out here where so intelligent..seems no one really reads what I post…just waiting for the next attack…still waiting about Madoff.
If you disagree with Dogfight it’s an ‘attack’. Why do you right wingers have to put everything into some kind of violent terminology?
Woof
March 25th, 2009 at 5:34 pmBURDEN
March 25th, 2009 at 5:35 pmOF
PROOF
I can just see it. Thugs with half concealed guns in banks saying…make the loan. Think about it you Wall Street pansy, market a toxic asset or your kids will have to go to public schools.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pmWelcome to OUR world!
March 25th, 2009 at 5:36 pmLike to know how many that blog out here are still living at home?
Dogfight, most people live at home. Some are unfortunate to not have a home, but you wouldn’t care about that.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:37 pmO.K. I’ll bite.
If Madoff contributed to Democratic candidates? I would like them to return said contributions, to the limits of their finances, to a fund administered to repay his victims. However, I doubt that these alleged contributions had much real effect since I have yet to hear a single lawmaker, from either party, defend Madoff in any way and, if one of the recipients of said alleged donations tried to influence his case, I would be disgusted beyond words.
Now. How does the stupid troll feel about Bill0 blaming the victims of crimes for being victims, harassing those who dare to criticize him, and committing the crime of slander on his show?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:39 pmI am glad I read this today. I am in the market for a new cell phone provider and now I know it won’t be AT&T.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:40 pmAnd poof, the dog has to go fight somewhere else.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pmlivelongandprosper Says:
Like to know how many that blog out here are still living at home?
Dogfight, most people live at home. Some are unfortunate to not have a home, but you wouldn’t care about that.
But the real question is, who’s home is it? Basements don’t count as a separate residence.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:41 pmRich H Says:
New post: Ford Spokesman Apologizes for Pig-Headed O’Reily.
Eat that trolls
But, they still say they will advertise on his show because of the number of viewers he has. Obviously not a company with a conscience.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:43 pmDang it! Why must the stupid trolls always get themselves banned just when I decide to up the pressure?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pmHere, doggie, doggie.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:44 pmI guess that dog just don’t hunt?!?
March 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pmOr profits.
heyoooo
March 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pmBilbo, I didn’t have time to read it. I’m just headed there. Not surprising though.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pmUnfortunately pete, dogfight doesn’t really want a quid pro quo. She is a hit & run troll, much like the rest.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:45 pmwatchdog Says:
Another liberal boycott. This one is going to work I just feel it! hahahahahahaha
I guess it really bothers you that liberals stand up for what they believe in rather than acting like brain dead zombies following the dictates of their master Billo.
I put my money where my beliefs are and I feel better for it. I don’t shop at Walmart, my money is in a Credit union and I don’t buy from companies who advertise on these hate monger shows or who attack liberals. In the not too distant past the head of Home Depot made a scurrilous attack on liberals. I was in the process of remodeling my home at the time and ended up in boycotting Home Depot. They probably lost $3,000 or more in sales from me. May sound like a drop in the bucket but if there were another 1,000 me’s out there, that adds up to some real money.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:46 pmHeh. Flagging works.
Dogbreath down!
March 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pmEmail sent.
With pleasure.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:48 pmpastcaring Says:
I know. There’s no such thing as a debate with trolls. It would be more productive to argue with a goldfish. It’s just that lately there have been several instances of them getting banned at the exact moment I’ve decided to twist their tail. I guess I’ll need to go back to delivering the heavy blows right from the start.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:51 pmAt&t…anyone who willingly gives this company their phone service has been asleep for several decades.
P&G: Lots of products to boycott and lots of options.
Captial One: if you haven’t cut up your credit card by now, enjoy whatever you get.
Sharp: most vulnerable because they lag behind most of their competitors.
Johnson & Johnson: people who make products targeting children advertising on O’Reilly? Wake up.
Mercedes Benz: Just plain stupid.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:53 pmMy policy exactly.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:53 pmUgh, my dad works for P&G.
March 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pmThanks for neutering your dog.
March 25th, 2009 at 6:10 pmOr I should say, Thanks for neutering that stray dog.
March 25th, 2009 at 6:11 pmwags, the companies themselves are not bad, per se. The products and/or services they provide and the people who work to provide them are not to blame. It is corporate management that is willing to sell their souls to make a buck that are under attack.
Of course, if your dad is part of this management, take him out to the woodshed and talk to him by hand. He will thank you for it someday.
March 25th, 2009 at 6:14 pmAdded my name to the letter campaign. To think I almost switched to AT&T a few weeks back. Yikes.
March 25th, 2009 at 6:30 pmPERSONALIZE YOUR EMAIL! It makes a big difference.
This is something I have learned and strongly encourage everyone else to do as well. Even the subject line of your email- personalize it so that the recipient actually takes a moment to look at your email (before they likely dismiss it). The more time you can get these people to spend with their eyes upon your words, the better.
These email campaigns really can produce results, folks. Keep it up and spread the word!
March 25th, 2009 at 6:46 pmAhh, Boohoohoo…AT&T is complaining about being “harrassed” by people (they were probably eavesdropping on for Bush) who are sick and tired of their corporate Mouth O’Loudly bullying anyone that he doesn’t like using his employer’s money. What would they do without him? He IS the fascist, rascist, corporate megaphone after all. Sorry if their continued support of him is inconveniencing AT&T’s flab-assed corporate officers. Finding out that these things come back around IS painful huh?
March 25th, 2009 at 8:31 pmCapital One has blocked the antiOReilly emails: This is what I got back.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
mediarelations@capitalone.com
March 26th, 2009 at 1:17 amIt will be my pleasure to support this initiative completely. Glad I’ve been away from AT&T for a good couple years now.
March 26th, 2009 at 1:37 amIf you hate Bill O and Fox so much stop watching!!! It is the only non socialist supporting news network out there. Go jerk off to CNN, CNBC, MSNBC, ABC,CBS NBC, or better yet get all of your facts from John Stewart. If you don’t have a television then go read the New York Times, LA Times, San Fran Chronicle, Chicago Tribune or just about any other print media. All you people are so wound around the axle about anyone who might disagree with you you will demonize them. You left wingnuts don’t have a problem screaming our opposing views but cant stand it if anyone voices theirs if you dont like it. If you think O’Reilly, and everyone else at fox is so full of BS and you believe that everyone knows that then what are you worried about?
March 26th, 2009 at 3:23 amAT&T is my land line carrier, and if Mr. Coe thinks that my E-Mail is harrassment, then I guess my continued monthly payments are harrassment also. I guess Mr. Coe would rather that I change to another carrier….
March 27th, 2009 at 12:57 amIf that is the case, then all he has to do is inform me of that fact and I`ll be more than happy to oblige him…..
Bill-O`, has had his producers stalk judges also, which I find very disturbing….
Wahhh wahhh, Listen to the Liberals cry! Get over it loons,and that dumb airhead Amanda needs to go and get a man,she might shut-up for awhile! Geuss you whiney liberals are scared because FOX blows you Jokesters away in the ratings. You wanna censor somebody make it Oberjerk! I have NEVER seena more TOXIC VILE LIE SPEWING piece of S**T in my life. F**K MSNBC,and all the trash that works there. Have a nice day,losers…
March 27th, 2009 at 2:17 amAT&T’s Mr. Coe should be scolded for his nonsensical characterization of this email campain ad “harassment.”
I googled “Michael Coe AT&T” and his email address popped right up: mcoe@attnews.us
It would be harassement if someone were to wait outside his office to follow him in his car, then stick a microphone in his face for “comment.” Oh, wait, the FIRST time is “journalism” – it’s the SECOND time that makes it harassment.
March 27th, 2009 at 1:49 pm